How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homology Axioms Degree and Classical Applications — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cw Complexes and Cellular Homology
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Homology Axioms Degree and Classical Applications
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Metric Spaces
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Relative Homology Excision and Mayer Vietoris
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Singular Chains and Singular Homology
- Splitting Fields
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
Compute sphere degrees through oriented cycles and local multiplicities, including polynomial maps at infinity. The counterexamples distinguish degree zero from constancy, reduced from unreduced degree in dimension zero, and finite from arbitrary additivity in homology uniqueness.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Degree of the circle power map
Example
For every , the continuous map , , has degree when both circles have their counterclockwise orientations. This includes and negative exponents.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Let be continuous, , with source and target orientations fixed. If is finite, then The sum over an empty fibre is . (Global sphere degree is the sum of local degrees)
On for , the identity, a constant map, any single coordinate reflection, and the antipodal map have degrees , , , and respectively. (Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps)
Verification
If , the fibre of consists of the roots , . In positively oriented angular coordinates centered at such a point and at , the local map is . The homotopy , , never sends a nonzero sufficiently small to zero, so it preserves the local pair and identifies the local action with that of the identity. Each local degree is therefore , and the finite-fibre formula gives .
If , the same -point fibre has angular formula . Homotoping its positive factor to leaves the reflection . Complex conjugation is a coordinate reflection on , of degree ; its singleton fibre and the local-sum formula give local sign . Thus . For , is constant and has degree zero. In particular is the identity.
Degree of a coordinate reflection on a sphere
Example
For , a coordinate reflection has degree . A reflection-invariant triangulation exhibits this sign by sending its oriented fundamental cycle to its negative.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
For an abstract simplicial complex and an integer , the simplicial chain group is the free abelian group generated by the oriented -simplices of , subject to the relation for every permutation of the vertices of a simplex. For , set . The boundary operator is in degree . For , it is defined on an oriented simplex by The well-definedness of this formula with respect to the chosen oriented representative is recorded in lem-simplicial-boundary-is-independent-of-oriented-representative through justified_by. (Simplicial chain groups and the boundary operator)
For every simplicial complex , the natural simplicial-to-singular chain map induces for all . (Simplicial and singular homology agree)
Verification
Take a regular -simplex in centered at the origin, with vertices . Radial projection of its boundary to is a homeomorphism: each ray meets its convex boundary exactly once, and the continuous bijection has compact source and Hausdorff target. The orthogonal symmetry interchanging and fixing the other vertices is reflection across the perpendicular bisector hyperplane. Rotate this configuration so that this hyperplane is the coordinate hyperplane of ; radial projection then commutes with the reflection.
With the orientation convention of [F2], put . Each codimension-two face occurs twice with opposite signs, so . Conversely, cancellation along every common facet forces the coefficients of any top cycle to be a common integer multiple of those of . There are no -simplices in the boundary, so generates its top simplicial homology and hence its oriented fundamental class under the natural simplicial-to-singular isomorphism [F3].
The vertex transposition commutes with the boundary formula. In the filled simplex its action on is multiplication by . Thus . Radial projection carries this equality to , independently of which sign was chosen for the generator.
Degree of the antipodal map in low dimensions
Example
The antipodal maps on have degrees , respectively. Of these three spheres, exactly and admit a continuous nowhere-zero tangent vector field.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
On for , the identity, a constant map, any single coordinate reflection, and the antipodal map have degrees , , , and respectively. (Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps)
For every integer , admits a continuous nowhere-zero tangent vector field if and only if is odd. (A sphere has a nowhere zero tangent vector field iff its dimension is odd)
Verification
In , negating all coordinates is the composite of its coordinate reflections. The antipodal formula in [F1] gives on , on , and on .
By [F2], the odd dimensions and permit such a field and dimension does not. Concretely, identify and and set . It has norm on the sphere and real inner product with , so is tangent and nowhere zero.
Local degrees of a polynomial map on the riemann sphere
Example
Let , with and . The map defined by and is a continuous self-map of an oriented -sphere and has degree . At each finite , its local degree is the multiplicity of the zero of ; its local degree at infinity is . Use the complex orientation in both source and target.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Let be continuous, , with source and target orientations fixed. If is finite, then The sum over an empty fibre is . (Global sphere degree is the sum of local degrees)
Let have degree . Then there exist distinct complex numbers and positive integers such that for some , with These exponents are uniquely determined by . Equivalently, has exactly roots counted with multiplicity. (A complex polynomial of degree has exactly roots counted with multiplicity)
For there is an exact sequence (Long exact sequence of a pair)
A map of pairs induces a commuting morphism from the long exact sequence of to that of , including the connecting maps. (Naturality of the pair long exact sequence)
Verification
Here is the sphere model and its orientation. The map lies on the unit sphere, and its inverse off the north pole is . Both formulas are continuous and inverse by substitution. Moreover approaches the north pole exactly as , giving the topology with neighborhoods of infinity containing . Declare the finite coordinate positive and use near infinity. At , writing , the transition difference is . On a sufficiently small disk its nonzero factor is homotopic through nonzero factors to . Multiplication by a nonzero complex constant is a rotation followed by a positive dilation, homotopic through invertible real maps to the identity. Thus the two charts give compatible local orientations; no orientation-reversal is hidden at infinity.
The leading-term estimate gives for all sufficiently large : divide the sum of lower-degree terms by , which tends to zero. It proves continuity at infinity. For a finite , polynomial division yields with and . Shrink the disk until . The homotopy has zero only at for every . Uniform boundedness of the factors permits a source disk mapping into one fixed target coordinate disk. Hence this is a homotopy of punctured local pairs to .
For a disk centered at zero, the pair exact sequence [F3] identifies with ; radial deformation identifies the latter with the counterclockwise circle generator. The normalized map of a small circle for , , is a rotation times . The latter has preimages of . Near each preimage its angular formula is , homotopic through positive linear slopes to , so its local degree is . Applying [F1] in dimension one gives angular degree . Rotation acts trivially by its rotation homotopy. Naturality [F4] of the disk pair boundary therefore gives local degree for , and step 2.1 gives the claimed finite local multiplicities.
In the coordinates and at the two infinities, the map is , extended by . Its denominator is nonzero on a small disk. The same nonvanishing-factor homotopy and disk-boundary calculation give local degree at infinity. The value is positive with the compatible chart orientations of step 1.1.
For any finite , [F2] applied to the degree- polynomial says its distinct roots have positive multiplicities summing to . They form the entire finite fibre, since infinity maps to infinity. By step 3.1 and [F1], is the sum of these local degrees, hence . This also agrees with applying [F1] to the singleton fibre of infinity and step 4.1. Repeated roots and require no change.
Two homology theories with different coefficient groups
Example
Singular homology with coefficients and with coefficients both satisfy the ordinary homology axioms on CW pairs. They are not naturally equivalent: the specified coefficient group is essential in uniqueness.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
For any abelian group , and for every integer . For every set-indexed family of pairs the canonical map is an isomorphism. Together with the structural axioms, singular homology is an ordinary theory with coefficient group . (Singular homology satisfies dimension and arbitrary additivity)
For any two ordinary homology theories on all CW pairs and a specified coefficient isomorphism , there is a unique natural equivalence normalized by and commuting with connecting homomorphisms. In particular, a theory with coefficient group is naturally equivalent to singular homology with coefficients , normalized by . Arbitrary additivity is part of the hypotheses. (Eilenberg steenrod uniqueness on all cw pairs)
Verification
Apply [F1] with and with . Both yield ordinary theories, and their degree-zero groups at a point are respectively and .
Any natural equivalence would in particular supply an isomorphism between these two groups at that point. No such isomorphism exists: every element of is annihilated by , whereas in . The coefficient-isomorphism hypothesis of [F2] is therefore not satisfied, and its uniqueness assertion makes no equivalence claim for these two theories.
Degree zero does not imply a sphere map is constant
Statement refuted
The implication “a continuous self-map of of degree zero is constant” is false. For every there is a surjective, hence nonconstant, continuous map of degree zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Let be continuous, , with source and target orientations fixed. If is finite, then The sum over an empty fibre is . (Global sphere degree is the sum of local degrees)
On for , the identity, a constant map, any single coordinate reflection, and the antipodal map have degrees , , , and respectively. (Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps)
For every and there exists a continuous self-map of of degree . (Every integer occurs as the degree of a sphere map)
Counterexample
Choose two disjoint closed round -balls in , each with nonempty interior. Collapse the complement of their interiors to a point. As in the pinch construction of [F3], this gives a continuous quotient to . On the first quotient use an orientation-preserving homeomorphism to the target sphere, taking the collapsed boundary to a chosen basepoint . On the second use an orientation-reversing homeomorphism with the same basepoint image; obtain it by composing an orientation-preserving one with a reflection fixing . Such a reflection has degree by [F2].
The two maps agree at the wedge point, so they descend to a continuous map . Each ball quotient already covers the target, so is surjective and nonconstant. A point has precisely two preimages, one in each ball interior. With the inherited local orientations their local degrees are and : restriction of each oriented quotient homeomorphism to its interior preserves the local generator, and the inserted reflection reverses it. Thus [F1] gives . This refutes constancy, without making any assertion that a degree-zero map cannot be nullhomotopic.
Degree is not defined by top homology for self maps of s zero
Statement refuted
The unreduced top-homology scalar definition of degree does not extend unchanged to : , and the transposition induces a nonscalar matrix. In contrast, the separate scalar invariant on is well defined and has possible values .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Let . Choose a generator of , using cor-homology-of-spheres. For a continuous self-map , its degree is the unique integer satisfying The induced map is furnished by prop-relative-homology-is-functorial-for-maps-of-pairs with empty subspaces. Replacing the same generator in source and target by its negative does not change the integer. For a map between separately oriented copies of , use their separately specified generators; reversing just one orientation changes the sign. The unreduced definition here is restricted to . (Degree of a self map of an oriented sphere)
For , is for and otherwise. For , and all other reduced groups vanish. Thus for , whereas . (Homology of spheres)
For an unreduced theory and a nonempty based CW space with a vertex, set The basepoint inclusion satisfies and splits this augmentation. The underlying ordinary theory is as in def-unreduced-homology-theory-on-cw-pairs. Independently, a reduced ordinary theory on based CW spaces consists of homotopy-invariant covariant functors , natural suspension isomorphisms , exact cofiber sequences, and arbitrary wedge additivity. More explicitly, for every based CW inclusion , is exact; the boundary in the extended sequence is the cofiber map to followed by . The suspension here is reduced suspension. The dimension axiom is for , with . Wedge additivity includes the empty wedge and gives . The empty space is not a based object. If its reduced groups are mentioned, this library uses in all degrees, as in def-zero-simplex-augmentation-and-reduced-singular-homology. The augmented-chain convention is a different extension and is not used here. (Reduced homology theory and augmentation)
Counterexample
Write and use the point classes as the ordered basis of , consistently with [F2]. A map sends a point class to the class of its image. Hence, with columns recording images, the identity, transposition, constant-, and constant- maps induce respectively , , , and . These are all four maps of a two-point discrete space. In particular the transposition matrix is not an integer multiple of the identity; the rank-one hypothesis of [F1] is absent.
The augmentation of [F3] is . Its kernel has generator . The four matrices in step 1.1 act on this generator as , respectively. Thus reduced degree exists in this case, but is a different convention from the unreduced definition restricted to positive-dimensional spheres.
Finite additivity alone does not prove infinite cw uniqueness
Statement refuted
Finite additivity cannot replace arbitrary additivity in uniqueness on all CW pairs. For every integer , set This construction on based CW spaces satisfies the reduced homotopy, exactness, excision, suspension, and dimension axioms with zero coefficient group, and finite wedge additivity, but fails arbitrary wedge additivity. Its pair version is The theory satisfies the unreduced ordinary axioms with coefficient except arbitrary additivity, agrees with on every finite-dimensional CW pair, and differs on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Ordinary unreduced theories on CW pairs and reduced ordinary theories on based CW spaces with vertex basepoints determine one another, naturally and compatibly with morphisms and coefficients. For the correspondence gives ; for it gives , where . Under this correspondence, pair boundaries are cofiber boundaries followed by inverse suspension, and arbitrary disjoint-sum additivity corresponds to arbitrary wedge additivity. For a CW triple there is a natural exact sequence , whose last map is the pair boundary followed by . (Unreduced pair and reduced quotient axioms are equivalent on cw pairs)
For any abelian group , and for every integer . For every set-indexed family of pairs the canonical map is an isomorphism. Together with the structural axioms, singular homology is an ordinary theory with coefficient group . (Singular homology satisfies dimension and arbitrary additivity)
For a CW pair , an ordinary theory with coefficient , and chosen cell orientations, the complex is canonically Its differential is the integral incidence matrix acting on . In degree one the entries are signed terminal-minus-initial endpoints. The direct-sum matrices have finite support in each column. (Axiomatic cellular boundaries are integral incidence matrices with coefficients)
For every finite-dimensional CW pair and ordinary theory , there is a canonical isomorphism for every integer , natural for cellular maps. It is the skeletal lift isomorphism described below and commutes with the homology connecting maps of pairs. The number of cells need not be finite. (Finite dimensional skeletal exactness computes axiomatic homology)
For every ordinary theory with arbitrary additivity and every CW pair , the canonical map is an isomorphism. So is the canonical colimit over finite subcomplex pairs of . The latter identification is natural for every continuous map of CW pairs. (Additivity and compact cell support control the infinite cw colimit)
Counterexample
For a family of abelian groups , denote by . Degreewise maps induce maps of , giving functoriality. If is exact at every , then is exact: when is finitely supported, replace the finitely many bad coordinates of by zero; the resulting equivalent tuple lies in . Choose coordinate lifts in and obtain a preimage in . The converse inclusion follows from . This uses ordinary choice for the countable family of nonempty lift sets. Adding, deleting, or altering finitely many initial coordinates has no effect on .
Apply step 1.1 to the ordinary singular pair sequence supplied by [F2]. Define the boundary by sending a representative to the tuple whose th coordinate is the singular boundary . Dropping the unused initial coordinate is precisely the shift identification of step 1.1. At each term the coordinatewise singular exact sequence and that shift prove the required exactness, even though is independent of . Homotopies and excision induce coordinatewise equal maps and isomorphisms, so they do so on . Apply [F1] here only to the ordinary singular theory [F2]: its quotient identifications and suspension isomorphisms give coordinatewise reduced cofiber sequences and suspension maps. Applying and step 1.1 gives the reduced axioms and identifies them with the displayed pair construction. Replacing reduced absolute groups by unreduced absolute groups changes only coordinate zero and therefore does not change . All structure maps are natural.
A point, the empty space under the zero reduced-empty convention, and have reduced homology in at most one degree. Their groups vanish; hence the coefficient of is zero. For any finite family, the product over degrees commutes with its finite direct sum, as does the finite-support subgroup. Thus finite disjoint-sum additivity holds for pairs and finite wedge additivity for reduced spaces. For a finite-dimensional CW pair of dimension at most , [F3] and [F4] applied to singular homology give outside , regardless of the number of cells. Therefore for every integer .
Give its CW structure with one vertex and one cell in each positive dimension, all attached by constant maps. The cellular differentials vanish, including the degree-one terminal-minus-initial differential. On each skeleton [F3] and [F4] compute one copy of in each positive degree present. Applying [F5] to ordinary singular homology, not to , gives for every and zero in degree zero. Hence : the all-ones tuple is not finitely supported. Yet each by step 2.2, so the canonical infinite wedge map from the direct sum of these zero groups is not surjective.
Taking the direct sum of the pair functors and , with componentwise structure maps, preserves homotopy, exactness, excision, dimension, and finite additivity. Its coefficient at a point is , and step 2.2 identifies it with on all finite-dimensional pairs. On , ordinary by the nonnegative singular chain complex, whereas by step 3.1. Thus even an abstract graded-group equivalence fails there. The ordinary all-CW uniqueness theorem requires arbitrary additivity, exactly the axiom that this construction fails.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Example 2.32, p.137
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Degree property (e), p.134
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Degree property (f) and Theorem 2.28, pp.134–135
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Proposition 2.30 and Example 2.32, pp.136–137
- Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Theorem 5.1.3 and Exercise 1.3.9
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Axioms for Homology, coefficient discussion p.161
- Miller, Algebraic Topology I lecture notes, Definition 11.1, p.26
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Example 2.31, p.136 (signed fold variation)
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Degree opening paragraph, p.134, excludes n=0
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §2.3 Exercise 2, p.165