Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Homology Axioms Degree and Classical Applications — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Compute sphere degrees through oriented cycles and local multiplicities, including polynomial maps at infinity. The counterexamples distinguish degree zero from constancy, reduced from unreduced degree in dimension zero, and finite from arbitrary additivity in homology uniqueness.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Degree of the circle power map

Example

For every dZ, the continuous map pd:S1S1, pd(z)=zd, has degree d when both circles have their counterclockwise orientations. This includes d=0 and negative exponents.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

Let f:SnSn be continuous, n1, with source and target orientations fixed. If f1(y) is finite, then deg(f)=xf1(y)degxf. The sum over an empty fibre is 0. (Global sphere degree is the sum of local degrees)

[F2]

On SnRn+1 for n1, the identity, a constant map, any single coordinate reflection, and the antipodal map have degrees 1, 0, 1, and (1)n+1 respectively. (Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps)

Verification

1.1

If d>0, the fibre of 1 consists of the d roots e2πik/d, 0k<d. In positively oriented angular coordinates centered at such a point and at 1, the local map is tdt. The homotopy t((1s)d+s)t, 0s1, never sends a nonzero sufficiently small t to zero, so it preserves the local pair and identifies the local action with that of the identity. Each local degree is therefore +1, and the finite-fibre formula gives degpd=d.

F1F2construct
2.1

If d=m<0, the same m-point fibre has angular formula tmt. Homotoping its positive factor m to 1 leaves the reflection tt. Complex conjugation is a coordinate reflection on S1, of degree 1; its singleton fibre and the local-sum formula give local sign 1. Thus degpm=m. For d=0, p0=1 is constant and has degree zero. In particular p1 is the identity.

F1F2step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Degree of a coordinate reflection on a sphere

Example

For n1, a coordinate reflection r:SnSn has degree 1. A reflection-invariant triangulation exhibits this sign by sending its oriented fundamental cycle to its negative.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F2]

For an abstract simplicial complex K and an integer n0, the simplicial chain group Cn(K) is the free abelian group generated by the oriented n-simplices of K, subject to the relation [vπ(0),,vπ(n)]=sgn(π)[v0,,vn] for every permutation π of the vertices of a simplex. For n<0, set Cn(K)=0. The boundary operator n:Cn(K)Cn1(K) is 0=0 in degree 0. For n1, it is defined on an oriented simplex by n[v0,,vn]=i=0n(1)i[v0,,vi^,,vn]. The well-definedness of this formula with respect to the chosen oriented representative is recorded in lem-simplicial-boundary-is-independent-of-oriented-representative through justified_by. (Simplicial chain groups and the boundary operator)

[F3]

For every simplicial complex K, the natural simplicial-to-singular chain map induces Hnsimp(K;G)Hn(K;G) for all n. (Simplicial and singular homology agree)

Verification

1.1

Take a regular (n+1)-simplex in Rn+1 centered at the origin, with vertices v0,,vn+1. Radial projection of its boundary to Sn is a homeomorphism: each ray meets its convex boundary exactly once, and the continuous bijection has compact source and Hausdorff target. The orthogonal symmetry interchanging v0,v1 and fixing the other vertices is reflection across the perpendicular bisector hyperplane. Rotate this configuration so that this hyperplane is the coordinate hyperplane of r; radial projection then commutes with the reflection.

construct
1.2

With the orientation convention of [F2], put c=[v0,,vn+1]=j=0n+1(1)j[v0,,v^j,,vn+1]. Each codimension-two face occurs twice with opposite signs, so c=0. Conversely, cancellation along every common facet forces the coefficients of any top cycle to be a common integer multiple of those of c. There are no (n+1)-simplices in the boundary, so c generates its top simplicial homology and hence its oriented fundamental class under the natural simplicial-to-singular isomorphism [F3].

F2F3algebra
2.1

The vertex transposition τ commutes with the boundary formula. In the filled simplex its action on [v0,,vn+1] is multiplication by 1. Thus τc=τ[v0,,vn+1]=c. Radial projection carries this equality to r[Sn]=[Sn], independently of which sign was chosen for the generator.

F2step 1.1step 1.2
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Degree of the antipodal map in low dimensions

Example

The antipodal maps on S1,S2,S3 have degrees +1,1,+1, respectively. Of these three spheres, exactly S1 and S3 admit a continuous nowhere-zero tangent vector field.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

On SnRn+1 for n1, the identity, a constant map, any single coordinate reflection, and the antipodal map have degrees 1, 0, 1, and (1)n+1 respectively. (Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps)

[F2]

For every integer n1, Sn admits a continuous nowhere-zero tangent vector field if and only if n is odd. (A sphere has a nowhere zero tangent vector field iff its dimension is odd)

Verification

1.1

In Rn+1, negating all coordinates is the composite of its n+1 coordinate reflections. The antipodal formula in [F1] gives (1)2=+1 on S1, (1)3=1 on S2, and (1)4=+1 on S3.

F1algebra
2.1

By [F2], the odd dimensions 1 and 3 permit such a field and dimension 2 does not. Concretely, identify R2=C and R4=C2 and set v(z)=iz. It has norm 1 on the sphere and real inner product Rezjizj=0 with z, so is tangent and nowhere zero.

F2construct
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Local degrees of a polynomial map on the riemann sphere

Example

Let P(z)=adzd++a0C[z], with d1 and ad0. The map P^:C{}C{} defined by P^C=P and P^()= is a continuous self-map of an oriented 2-sphere and has degree d. At each finite a, its local degree is the multiplicity of the zero a of P(z)P(a); its local degree at infinity is d. Use the complex orientation in both source and target.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

Let f:SnSn be continuous, n1, with source and target orientations fixed. If f1(y) is finite, then deg(f)=xf1(y)degxf. The sum over an empty fibre is 0. (Global sphere degree is the sum of local degrees)

[F2]

Let fC[x] have degree n1. Then there exist distinct complex numbers α1,,αr and positive integers m1,,mr such that f(x)=cj=1r(xαj)mj for some cC×, with m1++mr=n. These exponents are uniquely determined by f. Equivalently, f has exactly n roots counted with multiplicity. (A complex polynomial of degree n has exactly n roots counted with multiplicity)

[F3]

For AX there is an exact sequence Hn(A;G)Hn(X;G)Hn(X,A;G)δHn1(A;G)Hn1(X;G). (Long exact sequence of a pair)

[F4]

A map of pairs f:(X,A)(Y,B) induces a commuting morphism from the long exact sequence of (X,A) to that of (Y,B), including the connecting maps. (Naturality of the pair long exact sequence)

Verification

1.1

Here is the sphere model and its orientation. The map s(z)=(2Rez,2Imz,z21)/(1+z2) lies on the unit sphere, and its inverse off the north pole is (x,y,t)(x+iy)/(1t). Both formulas are continuous and inverse by substitution. Moreover s(z) approaches the north pole exactly as z, giving the topology with neighborhoods of infinity containing {z>R}{}. Declare the finite coordinate z positive and use w=1/z near infinity. At z00, writing z=z0+u, the transition difference is 1/(z0+u)1/z0=u/(z0(z0+u)). On a sufficiently small disk its nonzero factor is homotopic through nonzero factors to 1/z02. Multiplication by a nonzero complex constant is a rotation followed by a positive dilation, homotopic through invertible real maps to the identity. Thus the two charts give compatible local orientations; no orientation-reversal is hidden at infinity.

constructalgebra
2.1

The leading-term estimate gives P(z)adzd/2 for all sufficiently large z: divide the sum of lower-degree terms by zd, which tends to zero. It proves continuity at infinity. For a finite a, polynomial division yields P(a+u)P(a)=umq(a+u) with m1 and q(a)0. Shrink the disk until q(a+u)q(a)<q(a). The homotopy um((1s)q(a+u)+sq(a)) has zero only at u=0 for every 0s1. Uniform boundedness of the factors permits a source disk mapping into one fixed target coordinate disk. Hence this is a homotopy of punctured local pairs to q(a)um.

step 1.1constructalgebra
3.1

For a disk D centered at zero, the pair exact sequence [F3] identifies H2(D,D{0};Z) with H1(D{0};Z); radial deformation identifies the latter with the counterclockwise circle generator. The normalized map of a small circle for cum, c0, is a rotation times eiteimt. The latter has m preimages of 1. Near each preimage its angular formula is tmt, homotopic through positive linear slopes to tt, so its local degree is +1. Applying [F1] in dimension one gives angular degree m. Rotation acts trivially by its rotation homotopy. Naturality [F4] of the disk pair boundary therefore gives local degree m for cum, and step 2.1 gives the claimed finite local multiplicities.

F1F3F4step 2.1algebra
4.1

In the coordinates w=1/z and v=1/P(z) at the two infinities, the map is v=wd/(ad+ad1w++a0wd), extended by v(0)=0. Its denominator is nonzero on a small disk. The same nonvanishing-factor homotopy and disk-boundary calculation give local degree d at infinity. The value is positive with the compatible chart orientations of step 1.1.

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra
5.1

For any finite b, [F2] applied to the degree-d polynomial Pb says its distinct roots have positive multiplicities summing to d. They form the entire finite fibre, since infinity maps to infinity. By step 3.1 and [F1], degP^ is the sum of these local degrees, hence d. This also agrees with applying [F1] to the singleton fibre of infinity and step 4.1. Repeated roots and d=1 require no change.

F1F2step 3.1step 4.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Two homology theories with different coefficient groups

Example

Singular homology with coefficients Z and with coefficients Z/2 both satisfy the ordinary homology axioms on CW pairs. They are not naturally equivalent: the specified coefficient group is essential in uniqueness.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

For any abelian group G, H0(;G)G and Hn(;G)=0 for every integer n0. For every set-indexed family of pairs the canonical map αHn(Xα,Aα;G)Hn(αXα,αAα;G) is an isomorphism. Together with the structural axioms, singular homology is an ordinary theory with coefficient group G. (Singular homology satisfies dimension and arbitrary additivity)

[F2]

For any two ordinary homology theories h,k on all CW pairs and a specified coefficient isomorphism u:h0()k0(), there is a unique natural equivalence hk normalized by u and commuting with connecting homomorphisms. In particular, a theory with coefficient group G is naturally equivalent to singular homology with coefficients G, normalized by idG. Arbitrary additivity is part of the hypotheses. (Eilenberg steenrod uniqueness on all cw pairs)

Verification

1.1

Apply [F1] with G=Z and with G=Z/2. Both yield ordinary theories, and their degree-zero groups at a point are respectively Z and Z/2.

F1
2.1

Any natural equivalence would in particular supply an isomorphism between these two groups at that point. No such isomorphism exists: every element of Z/2 is annihilated by 2, whereas 210 in Z. The coefficient-isomorphism hypothesis of [F2] is therefore not satisfied, and its uniqueness assertion makes no equivalence claim for these two theories.

F2step 1.1algebra
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Degree zero does not imply a sphere map is constant

Statement refuted

The implication “a continuous self-map of Sn of degree zero is constant” is false. For every n1 there is a surjective, hence nonconstant, continuous map SnSn of degree zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

Let f:SnSn be continuous, n1, with source and target orientations fixed. If f1(y) is finite, then deg(f)=xf1(y)degxf. The sum over an empty fibre is 0. (Global sphere degree is the sum of local degrees)

[F2]

On SnRn+1 for n1, the identity, a constant map, any single coordinate reflection, and the antipodal map have degrees 1, 0, 1, and (1)n+1 respectively. (Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps)

[F3]

For every dZ and n1 there exists a continuous self-map of Sn of degree d. (Every integer occurs as the degree of a sphere map)

Counterexample

1.1

Choose two disjoint closed round n-balls D+,D in Sn, each with nonempty interior. Collapse the complement of their interiors to a point. As in the pinch construction of [F3], this gives a continuous quotient to (D+/D+)(D/D)SnSn. On the first quotient use an orientation-preserving homeomorphism to the target sphere, taking the collapsed boundary to a chosen basepoint b. On the second use an orientation-reversing homeomorphism with the same basepoint image; obtain it by composing an orientation-preserving one with a reflection fixing b. Such a reflection has degree 1 by [F2].

F2F3construct
2.1

The two maps agree at the wedge point, so they descend to a continuous map f:SnSn. Each ball quotient already covers the target, so f is surjective and nonconstant. A point yb has precisely two preimages, one in each ball interior. With the inherited local orientations their local degrees are +1 and 1: restriction of each oriented quotient homeomorphism to its interior preserves the local generator, and the inserted reflection reverses it. Thus [F1] gives degf=11=0. This refutes constancy, without making any assertion that a degree-zero map cannot be nullhomotopic.

F1step 1.1algebra
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Degree is not defined by top homology for self maps of s zero

Statement refuted

The unreduced top-homology scalar definition of degree does not extend unchanged to S0: H0(S0;Z)=Z2, and the transposition induces a nonscalar matrix. In contrast, the separate scalar invariant on H~0(S0;Z)Z is well defined and has possible values 1,0,+1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

Let n1. Choose a generator [Sn] of Hn(Sn;Z)Z, using cor-homology-of-spheres. For a continuous self-map f:SnSn, its degree is the unique integer satisfying f[Sn]=deg(f)[Sn]. The induced map is furnished by prop-relative-homology-is-functorial-for-maps-of-pairs with empty subspaces. Replacing the same generator in source and target by its negative does not change the integer. For a map between separately oriented copies of Sn, use their separately specified generators; reversing just one orientation changes the sign. The unreduced definition here is restricted to n1. (Degree of a self map of an oriented sphere)

[F2]

For n1, H~k(Sn;G) is G for k=n and 0 otherwise. For S0, H~0(S0;G)G and all other reduced groups vanish. Thus H0(Sn;G)G for n1, whereas H0(S0;G)GG. (Homology of spheres)

[F3]

For an unreduced theory h and a nonempty based CW space (X,x0) with x0 a vertex, set h~n(X)=ker(hn(X)phn()). The basepoint inclusion s satisfies ps=id and splits this augmentation. The underlying ordinary theory is as in def-unreduced-homology-theory-on-cw-pairs. Independently, a reduced ordinary theory on based CW spaces consists of homotopy-invariant covariant functors h~n, natural suspension isomorphisms σ:h~n(X)h~n+1(ΣX), exact cofiber sequences, and arbitrary wedge additivity. More explicitly, for every based CW inclusion AX, h~n(A)h~n(X)h~n(X/A) is exact; the boundary in the extended sequence is the cofiber map to ΣA followed by σ1. The suspension here is reduced suspension. The dimension axiom is h~n(S0)=0 for n0, with h~0(S0)=G. Wedge additivity includes the empty wedge and gives h~n()=0. The empty space is not a based object. If its reduced groups are mentioned, this library uses H~n(;G)=0 in all degrees, as in def-zero-simplex-augmentation-and-reduced-singular-homology. The augmented-chain convention H~1(;G)=G is a different extension and is not used here. (Reduced homology theory and augmentation)

Counterexample

1.1

Write S0={a,b} and use the point classes ea,eb as the ordered basis of H0, consistently with [F2]. A map sends a point class to the class of its image. Hence, with columns recording images, the identity, transposition, constant-a, and constant-b maps induce respectively (1001), (0110), (1100), and (0011). These are all four maps of a two-point discrete space. In particular the transposition matrix is not an integer multiple of the identity; the rank-one hypothesis of [F1] is absent.

F1F2algebra
2.1

The augmentation of [F3] is (u,v)u+v. Its kernel has generator ebea. The four matrices in step 1.1 act on this generator as +1,1,0,0, respectively. Thus reduced degree exists in this case, but is a different convention from the unreduced definition restricted to positive-dimensional spheres.

F3step 1.1algebra
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Finite additivity alone does not prove infinite cw uniqueness

Statement refuted

Finite additivity cannot replace arbitrary additivity in uniqueness on all CW pairs. For every integer n, set En(X)=(i0H~i(X;Z))/(i0H~i(X;Z)). This construction on based CW spaces satisfies the reduced homotopy, exactness, excision, suspension, and dimension axioms with zero coefficient group, and finite wedge additivity, but fails arbitrary wedge additivity. Its pair version is En(X,A)=(i0Hi(X,A;Z))/(i0Hi(X,A;Z)). The theory Hn(X,A;Z)En(X,A) satisfies the unreduced ordinary axioms with coefficient Z except arbitrary additivity, agrees with H on every finite-dimensional CW pair, and differs on W=i1Si.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

Ordinary unreduced theories on CW pairs and reduced ordinary theories on based CW spaces with vertex basepoints determine one another, naturally and compatibly with morphisms and coefficients. For A the correspondence gives hn(X,A)h~n(X/A); for A= it gives hn(X)h~n(X+), where X+=X{}. Under this correspondence, pair boundaries are cofiber boundaries followed by inverse suspension, and arbitrary disjoint-sum additivity corresponds to arbitrary wedge additivity. For a CW triple BAX there is a natural exact sequence hn(A,B)hn(X,B)hn(X,A)hn1(A,B), whose last map is the pair boundary followed by hn1(A)hn1(A,B). (Unreduced pair and reduced quotient axioms are equivalent on cw pairs)

[F2]

For any abelian group G, H0(;G)G and Hn(;G)=0 for every integer n0. For every set-indexed family of pairs the canonical map αHn(Xα,Aα;G)Hn(αXα,αAα;G) is an isomorphism. Together with the structural axioms, singular homology is an ordinary theory with coefficient group G. (Singular homology satisfies dimension and arbitrary additivity)

[F3]

For a CW pair (X,A), an ordinary theory h with coefficient G, and chosen cell orientations, the complex Ch(X,A) is canonically Ccell(X,A;Z)G. Its differential is the integral incidence matrix acting on G. In degree one the entries are signed terminal-minus-initial endpoints. The direct-sum matrices have finite support in each column. (Axiomatic cellular boundaries are integral incidence matrices with coefficients)

[F4]

For every finite-dimensional CW pair (X,A) and ordinary theory h, there is a canonical isomorphism hn(X,A)Hn(Ch(X,A)) for every integer n, natural for cellular maps. It is the skeletal lift isomorphism described below and commutes with the homology connecting maps of pairs. The number of cells need not be finite. (Finite dimensional skeletal exactness computes axiomatic homology)

[F5]

For every ordinary theory h with arbitrary additivity and every CW pair (X,A), the canonical map colimi0hn(Xi,Ai)hn(X,A) is an isomorphism. So is the canonical colimit over finite subcomplex pairs (K,KA) of X. The latter identification is natural for every continuous map of CW pairs. (Additivity and compact cell support control the infinite cw colimit)

Counterexample

1.1

For a family of abelian groups Mi, denote i0Mi/i0Mi by Q(M). Degreewise maps induce maps of Q, giving functoriality. If AiuiBiviCi is exact at every Bi, then Q(A)Q(B)Q(C) is exact: when v(b) is finitely supported, replace the finitely many bad coordinates of b by zero; the resulting equivalent tuple lies in kervi. Choose coordinate lifts in Ai and obtain a preimage in Q(A). The converse inclusion follows from viui=0. This uses ordinary choice for the countable family of nonempty lift sets. Adding, deleting, or altering finitely many initial coordinates has no effect on Q.

constructalgebra
2.1

Apply step 1.1 to the ordinary singular pair sequence supplied by [F2]. Define the E boundary by sending a representative (xi)i0 to the tuple whose jth coordinate is the singular boundary xj+1Hj(A;Z). Dropping the unused initial coordinate is precisely the shift identification of step 1.1. At each term the coordinatewise singular exact sequence and that shift prove the required exactness, even though En is independent of nZ. Homotopies and excision induce coordinatewise equal maps and isomorphisms, so they do so on Q. Apply [F1] here only to the ordinary singular theory [F2]: its quotient identifications and suspension isomorphisms give coordinatewise reduced cofiber sequences and suspension maps. Applying Q and step 1.1 gives the reduced E axioms and identifies them with the displayed pair construction. Replacing reduced absolute groups by unreduced absolute groups changes only coordinate zero and therefore does not change Q. All structure maps are natural.

F1F2step 1.1construct
2.2

A point, the empty space under the zero reduced-empty convention, and S0 have reduced homology in at most one degree. Their Q groups vanish; hence the coefficient of E is zero. For any finite family, the product over degrees commutes with its finite direct sum, as does the finite-support subgroup. Thus finite disjoint-sum additivity holds for pairs and finite wedge additivity for reduced spaces. For a finite-dimensional CW pair of dimension at most N, [F3] and [F4] applied to singular homology give Hi(X,A;Z)=0 outside 0iN, regardless of the number of cells. Therefore En(X,A)=0 for every integer n.

F2F3F4step 1.1algebra
3.1

Give W=i1Si its CW structure with one vertex and one cell in each positive dimension, all attached by constant maps. The cellular differentials vanish, including the degree-one terminal-minus-initial differential. On each skeleton [F3] and [F4] compute one copy of Z in each positive degree present. Applying [F5] to ordinary singular homology, not to E, gives H~i(W;Z)=Z for every i1 and zero in degree zero. Hence En(W)=i1Z/i1Z0: the all-ones tuple is not finitely supported. Yet each En(Si)=0 by step 2.2, so the canonical infinite wedge map from the direct sum of these zero groups is not surjective.

F3F4F5step 2.2algebra
4.1

Taking the direct sum of the pair functors H and E, with componentwise structure maps, preserves homotopy, exactness, excision, dimension, and finite additivity. Its coefficient at a point is Z0=Z, and step 2.2 identifies it with H on all finite-dimensional pairs. On W, ordinary H1(W;Z)=0 by the nonnegative singular chain complex, whereas (HE)1(W)=E1(W)0 by step 3.1. Thus even an abstract graded-group equivalence fails there. The ordinary all-CW uniqueness theorem requires arbitrary additivity, exactly the axiom that this construction fails.

F2step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1algebra

Sources