Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite tensor density, observable and measurement language — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These mathematical counterexamples establish three separate limits on ensemble language: an exact mean-energy band can be empty at zero width; agreement of entropy density does not force a one-site state to converge; and equality of every proper fixed-size marginal does not force global trace-norm convergence. Their states and measurements are finite matrix constructions, not claims about laboratory preparations or empirical frequencies.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A centered exact band can be empty

Statement

There are two-level additive data and a canonical mean for which every zero-width band centered at that mean is empty. Consequently a normalized uniform band density is not defined for that choice.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite additive ensemble convention in Additive spectral Hamiltonian and normalized ensembles.

[F1]

Additive spectral Hamiltonian and normalized ensembles: the second canonical probability is p2=e−βe2/(e−βe1+e−βe2) and the N-site energy label with m occurrences of level e2 has energy me2+(N−m)e1.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Take q=2, e1=0, e2=ϵ>0, and choose finite β>0 with βϵ=log⁡2. By [F1], p2=e−βϵ1+e−βϵ=11+2=2−1. This number is irrational: if 2 were rational, writing it as a reduced fraction a/b gives a2=2b2, so a is even, then b is even, contradicting reduction. Hence p2 is irrational.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

For any integer N≥1, an N-site label has energy mϵ for some integer m, whereas the canonical mean is NE=Nϵp2. The zero-width band condition forces mϵ=Nϵp2, hence m=Np2. Since p2 is irrational, Np2 is not an integer. Thus no label satisfies the condition, ΓN=∅, and ΠN/∣ΓN∣ is undefined. This shows why a nonemptiness or positive width hypothesis cannot be omitted.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Entropy density agreement does not force local state agreement

Statement

For a finite Hermitian matrix D, write ∥D∥1 for its trace norm: the sum of the absolute values of its eigenvalues, counted with multiplicity.

For the canonical densities γN of Additive spectral Hamiltonian and normalized ensembles with q=2, e1=e2=0 and any fixed finite β∈R, there are finite density sequences whose dimensionless entropy per site has the same limit as γN while their one-site reduced states remain separated from its one-site marginal by a fixed trace norm.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Dimensionless entropy of a finite density matrix: a density with positive eigenvalues λi has entropy −∑iλilog⁡λi.

[F2]

Subsystem expectations and reduced finite tensor densities: the one-site reduction is the partial trace over all remaining factors.

[F3]

Additive spectral Hamiltonian and normalized ensembles: for the stated zero levels, p1=p2=1/2, ZN=2N, and the canonical density is γN=(I/2)⊗N.

Proof

1.1givenF1F3algebra

On V=C2, the supplier [F3] identifies the stated canonical one-site density as γ=I/2 and its N-site density as γN=(I/2)⊗N. For each N≥1, set γN=(I/2)⊗N and τN=∣1⟩⟨1∣⊗(I/2)⊗(N−1). Both are positive of trace one, so are finite tensor densities. Their positive eigenvalues are respectively 2−N with multiplicity 2N and 2−(N−1) with multiplicity 2N−1. By [F1], sN(γN)=Nlog⁡2 and sN(τN)=(N−1)log⁡2; therefore ∣sN(τN)−sN(γN)∣/N=(log⁡2)/N→0.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra∎

By [F2], the one-site reductions are γ and ∣1⟩⟨1∣. Their difference in the ordered basis is diag⁡(1/2,−1/2), whose eigenvalues have absolute sum one. Thus ∥τN,1−γ∥1=1 for every N. Entropy-density agreement alone therefore does not imply local trace-norm convergence.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Fixed marginals do not determine global trace-norm convergence

Statement

For a finite Hermitian matrix D, write ∥D∥1 for its trace norm: the sum of the absolute values of its eigenvalues, counted with multiplicity.

For every N≥2 there are diagonal densities on N binary registers whose every proper fixed-size marginal equals the corresponding maximally mixed marginal, while their global trace-norm distance remains one. A global two-outcome POVM has first-effect trace pairings differing by 1/2.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Subsystem expectations and reduced finite tensor densities: reduced density entries are obtained by summing over the traced product labels.

[F2]

Finite tensor density, observable and measurement language: a finite POVM is a family of positive matrices summing to the identity.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

For N≥2, index each binary factor's ordered basis by {0,1}; a string x=(x1,…,xN) has even parity when ∑jxj is even. Let πN be the diagonal matrix with entry 2−(N−1) on even strings and zero on odd strings, and let γN=I/2N. There are 2N−1 even strings: the first N−1 bits can be arbitrary and the last bit is uniquely determined. Thus both matrices are nonnegative of trace one. Fix 0≤k<N coordinates and their values. Among the N−k≥1 unassigned coordinates, exactly half of the 2N−k completions have the required parity, namely 2N−k−1. Summing by [F1], the marginal diagonal entry of each fixed k-bit string is 2N−k−1/2N−1=2−k; all off-diagonal entries vanish. Thus (πN)k=I/2k=(γN)k for every proper block.

2.1step 1.1algebra

On an even string the diagonal difference πN−γN is 2−(N−1)−2−N=2−N; on an odd string it is −2−N. There are 2N strings in total, so the absolute eigenvalues sum to 2N2−N=1. Therefore ∥πN−γN∥1=1 for every N.

3.1givenF2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Let Peven be the diagonal matrix with entry one on even strings and zero on odd strings. Both Peven and I−Peven are nonnegative and sum to I, so they form a two-outcome POVM by [F2]. Their first-effect trace pairings are Tr⁡(πNPeven)=1 and Tr⁡(γNPeven)=1/2, a gap of 1/2. Hence equality of all proper local marginals does not entail global trace-norm convergence or equality of global POVM trace pairings. This is a mathematical separation; no physical probability interpretation is adopted.

Sources