How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Lebesgue-Stieltjes Measures and Distribution Functions
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Urysohn's Lemma and the Tietze Extension Theorem
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
Examples identify familiar positive functionals with their measures; the ordinal counterexamples show exactly why RMK uniqueness and regularity need their stated qualifiers. Each example now includes the representing-measure computation, and each counterexample names a Borel witness on which the asserted regularity or uniqueness fails.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The Riemann integral functional is represented by Lebesgue measure on an interval
Example
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let and define by the Riemann integral . Then is positive and its RMK representing measure is Lebesgue measure restricted to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice; continuous functions on are Riemann and Lebesgue integrable with equal integrals.
Verification
Linearity of the Riemann integral makes linear, and implies . Since is compact, .
Under the stated choice hypothesis, Lebesgue measure is regular on [given] ; its restriction to the closed subspace is finite and Radon. For every , equality of the Riemann and Lebesgue integrals gives . The RMK uniqueness theorem now identifies this measure as the representing measure.
Point evaluation is represented by a Dirac measure
Example
For , the functional defined by is positive and is represented by the Dirac measure .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is LCH and .
Verification
Evaluation is linear, and implies , so is positive.
For a nonnegative simple function , the definition of its integral [given] and the set formula for give . Increasing simple approximation and monotone convergence extend this identity to every nonnegative measurable function, and positive/negative parts extend it to every integrable real function. In particular, for every .
The measure is finite on compact sets. If a Borel set [step 1.2] contains , every open superset has -measure one; if it does not, the open set contains and has measure zero. Thus is outer regular. Likewise an open set containing contains the compact set , while the empty compact set suffices otherwise, so is inner regular on opens. Hence is Radon, and RMK uniqueness identifies it as the representing measure.
A locally integrable density functional is represented by g dlambda
Example
Let , assume the Axiom of Countable Choice, and let be locally integrable on . Then is a positive linear functional on represented by the Radon measure .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the Axiom of Countable Choice, and locally integrable.
Verification
If has support , then . Hence is well defined and linear; it is positive because .
The density construction makes [given] a Borel measure. Every compact set is contained in a ball, so local integrability makes finite on compact sets. Moreover, is LCH, and its rational open boxes form a countable basis. The second-countable regularity theorem therefore makes regular, hence Radon. Its defining integral gives , so RMK uniqueness identifies it as the representing measure.
A Lebesgue--Stieltjes functional is represented by its Stieltjes measure
Example
Let be increasing and right-continuous, and let be the Lebesgue--Stieltjes measure with . Then is a positive functional on represented by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is the Lebesgue--Stieltjes measure associated with .
Verification
The measure is finite on compact intervals, so the displayed integral is finite for compactly supported continuous . It is linear and positive.
Lebesgue--Stieltjes regularity makes Radon without changing its half-open interval convention. Thus the definition already gives a Radon representation, and RMK uniqueness says it is the representing measure.
Counting measure represents finite-support summation on a discrete LCH space
Example
If is discrete, every has finite support and is represented by counting measure.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: has the discrete topology.
Verification
Compact subsets of a discrete space are finite, so consists exactly of finite-support functions. The sum defining is therefore finite; it is linear and positive.
For counting measure , integration of a finite-support function is its finite sum, so . Counting measure is Radon on a discrete space: compact sets are finite and every set is open and is the union of its finite subsets. Its total mass may be infinite when is infinite.
The Dieudonne Borel measure on [0, omega_1] is not regular
Statement refuted
Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, a finite Borel measure on a compact Hausdorff space need not be regular.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, , and the resulting Dieudonne Borel probability measure .
Counterexample
The space is compact Hausdorff and . The open Borel subset contains a club, so .
Every compact is bounded below , hence contains no club and has . Therefore cannot be approximated from within by compact sets, and is not regular.
Distinct Borel measures can represent the same C_c functional
Statement refuted
Without a Radon or regularity hypothesis, a functional on need not determine its Borel representing measure uniquely.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: On , let be the Dieudonne measure and let .
Counterexample
Since is compact, . Eventual constancy gives for every .
Yet for , and . Thus the two Borel measures are distinct representations of the same functional; the missing condition is regularity.