Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The fixed-mode isometry of Fock space and the transfer of number and ladder operators

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). By AC implies DC implies countable choice, Choice supplies the Dependent Choice hypothesis, as defined in The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain, of the cited transverse free-field Fock result. Let H be a complex Hilbert space (Hilbert space, Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length) with completed tensor powers H⊗n, symmetric projections P+(n), Fock space F(H), sector projections Πn, number operator N and maximal creation and annihilation operators A±(f) as in Hilbert direct-sum construction, Fock sector projections, Number operator domain and Closed adjoint sector domains. Fix a unit vector φ∈H. Write φ⊗0:=1∈C and φ⊗n:=φ⊗⋯⊗φ∈H⊗n for n≥1, and define Uφ:F(C)→F(H),Uφen:=(0,…,0,φ⊗n,0,… ) with the entry in coordinate n, extended linearly. Then:

(a) each φ⊗n is a unit vector of ran⁡P+(n); the family (φ⊗n)n∈N is orthonormal in F(H), and Uφ is a linear isometry of F(C) onto the closed subspace span⁡‾{φ⊗n:n∈N} (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases, Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family, A bounded linear operator between normed spaces);

(b) for every ψ=(ψn)n∈N∈F(C) and every n, ΠnUφψ=UφΠn′ψ,∥Uφψ∥2=∑n∈N∣ψn∣2=∥ψ∥2, where Πn′ is the Fock sector projection of F(C); and for every ψ∈D(N′) one has Uφψ∈D(N) with NUφψ=UφN′ψ;

(c) for every ψ∈D(A±(1)) one has Uφψ∈D(A±(φ)) and A±(φ)Uφψ=UφA±(1)ψ; in particular for every z∈C the coherent vector ψz=e−∣z∣2/2∑nznn!en of Fixed-mode number law satisfies Uφψz∈D(A−(φ)) and A−(φ)Uφψz=z Uφψz;

(d) for the transverse case H=h of Transverse continuum free Fock Hamiltonian with ε(k)=ℏc∣k∣, Hf=⨁nTn, and a unit φ∈h∩D(εh) (so that εφ∈h), one has ⟨HfUφen,Uφen⟩=n ⟨εφ,φ⟩(n∈N), and for every ψ∈F(C) with ∑nn2∣ψn∣2<∞ ⟨HfUφψ,Uφψ⟩=(∑n∈Nn∣ψn∣2)⟨εφ,φ⟩=⟨N′ψ,ψ⟩ ⟨εφ,φ⟩; Already under φ∈D(εh), writing εˉ=⟨εφ,φ⟩, the finite spectral second moment is ∥Tnφ⊗n∥2=n∥εφ∥2+n(n−1)εˉ2. If moreover φ∈D(εh2), the vector lies in D(Tn2) and this norm square equals the literal operator pairing below; then ⟨Tnφ⊗n,φ⊗n⟩=n ⟨εφ,φ⟩,⟨Tn2φ⊗n,φ⊗n⟩=n ⟨ε2φ,φ⟩+n(n−1) ⟨εφ,φ⟩2.

No physical interpretation of the isometry, of the vectors Uφen, or of the transferred operators is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the complex Hilbert space H, its Fock space F(H) with sectors ran⁡P+(n), projections Πn, number operator N and maximal operators A±(f), the unit vector φ∈H, the map Uφ, a vector ψ=(ψn)∈F(C), and in part (d) the transverse space h, the energy multiplier ε and the operator Hf=⨁nTn.

[F1]

Sectors and coordinate embeddings. For n≥1 the vector ιn(u):=(0,…,0,u,0,… ) with u∈ran⁡P+(n) lies in F(H), ∥ιn(u)∥=∥u∥, and the ranges of distinct ιn are orthogonal; the same formula with n=0 and ran⁡P+(0)=C gives the vacuum embedding, so the embedding is defined for every n∈N; for x,y∈F(H) one has ⟨x,y⟩=∑n⟨xn,yn⟩ and ∥x∥2=∑n∥xn∥2 (Hilbert direct-sum construction clauses (a),(c),(d), Fock sector projections clauses (a),(b)).

[F2]

Symmetric tensors. P+(n) is the orthogonal projection onto ran⁡P+(n); for u∈H the elementary tensor u⊗n=u⊗⋯⊗u satisfies P+(n)u⊗n=u⊗n, ∥u⊗n∥=∥u∥n, and ⟨u⊗n,v⊗n⟩=⟨u,v⟩n (Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power clause (c), Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases clause (b)).

[F3]

Number operator. N is self-adjoint with D(N)={ψ:∑nn2∥ψn∥2<∞} and NΠn=nΠn on the sector, i.e. (Nx)n=nxn; the Fock space is the orthogonal direct sum of the sector ranges (Number operator domain clauses (a),(b), Fock sector projections clause (c)).

[F4]

Maximal creation and annihilation operators. A+(f) and A−(f) are closed linear operators in the state vector; creation is linear and annihilation conjugate-linear in the mode parameter, with domains D(A+(f))={ψ:∑n(n+1)∥P+(n+1)(f⊗ψn)∥2<∞} and D(A−(f))={ψ:∑n(n+1)∥Ψf(n)(ψn+1)∥2<∞}, and on them (A+(f)ψ)n=nP+(n)(f⊗ψn−1), (A−(f)ψ)n=n+1Ψf(n)(ψn+1); the contraction maps satisfy Ψf(n)(u1⊗⋯⊗un+1)=⟨u1,f⟩u2⊗⋯⊗un+1 (Closed adjoint sector domains, Creation contraction bounds clauses (a),(b)).

[F5]

Fixed-mode oscillator coefficients. For F(C) with orthonormal basis (en) and the operators A±(1) one has A+(1)en=n+1en+1, A−(1)en=n en−1 for n≥1 and A−(1)e0=0; for every z∈C the vector ψz=e−∣z∣2/2∑nznn!en is unit and satisfies A−(1)ψz=zψz (Fixed-mode number law clauses (a),(b)).

[F6]

Transverse Fock data. For the transverse space h and ε=ℏc∣k∣, the operators Tn on ran⁡P+(n) are self-adjoint with Tnψ=εnψ, εn(k1,…,kn)=∑i=1nε(ki), and Hf=⨁nTn is self-adjoint with domain {ψ:∑n∥Tnψn∥2<∞}; under the Euclidean identification of h⊗n with a subspace of L2((R3)n;(C3)⊗n), the multiplier εn is symmetric and commutes with all permutation unitaries, so εn preserves ran⁡P+(n) (Transverse continuum free Fock Hamiltonian clauses (a),(b),(c), Permutation sector projections on the n-fold tensor power clause (c), Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases clause (b)).

Proof

technique · direct; identify $F(\mathbb C)$ inside $F(H)$ along the coefficient expansion in the single mode $\varphi$, check the isometry and the sectorially diagonal operators coefficientwise, and evaluate the energy expectation on the mode sector by symmetry of the tensor integrals

Given: The data of the statement and [F1]-[F6].

1.1F1F2algebra

[The powers of φ are orthonormal sector vectors] For n≥0 put Φn:=φ⊗n, with Φ0:=1. By [F2] with u=φ and ∥φ∥=1 one has ∥Φn∥=1 for every n, P+(n)Φn=Φn, and ⟨Φn,Φn⟩=∏i=1n⟨φ,φ⟩=1; for m≠n the pairing ⟨Φm,Φn⟩ vanishes because Φm is supported in the direct-sum coordinate m and Φn in coordinate n, and the inner product of F(H) is the sum of the coordinate pairings by [F1]. Hence (Φn)n∈N is an orthonormal family with Φn∈ran⁡P+(n) for every n.

2.1F1F2algebra

[The isometry] Define Uφ on the finite linear span of (en) by Uφen=Φn and extend by linearity; by step 1.1, ∥Uφψ∥2=∑n∣ψn∣2=∥ψ∥2 for every finite combination, so Uφ is isometric on the dense finite-particle subspace F0(C) of Hilbert direct-sum construction clause (c) and extends uniquely to an isometry Uφ:F(C)→F(H) with the same norm identity for all ψ∈F(C) (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces, Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family). Its range is the closed linear span of (Φn), since an isometry maps the closed span of an orthonormal family onto the closed span of its image and the image family is orthonormal; this proves (a).

2.2F2F4F5step 1.1algebra

[Ladder transfer on the exact domains] Write ψ=∑nψnen. By [F4] and [F5], ψ∈D(A+(1)) exactly when ∑n(n+1)∣ψn∣2<∞, while ψ∈D(A−(1)) exactly when ∑n(n+1)∣ψn+1∣2=∑m≥1m∣ψm∣2<∞. For the unit mode φ, [F2] gives P+(n+1)(φ⊗ψnΦn)=ψnΦn+1 and [F4] gives Ψφ(n)(ψn+1Φn+1)=ψn+1Φn. Therefore the two exact domain sums for Uφψ equal the respective scalar sums, without any extra weighted output assumption. On these domains, (A+(φ)Uφψ)n=nψn−1Φn=(UφA+(1)ψ)n for n≥1, with zero vacuum coordinate, and (A−(φ)Uφψ)n=n+1ψn+1Φn=(UφA−(1)ψ)n. This proves (c), including its coherent-vector specialization by [F5].

2.3F3F6step 1.1algebra

[Energy expectation] Assume now H=h and φ unit with εφ∈h; write εˉ:=⟨εφ,φ⟩. For fixed n, Φn=φ⊗n∈ran⁡P+(n) and, by [F6], TnΦn=εnΦn; using the Euclidean identification and the symmetry of εn under the permutation action, the iterated L2 integral gives ⟨TnΦn,Φn⟩=∫(R3)n(∑i=1nε(ki))∏i=1n∥φ(ki)∥C32 d3k1⋯d3kn=n εˉ ∥φ∥2(n−1)=n εˉ, each of the n summands contributing the same product εˉ∥φ∥2(n−1) by Tonelli's theorem, the product measure being σ-finite and the integrand nonnegative; this is finite because εφ∈L2 and φ∈L2 give ∫ε∥φ∥2≤∥εφ∥ ∥φ∥<∞. The actual domain is also justified: by the triangle inequality on the product space, ∥TnΦn∥≤n∥εφ∥, since each factor multiplier has that norm and all other factors have norm one. Hence ∑n∣ψn∣2∥TnΦn∥2≤∥εφ∥2∑nn2∣ψn∣2<∞, so Uφψ∈D(Hf) and its finite-sector truncations converge in the graph norm: the squared graph-tail norms are the tails of these two convergent nonnegative series. Therefore for a finite combination the sector-diagonal form of Hf (clause (c) of [F6]) gives ⟨HfUφψ,Uφψ⟩=∑n∣ψn∣2 nεˉ; the general case ∑nn2∣ψn∣2<∞ follows by approximation with truncations in the graph norm of Hf (both sides are continuous under this approximation, the left because Hf is closed and self-adjoint, the right by dominated convergence). This proves the first two displays of (d).

3.1F1F3step 2.1algebra

[Sector and number transfer] For ψ=∑mψmem in the dense span and fixed n, ΠnUφψ=ψnΦn=Uφ(ψnen)=UφΠn′ψ; since both sides are bounded in ψ and the span is dense, the identity extends to all ψ∈F(C), and the norm identity is step 2.1. For ψ∈F(C) the coefficient vector of Uφψ is again (ψn), so ∑nn2∥(Uφψ)n∥2=∑nn2∣ψn∣2: Uφψ∈D(N) exactly when ψ∈D(N′), and then (NUφψ)n=nψnΦn=(UφN′ψ)n for every n by [F3]. This proves (b).

4.1F6step 1.1algebra∎

[Spectral second moment and literal square domain] For φ∈D(ε), expand εn2=∑iε(ki)2+∑i≠jε(ki)ε(kj) and integrate against ∏i∥φ(ki)∥2. Tonelli gives ∥TnΦn∥2=n∥εφ∥2+n(n−1)εˉ2, finite by the stated domain and Cauchy-Schwarz. This is the spectral second moment and requires no Tn2Φn. If φ∈D(ε2), the inequality (∑i=1nε(ki))4≤n3∑iε(ki)4 gives ∥Tn2Φn∥2≤n4∥ε2φ∥2<∞, so Φn∈D(Tn2); self-adjointness then gives ⟨Tn2Φn,Φn⟩=∥TnΦn∥2, exactly the original operator-square display. The vacuum has energy zero and all its moments vanish, handled separately when n=0.

Remarks

  • Scope. The lemma is a coefficientwise statement about an orthonormal family in a Fock space; it does not assert that a fixed mode is an energy eigenstate. In fact the energy transfer is only an expectation statement: Hf does not preserve the span of the φ⊗n unless εφ is a multiple of φ, which for the transverse continuum fails for every nonzero φ by Restricted momentum and energy multipliers of the transverse one-photon space clause (c).
  • Choice hypotheses. The transverse free-field Fock supplier assumes Dependent Choice; the stated Axiom of Choice supplies it by AC implies DC implies countable choice. The result also carries the cited Countable Choice hypothesis; no other choice is introduced.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources