ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Incompatible total flux forbids a solution

Physical scope

An incompatibility example for the ideal electrostatic Neumann problem in a named inertial frame: on the unit ball with zero volume source, the unit outward normal-derivative datum violates the necessary boundary flux budget (surface area 4 pi), so no classical or weak solution exists. The item is an impossibility statement about the ideal boundary value problem and asserts no measurement, no apparatus, no material property and no conclusion beyond the displayed data.

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the cited Sobolev trace/weak-solvability interfaces and Countable Choice for the surface-measure interfaces (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ( ${A C}_{ω}$ )). Let $B : = B_{1} (0) = {x \in R^{3} : ∣ x ∣ < 1}$ be the open unit ball, a bounded $C^{\infty}$ (in particular $C^{1}$ ) domain with $\partial B = S^{2}$ and outward normal $ν (x) = x$ (Euclidean balls, annuli and spheres as bounded smooth domains and hypersurfaces, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The Euclidean inner product $⟨ x, y ⟩ = \sum_{k < n} x_{k} y_{k}$ on $R^{n}$ ), and consider the pure electrostatic Neumann problem on $B$ (regime The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading, fields The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields, constants Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values) with zero volume source and unit outward normal derivative: $- Δ φ = 0 in B, \partial_{ν} φ = 1 on \partial B .$ All displayed coordinates and potentials are numerical SI readings: the ball has radius $1 m$ , $φ$ is read in volts, and $\partial_{ν} φ = 1$ denotes $1 V m^{- 1}$ . Thus the corresponding outward electric field is $E \cdot ν = - 1 V m^{- 1}$ , and $4 π$ in the derivative-flux integral carries $V m$ . The companion datum $f = 1$ denotes $1 V m^{- 2}$ in $- Δ φ = f$ ; it is not a claim of unit physical charge density.

Then: (a) [No classical solution] there is no real $φ \in C^{2} (\overline{B})$ satisfying these equations: if such a $φ$ existed, Necessary compatibility for the classical Neumann Poisson problem with $f = - Δ φ = 0$ and $g = \partial_{ν} φ \equiv 1$ would give $0 = \int_{B} f d λ_{3} = - \int_{\partial B} g d S = - ∣ S^{2} ∣ = - 4 π,$ because the surface area of the unit sphere is $∣ S^{2} ∣ = 4 π$ (Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure, The closed form for the volume of the unit $n$ -ball); the contradiction is the failure of the necessary flux compatibility of Uniqueness and flux compatibility for the electrostatic boundary value problem(b). (b) [No weak solution] more generally there is no $u \in H^{1} (B)$ with $\int_{B} \nabla v \cdot \nabla u d λ_{3} = ⟨ g, T v ⟩$ for all $v \in H^{1} (B)$ with $g \equiv 1$ read as an element of the dual trace space (The fractional Sobolev space on a compact $C^{1}$ boundary): testing $v \equiv 1$ would force $ℓ (1) = \int_{\partial B} 1 d S = 4 π = 0$ , and the weak Neumann existence lemma states existence exactly when $ℓ (1) = 0$ (Weak Neumann and transmission existence with interface charges); equivalently the unit ball's boundary flux budget fails already in the weak formulation. (c) [Physics reading and scope] in the pure electrostatic regime the datum $\partial_{ν} φ \equiv 1$ on the whole boundary of the unit ball is inadmissible: no electrostatic potential with zero volume source satisfies it, and the obstruction is the strictly positive total boundary flux $4 π$ , not a smoothness or compactness artefact. Every solvable zero-source Neumann problem must satisfy $\int_{\partial B} g d S = 0$ for an integrable derivative datum $g$ ; this necessary flux budget alone does not state the regularity hypotheses of an existence theorem (sufficiency at the smooth level is the separate content of Existence and regularity for the electrostatic boundary value problem(b) under its hypotheses). The item is a mathematical impossibility statement about the ideal boundary value problem: it reports no measurement, no apparatus and no material property, and the companion failure with unit source and zero boundary field is the same flux obstruction, obtained by evaluating that lemma with $f \equiv 1$ and $g \equiv 0$ .

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice as declared in the statement; the open unit ball $B = B_{1} (0)$ , its boundary $S^{2} = \partial B$ , the outward normal $ν (x) = x$ on $S^{2}$ , the pure electrostatic regime with zero volume source, and the displayed boundary value problem $- Δ φ = 0$ in $B$ , $\partial_{ν} φ = 1$ on $\partial B$ .

[F1]

Classical Neumann compatibility: for a bounded $C^{1}$ domain $Ω$ , a real $u \in C^{2} (\overline{Ω})$ , $f : = - Δ u$ and $g : = \partial_{ν} u$ , one has $\int_{Ω} f d λ_{3} = - \int_{\partial Ω} g d S$ (Necessary compatibility for the classical Neumann Poisson problem, The Laplacian of a $C^{2}$ function and of a $C^{2}$ vector field, Classical normal derivative).

[F2]

The unit ball is a bounded $C^{\infty}$ domain (in particular a bounded $C^{1}$ domain) with $\partial B = S^{2}$ , outward normal $ν (x) = x$ on $S^{2}$ , a compact embedded $C^{\infty}$ hypersurface carrying its finite surface measure; moreover $∣ S^{n - 1} ∣ = n ∣ B_{1} ∣$ , and with $V_{3} (1) = π^{3 / 2} / Γ (5 / 2)$ , $Γ (5 / 2) = \frac{3}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} Γ (1 / 2) = \frac{3 \sqrt{π}}{4}$ and $Γ (1 / 2) = \sqrt{π}$ , one computes $V_{3} (1) = 4 π / 3$ and $∣ S^{2} ∣ = 3 \cdot 4 π / 3 = 4 π$ (Euclidean balls, annuli and spheres as bounded smooth domains and hypersurfaces, Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure, The closed form for the volume of the unit $n$ -ball, The real Gamma functional equation $Γ (s + 1) = s Γ (s)$ , $Γ (1 / 2) = \sqrt{π}$ from the Gaussian integral, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The Euclidean inner product $⟨ x, y ⟩ = \sum_{k < n} x_{k} y_{k}$ on $R^{n}$ ).

[F3]

Boundary trace space: with the Axiom of Choice there is a unique bounded linear trace operator $T : W^{1, 2} (B) \to L^{2} (S^{2})$ with $T u = u ∣_{S^{2}}$ for every $u \in C (\overline{B}) \cap W^{1, 2} (B)$ ; the boundary fractional space $H^{1 / 2} (S^{2}) = W^{1 / 2, 2} (S^{2})$ is defined by the finite graph atlas and partition norm whose localised terms are Slobodeckij norms, each dominating the corresponding localised $L^{2}$ term, and the smooth graph densities are bounded on the compact supports of the partition, so there is a constant $C$ with $∥ h ∥_{L^{2} (S^{2})} \leq C ∥ h ∥_{H^{1 / 2} (S^{2})}$ for every $h \in H^{1 / 2} (S^{2})$ (The fractional Sobolev space on a compact $C^{1}$ boundary, The $L^{p}$ trace operator on a bounded $C^{1}$ domain).

[F4]

The weak Neumann solvability interface: for a bounded connected $C^{1}$ domain $Ω \subset R^{3}$ , $ε$ measurable symmetric uniformly elliptic, $ρ \in L^{2} (Ω)$ , $g \in H^{- 1 / 2} (\partial Ω)$ and $ℓ (v) = \int_{Ω} ρ v d λ_{3} + ⟨ g, T v ⟩$ on $H^{1} (Ω)$ , a weak Neumann solution $u \in H^{1} (Ω)$ with $\int_{Ω} \nabla v \cdot ε \nabla u d λ_{3} = ℓ (v)$ for every $v \in H^{1} (Ω)$ exists if and only if $ℓ (1) = 0$ ; in particular for $ε = I$ , $ρ = 0$ and $g \in H^{- 1 / 2} (\partial Ω)$ the solvability criterion is $⟨ g, T 1 ⟩ = 0$ (Weak Neumann and transmission existence with interface charges, The fractional Sobolev space on a compact $C^{1}$ boundary).

[F5]

Cauchy-Schwarz for $L^{2}$ : $\int ∣ f g ∣ d μ \leq ∥ f ∥_{2} ∥ g ∥_{2}$ for $f, g \in L^{2}$ (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for $L^{2}$ ).

[F6]

The constant function $1 \in C^{\infty} (\overline{B})$ satisfies $T 1 = 1$ in $L^{2} (S^{2})$ , the trace of the restriction, by the agreement of $T$ with restriction on $C (\overline{B}) \cap W^{1, 2} (B)$ in [F3]; and $1 \in L^{2} (S^{2})$ with $∥ 1 ∥_{L^{2} (S^{2})} = ∣ S^{2} ∣^{1 / 2} = 2 \sqrt{π}$ (The $L^{p}$ trace operator on a bounded $C^{1}$ domain, [F2]).

[F7]

Regime and reading: in the pure electrostatic regime with $J = 0$ , $B = 0$ and volume density $ρ = 0$ , the compatibility identity of Uniqueness and flux compatibility for the electrostatic boundary value problem(b) is the necessary flux budget for the smooth Neumann problem, and the sufficiency statement in the smooth class is Existence and regularity for the electrostatic boundary value problem(b) under its hypotheses; the constants, fields and units are those of the framework (The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading, The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields, Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values, Uniqueness and flux compatibility for the electrostatic boundary value problem, Existence and regularity for the electrostatic boundary value problem).

Verification

technique · direct

1.1F2F6

Geometry and area of the unit ball: $B$ is a bounded $C^{\infty}$ domain with $\partial B = S^{2}$ and outward normal $ν (x) = x$ ; it is connected and nonempty. The area is $∣ S^{2} ∣ = 4 π$ : by $∣ S^{n - 1} ∣ = n ∣ B_{1} ∣$ and $V_{n} (1) = π^{n / 2} / Γ (n / 2 + 1)$ , the functional equation gives $Γ (5 / 2) = \frac{3}{2} Γ (3 / 2) = \frac{3}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} Γ (1 / 2) = \frac{3 \sqrt{π}}{4}$ with $Γ (1 / 2) = \sqrt{π}$ , so $V_{3} (1) = π^{3 / 2} / (3 \sqrt{π} / 4) = 4 π / 3$ and $∣ S^{2} ∣ = 3 V_{3} (1) = 4 π$ .

2.1F1F7givenstep 1.1

Classical exclusion (a): suppose a real $φ \in C^{2} (\overline{B})$ satisfies $- Δ φ = 0$ in $B$ and $\partial_{ν} φ = 1$ on $\partial B$ ; put $f : = - Δ φ = 0$ and $g : = \partial_{ν} φ \equiv 1$ . By [F1] applied on the bounded $C^{1}$ domain $B$ with the outward normal $ν$ , $0 = \int_{B} f d λ_{3} = - \int_{\partial B} g d S = - ∣ S^{2} ∣ = - 4 π$ by [step 1.1], a contradiction since $4 π \neq 0$ ; hence no such $φ$ exists. This is (a), and it exhibits the failure of the necessary compatibility of Uniqueness and flux compatibility for the electrostatic boundary value problem(b).

2.2F3F5F6step 1.1

The datum $g \equiv 1$ as an element of the dual trace space: $1 \in L^{2} (S^{2})$ by [F6], so for $h \in H^{1 / 2} (S^{2})$ the integral $\int_{S^{2}} h d S$ is absolutely convergent, and Cauchy-Schwarz together with the inclusion bound of [F3] gives $∣ \int_{S^{2}} h d S ∣ \leq ∣ S^{2} ∣^{1 / 2} ∥ h ∥_{L^{2} (S^{2})} \leq C ∣ S^{2} ∣^{1 / 2} ∥ h ∥_{H^{1 / 2} (S^{2})}$ ; hence $g \equiv 1$ defines a bounded linear functional $⟨ g, \cdot ⟩$ on $H^{1 / 2} (S^{2})$ , i.e. an element of $H^{- 1 / 2} (\partial B)$ , with $⟨ g, h ⟩ = \int_{S^{2}} h d S$ .

2.3F1F2F4step 1.1

Companion failure with unit source and zero boundary field: for $f \equiv 1$ on $B$ and $g \equiv 0$ on $\partial B$ , any hypothetical $φ \in C^{2} (\overline{B})$ with $- Δ φ = f$ and $\partial_{ν} φ = g$ would satisfy, by [F1], $\int_{B} f d λ_{3} = ∣ B_{1} ∣ = V_{3} (1) = 4 π / 3 \neq 0 = - \int_{\partial B} 0 d S$ , a contradiction; thus the same flux budget excludes the unit-source datum, and in the weak formulation the corresponding functional $ℓ^{'} (v) = \int_{B} v d λ_{3}$ has $ℓ^{'} (1) = 4 π / 3 \neq 0$ , excluding weak solutions by [F4] as well.

3.1F3F5step 1.1step 2.2

The functional $ℓ (v) : = ⟨ g, T v ⟩ = \int_{S^{2}} T v d S$ on $H^{1} (B)$ : it is well defined because $T v \in L^{2} (S^{2})$ by [F3] and $L^{2} (S^{2}) \subset L^{1} (S^{2})$ with $\int_{S^{2}} ∣ T v ∣ d S \leq ∣ S^{2} ∣^{1 / 2} ∥ T v ∥_{L^{2} (S^{2})}$ by Cauchy-Schwarz and $∣ S^{2} ∣ < \infty$ [F5, F6]; it is linear and bounded, $∣ ℓ (v) ∣ \leq ∣ S^{2} ∣^{1 / 2} ∥ T v ∥_{L^{2} (S^{2})} \leq C^{'} ∥ v ∥_{H^{1} (B)}$ , by the trace bound [F3]. At the constant function $v \equiv 1$ one has $ℓ (1) = \int_{S^{2}} T 1 d S = \int_{S^{2}} 1 d S = ∣ S^{2} ∣ = 4 π \neq 0$ by [F6] and [step 1.1].

4.1F4givenstep 3.1

Weak exclusion (b): with $Ω = B$ (bounded, connected, $C^{1}$ ), $ε = I$ (symmetric, uniformly elliptic), $ρ = 0 \in L^{2} (B)$ and $g \equiv 1 \in H^{- 1 / 2} (\partial B)$ from [step 2.2], the data functional of the weak Neumann problem is exactly $ℓ$ of [step 3.1]; by the criterion [F4], a weak solution $u \in H^{1} (B)$ with $\int_{B} \nabla v \cdot \nabla u d λ_{3} = ℓ (v) = ⟨ g, T v ⟩$ for all $v \in H^{1} (B)$ exists if and only if $ℓ (1) = 0$ , but $ℓ (1) = 4 π \neq 0$ by [step 3.1]; hence no such $u$ exists. The obstruction is already visible by testing $v \equiv 1$ : the left side vanishes and the right side is $4 π$ . This is (b).

5.1F7givenstep 2.1step 4.1step 2.3∎

Reading and scope (c): on the unit ball with zero volume source the unit outward normal-derivative datum is inadmissible in both the classical $C^{2} (\overline{B})$ class and the weak $H^{1} (B)$ class; the obstruction is the strictly positive total boundary flux $∣ S^{2} ∣ = 4 π$ , not smoothness or compactness, and the necessary compatibility $\int_{\partial B} g d S = 0$ for the zero-source problem is a flux budget whereas sufficiency in the smooth class is the separate content of Existence and regularity for the electrostatic boundary value problem(b) under its hypotheses [F7]. No step uses the ball's symmetry beyond the area computation of [step 1.1]; no measurement, apparatus or material property is asserted, and the companion failure of [step 2.3] is the same flux obstruction evaluated at $f \equiv 1$ , $g \equiv 0$ . This is (c).

Incompatible total flux forbids a solution

Example

Facts & Assumptions

Verification

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources