Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Examples identify familiar positive functionals with their measures; the ordinal counterexamples show exactly why RMK uniqueness and regularity need their stated qualifiers. Each example now includes the representing-measure computation, and each counterexample names a Borel witness on which the asserted regularity or uniqueness fails.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Riemann integral functional is represented by Lebesgue measure on an interval

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let a<b and define L:C([a,b])R by the Riemann integral L(f)=abf(x)dx. Then L is positive and its RMK representing measure is Lebesgue measure restricted to [a,b].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice; continuous functions on [a,b] are Riemann and Lebesgue integrable with equal integrals.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Linearity of the Riemann integral makes L linear, and f0 implies L(f)0. Since [a,b] is compact, Cc([a,b])=C([a,b]).

given
1.2

Under the stated choice hypothesis, Lebesgue measure is regular on [given] R; its restriction to the closed subspace [a,b] is finite and Radon. For every fC([a,b]), equality of the Riemann and Lebesgue integrals gives L(f)=[a,b]fd(λ[a,b]). The RMK uniqueness theorem now identifies this measure as the representing measure.

given
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Point evaluation is represented by a Dirac measure

Example

For xX, the functional Lx:Cc(X)R defined by Lx(f)=f(x) is positive and is represented by the Dirac measure δx.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X is LCH and xX.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Evaluation is linear, and f0 implies f(x)0, so Lx is positive.

given
1.2

For a nonnegative simple function s, the definition of its integral [given] and the set formula for δx give sdδx=s(x). Increasing simple approximation and monotone convergence extend this identity to every nonnegative measurable function, and positive/negative parts extend it to every integrable real function. In particular, Xfdδx=f(x)=Lx(f) for every fCc(X).

given
2.1

The measure δx is finite on compact sets. If a Borel set E [step 1.2] contains x, every open superset has δx-measure one; if it does not, the open set X{x} contains E and has measure zero. Thus δx is outer regular. Likewise an open set containing x contains the compact set {x}, while the empty compact set suffices otherwise, so δx is inner regular on opens. Hence δx is Radon, and RMK uniqueness identifies it as the representing measure.

step 1.2
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

A locally integrable density functional is represented by g dlambda

Example

Let n1, assume the Axiom of Countable Choice, and let g0 be locally integrable on Rn. Then Lg(f)=Rnfgdλ is a positive linear functional on Cc(Rn) represented by the Radon measure gdλ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: n1, the Axiom of Countable Choice, and g0 locally integrable.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

If fCc has support K, then fgdλfKgdλ<. Hence Lg is well defined and linear; it is positive because g0.

given
1.2

The density construction makes [given] μg(E)=Egdλ a Borel measure. Every compact set is contained in a ball, so local integrability makes μg finite on compact sets. Moreover, Rn is LCH, and its rational open boxes form a countable basis. The second-countable regularity theorem therefore makes μg regular, hence Radon. Its defining integral gives Lg(f)=fdμg, so RMK uniqueness identifies it as the representing measure.

given
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

A Lebesgue--Stieltjes functional is represented by its Stieltjes measure

Example

Let F:RR be increasing and right-continuous, and let μF be the Lebesgue--Stieltjes measure with μF((a,b])=F(b)F(a). Then LF(f)=fdμF is a positive functional on Cc(R) represented by μF.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: μF is the Lebesgue--Stieltjes measure associated with F.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The measure μF is finite on compact intervals, so the displayed integral is finite for compactly supported continuous f. It is linear and positive.

given
2.1

Lebesgue--Stieltjes regularity makes μF Radon without changing its half-open interval convention. Thus the definition already gives a Radon representation, and RMK uniqueness says it is the representing measure.

given
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Counting measure represents finite-support summation on a discrete LCH space

Example

If X is discrete, every fCc(X) has finite support and L(f)=xXf(x) is represented by counting measure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X has the discrete topology.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Compact subsets of a discrete space are finite, so Cc(X) consists exactly of finite-support functions. The sum defining L is therefore finite; it is linear and positive.

given
2.1

For counting measure #, integration of a finite-support function is its finite sum, so L(f)=fd#. Counting measure is Radon on a discrete space: compact sets are finite and every set is open and is the union of its finite subsets. Its total mass may be infinite when X is infinite.

given
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Dieudonne Borel measure on [0, omega_1] is not regular

Statement refuted

Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, a finite Borel measure on a compact Hausdorff space need not be regular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, X=[0,ω1], and the resulting Dieudonne Borel probability measure mˉ.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The space X is compact Hausdorff and mˉ(X)=1. The open Borel subset Y=[0,ω1) contains a club, so mˉ(Y)=1.

given
2.1

Every compact KY is bounded below ω1, hence contains no club and has mˉ(K)=0. Therefore Y cannot be approximated from within by compact sets, and mˉ is not regular.

given
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Distinct Borel measures can represent the same C_c functional

Statement refuted

Without a Radon or regularity hypothesis, a functional on Cc(X) need not determine its Borel representing measure uniquely.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: On X=[0,ω1], let mˉ be the Dieudonne measure and let δ=δω1.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Since X is compact, Cc(X)=C(X). Eventual constancy gives fdmˉ=f(ω1)=fdδ for every fCc(X).

given
2.1

Yet for Y=[0,ω1), mˉ(Y)=1 and δ(Y)=0. Thus the two Borel measures are distinct representations of the same functional; the missing condition is regularity.

given

Sources