Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The ideal infinite parallel-plate capacitor

Physical scope

The ideal two-infinite-plane capacitor model in a named inertial frame: uniform field between the plates, zero field outside, plane charge densities +/- sigma, potential difference V = sigma d/epsilon_0, and the ideal-model charge-voltage and energy relations Q = (epsilon_0 A/d) V and U = Q^2/(2C) = CV^2/2 for a chosen area A. The infinite planes and unbounded field are declared idealizations outside the compact-conductor and declared-sheet-source hypotheses; the item asserts no fringe computation, no finite-geometry approximation theorem, no material or transient effect and no measurement.

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) as carried by the integral and distribution interfaces (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Declare the ideal parallel-plate model of two infinite parallel charged planes in vacuo, read as equipotential ideal conductor surfaces of the same equilibrium structure as The ideal electrostatic conductor model (the pure electrostatic regime The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading with fields The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields): for a separation parameter d>0, half-separation h=d/2, a surface-density parameter σ>0 (C m−2) and the framework constants of Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values, the model consists of the field E(x):={−σε0e3,∣x3∣<h,0,∣x3∣>h,x=(x1,x2,x3), where e3:=(0,0,1), the coordinates and d,h carry metres, and arbitrary zero values are assigned to E on the two planes for its locally integrable representative; together with the plane densities +σ on Π+:={x3=h} and −σ on Π−:={x3=−h}, and with the piecewise potential φ(x):=+σε0x3 for ∣x3∣≤h, φ:=+σhε0 for x3≥h and φ:=−σhε0 for x3≤−h. Then: (a) [Direct distributional verification] E and φ are locally integrable and C∞ off Π+∪Π− with E=−∇φ there, φ is continuous on R3 and constant on each plane with the values φ∣Π+=+σh/ε0, φ∣Π−=−σh/ε0; and in D′(R3) div⁡E=σε0(δΠ+−δΠ−),curl⁡E=0, where δΠ±(ψ):=∫R2ψ(x1,x2,±h) dx1 dx2 for compactly supported smooth ψ are the plane distributions defined by the iterated Lebesgue integrals. Equivalently, the model realises the static electrostatic equations with the declared pair of plane densities and no other source, and the potential differences read off φ are φ(h)−φ(−h)=2σh/ε0=σd/ε0. (b) [Uniform field and voltage] the field between the planes has constant magnitude ∣E∣=σ/ε0 and is normal to the planes, and the potential difference between the plates is V:=φ∣Π+−φ∣Π−=σd/ε0. (c) [Charge, capacitance and energy of the ideal model] for any Lebesgue-measurable region P⊆R2 with finite positive area A=λ2(P)>0 the charge on the portion of area A of the positive plate is Q:=σA, so Q=(ε0A/d)V with the geometric ratio C:=QV=ε0Ad>0, independent of σ and V; and the field energy contained in the slab of area A between the plates is U=ε02∫slab of area A∣E∣2 dλ3=σ2Ad2ε0=12QV=Q22C=12CV2. (d) [Relation to the bounded-conductor theorem and scope] the linearity Q=CV, the positivity C>0 and the energy identities U=12QV=Q22C=12CV2 have the same scalar form as the conclusions of Capacitance and energy for specified linear conductor geometry(d) for its bounded conductor geometry with only conductor 1 driven, every other conductor and the outer boundary grounded, and zero volume source, taking C=C11, Q=Q1 and V=V1 in that theorem; this example verifies them directly for the ideal model because the infinite planes and the unbounded declared field are outside that theorem's hypotheses (compact conductors in a bounded vacuum region) and outside the declared stationary-sheet source type of Distributional Maxwell equations with point and stationary-sheet sources, exactly as the ideal line source lies outside the compact-source types of the electrostatic page. No approximation theorem from finite plates to the infinite model is asserted; for a finite real plate pair the uniform-field model neglects the fringing field near the edges, which is not computed here, and the idealisation also omits the finite-thickness, material, transient and measurement content of any real capacitor.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice; the parameters d>0, h=d/2, σ>0 and ε0>0; the declared field E, plane densities ±σ on Π±, and potential φ of the statement; and the plane distributions δΠ±.

[F1]

The model data and elementary regularity: E is bounded, equal to −(σ/ε0)e3 on the open slab {∣x3∣<h} and to 0 outside it, hence locally integrable; φ is bounded, affine on the closed slab, constant on the two open half-spaces, and continuous on R3 with equal one-sided values on each plane: φ∣Π+=σh/ε0, φ∣Π−=−σh/ε0; on each of the three open regions {∣x3∣<h}, {x3>h}, {x3<−h} the maps are C∞ (affine or constant), and E=−∇φ there by the classical gradient of affine functions; on the slab ∣E∣=σ/ε0 and E is normal to the planes, outside it E=0; the plane functionals δΠ± satisfy ∣δΠ±(ψ)∣≤AKsup⁡K∣ψ∣ for tests supported in a compact K, where AK<∞ is the area of a bounded planar box containing the horizontal projection of K, hence are distributions by Local finite order characterization of distributions (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for n≥1 every norm N on Rn satisfies N(x)≤C∥x∥1 and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for d2, The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields, The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading, Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values, The ideal electrostatic conductor model).

[F2]

Distributional calculus and integration: a locally integrable function represents a regular distribution, its distributional partial derivatives act by ⟨∂iTF,ψ⟩=−∫F ∂iψ dλ3, and differentiability distinguishes the constant slab-indicator part; test functions are smooth and compactly supported, sums and scalar multiples of L¹ functions are L¹, and the iterated integrals over R2×(−h,h) may be computed by Fubini, with the one-dimensional fundamental theorem giving ∫−hh∂3ψ(x1,x2,s) ds=ψ(x1,x2,h)−ψ(x1,x2,−h) for smooth compactly supported ψ, the comparison of Riemann and Lebesgue integrands being available throughout (Distribution, Distributional derivative, Test function space d of an open set, Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Locally integrable functions embed in distributions, If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u′,v′ integrable, then ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product, Riemann–Lebesgue comparison for distribution test integrands, The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)).

[F3]

Slab measure for measurable bases: for a Lebesgue-measurable P⊆R2 with A=λ2(P), choosing a Borel set P0 equal to P off a Borel λ2-null set, the product P0×(−h,h) is Borel with λ3(P0×(−h,h))=λ2(P0)⋅2h=A⋅2h by the product-measure identification and Tonelli, while (P△P0)×(−h,h) is contained in the null set N×(−h,h); completeness of Lebesgue measure then gives λ3(P×(−h,h))=A⋅2h, and the same argument applies to any nonnegative integrand constant on the slab (L(Rn) is exactly the completion of the restriction of λn to the Borel sets, Assuming countable choice, L(Rn) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λn is a complete measure extending elementary volume, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}, The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}, Integral over a measurable subset, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable).

[F4]

The bounded-conductor comparison: under its declared Axiom of Choice, bounded smooth ambient domain, connected vacuum region, grounded outer boundary, zero volume source and smooth unit-Dirichlet solutions, Capacitance and energy for specified linear conductor geometry(a)-(c) gives q=Cv and U=12vTCv=12∑jvjqj, where v,q∈Rm are the conductor-potential and charge vectors and C=(Cjk) is its symmetric positive definite capacitance matrix. Its scalar identities in (d) concern only one driven conductor with vj=0 for j≠1: q1=C11v1, C11>0 and U=12q1v1=q12/(2C11)=12C11v12. These are a conditional comparison, not an application to the infinite planes, which are outside its compact conductor geometry and the compact stationary-sheet source type of Distributional Maxwell equations with point and stationary-sheet sources(c) (The ideal electrostatic conductor model).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1given

Local integrability, classical relations and continuity: E is bounded by σ/ε0 and continuous off the two planes, so for every compactly supported smooth test the product E⋅∇ψ is compactly supported and the integral is finite; φ is bounded by σh/ε0, hence locally integrable, and continuous because the slab formula, the two constants and the plane values match at x3=±h. On each of the three open regions E=−∇φ classically, with ∣E∣=σ/ε0 and normal direction inside the slab and E=0 outside; this is the regularity asserted in (a) and the uniform-field statement of (b).

1.2F2given

Distributional divergence: for ψ∈D(R3), the definition of the distributional derivative gives ⟨div⁡E,ψ⟩=−∫R3E⋅∇ψ dλ3, and since E vanishes off the slab and equals −(σ/ε0)e3 on it, this is σε0∫R31{∣x3∣<h}∂3ψ dλ3. Fubini writes the integral as the iterated integral ∫R2(∫−hh∂3ψ(x1,x2,s) ds)dx1dx2, and the inner integral equals ψ(x1,x2,h)−ψ(x1,x2,−h) by the fundamental theorem; hence ⟨div⁡E,ψ⟩=σε0(δΠ+−δΠ−)(ψ) for every test ψ, i.e. div⁡E=σε0(δΠ+−δΠ−) in D′(R3), with no other source.

1.3F2given

Distributional curl: E1=E2=0 are the zero distribution; E3=−(σ/ε0)1{∣x3∣<h} is a function of x3 alone, so pairing its distributional ∂1- and ∂2-derivatives against a test gives integrals of ∂1ψ and ∂2ψ over the slab, and each inner one-dimensional integral over R of a compactly supported derivative vanishes by the fundamental theorem; hence ∂1E3=∂2E3=0 in D′(R3), while ∂3E1=∂3E2=0 because E1,E2 vanish identically. All three components of curl⁡E=(∂2E3−∂3E2, ∂3E1−∂1E3, ∂1E2−∂2E1) therefore vanish: curl⁡E=0. Together with the divergence identity above this is the asserted static electrostatic realization of (a) with the declared plane sources, and no other source.

1.4F1given

Potential difference and voltage (b): the trace values of [F1] give φ∣Π+−φ∣Π−=σh/ε0−(−σh/ε0)=2σh/ε0=σd/ε0 because d=2h; combined with the constant normal field of magnitude σ/ε0 between the planes and the zero field outside, this is (b), and it also exhibits the potential difference of (a).

2.1F1F3givenstep 1.4

Charge, capacitance and energy (c): fix a Lebesgue-measurable P⊆R2 with finite positive area A=λ2(P). The positive plate carries the constant density +σ, so the charge on the portion over P is Q=σλ2(P)=σA. The slab of area A between the plates is P×(−h,h), and on it ∣E∣2=σ2/ε02 is constant; by [F3] the slab has λ3-measure A⋅2h=Ad, so Tonelli gives ∫P×(−h,h)∣E∣2 dλ3=(σ2/ε02)Ad and U=ε02⋅σ2ε02Ad=σ2Ad2ε0. With V=σd/ε0 from [step 1.4], the ratio C:=Q/V=(σA)/(σd/ε0)=ε0A/d is positive and independent of σ and V; and the four displayed energies agree: 12QV=12σA⋅σdε0=σ2Ad2ε0, Q2/(2C)=(σA)2⋅d2ε0A=σ2Ad2ε0 and 12CV2=12⋅ε0Ad⋅σ2d2ε02=σ2Ad2ε0. This is (c).

3.1F4givenstep 2.1∎

Relation to the bounded-conductor theorem and scope (d): the relations Q=CV, C>0 and U=12QV=Q22C=12CV2 verified in [step 2.1] have the same scalar form as Capacitance and energy for specified linear conductor geometry(d), under that theorem's hypotheses with only conductor 1 driven and every other conductor and the outer boundary grounded, taking C=C11, Q=Q1 and V=V1 [F4]. For general conductor-potential data its conclusions instead use the matrix relation q=Cv and the energy U=12∑jvjqj; the present verification is direct, from the explicitly declared piecewise model, because the infinite planes, the unbounded field and the plane densities are outside that theorem's compact-conductor and declared sheet-source hypotheses, and no approximation theorem from finite plates to the infinite model is asserted. The uniform-field idealization neglects the fringing field near finite edges, which is not computed, and omits finite thickness, material, transient and measurement content; the direct argument retains only ACω as declared, and no empirical claim is made. This is (d).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources