Alphabeta Math

Offline reinforcement learning and off-policy evaluation

About this page
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 1 result · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.
1 · Prerequisites
Abstract Algebra
Combinatorics
Linear Algebra
Machine Learning Algorithms
Measure Theory
Probability
Real Analysis
Set Theory
Topology
2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Items

Theorem

Without trajectory coverage, logged data need not identify policy value

Definition

Finite-horizon offline reinforcement-learning dataset and coverage

Lemma

Finite-horizon policy ratios are trajectory Radon-Nikodym derivatives

Algorithm

Ordinary, per-decision, and weighted trajectory importance sampling

Algorithm

Finite-horizon doubly robust off-policy value evaluation

Theorem

Trajectory and per-decision importance sampling are unbiased under coverage

Theorem

Doubly robust evaluation is unbiased under either exact component

Remark

Off-policy estimates do not guarantee offline policy safety

Sources