How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stability regions and stiff equations — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Banach-Space Differential Calculus and Banach Manifolds
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear multistep methods and Dahlquist equivalence
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- One-step ODE Consistency and Local Error
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Runge–Kutta Methods and Order
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Stability regions and stiff equations
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples compute forward Euler's frequency-dependent step limit, a fast/slow diagonal system's shared step restriction, and the contrasting stiff-mode damping of backward Euler, BDF2, and trapezoidal. The counterexample shows why a scalar A-stability result does not by itself prove matrix contractivity.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Backward Euler scalar A-stability does not imply matrix contractivity
Statement refuted
For every real matrix whose characteristic polynomial has all roots in the closed left half-plane, the backward-Euler matrix step is contractive in the Euclidean norm.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The real matrix and a unit backward-Euler step .
Matrix-step contractivity and the logarithmic norm in a specified inner product: Euclidean contractivity requires the induced norm of the matrix step to be at most one; .
Backward Euler is A-stable and L-stable: the backward-Euler scalar stability function is and is A-stable.
Counterexample
The characteristic polynomial of is , so its roots are both and the scalar backward-Euler factor is . Also , so is nonnormal.
Direct inversion gives . For , this step gives , whose Euclidean norm is . Thus the matrix step is not contractive.
For , , with equality at . Hence , which records the nonnormal growth hidden by the negative scalar test value. The claimed implication is false.
Forward Euler's stability region restricts both decay rate and frequency
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with , , and a step size .
Forward Euler has the closed unit disk centered at −1 as its absolute-stability region: forward Euler is absolutely stable exactly when .
Example
For this decaying oscillatory scalar mode, forward Euler is absolutely stable exactly when . Thus a large oscillation frequency reduces the allowed step even when the real decay rate is fixed.
Verification
Set . Then .
By [F1], stability is equivalent to the last expression being at most one. Since and , this is equivalent to , or .
A fast component restricts the forward-Euler step in a diagonal fast-slow system
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The diagonal system , , and forward Euler with one common step .
Forward Euler has the closed unit disk centered at −1 as its absolute-stability region: a scalar decay equation is absolutely stable under forward Euler exactly when .
Example
The slow component alone permits every , but requiring absolute stability for both components gives . This example exhibits how a fast decay scale can constrain a step selected to track a slower component.
Verification
Applying forward Euler to each diagonal component gives the multipliers and .
By [F1], the first component is stable exactly when and the second exactly when . Their intersection is .
Backward Euler and BDF2 damp a fast scalar mode while trapezoidal does not
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Reals and , and a classical solution on , meaning is continuous on , differentiable on , satisfies there, and has . Write .
The real exponential function and the number by a power series: is defined by its real power series and .
The exponential function is smooth and : is and .
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with : if maps into , is a limit point where is differentiable, and is a limit point of where is differentiable, then . For each , take and ; both limit-point hypotheses hold.
Both constant-step BDF2 test roots vanish in the stiff limit: both BDF2 test roots tend to zero as in the closed left half-plane.
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when : products satisfy , and scalar multiples satisfy at a limit point where the input functions are differentiable.
Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function: products and scalar multiples of functions continuous at a point are continuous there, and the identity function is continuous.
A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant: if is an interval and is continuous on , differentiable at every interior point, and has throughout the interior, then is constant on .
The exponential is positive and satisfies : for every real .
The identity map has difference quotient and derivative at each real . Since , [F8] gives , and [F9] gives continuity of on .
Since is continuous on by [F2], for either sign, any , and any , choose such that implies . Taking , implies . Thus is continuous on by the - definition.
Example
As , the exact one-step factor and the backward-Euler factor tend to zero, as do both BDF2 roots. The trapezoidal factor tends to . It remains A-stable but leaves the fast mode nearly undamped with alternating sign.
Verification
The function is continuous on by [F13], has by [F1], and satisfies on by [F2], [F3], and [F12]. Thus it is a classical solution.
Let be any classical solution from the Given and set on . By [F13] and [F9], is continuous there. On , [F8], [F2], [F3], and [F12] give . So [F10] makes constant; since , [F11] gives . The exact one-step factor is therefore .
At , [F5] gives , and [F6] gives .
Since lies in the closed left half-plane, [F7] gives that both BDF2 roots tend to zero as . By [F4] and step 1.2 the exact factor also tends to zero. Therefore , exhibiting the trapezoidal fast-mode damping defect without making a general accuracy claim.
Sources
- MIT OpenCourseWare, 18.330 Introduction to Numerical Analysis, Chapter 5, §5.2.2: Stability
- Ernst Hairer and Gerhard Wanner, Introduction à l’Analyse Numérique, Chapter III, §III.9
- Masayuki Yano, James Douglass Penn, George Konidaris, and Anthony T. Patera, Math, Numerics, and Programming (for Mechanical Engineers), Unit IV, Chapter 21