Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A smooth spacelike reference section is a bounded rapidity graph

Statement

In the invariant boost tube, let Σ be a smooth spacelike hypersurface through S whose unit normal to S within Σ, pointing into its exterior side, has positive e1 component in the invariant orthonormal normal frame (e0,e1). This allows a nonzero timelike component of that normal and does not require the circle action to preserve Σ. After shrinking, its exterior collar has the form τ=a(r,y) for 0<r<r0, y∈S, with a smooth down to r=0 and uniformly bounded, say ∣a∣≤A. Suppose T=K−ΩZ is future transverse to this collar, meaning its lapse relative to the future unit normal is positive, and K is future timelike there. Then 1+ΩZSa>0 on the graph. Consequently for any formal (r,τ,y), the function t↦τ+t−a(r,ψ−Ωty) is strictly increasing and has exactly one zero; that zero satisfies ∣τ+t∣≤A.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A spacelike hypersurface has a future unit normal, and positive lapse means a positive normal component of the field. Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data

[F2]

The boost and circle coordinates are those of the preceding lemma. In particular, S is a nonempty compact two-sphere, κ>0, K=∂τ, Z=ZS, T=∂τ−ΩZS, and ψ is the circle action on S. Circle-invariant normal coordinates linearize a bifurcate Killing boost

[F3]

Smooth inverse and parameter-dependent implicit function theorems apply in charts. The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds The parametrized implicit function theorem with Cᵏ regularity

[F4]

A continuous function on a closed bounded interval is Riemann integrable. For a continuous function differentiable in the interior, Newton–Leibniz identifies its endpoint difference with the integral of a Riemann-integrable extension of its derivative. A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative

[F5]

A continuous parameter derivative on a compact rectangle can be passed through its Riemann integral, including as a one-sided derivative at an endpoint. Integrals of two integrable functions on [0,1] differ by at most their uniform error. Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral Uniformly close integrable functions have integrals differing by at most the interval length times their uniform error

[F6]

A continuous real function on a nonempty compact metric space attains its extrema. An open neighborhood of a compact factor times a point contains a product neighborhood of that slice. Closed Euclidean intervals are compact. For the metric theorem, fix an identification ι:S→S2 and use the metric d(y,z)=∣ι(y)−ι(z)∣, which induces the topology of S. A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value Tube lemma: if K is compact and an open N ⊆ X × Z contains K × {z₀}, then N contains K × W for some open W ∋ z₀ Heine-Borel in ℝⁿ: with the Euclidean metric a subset of ℝⁿ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line

[F7]

Proof

Given: The stated data and complete hypotheses.

Goal: Establish the conclusions on the domains and parameter ranges specified.

1.1F1F2F3F4F5F6

Project the normal tube to (v,y). At S its kernel is the timelike line spanned by e0, which is transverse to the spacelike tangent plane of Σ. Thus [F3] supplies local graphs u=w(v,y) with w(0,y)=0; local uniqueness makes them agree on overlaps after shrinking. Write the exterior-pointing unit normal to S within Σ as ν=βe0+αe1. The stated side hypothesis gives α>0, while unit length gives α2−β2=1. Thus the exterior side corresponds to increasing v, and ∂vw(0,y)=β/α has absolute value less than one; no equality ν=e1 is used. Compactness of S and the product-neighborhood assertion in [F6] give a common exterior graph collar 0≤v<ε. Define q(v,y)=∫01∂vw(tv,y) dt. The integrand is smooth in each chart, and [F4], applied to t↦w(tv,y), gives w(v,y)=vq(v,y), including at v=0; hence q(0,y)=∂vw(0,y). To check joint smoothness, differentiate successively in the chart variables (v,y) using [F5] on closed coordinate intervals. Every resulting derivative is the integral of the corresponding continuous derivative of the integrand. These integrals are jointly continuous: for any such integrand H and fixed parameter p0, the open set ∣H(t,p)−H(t,p0)∣<η contains [0,1]×{p0}, so [F6] gives a neighborhood of p0 where the inequality holds uniformly in t; the integral-error bound in [F5] then gives continuity. This also proves smoothness up to v=0 using its one-sided derivatives (or a local smooth extension of the graph there).

2.1F2F3F6F7step 1.1

Apply [F6] on S to obtain m=max⁡y∣q(0,y)∣<1, and choose m<θ<1. The open set ∣q(v,y)∣<θ contains {0}×S, so the tube lemma in [F6] gives this bound on a common smaller collar. Put R(v,y)=v1−q(v,y)2. Then ∂vR(0,y)=1−q(0,y)2≥1−m2>0. Continuity and the same tube lemma allow a further shrinking with ∂vR>c=121−m2 throughout. Fix 0<ε1<ε within that collar. By [F7], R(ε1,y)>cε1 and v↦R(v,y) is strictly increasing; the intermediate value theorem gives a unique inverse v=b(r,y) for 0≤r<r0=cε1. The inverses are smooth by [F3], including at zero, and their uniqueness makes the chartwise inverses agree. Substituting into [F2]'s boost coordinates gives a(r,y)=κ−1arctanh⁡q(b(r,y),y). It is smooth down to zero, and ∣a∣≤A=κ−1arctanh⁡θ, so the entire exterior collar has the asserted bounded-rapidity graph form.

3.1F1F2F7step 2.1∎

On the spacelike graph, the defining function f=τ−a(r,y) has df(K)=1 and timelike normal covector df. If n is its future unit normal, write df=λg(n,⋅) there. Since K is future timelike, g(n,K)<0, so λ<0. The positive lapse N=−g(T,n)>0 from [F1] therefore gives df(T)=−λN=1+ΩZSa>0. For any fixed formal (r,τ,y) with 0<r<r0, set h(t)=τ+t−a(r,ψ−Ωty). The circle action in [F2] is defined for all real t, and h′(t)=1+ΩZSa(r,ψ−Ωty)>0, using the graph inequality at that base point. Thus [F7] applied on every finite interval proves strict increase. Step 2.1 gives ∣h(t)−(τ+t)∣≤A, so h(−τ−A−1)≤−1 and h(−τ+A+1)≥1. The intermediate value theorem in [F7] gives a zero between these endpoints, strict increase gives uniqueness, and at the zero τ+t=a(r,ψ−Ωty) gives ∣τ+t∣≤A.

Depends on

Used by · 7

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.