Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Examples identify familiar positive functionals with their measures; the ordinal counterexamples show exactly why RMK uniqueness and regularity need their stated qualifiers. Each example now includes the representing-measure computation, and each counterexample names a Borel witness on which the asserted regularity or uniqueness fails.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

The Riemann integral functional is represented by Lebesgue measure on an interval

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let a<b and define L:C([a,b])→R by the Riemann integral L(f)=∫abf(x) dx. Then L is positive and its RMK representing measure is Lebesgue measure restricted to [a,b].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice; continuous functions on [a,b] are Riemann and Lebesgue integrable with equal integrals.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

Linearity of the Riemann integral makes L linear, and f≥0 implies L(f)≥0. Since [a,b] is compact, Cc([a,b])=C([a,b]).

1.2given

Under the stated choice hypothesis, Lebesgue measure is regular on [given] R; its restriction to the closed subspace [a,b] is finite and Radon. For every f∈C([a,b]), equality of the Riemann and Lebesgue integrals gives L(f)=∫[a,b]f d(λ∣[a,b]). Thus λ∣[a,b] is a Radon representing measure.

2.1step 1.2given∎

To prove uniqueness without a general LCH cutoff, let ρ be any other Radon representing measure on [a,b]. If K⊆O⊆[a,b] with K compact and O relatively open, A compact set and a disjoint closed set have a positive norm-distance gap gives a positive distance between nonempty K and the closed set [a,b]∖O; when the latter is empty use the constant function 1, and when K is empty the comparison is trivial. Choose a smaller δ>0. The function u(x)=max⁡{0,1−d(x,K)/δ} is continuous by ∣d(x,A)−d(y,A)∣≤d(x,y), so the distance to a fixed nonempty set is 1-Lipschitz, equals 1 on K, and vanishes outside O. Equality of the two representing integrals therefore gives λ(K)≤∫u dλ=∫u dρ≤ρ(O); symmetry gives ρ(K)≤λ(O). Outer regularity yields equality on compact sets, inner regularity then equality on opens, and outer regularity yields equality on every Borel set. Thus ρ=λ∣[a,b].

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Point evaluation is represented by a Dirac measure

Example

For x∈X, the functional Lx:Cc(X)→R defined by Lx(f)=f(x) is positive and is represented by the Dirac measure δx.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X is LCH and x∈X.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

Evaluation is linear, and f≥0 implies f(x)≥0, so Lx is positive.

1.2given

For a nonnegative simple function s, the definition of its integral [given] and the set formula for δx give ∫s dδx=s(x). Increasing simple approximation and monotone convergence extend this identity to every nonnegative measurable function, and positive/negative parts extend it to every integrable real function. In particular, ∫Xf dδx=f(x)=Lx(f) for every f∈Cc(X).

2.1step 1.2∎

The measure δx is finite on compact sets. If a Borel set E [step 1.2] contains x, every open superset has δx-measure one; if it does not, the open set X∖{x} contains E and has measure zero. Thus δx is outer regular. Likewise an open set containing x contains the compact set {x}, while the empty compact set suffices otherwise, so δx is inner regular on opens. Hence δx is a Radon measure representing Lx by step 1.2.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

A locally integrable density functional is represented by g dlambda

Example

Let n≥1, assume the Axiom of Countable Choice, and let g≥0 be locally integrable on Rn. Then Lg(f)=∫Rnfg dλ is a positive linear functional on Cc(Rn) represented by the Radon measure g dλ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: n≥1, the Axiom of Countable Choice, and g≥0 locally integrable.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

If f∈Cc has support K, then ∫∣fg∣ dλ≤∥f∥∞∫Kg dλ<∞. Hence Lg is well defined and linear; it is positive because g≥0.

2.1given∎

The density construction makes μg(E)=∫Eg dλ a Borel measure. Every compact set is contained in a ball, so local integrability makes μg finite on compact sets. Moreover, Rn is LCH, and its rational open boxes form a countable basis. The second-countable regularity theorem therefore makes μg regular, hence Radon. Its defining integral gives Lg(f)=∫f dμg, so μg is a Radon measure representing Lg.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

A Lebesgue--Stieltjes functional is represented by its Stieltjes measure

Example

Let F:R→R be increasing and right-continuous, and let μF be the Lebesgue--Stieltjes measure with μF((a,b])=F(b)−F(a). Then LF(f)=∫f dμF is a positive functional on Cc(R) represented by μF.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: μF is the Lebesgue--Stieltjes measure associated with F.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

The measure μF is finite on compact intervals, so the displayed integral is finite for compactly supported continuous f. It is linear and positive.

2.1given∎

Lebesgue--Stieltjes regularity makes μF Radon without changing its half-open interval convention. Thus the definition already gives a Radon representation, and RMK uniqueness says it is the representing measure.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Counting measure represents finite-support summation on a discrete LCH space

Example

If X is discrete, every f∈Cc(X) has finite support and L(f)=∑x∈Xf(x) is represented by counting measure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X has the discrete topology.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

Compact subsets of a discrete space are finite, so Cc(X) consists exactly of finite-support functions. The sum defining L is therefore finite; it is linear and positive.

2.1given∎

For counting measure #, integration of a finite-support function is its finite sum, so L(f)=∫f d#. Counting measure is Radon on a discrete space: compact sets are finite and every set is open and is the union of its finite subsets. Its total mass may be infinite when X is infinite.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Dieudonne Borel measure on [0, omega_1] is not regular

Statement refuted

Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, a finite Borel measure on a compact Hausdorff space need not be regular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, X=[0,ω1], and the resulting Dieudonne Borel probability measure mˉ.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1given

The space X is compact Hausdorff and mˉ(X)=1. The open Borel subset Y=[0,ω1) contains a club, so mˉ(Y)=1.

2.1given∎

Every compact K⊆Y is bounded below ω1, hence contains no club and has mˉ(K)=0. Therefore Y cannot be approximated from within by compact sets, and mˉ is not regular.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Distinct Borel measures can represent the same C_c functional

Statement refuted

Without a Radon or regularity hypothesis, a functional on Cc(X) need not determine its Borel representing measure uniquely.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: On X=[0,ω1], let mˉ be the Dieudonne measure and let δ=δω1.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1given

Since X is compact, Cc(X)=C(X). Eventual constancy gives ∫f dmˉ=f(ω1)=∫f dδ for every f∈Cc(X).

2.1given∎

Yet for Y=[0,ω1), mˉ(Y)=1 and δ(Y)=0. Thus the two Borel measures are distinct representations of the same functional; the missing condition is regularity.

Sources