Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Affine second-moment bounds for normalized complex Gaussian block products

Statement

Assume Countable Choice for the finite-dimensional Gaussian probability law. Let k≥1, p≥2, ℓ=k+p, and d,a≥1 be integers. Let G1∈Ck×ℓ and G2∈Cd×ℓ be independent matrices with iid normalized complex Gaussian entries as in Standard real and normalized complex Gaussian matrix laws, so E∣g∣2=1. Put Z=G2G1†, where G1† is the Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse of The Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse A+ as the solution of the four Penrose equations. For every fixed S∈Ca×d, writing C=22e with e=exp⁡(1) as in The real exponential function and the number e by a power series, one has E∥SZ∥22≤Cℓp2(∥S∥F2+p4∥S∥22), E∥SZ∥22≤e2ℓp2(∥S∥F2+p2∥S∥22). Here ∥⋅∥2 is the induced operator norm of The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv|| and ∥⋅∥F is the Frobenius norm of The Frobenius norm ∥A∥F=(∑i,j∣aij∣2)1/2 on real or complex matrices. These are coarse second-moment bounds; no sharp complex Chevet comparison is assumed. The values on the null event where G1 loses row rank may be set to zero in these integrals.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice for the finite-dimensional Gaussian law; the stated independent blocks, k≥1, p≥2, ℓ=k+p, d,a≥1; and a fixed compatible matrix S.

[F1]

Standard real and normalized complex Gaussian matrix laws: a normalized complex Gaussian scalar has density π−1e−∣z∣2 and E∣z∣2=1; matrix entries have the independent product density. The finite-dimensional Lebesgue Gaussian measures use the stated The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) assumption.

[F2]

Orthogonal and unitary invariance of Gaussian matrix blocks: left or right unitary changes preserve the normalized complex Gaussian law, and disjoint row blocks of a transformed iid matrix are independent.

[F3]

A wide Gaussian matrix has full row rank almost surely: the k×(k+p) block G1 has row rank k almost surely.

[F4]

Exact Frobenius moments of wide Gaussian pseudoinverses: on that full-row-rank event, M=(G1G1∗)−1=(G1†)∗G1†, each diagonal entry of M has the reciprocal Γ(p+1,1) law, and Etr⁡M=k/p.

[F5]

The Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse A+ as the solution of the four Penrose equations defines G1† by the four Penrose equations, and Every finite real or complex matrix has a unique Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse gives its unique finite-dimensional real or complex value. On full row rank, Exact Frobenius moments of wide Gaussian pseudoinverses also gives G1†=G1∗(G1G1∗)−1.

[F6]

The Beta function is B(u,v)=∫01tu−1(1−t)v−1 dt for u,v>0 (Euler's real Beta integral), and the Beta--Gamma identity is B(u,v)=Γ(u)Γ(v)/Γ(u+v) (The real Beta--Gamma identity). Euler integration and the functional equation for Γ are The real Gamma function by Euler's integral and The real Gamma functional equation Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s).

[F7]

For integer q≥1, t↦∣t∣q is convex by Absolute real powers are Borel measurable and convex, so Jensen for expectation gives EX≤(EXq)1/q for X≥0 with finite qth moment (Jensen's inequality for expectation). The finite Jensen inequality for convex functions on Euclidean convex sets is Finite Jensen inequality for convex functions on Rn, and the finite arithmetic--geometric mean inequality is The arithmetic mean, geometric mean inequality.

[F8]

Nonnegative product-measurable functions may be integrated in either order by Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product.

[F10]

The factorial is the recursively defined natural product (The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N); in real arithmetic natural numbers are read through the canonical embedding ι (The canonical natural ι(n)=n⋅1F of a field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing). Also e=exp⁡(1) with exp⁡(x)=∑n≥0xn/n! (The real exponential function and the number e by a power series). The natural logarithm is the inverse of the positive real exponential, is strictly increasing, obeys the product and quotient laws, and satisfies log⁡′(x)=1/x (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm, The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t).

[F12]

Under Countable Choice, a C1 diffeomorphism between open subsets of Rn changes variables in nonnegative Lebesgue integrals by its absolute Jacobian (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

[F13]

Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure on Rn as rn−1 dr dσ for nonnegative Borel functions (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F14]

The shape-rate Gamma law with shape a>0 and rate b>0 has density baua−1e−bu/Γ(a) on u>0; in particular, Γ(a,1) has density ua−1e−u/Γ(a) (Shape-rate Gamma distribution). This matches the scale-1 notation in Exact Frobenius moments of wide Gaussian pseudoinverses.

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice as required by the finite-dimensional Gaussian law [F1], the Gamma density normalization in [F14], and the Lebesgue integration suppliers [F12] and [F13] (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). No stronger choice principle is used.

Proof

1.1givenF2F3F4F5A1algebra

On the full-row-rank event of [F3], set M=(G1G1∗)−1. For a fixed unit v∈Ck, choose a unitary U0 with U0e1=v. By [F2], U0∗G1 has the same law as G1, and its inverse Gram matrix is U0∗MU0; hence v∗Mv has the same law as M11. The Moore--Penrose formula in [F4] gives ∥G1†v∥22=v∗Mv, so [F4] makes this variance 1/U for U∼Γ(p+1,1). The formula in [F4] also gives G1G1†=Ik, hence G1†v≠0. Conditional on G1, a row of G2G1†v is a fixed linear functional of one isotropic normalized complex Gaussian row. Completing G1†v/∥G1†v∥2 to a unitary basis and using [F2] shows that this functional is a normalized complex Gaussian with variance v∗Mv; the d rows are conditionally independent. The full-row-rank set is open because it is the union of the nonzero-minor sets. On this set the inverse formula in [F4] is continuous; setting Z=0 on its null complement therefore gives a Borel version, equal almost surely to the stated product. This justifies the expectations without changing their values.

2.1step 1.1F1F6F8F12F13F14A1algebra

Apply [F13] in R2 to the radial density π−1e−∣z∣2 from [F1]. Since this is a probability density, 1=π−1σ(S1)∫0∞e−r2r dr; substitution u=r2 by [F12] makes the integral Γ(1)/2=1/2 by [F6], so σ(S1)=2π. Applying [F13] to the indicator of {z:∣z∣2∈E} for a Borel set E⊆(0,∞), and again substituting u=r2, gives P(∣g∣2∈E)=∫Ee−u du. Thus the squared modulus is Γ(1,1). For independent X∼Γ(r,1) and Y∼Γ(s,1), the map (x,y)↦(t=x+y,w=x/(x+y)) is a C1 diffeomorphism from (0,∞)2 to (0,∞)×(0,1), with inverse (t,w)↦(tw,t(1−w)) and inverse Jacobian determinant t. By [F12], their joint density in these coordinates is tr+s−1e−twr−1(1−w)s−1/(Γ(r)Γ(s)). Integrating in w by Tonelli [F8] and applying the Beta--Gamma identity [F6] gives the Γ(r+s,1) density in t. Finite induction therefore makes the squared norm of j independent normalized complex Gaussian coordinates Γ(j,1). Euler integration [F6] gives its qth moment Γ(j+q)/Γ(j) and gives EU−q=Γ(p+1−q)/Γ(p+1) for U∼Γ(p+1,1) when 0<q<p+1. Integrating first over G2 and then G1 by [F8], for each fixed unit v∈Ck and 1≤j≤d this yields E∥PjZv∥22q=Γ(j+q)Γ(p+1−q)Γ(j)Γ(p+1), where Pj keeps the first j rows.

3.1step 2.1F1F2F6F8F9F12A1choosealgebra

Define P0Z=0. On an auxiliary finite product probability space, let h∈Ck have iid normalized complex Gaussian coordinates, independent of (G1,G2), and put v=h/∥h∥2 when h≠0 and v=e1 when h=0; the latter event has probability zero by [F1]. The law of v is unitary invariant by [F2]. For k=1, E∣v1∣2q=1. For k≥2, X=∣h1∣2 and Y=∑i=2k∣hi∣2 are independent with laws Γ(1,1) and Γ(k−1,1) by step 2.1. The change s=X+Y, t=X/(X+Y) is a C1 diffeomorphism with Jacobian s and factors the joint density into a Γ(k,1) density in s and a Beta(1,k−1) density in t by [F12]. Thus [F6] gives ck(q):=E∣v1∣2q=Γ(k)Γ(q+1)Γ(k+q), which also equals 1 when k=1. For each fixed Z, choose a unit right singular vector u of PjZ for its largest singular value (possible by [F9]). Its SVD gives ∥PjZv∥22≥∥PjZ∥22∣u∗v∣2. Average over the auxiliary v; unitary invariance replaces u by e1, so the left side is at least ck(q)∥PjZ∥22q after raising to power q. Integrate over Z by [F8] and use step 2.1, then divide by ck(q)>0, to obtain E∥PjZ∥22q≤Γ(j+q)Γ(k+q)Γ(p+1−q)Γ(j)Γ(k)Γ(q+1)Γ(p+1). The eigenvector is selected only for each fixed finite matrix in this pointwise inequality; no measurable eigenvector is used.

4.1step 3.1F2F4F6F7F8A1algebra

The law of Z is left-unitary invariant by [F2], since left multiplication acts only on G2. Conditional coordinate second moments give EG2∥G2G1†∥F2=d∥G1†∥F2; [F4] and [F8] therefore give E∥Z∥F2=dk/p<∞. For integer 1≤q≤p, apply Jensen [F7] to the nonnegative variable ∥PjZ∥22 and use step 3.1. The Gamma functional equation [F6] then gives E∥PjZ∥22≤[(k)q(j)qq!(p)↓q]1/q, where (b)q=b(b+1)⋯(b+q−1) and (p)↓q=p(p−1)⋯(p−q+1).

5.1step 4.1F6F7F10F11algebra

By AM--GM [F7], (k)q1/q≤k+(q−1)/2 and (j)q1/q≤j+(q−1)/2. We also have (q!)1/q≥q/e: for q=1 this is immediate since the first two terms of the defining series give e>1; for q≥2, on each [r−1,r] with 2≤r≤q, monotonicity of log⁡ in [F10] gives ∫r−1rlog⁡t dt≤log⁡r. Additivity and monotonicity of integration [F11] yield ∫1qlog⁡t dt≤∑r=2qlog⁡r=log⁡(q!), the last equality following by induction from the product law in [F10]. The primitive tlog⁡t−t has derivative log⁡t by [F10], and log⁡ is integrable on [1,q] by [F11], so the fundamental theorem gives ∫1qlog⁡t dt=qlog⁡q−q+1. Hence log⁡(q!)≥qlog⁡q−q+1≥qlog⁡(q/e), because log⁡e=1 and the quotient law holds by [F10]. Since log⁡ is strictly increasing and both arguments are positive, q!≥(q/e)q. Finally, pair the first and last, second and penultimate, and so on among the q factors of (p)↓q. Each complete pair has product (p−i)(p−q+1+i)=p(p−q+1)+i(q−1−i)≥p(p−q+1). If q is odd, the unpaired middle factor is p−(q−1)/2, and (p−q−12)2=p(p−q+1)+(q−1)24≥p(p−q+1). Thus (p)↓q1/q≥p(p−q+1).

6.1step 4.1step 5.1A1algebra

Take q=⌈p/2⌉ in step 4.1. Then q≥p/2, p−q+1≥p/2, and (q−1)/2≤p/4. Step 5.1 gives, for 1≤j≤d, E∥PjZ∥22≤Cℓp−2(j+p/4),C=22e. Indeed, the denominator in step 5.1 is at least (q/e)p(p−q+1)≥p2/(22e), while k+(q−1)/2≤k+p/4≤ℓ and j+(q−1)/2≤j+p/4. This proves the displayed half-order bound. For q=p, (p)↓p=p!, so step 5.1 bounds both denominator roots by p/e and their product from below by (p/e)2. The numerator factors are at most k+p/2≤ℓ and j+p/2. Substitution into step 4.1 gives E∥PjZ∥22≤e2ℓp−2(j+p/2). Both bounds also hold at j=0 because P0Z=0.

7.1step 4.1step 6.1F2F7F9A1constructalgebra∎

If S=0, both claims hold. Otherwise set σ=∥S∥2>0 and diagonalize S∗S by [F9] as W∗diag⁡(σ2w1,…,σ2wd)W, where 0≤wi≤1. The Frobenius singular-value formula in [F9] gives ∥S∥F2=tr⁡(S∗S)=σ2∑iwi, hence ∑iwi=∥S∥F2/σ2. For w∈[0,1]d, define f(w)=E∥diag⁡(wi)Z∥22. It is finite because 0≤wi≤1 and operator norm is bounded by Frobenius norm in [F9], so f(w)≤E∥Z∥F2<∞ by step 4.1. It is convex because for every fixed unit vector u, ∥diag⁡(wi)Zu∥22=∑iwi∣(Zu)i∣2 is linear in w, and taking the unit-vector maximum and then expectation preserves convexity. It is invariant under coordinate permutations by the row-unitary invariance of Z from [F2]. For each subset J⊆{1,…,d} put λJ=∏i∈Jwi∏i∉J(1−wi). These are nonnegative, sum to ∏i(wi+1−wi)=1, and satisfy ∑J∋iλJ=wi; hence the convex combination of indicator vectors is w and its mean cardinality is ∑iwi. Finite Euclidean Jensen [F7] gives f(w)≤∑JλJf(1J). By permutation invariance and step 6.1, f(1J)=E∥P∣J∣Z∥22≤h(∣J∣) for each of the two affine bounds h(j) there. Since h is affine, f(w)≤∑JλJh(∣J∣)=h(∑iwi); this includes every endpoint wi=0 or 1 and never uses a row count above d. Finally, left-unitary invariance and the diagonalization of S∗S give E∥SZ∥22=E∥diag⁡(σwi)WZ∥22=σ2f(w). Substitution of each affine h proves both asserted inequalities.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

179 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources