Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The vacuum region around compact smooth conductors is a bounded smooth domain

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) as carried by the boundary interfaces (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let k≥1, let Ω⊂R3 be a bounded Ck domain, and let D1,…,Dm (m≥0) be bounded Ck domains with pairwise disjoint closures whose closures satisfy D1‾∪⋯∪Dm‾⊂Ω strictly inside Ω. Put

Ωv:=Ω∖(D1‾∪⋯∪Dm‾).

Then:

(a) [Domain] Ωv is a bounded Ck domain in the sense of Bounded C^k domains and boundary charts (in particular nonempty, bounded and open);

(b) [Boundary] ∂Ωv=∂Ω∪∂D1∪⋯∪∂Dm, a disjoint union of nonempty compact sets; the compact embedded Ck hypersurfaces ∂Ω,∂D1,…,∂Dm are pairwise disjoint (The boundary of a bounded smooth domain is a compact embedded hypersurface);

(c) [Normals and sign] the outward unit normal of Ωv at a point of ∂Ω equals the outward unit normal of Ω, and at a point of ∂Dj it equals the negative of the outward unit normal of Dj defined by Bounded C^k domains and boundary charts and Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals; so the outward normal of Ωv on ∂Dj points from the vacuum into the conductor;

(d) [Componentwise statement] Ωv has finitely many connected components. Each component U is an open bounded Ck domain; its boundary is the compact restricted subset ∂U⊆∂Ωv, a union of the boundary components incident to U. The normal formulas in (c) restrict to those boundary pieces. It need not have every boundary piece of Ωv, and connectedness of Ωv is not asserted.

No regularity beyond Ck, no convexity and no topological simplicity is claimed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω as in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω); a bounded Ck domain Ω⊂R3, k≥1; bounded Ck domains D1,…,Dm (m≥0) with pairwise disjoint closures all strictly contained in Ω. All metric notions use the Euclidean metric d2 and norm on R3; write B(x,r) for open balls, A‾ for closure and ∂A for the metric boundary.

[F2]

Closure is the smallest closed superset: A⊆F with F closed implies A‾⊆F, and A is closed iff A=A‾. The boundary is ∂A=A‾∖int⁡(A), and for open A the interior is A itself; boundaries are closed; every ball about a point of A‾ meets A (The closure of a nonempty A is {x:d(x,A)=0}, equals A together with its limit points, and is the smallest closed superset, Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space).

[F4]

The chart property and the outward normal: at every boundary point x of a bounded Ck domain D there are an open W∋x, a rigid motion R=Q⋅+b with orthogonal Q, an open ball B⊆R2, h∈Ck(B) with R(D∩W)=R(W)∩{(y,s):s<h(y)}, and the prescribed outward normal in ambient coordinates is QT(−Dh(y),1)/1+∣Dh(y)∣2, agreeing on overlaps; shrinking W preserves the identity (Bounded C^k domains and boundary charts, Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals, The boundary of a bounded smooth domain is a compact embedded hypersurface).

[F5]

For a bounded Ck domain the boundary is nonempty, compact, and a compact embedded Ck hypersurface with finitely many connected components; hence also ∂D∩W=R−1({(y,h(y)):y∈B}∩R(W)) and points of R(W) with s>h(y) lie outside D‾ (The boundary of a bounded smooth domain is a compact embedded hypersurface).

[F6]

Let B1⊆R2 be a ball, h∈C(B1;R), c∈R and δ>0, and suppose ∣h(y)−c∣≤δ/4 for all y∈B1. With H:=c+δ/2 one then has h(y)<H<h(y)+δ for every y∈B1. Consequently each of the regions S+:={(y,s):y∈B1, h(y)<s<h(y)+δ} and S−:={(y,s):y∈B1, h(y)−δ<s<h(y)} is polygonally connected: for u=(y1,s1) and v=(y2,s2) in S+ the segment [y1,y2] lies in the convex ball B1 (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms, Cauchy-Schwarz ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥2∥y∥2 with its equality case, the triangle inequality for ∥⋅∥2, the parallelogram law and polarisation, Rn as the set of functions n→R, and d1, d2, d∞ are metrics on it), every point (y,H) of the middle segment satisfies h(y)<H<h(y)+δ by the displayed inequality, and the vertical segments from s1 up to H at y1 and from H down to s2 at y2 have all their intermediate heights between the endpoint heights, hence also lie in S+; the same with H−:=c−δ/2 and the reversed inequalities applies to S−. These three-segment paths are polygonal paths (Polygonal paths and polygonally connected subsets of Rn, A finite concatenation of straight segments in Rn is a continuous path), so a polygonally connected set is path-connected and hence connected (Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component).

[F7]

Rigid motions and reflections: R=Q⋅+b and ρ(y,s)=(y,−s) are continuous bijections with continuous inverses and preserve distances; images of connected sets under them are connected (Linear isometries, and orthogonal or unitary operators on finite-dimensional inner product spaces, A continuous image of a connected space is connected, and connectedness is a topological property).

[F9]

Every connected component of an open subset of Rn is open in Rn and polygonally connected; components are nonempty, pairwise disjoint, cover the space, are the maximal connected subsets, and are closed; a union of connected sets with a common point is connected (Every connected component of an open subset of Rn is open and polygonally connected, Connected components, quasicomponents, and totally disconnected spaces, The components of a space are its maximal connected subsets, they partition it, and each of them is closed, A union of connected subspaces with a point in common is connected, and so is a union of a family in which every member meets a fixed connected member).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3

Put K:=D1‾∪⋯∪Dm‾ (so K=∅ when m=0). Each Dj‾ is closed and bounded, hence compact [F1, F2]; K is a finite union of compact sets, hence closed and bounded and therefore compact [F1]. By hypothesis K⊆Ω, so ∂Ω∩K=∅, and the sets D1‾,…,Dm‾ are pairwise disjoint. Put Ωv:=Ω∖K; it is open, since Ω is open and K is closed, and bounded, since Ω is; and, when m>0, for every x∈∂Ω we have d(x,K)>0 by [F3]. For m=0 set ρx:=1; for m>0 set ρx:=d(x,K)>0. In either case B(x,ρx/2) misses K.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

Ωv≠∅. Since Ω is a bounded Ck domain, ∂Ω≠∅ [F5]; fix x∈∂Ω and put ρ:=ρx>0 as in step 1.1. Every ball about x meets Ω while x∉Ω [F2], so there is y∈B(x,ρ/2)∩Ω. Then d(y,q)≥d(x,q)−d(x,y)>ρ−ρ/2>0 for every q∈K, so y∉K; hence y∈Ωv.

2.2F2F3F4F5step 1.1

∂Ωv=∂Ω∪∂D1∪⋯∪∂Dm as a disjoint union. For x∈∂Dj: x∈Dj‾⊆Ω, so x∉Ωv; every ball about x meets Dj⊆K [F2], and for a sufficiently small ball it lies in Ω and misses ⋃i≠jDi‾ (positive distances between the pairwise disjoint compact sets [F3]) and meets R3∖Dj‾ [F4, F5], hence meets Ωv; so x∈∂Ωv. For x∈∂Ω: every ball about x meets Ω while x∉K with B(x,ρx/2)∩K=∅ [step 1.1], so small balls meet Ωv; and x∉Ωv; so x∈∂Ωv. Conversely let x∈∂Ωv; then x∈Ωv‾⊆Ω‾ and x∉Ωv [F2]. If x∉Ω then x∈∂Ω. If x∈Ω, then x∈K, say x∈Dj‾; if x∈Dj then Dj is open and a small ball about x lies in Dj⊆K, so it misses Ωv, contradicting x∈Ωv‾; hence x∈Dj‾∖Dj=∂Dj. The displayed pieces are pairwise disjoint because K⊆Ω and the Dj‾ are pairwise disjoint, and each is nonempty and compact [F5].

3.1F4F5F7F8step 1.1step 2.2

At every point of ∂Ωv the vacuum region Ωv is locally exactly the one-sided subgraph of a Ck graph. Let x∈∂Ω. Use the chart of [F4] for Ω at x and let ρ:=ρx>0 [step 1.1]; replacing W by the open set W∩B(x,ρ/2) preserves the chart identity [F4] and makes W∩K=∅, so Ωv∩W=Ω∩W and R(Ωv∩W)=R(W)∩{s<h(y)}. Let x∈∂Dj. Use the chart of [F4] for Dj at x, and replace W by an open ball about x contained in Ω and avoiding ⋃i≠jDi‾; this keeps the chart identity [F4] and gives Ωv∩W=W∖Dj‾, whose image is R(W)∩{s>h(y)}: points with s<h(y) lie in Dj, points with s=h(y) lie on ∂Dj [F4, F5]. Put ρ0(y,s):=(y,−s) and R0:=ρ0∘R, h0:=−h; then R0 is a rigid motion, h0∈Ck, and R0(Ωv∩W)=R0(W)∩{s<h0(y)} [F7, F8].

3.2F5step 2.2

The boundary pieces of [step 2.2] are the compact embedded Ck hypersurfaces of the boundary lemma, and they are pairwise disjoint with nonempty compact pieces; this is (b).

4.1F4F8step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1

Ωv is a bounded Ck domain: it is nonempty [step 2.1], bounded and open [step 1.1], and by [step 2.2] every boundary point is treated by one of the two local charts of [step 3.1], each exhibiting Ωv locally as the one-sided subgraph of a Ck function over an open ball after a rigid motion [F4, F8]. This is (a).

4.2F4F7F8step 3.1

The normals. In the ∂Ω case of [step 3.1] the chart data for Ωv and for Ω are identical, so the prescribed outward normal of Ωv, computed by the formula of [F4], equals that of Ω at every point of ∂Ω. In the ∂Dj case, the chart of Ωv is R0=ρ0∘R with graph h0=−h; the orthogonal part of R0 is ρ0Q, whose inverse is QTρ0, so [F4] gives the vacuum normal (QTρ0)(−Dh0(y),1)/1+∣Dh0(y)∣2=(QTρ0)(Dh(y),1)/1+∣Dh(y)∣2, and since ρ0(Dh,1)=(Dh,−1)=−(−Dh,1) this equals −QT(−Dh(y),1)/1+∣Dh(y)∣2, the negative of the prescribed outward normal of Dj [F4, F8]. This is (c).

4.3F3F6F7F8step 3.1

Connected collars and patches. Fix one of the charts of [step 3.1], shrinking its neighborhood to be bounded first. Write R for its rigid motion, W for its domain, h for its graph function and B′′ for the set of parameters y with (y,h(y))∈R(W), an open subset of B containing the parameter of the distinguished boundary point. Choose a ball B1 with B1‾⊆B′′; the compact graph set G:={(y,h(y)):y∈B1‾}⊆R(W) (Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, The image of a compact metric space under a continuous map is compact, and so is the image of any compact subset, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value) is disjoint from the closed set R3∖R(W), the function z↦d(z,R3∖R(W)) is positive and continuous on G (its Lipschitz constant is at most one by the triangle inequality), hence has a positive minimum δ by [F3]. Its complement is nonempty because W is bounded. By continuity of h at the parameter yx of the distinguished point choose a ball B1′⊆B1 around yx with ∣h(y)−h(yx)∣≤δ/4 for y∈B1′ [F8]. In the inner case the region T:={(y,s):y∈B1′, h(y)<s<h(y)+δ} is contained in R(W) (every point of T is within δ of its graph point, which lies in G) and in {s>h(y)}, so R−1(T)⊆Ωv∩W; in the outer case the same holds for T:={(y,s):y∈B1′, h(y)−δ<s<h(y)} and {s<h(y)}, by the descriptions of [step 3.1]. The set T is polygonally connected by [F6], hence connected, so N:=R−1(T) is connected as its continuous image [F7]; moreover N accumulates at every point X(y) of the patch P:=X(B1′)⊆∂Ωv, since the points (y,h(y)±ε) with 0<ε<δ lie in T and converge to (y,h(y)) as ε↓0.

5.1F9step 4.1

Each connected component of the open set Ωv is open in R3 and polygonally connected [F9]; in particular every component is open.

5.2F2F9step 3.1step 4.3

Each patch is incident to exactly one component. The connected nonempty collar N of step 4.3 lies in one component U of Ωv [F9]. For z=X(y0)∈P, continuity of h and openness of B1′ give a ball B(z,r) so small that its chart coordinates satisfy y∈B1′ and ∣s−h(y)∣<δ, and that B(z,r)⊂W. By step 3.1 the vacuum portion of this ball lies in the one-sided collar, hence B(z,r)∩Ωv⊂N⊂U. If z∈∂U1 for another component, the ball meets U1 by [F2], so U1 meets N and equals U by [F9]. Conversely, every z∈P is in ∂U because the collar accumulates there and z∉Ωv. Thus every point of P is incident to exactly U.

6.1F2F9F10step 2.2step 3.2step 5.2

Every component is incident to a patch. Let U be a component of Ωv. It is nonempty, open and bounded, so ∂U≠∅: otherwise U‾=U, making U a nonempty clopen proper subset of the connected space R3 (proper since U is bounded), contradicting [F10]. Also ∂U⊆∂Ωv: if x∈∂U then x∈U‾⊆Ωv‾ and x∉Ωv, because Ωv is open and x lies neither in the open set U nor in its open complement in Ωv [F2, F9]. By [step 2.2] and [step 3.2] every point of ∂Ωv lies on one of the finitely many boundary pieces, and the patches of the kind constructed in [step 4.3] cover each piece; so some such patch P meets ∂U, and [step 5.2] identifies U as the unique component incident to P.

7.1step 3.2step 5.2step 6.1

Finitely many components. The patches of the kind constructed in [step 4.3], for all boundary points, cover ∂Ωv [step 6.1], and ∂Ωv is compact [step 3.2]; hence finitely many of them already cover ∂Ωv. Each determines exactly one component [step 5.2], and every component is determined by one of them [step 6.1]; therefore the components of Ωv are among these finitely many, so Ωv has finitely many connected components.

8.1F4F8F9F10step 1.1step 3.1step 4.2step 5.1step 3.2step 4.3step 5.2step 6.1step 7.1∎

Each component is a bounded Ck domain with the stated boundary. Let U be a component of Ωv and let P be a patch incident to U [step 6.1]. The local description of [step 3.1] shows that, in the chart of P, U coincides with the one-sided region described there, hence is locally exactly the one-sided subgraph of the Ck function h (outer case) or of the reflected Ck function h0=−h (inner case) over a ball [F4, F8, step 3.1, step 5.2]. So U is a bounded Ck domain: it is open [step 5.1], bounded (a subset of bounded Ωv) and nonempty [F9]. Every point of a patch incident to U is a boundary point of U (it lies in ∂Ωv and in the closure of the collar N⊆U [step 4.3, step 5.2]), and conversely every boundary point of U lies in a patch incident to U [step 6.1]; hence ∂U equals the union of those patches in a finite covering that are incident to U. It is compact because it is closed in R3 [F2] and contained in the compact ∂Ωv [step 3.2], by [F1]. Finally, let C be a connected component of ∂Ωv; the assignment to x∈C of the component of Ωv incident to a patch containing x takes values in a finite set and is locally constant on C (near a point of a patch it is given by the single component of that patch [step 5.2]), so it is constant on the connected set C [F10]; hence each boundary component of ∂Ωv is incident to exactly one component of Ωv, and ∂U is a union of such boundary components. The normal formulas of [step 4.2] apply verbatim to each piece of ∂U, since they are the same local charts. This is (d); connectedness of Ωv itself is neither assumed nor asserted.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources