Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Curl-field energy identity for Newtonian potentials of divergence-free compact currents

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (ACω), with the exact meaning of The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). Let μ0>0 be a real scalar parameter, let J∈Cc∞(R3;R3) (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms) with div⁡J=0 (Divergence and curl of a C1 vector field), and define componentwise A:=μ0N(J),Ai=μ0 N(Ji),Nf(x)=∫R3f(y)4π∣x−y∣ dλ3(y), the Newtonian vector potential attached to Newtonian potential of compactly supported data in dimension three. Then:

(a) A∈C∞(R3;R3) with div⁡A=0 and −ΔA=μ0J pointwise on R3, componentwise (The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field);

(b) there is C>0 with ∣curl⁡A(x)∣≤C/(1+∣x∣2) for every x∈R3; hence curl⁡A∈L2(R3;R3) and ⟨A,J⟩∈L1(R3), both in the ordinary Lebesgue sense (Integral over a measurable subset);

(c) the curl-field energy identity ∫R3∣curl⁡A∣2 dλ3=μ0∫R3⟨A,J⟩ dλ3 holds, and equivalently 12∫R3⟨A,J⟩ dλ3=12μ0∫R3∣curl⁡A∣2 dλ3≥0.

The identity is stated for the explicit smooth compact currents and the Newtonian construction; no uniqueness, no decay of A itself beyond the curl bound of (b), and no extension to singular currents is claimed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω, let μ0>0 and let J∈Cc∞(R3;R3) satisfy div⁡J=0, with A=μ0N(J) componentwise as in the Statement.

[A1]

Countable Choice, written ACω, says every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Assume ACω, let ε0>0 and f∈Cc∞(R3;R) with Nf(x)=∫R3f(y)/(4π∣x−y∣) dy. Then Nf∈C∞(R3), −ΔNf=f pointwise, and for every multi-index α one has DαNf=N(Dαf). (Newtonian potential of smooth compact data is smooth and solves the Poisson equation pointwise).

[F2]

For a measurable compactly supported f, the Newtonian potential is Nf(x)=∫RnΦ(x−y)f(y) dy at each x where the integral is absolutely finite. (Newtonian potential of compactly supported data).

[F3]

Assume Countable Choice, let n≥3, let f be integrable and zero outside BR(0), and put M=∫f. For r=∣x∣>2R, ∣Nf(x)−Mr2−n(n−2)ωn−1∣≤2n−1Rωn−1∥f∥1r1−n. (Far-field asymptotics of compact-source Newtonian potentials).

[F4]

Assume ACω, let n≥3, let f∈L1(Rn) vanish outside a closed ball of radius R, and let Nf be the Newtonian potential. Then for every x with ∣x∣>2R the gradient is absolutely convergent and ∣∇(Nf)(x)∣≤2n−1∥f∥1ωn−1∣x∣n−1. (The far-field gradient of a compactly supported Newtonian potential).

[F5]

For C1 fields on an open U⊆R3, div⁡(F×G)=⟨curl⁡F,G⟩−⟨F,curl⁡G⟩. (The divergence and curl of a cross product).

[F6]

For a C2 field F on an open U⊆R3, curl⁡curl⁡F=∇div⁡F−ΔF. (The curl of a curl is the gradient of the divergence minus the Laplacian).

[F7]

The divergence and curl are defined pointwise from first partial derivatives; for F=(Fx,Fy,Fz) one has div⁡F=∂xFx+∂yFy+∂zFz and curl⁡F=(∂yFz−∂zFy, ∂zFx−∂xFz, ∂xFy−∂yFx). (Divergence and curl of a C1 vector field).

[F8]

For a C2 function the Laplacian is Δf=div⁡∇f, and for a C2 map ΔF is componentwise. (The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field).

[F9]

The cross product in coordinates is (u×v)x=uyvz−uzvy, with the cyclic permutations for the other two coordinates. (The cross product in R3).

[F10]

The Euclidean inner product is ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk, and it is symmetric. (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn).

[F11]

B(x,r)={y:d(x,y)<r} is the open ball of the metric space. (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

[F12]

Let 0≤f1≤f2≤⋯ be measurable with fn↑f pointwise. Then ∫fn dμ↑∫f dμ. (Monotone convergence for the integral).

[F13]

Let fn→f almost everywhere with ∣fn∣≤g almost everywhere for a single integrable nonnegative g. Then f∈L1 and ∫fn dμ→∫f dμ. (Dominated convergence).

[F14]

For measurable f:X→[0,+∞] and E∈A, ∫Ef dμ:=∫fχE dμ. (Integral over a measurable subset).

[F15]

For measurable f,g:X→[0,+∞] with f≤g one has ∫f dμ≤∫g dμ. (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

[F16]

For a nonnegative simple measurable function s=∑jcjχEj the simple integral is ∫s dμ=∑jcjμ(Ej). (The integral of a nonnegative simple function).

[F17]

The nonnegative integral of a nonnegative simple function equals its simple integral. (The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions).

[F18]

Let k∈N and let U⊆R3 be open; a map on U is of class Ck when each component is, and it is smooth when it is Ck for every k∈N, in particular for every k≥1. (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).

[F19]

Assume ACω and 0<ε<R. Then BR={x:∣x∣<R} is a bounded C1 domain with boundary SR and outward normal ν(x)=x/∣x∣, the divergence theorem applies on BR, and each sphere Sr is a compact embedded C1 hypersurface carrying a finite Borel surface measure with the standard graph charts. (Euclidean balls, annuli and spheres as bounded smooth domains and hypersurfaces).

[F20]

On a bounded C1 Euclidean domain the divergence theorem holds with the outward normal, ∫Ωdiv⁡F dλ=∫∂Ω⟨F,ν⟩ dS. (Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain).

[F21]

On a compact embedded C1 hypersurface the surface integral is defined by finitely many graph charts, and for a bounded continuous g with finite area one has ∫S∣g∣ dS≤sup⁡S∣g∣∫S1 dS. (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces).

[F22]

The chart surface measure on Sn−1 equals the polar measure σ, scaling by r multiplies surface measure by rn−1, and ∣Sn−1∣=n∣B1∣. (Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure).

[F23]

For every n≥1, Vn(1)=πn/2/Γ(n/2+1). (The closed form for the volume of the unit n-ball).

[F24]

For every s>0, Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s). (The real Gamma functional equation Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s)).

[F29]

A subset A of a metric space is bounded if A=∅ or there are x0 and r>0 with A⊆B(x0,r). (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space).

[F30]

Every compact subset of a metric space is closed and bounded. (A compact subset of a metric space is closed and bounded).

[F31]

For f:Rn→R the support is supp⁡f={x:f(x)≠0}‾, and f is compactly supported when that support is compact. (The support of a function on Rn and its compactly supported Riemann integral).

[F32]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ). (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

[F33]

For n≥1 the Euclidean distance d2 is a metric on Rn. (Rn as the set of functions n→R, and d1, d2, d∞ are metrics on it).

[F34]

Under Countable Choice every continuous map Rn→Rm is Borel measurable. (Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable).

[F35]

Assume ACω, let n≥1, x∈Rn and r>0; then the Euclidean ball B(x,r) is Lebesgue measurable with 0<λn(B(x,r))<∞. (Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F11F29F30F31F33algebra

The supports of the components Ji are compact by [F31] and bounded by [F30], [F33] and [F29]. Fix R>0 with supp⁡J⊆BR(0)=B(0,R), an open ball in the sense of [F11] (for the empty case any R works), and put r0:=max⁡{2R,1}.

1.2F1F2F6F7F8F18F32algebra

By [F1] applied to each component Ji (with [F18] supplying the smoothness of the components of J), each Ai=μ0N(Ji) lies in C∞(R3) and satisfies −ΔAi=μ0Ji and DαAi=μ0N(DαJi) for every multi-index α; in particular A is C∞, hence C2 for [F6], and [F8] gives −ΔA=μ0J componentwise. Moreover div⁡A=∑i∂iAi=μ0∑iN(∂iJi)=μ0N(div⁡J)=0 pointwise, where the middle equality uses [F1] with α=ei and the linearity [F32] (with [F2] supplying the integral representation).

1.3F3F4F26F27F28F33algebra

For r>r0≥2R and each i, [F3] with n=3 gives ∣NJi(x)−Mi4πr∣≤R∥Ji∥1πr2, where Mi=∫Ji and r=∣x∣; hence ∣Ai(x)∣≤μ0(∣Mi∣4π+R∥Ji∥1π)1r, and [F4] with n=3 gives ∣∇Ai(x)∣≤μ0∥Ji∥1πr2. By [F28], [F26], [F33] and [F27], the closed ball Bˉr0(0) is compact and each of the continuous functions Ai and ∂kAi attains a finite maximum on it, so there are finite constants c1,c2 with ∣A(x)∣≤c1 and ∣∂kAi(x)∣≤c2 for all x and i,k; consequently A and all its first partials are bounded on R3.

2.1F7F9F10F14F15F16F17F35step 1.2step 1.3algebra

By [F9] each coordinate of curl⁡A is a difference of two entries of ∇A, so [F7] yields ∣curl⁡A(x)∣≤2∑i,k∣∂kAi(x)∣≤18c2 for ∣x∣≤r0, while for ∣x∣>r0 the gradient bound of step 1.3 gives ∣curl⁡A(x)∣≤2∑i,kμ0∥Ji∥1π∣x∣2≤36μ0max⁡i∥Ji∥1π∣x∣2. Hence ∣curl⁡A(x)∣≤C/(1+∣x∣2) on all of R3 with C:=max⁡{1,18c2(1+r02), 72μ0max⁡i∥Ji∥1/π}. Moreover ⟨A,J⟩ is continuous because A is C∞ by step 1.2 and J is smooth, it is supported in the compact set supp⁡J⊆BR(0) with R>0, and it is bounded by 3c1max⁡i∥Ji∥∞: by [F10], ∣⟨A,J⟩∣≤∑i∣Ai∣ ∣Ji∣≤c1∑i∣Ji∣≤3c1max⁡i∥Ji∥∞, since each ∣Ai∣≤∣A∣≤c1. Since ∣⟨A,J⟩∣1BR(0)≤3c1max⁡i∥Ji∥∞ 1BR(0) pointwise, [F14] and [F15] give ∫R3∣⟨A,J⟩∣ dλ3=∫BR(0)∣⟨A,J⟩∣ dλ3≤3c1max⁡i∥Ji∥∞∫BR(0)1 dλ3=3c1max⁡i∥Ji∥∞ λ3(BR(0))<∞, the middle equality being the simple integral of the indicator by [F16] and [F17], and the finiteness of λ3(BR(0)) being [F35].

2.2F5F6F10step 1.2algebra

On R3 one has, by [F5], [F6], [F10] and step 1.2, div⁡(A×curl⁡A)=⟨curl⁡A,curl⁡A⟩−⟨A,curl⁡curl⁡A⟩=∣curl⁡A∣2−μ0⟨A,J⟩, because curl⁡curl⁡A=∇div⁡A−ΔA=−ΔA=μ0J. The fields A and curl⁡A are C1 by step 1.2, so [F5] applies.

3.1F19F20step 2.2

Fix r>r0. By [F19] the ball Br(0) is a bounded C1 domain with boundary Sr and outward normal ν(x)=x/∣x∣, and [F20] applied to F=A×curl⁡A together with step 2.2 gives ∮Sr⟨A×curl⁡A,ν⟩ dS=∫Br(0)∣curl⁡A∣2 dλ3−μ0∫Br(0)⟨A,J⟩ dλ3.

3.2F9F21F22F23F24F25step 1.3step 2.1algebra

For r>r0 the boundary term is bounded by the decay estimates: [F21] and the componentwise bound ∣(u×v)x∣≤2max⁡k∣uk∣max⁡k∣vk∣ from [F9] give ∣∮Sr⟨A×curl⁡A,ν⟩ dS∣≤∫Sr∣A×curl⁡A∣ dS≤4sup⁡Sr∣A∣sup⁡Sr∣curl⁡A∣∫Sr1 dS. By [F22], [F23], [F24] and [F25] the sphere area is ∫Sr1 dS=∣S2∣r2=3V3(1)r2=4πr2, and by steps 1.3 and 2.1, sup⁡Sr∣A∣≤c1′ r−1 and sup⁡Sr∣curl⁡A∣≤c2′ r−2 for constants c1′,c2′ independent of r. Hence the boundary term is at most 16πc1′c2′/r, which tends to 0 as r→∞.

4.1F12F13F34step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2algebra

Let rn↑∞ with rn>r0. The functions ∣curl⁡A∣21Brn(0) are nonnegative and measurable by [F34], and increase to ∣curl⁡A∣2; [F12] therefore gives ∫Brn(0)∣curl⁡A∣2 dλ3↑L:=∫R3∣curl⁡A∣2 dλ3∈[0,+∞]. The functions ⟨A,J⟩1Brn(0) converge pointwise to ⟨A,J⟩ and are dominated by the integrable function ∣⟨A,J⟩∣ of step 2.1, so [F13] gives ∫Brn(0)⟨A,J⟩ dλ3→∫R3⟨A,J⟩ dλ3, a finite real number. Passing to the limit in the identity of step 3.1 using the vanishing boundary term of step 3.2 yields L=μ0∫R3⟨A,J⟩, so curl⁡A∈L2(R3;R3) and the identity of (c) holds; the equivalent form follows by dividing by 2μ0>0, and L≥0 gives the final inequality.

5.1A1F1F3F4F12F13F20step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 4.1∎

Clauses (a), (b), (c) are now established: (a) in step 1.2, the decay bound and the L1 statement (b) in steps 2.1 and 4.1, and the identity with its equivalent form in step 4.1. The hypothesis div⁡J=0 was used only in step 1.2; smoothness and compact support only in steps 1.1 through 1.3; no uniqueness of A, no decay of A beyond the curl bound, and no singular-current extension is asserted. Countable Choice enters only through the cited Newtonian, measure and surface interfaces, not through any selection.

Source notes

Hunter §2.6.1 and §2.7, printed pp. 33-37, and Teschl §5.3, equations (5.21)-(5.26), printed pp. 117-118, supply the Newtonian potential, the local kernel estimates and the far-field behaviour behind the decay steps. Neither text states the curl-field energy identity in this exact form; the present proof assembles it from the supplied smoothness and decay of the Newtonian potential, the vector-calculus identity for div⁡(F×G), the divergence theorem on a ball and the monotone-convergence argument. The local identities div⁡A=0 and −ΔA=μ0J are recorded pointwise for the explicit smooth compact currents; the fine behaviour of the fields at a singular current is not treated.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources