Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth Brill–Noether gaps for the named weighted, Fano and cyclic families

Statement

Assume AC. Let (X,H) be one of the following three named source families. The threefold is smooth projective, KX≅OX, H1(OX)=0, and H is ample Cartier. The weighted case uses the source standard well-formed amplitude-zero quasismooth complete-intersection presentation, without an intersection with a linear cone, and H its ample Picard generator. The Fano-fourfold case has X a general anticanonical divisor of smooth M, −KM=rA, H=A∣X, with r≥3, or r=2 and ρ(M)=1. The cyclic case has a degree-d cyclic cover of smooth Fano Y, −KY=rAY, H=π∗AY, d≥2, d−1∣r, smooth branch B∈∣drAY/(d−1)∣, general when AY is not generated, and r≥2, or r=1 and ρ(Y)=1. Then there are a positive integer a, a smooth integral S∈∣aH∣, and a smooth integral C∈∣aH∣S∣ such that BN⁡C<χ(OX(aH)). The weighted case consists of exactly the thirteen standard types displayed below; a=2 for X10,X6,6,X4,6 and a=1 for the other ten. In the Fano and cyclic cases a=1. No normalization of arbitrary non-well-formed raw stack presentations is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Exactly the smooth CY threefold, source-standard weighted convention or named Fano/cyclic construction, and polarization in the Statement. BN ranges over positive-rank torsion-free stable curve sheaves; on the smooth curves constructed below these are bundles.

[F2]

Smooth Fano fundamental ladders and the high-degree embedding bridge gives actual smooth primitive ladders, the degree-one base-point avoidance and high-degree embedding. Very general K3 sections in the specified Fano regimes have the primitive ambient Picard group gives precisely the very-ample or degree-one double-plane K3 alternatives. The weighted degree one del Pezzo and double plane K3 ladder gives the exact weighted sextic geometry, not a general del-Pezzo classification. Primitive anticanonical K3 bridges for the nonprimitive Fano cases supplies the separate nonprimitive decomposition cases and the primitive-polarization anticanonical K3 bridge; maximality is not added to the Statement.

[F3]

Ample divisor relative handles and primitive integral restriction supplies the integral primitive restrictions in the explicit weighted joins. Log adjoint and nef big vanishing on smooth projective varieties, Bertini smoothness away from the base locus and Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch for projective morphisms supply smooth vanishing, actual generic smooth sections and Euler identities. Finite étale covers extend across the closed point of a regular local ring is used in the weighted stabilizer argument. regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay and Cohen--Macaulayness and a regular parameter quotient supply the graded regular-sequence depth argument.

[F4]

Assuming dependent choice, every locally compact Hausdorff space is a Baire space allows choosing a very-general K3 section also transverse to a fixed smooth member. The Axiom of Choice is the ambient convention.

[F5]

The following finite Hilbert-product calculations and local curve bounds are proved in the numbered argument; they are displayed together for comparison.

standard typeaA³χ(OX(A))proved BN bound to use
X5⊂P41557/2
X2,4⊂P51865
X3,3⊂P519611/2
X2,2,3⊂P6112713/2 (nonhyperelliptic)
X2,2,2,2⊂P711686, by the exact K3(s=2,m=8) bound
X8⊂P(14,4)1242
X6⊂P(14,2)1345/2
X3,4⊂P(15,2)1654
X2,6⊂P(15,3)1453
X4,4⊂P(14,22)1443
X10⊂P(1³,2,5)2875
X6,6⊂P(1²,2²,3²)2859/2 (canonical-embedding proof below)
X4,6⊂P(1³,2²,3)216848, by the exact K3(s=4,m=2) bound
[F6]

Projective threefold coherent comparison and holomorphic bundle algebraization gives coherent cohomology comparison and full faithfulness for a smooth irreducible projective complex threefold. The local Dolbeault lemma on nested polydiscs gives the locally exact Dolbeault resolution of its analytic structure sheaf, whose smooth-form terms are acyclic by Sheaves of smooth-function modules are cohomologically acyclic; The acyclic-resolution theorem for right derived functors identifies its cohomology with that of global smooth forms, using the injective-resolution datum supplied by AC. The first Chern class classifies complex line bundles classifies numerable topological complex line bundles on a connected compact smooth manifold by singular integral H². The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID applies to its free integral singular chains with coefficient module Z. These interfaces will be used only for the actual smooth projective threefold Y in step 18.1.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4F5givenconstruct

Weighted classification and normalization interface. Use the source standard normalized weighted presentation: sorted positive weights a0≤…≤ac+3, sorted degrees d1≤…≤dc, regular-sequence homogeneous equations, amplitude ∑d−∑a=0, no degree equal to a weight, and a smooth quasi-smooth coarse threefold. Its generic weighted stabilizer is trivial. For this standard presentation the smooth CY cannot meet a nontrivial stabilizer stratum. Indeed, at a cone point the smooth transverse three-dimensional slice has determinant character λ∑a−∑d=1, by the equivariant tangent/normal exact sequences; the radial line has trivial character. Formal averaging linearizes its finite cyclic stabilizer. The action on the slice is faithful, since otherwise that element fixes an open slice and gives a nontrivial generic stabilizer. A nontrivial subgroup of SL3 has no nonidentity pseudoreflection, hence its quotient cover is unramified in codimension one. If the coarse quotient were regular, the ACTUAL punctured purity supplier thm-purity-for-finite-covers-of-regular-local-rings applied at a minimal-height non-etale point would make the cover etale there. Repeating rules out every branch component. Over the complete local regular ring with residue C, a finite etale cover splits (lift its residue idempotents successively through the nilpotent parameter quotients); a connected faithful local stabilizer cover therefore has degree one. Contradiction. Thus the threefold avoids every nontrivial weighted stabilizer stratum.

2.1F1F2F3F4F5step 1.1construct

The stated standard well-formed amplitude-zero presentation is the interface used for the 'weighted CY complete intersection' clause. This note does not assert that coarse KX=O alone proves the displayed amplitude for a NON-well-formed stack presentation. Common Veronese factors can be removed and numerical linear-cone redundancies eliminated; if an arbitrary presentation is allowed rather than the standard source convention, that normalization must be supplied, rather than smuggling it into the numerical classification. The later arithmetic and curves below apply to each of the actual thirteen standard types.

3.1F1F2F3F4F5step 2.1construct

Necessary numerical conditions, from coordinate strata and Jacobians. If a subset of μ weights has gcd h>1, its coordinate stratum has dimension μ−1, and only the equations whose degrees are divisible by h restrict nontrivially there. Since the smooth threefold avoids that stratum, at least μ degrees are divisible by h. In particular every individual weight divides some degree, and the gcd of any μ≥c+1 weights is one. These are stronger smoothness conditions than an assumed integer degree alone. For every prime power pk, counting the weights divisible by pk and applying this subset condition shows that no more such weights than degrees occur. Summing their exponents gives ∏ai divides ∏dj.

4.1F1F2F3F4F5step 3.1construct

Quasi-smoothness also gives dj>a3+j. To prove it, suppose dj<a3+j (equality is excluded). On the coordinate plane of variables x3+j,…,xc+3, the first j equations and ALL their first derivatives vanish: their degrees are below the smallest surviving weight, and a derivative could be constant only if an excluded degree equaled a weight. The remaining c−j equations in c−j+1 variables have a nonzero common cone point. At that point the Jacobian has rank below c, contradiction.

5.1F1F2F3F4F5step 4.1construct

Put δj=dj−a3+j>0 and S=a0+a1+a2+a3=∑δ. If c≥4 then δc−j≥a3−j for j=0,1,2,3. Otherwise, on the plane of the last j+1 variables, the first c−j equations have no surviving pure terms and have derivatives supported in only the first 3−j columns; the last j equations add rank at most j. Their common nonzero cone point therefore has Jacobian rank≤3<c. Summing shows c≤4. For c=4 equality forces δj=aj−1. The largest weight divides some degree, and no degree equals it, so d4≥2a7. But d4=a7+a3, forcing a3=…=a7. The gcd-of-five condition makes this weight one, giving only (2,2,2,2) in eight weight-one variables.

6.1F1F2F3F4F5step 5.1construct

For c≤3 put λj=dj/a3+j>1. Since ∑(λj−1)a3+j=S≤4a4, one has ∑λj≤c+4. Product integrality and arithmetic–geometric mean imply a0a1a2a3≤((c+4)/c)c; its integer bounds are respectively5,9,12. Also the largest weight divides a degree at least twice itself, so δc≥ac+3. Since the other δ are positive, ac+3≤S−c+1.

7.1F1F2F3F4F5step 6.1construct

These finite bounds reduce the classification to an explicit integer loop. The complete exact-integer code is retained at research/conformal-field-theory-string-theory-step3-fresh-2026-11-04-weighted-enumeration.py: enumerate sorted first-four weights with ∏≤5,9,12, sorted tails between a3 and S−c+1, and positive compositions δ of S; retain sorted degrees a3+j+δj, no degree equal to a weight, product divisibility and every gcd subset condition just proved. There are 5394 degree-composition candidates before rejection (25, 753 and 4616 in codimensions one, two and three); 1925 remain after the sorted-degree test. The program uses only exact integer arithmetic, and every range and rejection is a proved necessary condition; its thirteen output rows are displayed below. The omitted source c=3 case is explicitly included by this finite loop. Each type is retained here only as a necessary possibility; constructing examples is unnecessary for the implication applied to a GIVEN existing X.

8.1F1F2F3F4F5step 7.1construct

Hilbert arithmetic, without a hidden threefold RR theorem. For a weighted regular-sequence coordinate ring R, the Koszul resolution gives HilbR(t)=∏(1−tdj)/∏(1−tai). The polynomial ring is Cohen–Macaulay and quotienting by the homogeneous regular sequence leaves depth4. Its irrelevant-ideal Cech complex therefore has H0 and H1 zero, giving H0(X,OX(nH))=Rn. For n>0 the actual now-constructed nef-big adjoint vanishing with KX=0 gives χ(OX(nH))=dim Rn. The pole at t=1 gives H3=∏d/∏a; equivalently the third finite difference of the Hilbert polynomial is the length of three Cartier hyperplane cuts, proving this intersection normalization directly.

9.1F1F2F3F4F5step 8.1construct

Take A=aH as in the table. The chosen multiples are basepoint-free. For the standard weighted rows with a=1, setting all weight-one variables to zero would leave a point/line of weights2,3,4. If it met X the surviving equations have dependent gradients by weighted Euler, or a row of the Jacobian is identically zero, contradicting quasi-smoothness. For X10, X66, X46 the degree-two sections contain all xi xj and all weight-two variables; their common zero is the pure weight3 or5 stratum, again excluded by the same Jacobian calculation. Thus a=2 is generated in those rows.

10.1F1F2F3F4F5step 9.1construct

General S∈|A| and Cin∣A∣S∣ are smooth by the basepoint-free characteristic-zero Bertini argument. They are connected: the Koszul sequence for two A sections and positive-twist adjoint vanishing, dualized using KX=0, gives H0(OC)=C. Smooth connected means integral. Adjunction gives ωC=OC(2A), g(C)−1=A3. The χ column is obtained by multiplying the displayed finite Hilbert products through degree a, so no family-specific Chern number is assumed.

11.1F1F2F3F4F5step 10.1construct

The exact table is displayed in F5.

12.1F1F2F3F4F5step 11.1construct

All thirteen rows have a proved strict numerical gap BNC<χ(OX(A)), using the two exact exceptional surface joins in the companion note. For X2,2,3 ordinary very ample H makes ωC=2H∣C very ample, so the locally proved nonhyperelliptic bound applies. The reduction/scaling supplier then transfers Γ-BMT from A=aH back to H; the actual K3 existence and Picard-divisibility inputs for the two exceptional rows are established in weighted-exceptional-surface-joins.md.

13.1F1F2F3F4F5step 12.1construct

The exact X6,6 canonical-embedding repair. Write the variables of weights1,1,2,2,3,3 as x1,x2,y1,y2,z1,z2. X cannot meet the pure z stratum: at a common root of the two degree-six quadratics in z, their gradients in z are dependent by Euler, while every x/y derivative vanishes by degree. This contradicts quasi-smoothness. Hence |2H|, generated by xi xj and y1,y2, is basepoint-free.

14.1F1F2F3F4F5step 13.1construct

Choose two general degree-two sections with independent y-coefficient matrix. On x1=x2=0 their common zero would imply y1=y2=0, which has just been excluded. Their smooth curve C therefore lies entirely in U={x1≠0orx2≠0}. On x1≠0, degree-four section ratios recover the full weighted affine coordinates: x2 x13/x14=x2/x1, x1² yi/x14=yi/x12, x1 zj/x14=zj/x13.

15.1F1F2F3F4F5step 14.1construct

Thus the degree-four linear system is an immersion and separates every point on that chart; the identical argument applies to x2. The weight-one fourth-Veronese coordinates determine [x1:x2], so these inverse-chart formulas agree and separate points across the charts as well. Its restriction to the proper smooth curve C is a closed immersion. Adjunction identifies that restricted line with ωC=4H∣C, proving that C is nonhyperelliptic. The local bound gives BNC≤g/2=9/2<5=χ(OX(2H)).

16.1F1F2F3F4F5step 15.1construct

One MUST NOT replace this by the stronger source assertion that 4H is very ample on the WHOLE X. On x1=x2=0 all degree-four monomials are products yi yj and forget the z coordinates. The corrected argument proves precisely the canonical very-ampleness on the chosen C, which is all the source reduction requires.

17.1F1F2F3F4F5step 16.1construct

The two exceptional weighted joins. Let the GIVEN smooth X be the intersection of four quadrics in P7. Replace their ordered basis by a general invertible linear combination. The common zero locus M of the first three quadrics is smooth: outside the base locus X, successive Bertini applied to their generating linear system gives smoothness; at every point of X the four original differentials are independent, so any three independent linear combinations remain independent. The same argument chooses a smooth flag of partial intersections. Adjunction gives dim M=4 and −KM=2OM(1).

18.1F1F2F3F4F5F6step 17.1construct

Choose a general hyperplane Y in M. It is smooth, and S=X∩Y is smooth by Bertini. On Y, A=OY(1) is very ample; adjunction from −KM=2OM(1) gives −KY=A, and A3=8. Apply the integral relative-handle supplier down the smooth complete-intersection flag from P7 to Y: every ambient dimension is at least four, so restriction on singular integral H² is an isomorphism, taking the primitive generator c1(OP7(1)) to c1(A). Thus H2(Y;Z)=Zc1(A). The same relative homology vanishing and long exact sequences give H1(Y;Z)=0, starting from the usual cell decomposition of P7. The algebraic Koszul resolution gives H0(OY)=C and H1(OY)=H2(OY)=0. In particular Y is connected; smoothness then makes it irreducible. Threefold GAGA applies to this Y and gives H1(Yan,OYan)=0. By the Dolbeault lemma the smooth (0,q)-form sheaves resolve OYan; they are modules over smooth real functions and hence acyclic, so the acyclic-resolution theorem identifies this vanishing with global dbar cohomology. A topologically trivial holomorphic line bundle therefore has a nonzero holomorphic frame: choose a nonzero smooth frame s (smooth approximation and a partition of unity preserve nonvanishing on compact Y), write s=fi ei in local holomorphic frames, and glue the closed forms α=fi−1 dbar fi. Their common class vanishes, so α=dbar f for a global smooth function f; exp⁡(−f)s is a nonzero holomorphic frame. Consequently analytic Pic injects into topological Pic. GAGA full faithfulness algebraizes that trivialization and its inverse for an algebraic line bundle, so algebraic Pic(Y) also injects. The topological classification identifies the target with singular H²(Y;Z); its hypotheses hold because Y is a connected compact smooth manifold, hence paracompact Hausdorff and of CW homotopy type. Integrality can also be checked by UCT with R=G=Z and free singular chains: H1=0 kills the Ext term and H2=Hom⁡(H2,Z) is torsion-free. Since c1(A) already generates H²(Y;Z), the injective algebraic Picard map has image all of it, proving Pic(Y)=ZA. This uses GAGA only on Y, and requires neither exponential-sequence surjectivity nor a field-coefficient comparison with integral cohomology.

19.1F1F2F3F4F5step 18.1construct

Apply the VERY AMPLE alternative of the exact K3 NL supplier to Y and L=A. A very general hyperplane T in Y is a smooth K3 with Pic(T)=ZAT. It can also be chosen transverse to the fixed smooth S: Bertini transversality is a nonempty Zariski-open condition, whereas the exceptional NL loci form a countable union of proper analytic subvarieties; Baire supplies a point in their complement inside this open set. The curve C=X∩T is smooth and integral, belongs to ∣2AT∣, and simultaneously is a member of ∣H∣S∣. Connectedness follows from the usual Koszul sequence and adjoint vanishing; smooth connected curves are integral.

20.1F1F2F3F4F5step 19.1construct

The actual K3 bound with (s,m)=(2,8) yields BNC≤6<8=χ(OX(H)). Thus the numerical curve reduction applies to the original polarization H.

21.1F1F2F3F4F5step 20.1construct

The weighted (4,6) intersection. Write the ambient coordinates as x0,x1,x2 of weight1, y0,y1 of weight2, and z of weight3, and the GIVEN smooth X as f4=f6=0. Smoothness and the amplitude-zero stabilizer argument show that X avoids the ambient nontrivial stabilizer locus. In particular f6 has a nonzero z² coefficient. The linear system |2H| on X is basepoint-free: its sections include all xi xj,y0,y1, whose common zero would be the excluded z-only point.

22.1F1F2F3F4F5step 21.1construct

Choose a general degree-two equation ℓ with nonzero coefficient of y1. Eliminating y1 identifies the ambient hyperplane ℓ=0 with P(1³,2,3). Its intersection S with X is smooth. We may choose ℓ such that the remaining y-direction is not a zero of the binary cubic f6(0,y0,y1,0). This cubic is not identically zero: otherwise f4, which is a binary quadratic on this stratum, has a common point with f6, contradicting avoidance of the stabilizer locus. Hence this extra requirement is nonempty open.

23.1F1F2F3F4F5step 22.1construct

Replace f6 by f6+q2 f4, where q2 is a degree-two form. This does not change X. Choose q2 and ℓ generally so that the threefold Y={ℓ=0,f6+q2f4=0} is smooth. Here are the actual Bertini hypotheses. On the open set f4≠0, varying q2 gives the degree-two linear system, which is basepoint-free outside the z-only point; the z-only point is excluded by the nonzero z² coefficient. The common base locus on the ambient smooth locus is X. Along X, df4 and df6 are independent; moreover dℓ restricted to TX is nonzero along S, because S is a smooth |2H| member. Thus dℓ and d(f6+q2 f4) are independent along S for every q2. The ordinary Bertini argument on the smooth weighted charts therefore applies both off and on the base locus. The remaining coordinate orbifold points are excluded by the nonzero z² and residual y³ coefficients, and the x=0 weighted line has coprime active weights2,3 away from those two points, so no further stabilizer remains. Thus Y is an actual smooth threefold and OY(1) is Cartier.

24.1F1F2F3F4F5step 23.1construct

The completed degree-one del-Pezzo geometry supplier applies to this arbitrary smooth weighted sextic, not merely a generic example: nonzero z²,y³ coefficients permit completing the square and translating y to give z2+y3+f4′(x)y+f6′(x)=0. It yields A=OY(1), Pic(Y)=ZA, −KY=2A, A3=1, and the full |2A| system. The separate weighted alternative of the exact NL supplier gives a very general smooth T∈|2A| with Pic(T)=ZAT and AT2=2. Choose T also transverse to the fixed smooth S, as in the preceding open/Baire argument.

25.1F1F2F3F4F5step 24.1construct

On Y the fixed surface S is the divisor f4=0 of class4A; hence C=S∩T is a smooth integral member of ∣4AT∣. On the original X it is the intersection of ℓ and a second degree-two equation, so S∈|2H| and Cin∣2H∣S∣, exactly the required curve pair for the polarization 2H. Connectedness follows by the Koszul/vanishing argument on X. The actual K3 bound with (s,m)=(4,2) gives BNC≤48<8=χ(OX(2H)).

26.1F1F2F3F4F5step 25.1construct

Euler polynomials of the relevant Fanos

27.1F1F2F3F4F5step 26.1construct

For a smooth Fano n-fold with −K=rA and A ample Cartier, Kodaira/adjoint vanishing gives χ(O)=1 and χ(O(tA))=0 for integer −r<t<0. Serre duality gives P(t)=(−1)nP(−r−t). The Euler polynomial has degree n with leading coefficient An/n!, by successive Cartier cuts (or actual GRR). These facts determine the required values without a classification table.

28.1F1F2F3F4F5step 27.1construct

In dimension four, r≤5 because P has the r−1 distinct negative roots and P(0)=1. Put d=A4. If r=5, P(t)=d(t+1)(t+2)(t+3)(t+4)/24 and P(0)=1 makes d=1; P(1)=5. If r=4, symmetry makes the middle root double, P(t)=d(t+1)(t+2)2(t+3)/24, so d=2 and P(1)=6. If r=3,

29.1F1F2F3F4F5step 28.1construct

P(t)=(d/24)(t+1)(t+2)(t2+3t+12/d), so P(1)=d+3.

30.1F1F2F3F4F5step 29.1construct

If r=2, write u=t+1; symmetry and P(−1)=0 give P(t)=(d/24)u4+(1−d/24)u2, so P(1)=d/2+4. For a general smooth X∈|rA|, the exact divisor sequence gives χ(OX(H))=P(1)−P(1−r)=P(1), and H3=r d.

31.1F1F2F3F4F5step 30.1construct

In dimension three, r≤4 for the same root count. Write v=A3. For r=4, P(t)=v(t+1)(t+2)(t+3)/6, hence v=1 and P(1)=4. For r=3, P(t)=v(t+1)(t+2)(t+3/2)/6, hence v=2 and P(1)=5. For r=2, P(t)=(v/6)(t+1)3+(1−v/6)(t+1), so P(1)=v+2. For r=1, write u=t+1/2; oddness and P(0)=1 give P(1)=v/2+3. No basepoint-free assertion is inferred merely from these Hilbert polynomials.

32.1F1F2F3F4F5step 30.1step 31.1constructalgebra

Separate primitive and nonprimitive cases before applying the fundamental-ladder supplier. Let I be the maximal index and B its primitive divisor. The new F2 bridge proves r divides I, A=(I/r)B, and I≤dim+1. Thus a nonprimitive fourfold case in this Statement necessarily has r=2, I=4, A=2B and B4=2; r≥3 has no nonprimitive case. The bridge gives a smooth Y∈|2B| with Pic(Y)=ZB, and a very general smooth anticanonical K3 T∈|2B|Y| with Pic(T)=ZBT and BT2=8. Choose Y transverse to the fixed general X∈|4B|, and T also transverse to X∩Y. Then S=X∩Y belongs to |H| and C=X∩T belongs to ∣H∣S∣, while Cin∣4BT∣. Smoothness follows from those transverse choices and integrality from the Koszul/adjoint-vanishing connectedness calculation. Apply the K3 bound to the primitive BT with (s,m)=(4,8), giving BNC≤336<20=χ(OX(H)); the last Euler value is step 30.1 with A4=32. This proves the entire nonprimitive fourfold case. The remaining fourfold calculations concern only maximal-index cases.

32.2F1F2F3F4F5step 31.1construct

Fano-fourfold anticanonical targets. For r=5,4 the actual smooth H-ladder gives curves with g−1=H3=5,8 respectively. The classical BN bounds are 7/2<5 and 5<6. For r=3 the required common curve can be realized as C∈|3H| on a smooth del-Pezzo surface with m=H2=d. Its bound is max(d+1,3)<d+3=χ(OX(H)), for EVERY positive integer d.

33.1F1F2F3F4F5step 32.2construct

In the remaining primitive case r=2, H3=2d and χ=d/2+4; integrality of this Euler value forces d even. When d≤4 the classical bound d+1 is strictly smaller (d<6); no Picard-one K3 claim is needed, including the degree-four double-quadric exception. When d≥6, the exact geometry supplier is a smooth K3 surface with polarization H2=d and H² dividing every divisor intersection H·D, containing C∈|2H|. The locally proved K3 bound d/2+2 gives the strict gap2. Picard rank one is one sufficient geometric way to supply that divisibility, not a claim that every anticanonical K3 of every Picard-one Fano has it.

34.1F1F2F3F4F5step 33.1construct

The exact cyclic cover algebra and ramification class. Let Y be a smooth Fano threefold with −KY=rA. Let d≥2, d−1 dividing r, and put k=r/(d−1). The cyclic cover is SpecY of the algebra ⊕j=0d−1OY(−jkA), with multiplication given by the branch section of OY(dkA). Its ramification divisor R has OX(R)=π∗OY(kA), so R∈|kH|, H=π∗A, not |H| unless k=1. This follows directly from the tautological covering coordinate, whose dth power is the branch section. The branch B∈|dkA| is isomorphic to R as a smooth variety. H3=d v. Finite-flat pushforward gives χ(OX(H))=∑j=0d−1P(1−jk).

35.1F1F2F3F4F5step 34.1construct

If k>1 all j≥1 terms lie among the negative roots of P, so χ=P(1). If k=1 the j=1 term is1 and all later terms are negative roots, so χ=P(1)+1. Thus: - r=4,v=1: (d,χ,H3)=(2,4,2),(3,4,3),(5,5,5). - r=3,v=2: (d,χ,H3)=(2,5,4),(4,6,8). - r=2: d=2 gives (χ,H3)=(v+2,2v); d=3 gives(v+3,3v). - r=1: d=2 gives (χ,H3)=(v/2+4,2v).

36.1F1F2F3F4F5step 35.1construct

Every value follows from the actual covering algebra and §1. No source Chern-number table is a premise.

36.2F1F2F3F4F5step 34.1step 35.1constructalgebra

For cyclic r≥2, a nonprimitive decomposition can only be r=2, I=4, A=2B. The primitive I=4 ladder makes B and A generated. General A cuts are smooth and transverse to the fixed smooth branch by Bertini on Y and on the branch. Write v=A3. If d=2, pull back a smooth A-surface and its smooth transverse A-curve. The local equation z2=f makes these pullbacks smooth at the branch; elsewhere the cover is étale. They are ample divisors successively, hence connected and integral. Their curve has g−1=2v by CY adjunction, so the classical F1 bound is BN≤v+1<v+2=χ. If d=3, choose a smooth S′∈|A| transverse to the branch D∈|3A|. The ramification R≅D lies in |H|, and C=D∩S′ lies in ∣H∣R∣ and in ∣3A∣S′∣. Both are smooth and connected ample divisors. Adjunction gives −KS′=A∣S′, so the del-Pezzo F1 bound gives BN≤max(v+1,3)<v+3=χ for v≥1. No primitivity is required by that bound.

37.1F1F2F3F4F5step 36.1construct

The corrected smooth curve choice and the full list of BN gaps. In the remaining maximal-index cases, for k>1 choose S,C as pullbacks of a smooth fundamental surface A and a smooth A-curve on it, with branch transverse. These have classes H,H|S, so g(C)−1=dv by CY adjunction. The assumption that the branch is general when A has base points is exactly the needed extra transversality/avoidance in those exceptional fundamental systems. F2 supplies that actual smooth ladder; the erroneous ramification divisor is NOT used as a member of |H|.

38.1F1F2F3F4F5step 37.1construct

The classical BN bound dv/2+1 gives a strict gap in every k>1 case: - r=4,d=2:2<4; r=4,d=3:5/2<4. - r=3,d=2:3<5. - r2,d2: v+1<v+2, all v.

39.1F1F2F3F4F5step 38.1construct

For k=1 the ramification R is genuinely in |H|. Take S=R≅B and a smooth fundamental S'∈|A| on Y transverse to B; then C=B∩S′ gives Cin∣H∣S. If r4 or3, the classical bounds give 7/2<5 and 5<6. For r2,d3, S' is a smooth del-Pezzo surface with −KS′=A∣S′, m=v, and Cin∣3HS′∣. Hence BNC≤max(v+1,3)<v+3=χ.

40.1F1F2F3F4F5step 39.1construct

For the remaining primitive r1,d2 case, integrality of v/2+3 forces v even. S' is K3 and C∈|2A|S'|. If v≤4, the classical bound v+1<v/2+4 proves the strict gap, including the double-quadric v4 example whose K3 cuts have Picard rank at least two. If v≥6 and ρ(Y)=1, F2 and its exact very-ample/NL supplier supply the actual Picard-divisibility K3 condition. Its bound v/2+2 gives the strict gap2. This is the whole named r1 scope; the source's additional ρ>1,v6 gonality case is not needed or asserted here.

41.1F1F2F3F4F5step 35.1step 36.2step 40.1constructalgebra∎

Finally let r=1,d=2 and A=IB with I≥2 maximal. Since ρ(Y)=1, the bridge gives Pic(Y)=ZB, I∈{2,3,4}, and a very general smooth anticanonical K3 T∈|IB| with Pic(T)=ZBT. Put w=B3≥1 and m=BT2=Iw. The system |A| is generated, including I=2,w=1 by its weighted-sextic construction. Choose T also transverse to the fixed branch D∈|2IB|. The ramification R≅D is a smooth member of |H|, and C=D∩T is a smooth integral member of ∣H∣R∣ and of |2I BT∣. Integrality again follows from connectedness by the actual Koszul/vanishing argument. The primitive K3 bound with s=2I gives BNC2≤I6w2/4+2I3w+4I2. Step 35.1 gives χ(OX(H))=I3w/2+4. The square of this positive Euler value minus that BN upper-bound square is 2I³w+16−4I², positive for I=2,3,4 and w≥1 (its respective minima are16,34,80). Hence BNC<χ(OX(H)). Together with the preceding cases, this proves the unchanged full Statement for every allowed decomposition, with a=1 in all Fano and cyclic cases.

Remarks

The finite necessary-condition loop was replayed locally and returned exactly the thirteen displayed types. Its exact-integer implementation and computed results are retained in research/conformal-field-theory-string-theory-step3-fresh-2026-11-04-weighted-enumeration.py and research/conformal-field-theory-string-theory-step3-fresh-2026-11-04-weighted-enumeration.result.json; this is local computation, not an imported external finite-computation result. Actual source reading and limits are preserved in those notes. The source-standard weighted presentation is explicit; no arbitrary raw-presentation normalization is claimed. This is a research source candidate, not native admission.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources