Alphabeta Math

Triangularisation and Jordan Form: Examples and Counterexamples

About this page
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 17 results · all verified · 14 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.
1 · Prerequisites
Abstract Algebra
Combinatorics
Coxeter Groups
Linear Algebra
Real Analysis
Set Theory
2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Items

Example

The quotient of F³ by a coordinate line and its canonical projection

Example

The first isomorphism theorem for (x,y,z)↦(x+y,y+z)

Example

A split 3×3 operator that is triangularisable but not diagonalisable

Example

Building an upper-triangular matrix from a complete invariant flag

Example

Building a Jordan-string basis for a nilpotent operator on F⁶

Example

Recovering J₃(0),J₂(0),J₁(0) from ranks of powers

Example

Recovering a 5×5 Jordan form from shifted power ranks at two eigenvalues

Example

The real quarter-turn acquires diagonal Jordan form over ℂ

False statement

FALSE: Every finite-dimensional endomorphism is triangularisable over its base field

False statement

FALSE: Every finite-dimensional endomorphism has Jordan form over its base field

False statement

FALSE: Equal characteristic and minimal polynomials imply similarity

False statement

FALSE: Jordan canonical form is a unique literal matrix without fixing block order

False statement

FALSE: Geometric multiplicity alone determines Jordan block sizes

Example

Computing commuting diagonal and nilpotent parts of a split Jordan matrix

False statement

FALSE: Every endomorphism has a commuting diagonal-plus-nilpotent decomposition over its base field

Example

A companion operator with a visible cyclic vector and equal canonical polynomials

Counterexample

The identity on F² has no cyclic vector

Sources