Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quantum doubles, Hecke quotients and physical braid operators

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Braided line representation data

Definition

Let k be a field and let C be a locally finite k-linear abelian rigid monoidal category whose tensor product is k-bilinear. For each object Y write End⁡C(Y):=Hom⁡C(Y,Y). The tensor unit 1 is assumed to satisfy End⁡C(1)≅k as k-algebras. Here rigid means every object has left and right duals with evaluation and coevaluation maps satisfying the two snake identities. Equip C with a braiding cY,Z:Y⊗Z→Z⊗Y, natural in Y,Z, satisfying the two hexagon identities with the associator α. Fix X∈C, put P0(X)=1, P1(X)=X, and recursively put Pm+1(X)=Pm(X)⊗X.

For any object Y, let Aut⁡C(Y) be the group under composition of those g∈End⁡C(Y) for which some h∈End⁡C(Y) satisfies g∘h=h∘g=id⁡Y.

For each n≥2 and 1≤i<n, let Qn,i(X) be the parenthesized product (Pi−1(X)⊗(X⊗X))⊗Pn−i−1(X), with the unit factors at either end removed by the fixed unitors when an exponent is zero. Choose a canonical rebracketing isomorphism ρn,i:Pn(X)→Qn,i(X) made from associators, unitors, and their inverses, without permuting the ordered tensor factors. Define

BiX:=ρn,i−1∘(id⁡Pi−1(X)⊗cX,X⊗id⁡Pn−i−1(X))∘ρn,i∈End⁡C(Pn(X)).

The family BiX is independent of the chosen canonical rebracketing path and determines a homomorphism ϱn:Bn→Aut⁡C(Pn(X)), where Bn is the braid group with positive generator σi sent to BiX. These are exact algebraic morphisms.

Physical interpretation boundary. A physical adiabatic-exchange interpretation needs additional model data; the categorical data below supply none of the analytic or physical data. Here H is a complete complex inner-product space, with inner product linear in its first variable. For each dimensionless s∈[0,1], let K(s):D⊆H→H be self-adjoint on a specified common dense domain D. For a densely defined operator K, its adjoint K∗ is defined by y∈D(K∗) exactly when some z∈H satisfies ⟨Kx,y⟩=⟨x,z⟩ for every x∈D(K), with K∗y=z; self-adjoint means D(K∗)=D and K∗x=Kx there. The spectrum σ(K) is the set of λ∈C for which K−λI has no bounded, everywhere-defined inverse.

For each s, supply a projection-valued measure Es on the Borel subsets of R: each Es(A) is an orthogonal projection, Es(R)=I, and for pairwise disjoint Borel sets Aj, Es(⋃jAj)x=∑jEs(Aj)x with norm convergence for every x∈H. Require Es to represent K(s) as its spectral integral: with μs,x(A):=⟨Es(A)x,x⟩, the domain is D={x∈H:∫Rλ2 dμs,x(λ)<∞} and K(s)x=∫Rλ dEs(λ)x there. For a Borel set Ω⊆R, define its spectral projection by P(s):=Es(Ω). Require ran⁡P(s) to be finite-dimensional and dist⁡(Ω,σ(K(s))∖Ω)≥γ>0 uniformly in s, where dist⁡(A,B):=inf⁡{∣a−b∣:a∈A, b∈B} and inf⁡∅:=+∞.

Require s↦P(s) to be continuously differentiable in operator norm. Its ranges then form a finite-rank Hermitian vector bundle E→[0,1], meaning the locally trivial bundle with fiber Es:=ran⁡P(s) and the inner product inherited from H. A Hermitian connection on E is a complex-linear covariant derivative ∇s on continuously differentiable sections satisfying ∇s(fψ)=f′ψ+f∇sψ and ∂s⟨ψ,ϕ⟩=⟨∇sψ,ϕ⟩+⟨ψ,∇sϕ⟩. Its parallel transport W(s,0):E0→Es is the map obtained by solving ∇sψ(s)=0 along the interval.

Supply a family of unitary operators Uε(s,0):H→H, where unitary means surjective and inner-product-preserving, with Uε(0,0)=I and Uε(s,0)D⊆D. Require for each x∈D that s↦Uε(s,0)x is differentiable in Hilbert norm and satisfies iε∂sUε(s,0)x=K(s)Uε(s,0)x; all conditions ensuring this propagator exists are part of the model data. Here ε>0 is an energy scale and the slow-evolution regime means ε↓0. A linear operator A on H is bounded when sup⁡∥x∥≤1∥Ax∥<∞; this supremum is its operator norm ∥A∥op. The added data must include a bound r(ε)→0 such that

sup⁡s∈[0,1]∥Uε(s,0)P(0)−ιsW(s,0)P(0)∥op≤r(ε),

where ιs:Es↪H is inclusion. In a physical realization, K(s), γ, and ε have the model's energy units; no numerical values are fixed here. The categorical data do not assert an experimental realization.

Diagrammatic convention

The first diagram is a composition diagram: arrows run from source to target, and the outer path is the definition BiX=ρn,i−1Ciρn,i, where Ci is the local tensor of cX,X with spectator identities. The label ρn,i(α) means a finite composite of associators and unitors. In the second diagram time/order points upward; the positive crossing is, by definition, cX,X, with the right input strand passing over the left. Both drawings omit spectator strands. They record conventions only; the proof uses morphism composition and coherence, not the diagrams.

Pn(X)Qn;i(X)Qn;i(X)Pn(X)½n;i(®)BXiCi½n;i(®)¡1
diagram failed to render:
\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline=(current bounding box.center),>=stealth,thick]
  \draw (0,0) .. controls (0,1.1) and (1.4,1.9) .. (1.4,3);
  \draw[white,line width=5pt] (1.4,0) .. controls (1.4,1.1) and (0,1.9) .. (0,3);
  \draw (1.4,0) .. controls (1.4,1.1) and (0,1.9) .. (0,3);
  \node at (0, -0.35) {$X$}; \node at (1.4, -0.35) {$X$};
  \node at (0, 3.3) {$X$}; \node at (1.4, 3.3) {$X$};
  \node at (0.7,1.5) {$c_{X,X}$};
  \draw[->] (2.1,0.2) -- (2.1,2.8) node[midway,right] {$\text{time}$};
\end{tikzpicture}

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The category data, associator, unitors, braiding, object X, integer n≥2, and adjacent index i.

[F1]

Tensor and multitensor categories: a tensor category is a locally finite k-linear abelian rigid monoidal category, with bilinear tensor product and End⁡(1)≅k.

[F2]

Braiding: cY,Z:Y⊗Z→Z⊗Y is a natural isomorphism satisfying the two hexagon identities with the associator.

[F3]

Braided coherence is controlled by underlying braids: two formal canonical composites on X⊗n built from associators, unitors, braidings, and their inverses are equal when they have the same underlying braid.

[F4]

The braid group by Artin presentation: Bn has generators σ1,…,σn−1, adjacent braid relations, and far commutation relations.

[F5]

Von Dyck's theorem: maps of generators that satisfy the relators extend uniquely from a presented group: a generator assignment satisfying all relators of a presented group extends uniquely to a group homomorphism.

[F6]

Finite double and its canonical quasitriangular structure: for finite-dimensional H with bijective antipode, the fixed order is D(H)=H∗op⊗H; the canonical R satisfies RΔD(d)=ΔDop(d)R, and τ∘R is the left-module Yetter–Drinfeld braiding in the stated convention.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3givenconstruct

By the canonical rebracketing property in [F3], there is a canonical isomorphism ρn,i:Pn(X)→Qn,i(X) built from the associators and unitors; every factor is invertible, so the composite is invertible. The map id⁡⊗cX,X⊗id⁡ is an endomorphism of Qn,i(X), because cX,X is an isomorphism from X⊗X to the same ordered object X⊗X. Conjugating gives the displayed endomorphism BiX of Pn(X).

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

If ρn,i and ρn,i′ are two such canonical rebracketings, then ρn,i′ρn,i−1 has trivial underlying braid. Inserting the same local cX,X gives formal composites with underlying braid σi; [F3] makes the resulting endomorphisms equal. Thus BiX is independent of the rebracketing path.

3.1F3F4step 2.1algebra

The two composites BiXBi+1XBiX and Bi+1XBiXBi+1X have underlying braid words σiσi+1σi and σi+1σiσi+1, equal in Bn; operators with ∣i−j∣>1 have the equal underlying words σiσj=σjσi. By [F3] the corresponding morphisms are equal.

4.1F2F4F5step 1.1step 3.1construct

Each BiX is invertible by step 1.1 and [F2]. The relations in step 3.1 therefore satisfy the Artin presentation [F4], and [F5] gives the unique homomorphism ϱn:Bn→Aut⁡C(Pn(X)) with ϱn(σi)=BiX.

5.1F6given∎

In the Hopf-module convention, the coproduct supplies the tensor-product module action, while [F6]'s intertwining identity RΔD(d)=ΔDop(d)R makes τ∘R the exchange braiding; [F6] fixes the factor order H∗op⊗H. This supplies the category braiding only when the relevant module objects and category structure are supplied. No semisimplicity, unitarity, modularity, or physical realization follows from [F6] alone.

Remarks

The finite-double result is used only at its inspected interface. The definition does not assert that an arbitrary quasitriangular Hopf algebra is semisimple or unitary, that it defines a modular tensor category, or that its modules are realized by an experiment.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Vacuum projectors obey the reverse adjacent Temperley–Lieb relation

Statement

Let C be a unitary spherical fusion category over C. Let a,b,c be simple objects, with a self-dual, Naa1=1, and supply the normalized vacuum-channel self-duality datum with sign κa∈{+1,−1} and positive spherical dimension da. For n≥3, take the fixed-boundary repeated-a path space Ha,n;b,c=Hom⁡C(c,Tn) with T0=b and Tj+1=Tj⊗a, as in Fixed-boundary anyonic fusion-path space. Let Pi=Pi,1 be the orthogonal local vacuum-channel projectors and put Ui=δaPi, where δa=κada. Then, for every 1≤i≤n−2,

Ui+1UiUi+1=Ui+1.

This supplies the reverse adjacent relation for the repeated-charge Temperley–Lieb family.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The unitary spherical fusion category, self-dual charge a, normalized vacuum-channel cup/cap datum, fixed-boundary path space, and indices 1≤i≤n−2.

[F1]

Fixed-boundary anyonic fusion-path space: Ha,n;b,c=Hom⁡(c,b⊗a⊗n) has split-tree bases indexed by intermediate simple charges and every vertex multiplicity coordinate.

[F2]

Local anyonic channel projector: Pi,s=Fi−1ΠsFi, where Fi is the typed F-move coordinate matrix and Πs retains all multiplicity coordinates of pair output s.

[F3]

F-symbol as a recoupling matrix: for the three-site associator, the coefficient Ff,e is the target right-tree coordinate of the left-tree basis map after applying the inverse associator; the tree bases are orthonormal.

[F4]

Local channel projections are orthogonal idempotents: in a unitary fusion category with orthonormal split-tree bases, each local channel projector is an orthogonal projection.

[F5]

Frobenius–Schur sign in a normalized anyonic vacuum channel: da>0, κa∈{+1,−1}, and the normalized duality maps are coev⁡=da v and ev⁡=κada v†.

[F6]

The vacuum F-coefficient records the Frobenius–Schur sign: in the stated orthonormal vacuum gauge, (Faaaa)1,1=κa/da and δa=κada.

[F7]

Canonical F-move paths give the same channel operator: canonical F-move paths between the same fixed parenthesizations give the same local channel operator.

[F8]

Unitary fusion paths form an orthonormal Hilbert basis: the split Hom inner product on the path space is linear in its first variable and satisfies g†f=⟨f,g⟩id⁡c.

Proof

Given: The category and path data in the Statement, with the split-tree inner products and normalized vacuum gauge from [F2]–[F6].

1.1F1F2F4givenconstruct

Choose a parenthesization grouping the three sites ai,ai+1,ai+2 and decompose the split-tree basis by their simple total charge y and the spectator labels. If the first pair fuses to 1, then its fusion with the third a has total charge y=1⊗a≅a; the same is true if the last pair fuses to 1. On the y=a block each vacuum-channel subspace has dimension Naa1N1aa=1, since Naa1=1 and the tensor unit acts as the identity. On every y≇a block both projectors vanish. Each fixed spectator label and multiplicity coordinate gives a copy of this local block, where Pi and Pi+1 act as rank-one orthogonal projections onto unit vectors e and f, by [F4].

2.1F3F5F6step 1.1algebra

By the F-symbol coordinate convention in [F3], the vacuum-to-vacuum entry of the three-site F-move is the coordinate of one unit basis vector in the other tree basis. Therefore ∣⟨e,f⟩∣=∣(Faaaa)1,1∣=∣κa/da∣=1/da by [F5] and [F6], so ∣⟨e,f⟩∣2=da−2.

3.1F4F7F8step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For unit vectors e,f, the linear-first convention in [F8] gives the rank-one projections Pex=⟨x,e⟩e and Pfx=⟨x,f⟩f. Hence PfPePfx=⟨x,f⟩⟨f,e⟩⟨e,f⟩f=∣⟨e,f⟩∣2Pfx. Therefore Pi+1PiPi+1=da−2Pi+1 on each y=a spectator copy; on every other block both sides are zero. Tensoring with the spectator identities and transporting to the fixed path parenthesization preserves the relation by [F7].

4.1F5F6step 3.1algebra∎

Since δa=κada and κa2=1, δa2=da2. Thus Ui+1UiUi+1=δa3Pi+1PiPi+1=δa3da−2Pi+1=δaPi+1=Ui+1. The sign is retained in the final equality.

Remarks

The published anyonic projector proposition supplies the square relation, the left-oriented adjacent relation, and distant commutation, but its Statement does not list this reverse adjacent relation. The rank-one calculation above proves that missing direction from the same normalized F-coefficient, so the Hecke braid theorem can be applied to the actual anyonic family without assuming the omitted relation.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Temperley–Lieb projectors give a Hecke braid representation

Statement

For a complex vector space V, let End⁡C(V) be its set of complex-linear endomorphisms, with composition as multiplication, and define GL⁡(V) to be the group of bijective elements of End⁡C(V). A complex Hilbert space is a complete complex inner-product space; here the inner product is linear in its first variable and ∥x∥:=⟨x,x⟩. A linear operator A:V→V on such a space is bounded if some C<∞ satisfies ∥Ax∥≤C∥x∥ for every x∈V, self-adjoint if ⟨Ax,y⟩=⟨x,Ay⟩ for all x,y∈V, and unitary if it is surjective and preserves the inner product. In the formulas below, IV denotes the identity map of V.

Let n≥2, let V be a complex vector space, and let U1,…,Un−1∈End⁡C(V). Suppose δ∈C, q∈C×, and δ=q+q−1, and assume

Ui2=δUi(1≤i<n),UiUi+1Ui=Ui,Ui+1UiUi+1=Ui+1(1≤i≤n−2),UiUj=UjUi(∣i−j∣>1).

Define Bi:=qIV−Ui. Then each Bi is invertible with Bi−1=q−1IV−Ui; the Bi satisfy the Artin braid and far-commutation relations; and

(Bi−qIV)(Bi+q−1IV)=0.

Thus σi↦Bi defines a group homomorphism Bn→GL⁡(V). If Hv(n) is the generic type-A Hecke algebra with (Ti−v)(Ti+1)=0, its scalar specialization Hq2(n) has a unital algebra representation Ti↦qBi. This is the standard Hecke normalization because (qBi−q2IV)(qBi+IV)=0. If V is a complex Hilbert space and each Ui is bounded self-adjoint, then δ∈R and ∣q∣=1 imply that each Bi is unitary. No faithfulness, diagonalizability, or physical realization is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: n≥2, the operator family on V, and q,δ satisfying the hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

Vacuum-channel anyonic projectors satisfy Temperley–Lieb relations: on the repeated-a path space Ui=δaPi with δa=κada; its Statement gives the square relation, UiUi+1Ui=Ui, and distant commutation.

[F2]

Vacuum projectors obey the reverse adjacent Temperley–Lieb relation: on the same path space the omitted reverse relation Ui+1UiUi+1=Ui+1 holds, so [F1] and [F2] supply the complete adjacent Temperley–Lieb relations.

[F3]

The generic type-A Hecke algebra: Hv(n) is presented by generators Ti, the type-A braid and distant-commutation relations, and (Ti−v)(Ti+1)=0; specialization at a unit v=q2 preserves this presentation.

[F4]

The Hecke generators satisfy the Artin relations and are units: the generators of the Hecke tower are units and the standard assignment σi↦Ti defines the braid-group homomorphism into the Hecke unit group.

[F5]

The braid group by Artin presentation: Bn has precisely the adjacent braid and distant-commutation relators displayed in the Statement.

[F6]

Von Dyck's theorem: maps of generators that satisfy the relators extend uniquely from a presented group: a map from the generators of a presented group extends uniquely to a homomorphism when every defining relator maps to the identity.

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

Since Ui2=δUi and δ=q+q−1, (qIV−Ui)(q−1IV−Ui)=IV−(q+q−1)Ui+Ui2=IV. The product in the reverse order is the same polynomial in Ui, so Bi−1=q−1IV−Ui.

1.2givenalgebra

For adjacent i,i+1, expansion and the square and adjacent Temperley–Lieb relations give (qIV−Ui)(qIV−Ui+1)(qIV−Ui)−(qIV−Ui+1)(qIV−Ui)(qIV−Ui+1)=−(q2−qδ+1)(Ui−Ui+1)=0, since qδ=q2+1. Thus the adjacent braid relation holds.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

We have Bi−qIV=−Ui and Bi+q−1IV=δIV−Ui; hence (Bi−qIV)(Bi+q−1IV)=−δUi+Ui2=0.

2.2F5givenstep 1.1algebra

If ∣i−j∣>1, then BiBj−BjBi=UiUj−UjUi=0. Together with step 1.1, the Bi are units satisfying all relators of [F5].

3.1F5F6step 2.2construct

By [F6] applied to [F5] and the assignment σi↦Bi, step 2.2 supplies a unique homomorphism ρn:Bn→GL⁡(V) with ρn(σi)=Bi.

3.2F3step 2.1step 1.2step 2.2algebra

Let T~i:=qBi. They satisfy the braid and distant relations by steps 1.2–2.2, and (T~i−q2IV)(T~i+IV)=q2(Bi−qIV)(Bi+q−1IV)=0. Consequently the generator map from the free unital algebra kills every defining relator of Hq2(n), so its defining ideal lies in the kernel and the map factors through the quotient Hq2(n). This gives the stated unital Hecke-algebra representation.

4.1F3F4step 3.2construct

Apply the coefficient map Z[v±1,z]→C, v↦q2, z↦0, to the Hecke tower in [F4]. By its defining scalar-extension construction and the specialization in [F3], the resulting algebra is Hq2(n); base change carries [F4]'s braid homomorphism to ηn:Bn→Hq2(n)× with ηn(σi)=Ti. Composing with Φn from step 3.2 sends σi to qBi, identifying the chosen normalization against the standard Hecke generator assignment. No Markov trace or link-invariant claim is used.

5.1F1F2givenstep 1.1algebra∎

If V is a complex Hilbert space, Ui is bounded self-adjoint, δ∈R, and ∣q∣=1, then for all x,y∈V self-adjointness and Ui2=δUi give ⟨Bix,Biy⟩=∣q∣2⟨x,y⟩−(q+q‾)⟨x,Uiy⟩+δ⟨x,Uiy⟩=⟨x,y⟩, since q−1=q‾ and δ=q+q−1. Thus Bi preserves the inner product; it is surjective by its inverse in step 1.1, and so it is unitary by the convention in the Statement. For the repeated-a anyonic path family, [F1] and [F2] supply both adjacent relations, the square relation, and distant commutation with the signed δa=κada; whenever q+q−1=δa, it therefore meets the operator hypotheses of this theorem. No sign is replaced by +1.

Remarks

The finite-dimensional anyonic path-space operators are one algebraic source of the Ui. The conclusion is conditional on their displayed relations and signed loop parameter. It does not identify these operators with an experimentally realized adiabatic exchange.

PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Coxeter quotient at the Hecke specialization q=1

Statement

Let n≥2, V be a complex vector space, Ui∈End⁡C(V), δ∈C, and q∈C× satisfy δ=q+q−1 and

Ui2=δUi,UiUi+1Ui=Ui,Ui+1UiUi+1=Ui+1,UiUj=UjUi(∣i−j∣>1).

Put Bi=qIV−Ui, and let ρn:Bn→GL⁡(V) be the homomorphism ρn(σi)=Bi from the preceding Temperley–Lieb–Hecke construction. At q=1 one has δ=2 and Bi=IV−Ui. These operators satisfy Bi2=IV, so ρn factors through the canonical quotient πn:Bn→Sn as a representation Sn→GL⁡(V). The q=1 Hecke generator relations are then the type-A Coxeter relations. For general q, the roots of the quadratic relation are q and −q−1; they coincide when q2=−1, and no diagonalizability is asserted. Involutivity is not imposed by the Hecke relation and need not hold.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The operator family, parameter relation, and braid-group representation from Temperley–Lieb projectors give a Hecke braid representation.

[F1]

Temperley–Lieb projectors give a Hecke braid representation: the Bi satisfy the adjacent braid and distant-commutation relations and (Bi−qIV)(Bi+q−1IV)=0.

[F2]

The generic type-A Hecke algebra: the specialized generators have quadratic relation (Ti−v)(Ti+1)=0, together with type-A braid and distant-commutation relations.

[F3]

The symmetric group has the Coxeter presentation: the adjacent transpositions si present Sn with relators si2=1, the adjacent braid relations, and distant commutation.

[F4]

The braid group surjects onto the symmetric group: the canonical quotient sends σi↦si (in the library's transported indexing convention).

[F5]

Von Dyck's theorem: maps of generators that satisfy the relators extend uniquely from a presented group: a generator assignment satisfying all presentation relators extends uniquely to a homomorphism.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

At q=1, the parameter relation gives δ=2. For every i, Bi2=(IV−Ui)2=IV−2Ui+Ui2=IV, using Ui2=2Ui from [F1].

1.2F1algebra

The general quadratic in [F1] factors as (Bi−qIV)(Bi+q−1IV)=0, whose scalar roots are q and −q−1; equality of those roots is equivalent to q2=−1. This polynomial relation alone asserts no diagonalization.

2.1F1F3F5step 1.1construct

By [F1], the Bi also satisfy the adjacent braid and distant-commutation relators. Along with step 1.1, these are exactly the Coxeter relators in [F3], so [F5] gives a homomorphism ρ~n:Sn→GL⁡(V) with ρ~n(si)=Bi.

3.1F1F4step 2.1algebra

The composite ρ~n∘πn, with πn from [F4], and the braid representation ρn from [F1] agree on every generator σi, since both send it to Bi. The generators determine a homomorphism from Bn, so ρn=ρ~n∘πn.

3.2F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The Hecke representation of the preceding theorem sends Ti to qBi, which equals Bi at q=1. The generic relation (Ti−v)(Ti+1)=0 in [F2] then becomes Ti2=IV; together with the braid and distant relations these are exactly the Coxeter generator relations in [F3]. Thus the specialized Hecke generators act by the same generator assignment as ρ~n.

4.1F1algebra∎

To see that involutivity is not forced for general q, take V=C, Ui=0 for every i, q=2, and δ=5/2. All Temperley–Lieb relations hold, while Bi=2IV and Bi2=4IV≠IV.

Remarks

At q=1 the Coxeter quotient is obtained by adding involutions to the braid presentation. At general q, the representation remains a braid/Hecke representation; no symmetric-group action follows unless the involution relations are separately verified.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources