How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Spherical Simplex Metrics, Angular Links, and Cones — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cayley Graphs, Word Metrics and Quasi-Isometry
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Coxeter Polyhedral Gluings and Intrinsic Metrics
- Coxeter Presentations, Exchange, and Reduced Word Theorems
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Direct Matrix Factorisations: LU, Cholesky and QR
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Groups and Presentations
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Further Trigonometric Identities and Inverse Functions
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Real Forms and Reflection Geometry
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Simplicial Subdivision and Simplicial Approximation
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Spherical Simplex Metrics, Angular Links, and Cones
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Ascoli–Arzelà Theorem
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This companion is a dependency leaf: its examples use only the theory of spherical-simplex-metrics-angular-links-and-cones and that page's established prerequisite closure, and no other theory page may depend on a supplier homed here.
A spherical simplex from a Gram matrix and its vertex-link Schur complement builds the spherical simplex of the matrix with diagonal and constant off-diagonal : is positive definite by the quadratic form , the Cholesky realisation gives four unit vectors with pairwise inner product , the functional with is the pairing with , and the vertex-link Schur complement has off-diagonal entries with positive quadratic form . Iterating over the edge spanned by gives the two-step Schur value , matching an independent orthogonal-projection computation, so the face-link formula is order-independent on this matrix.
Link edge lengths versus dihedral mirror angles in type I_2(m) compares the two angles of the regular -gon: the interior angle is the angular distance between the two incident edge directions at a vertex, i.e. the edge length of the vertex link, while the two inward edge normals are at distance , so the mirror angle of the canonical rank-two form of type is ; the link Gram matrix has off-diagonal , its cosine is the negative of the mirror-angle cosine, and the values are distinct for . The product of the two reflections is a rotation of the positive-definite plane through (trace , order ).
The disconnected universal-Coxeter nerve and the angular truncation convention tests the truncation convention on the nerve of the universal Coxeter system: the nerve is a finite set of isolated points, the componentwise path distance is off the diagonal, and the truncated metric is there; the cone is the metric star of rays, in which the distance of points on different rays is the sum of their radii along the through-apex path, the -geodesic hypothesis holds vacuously, and every value in place of is inconsistent with the star geometry: the points would be declared closer than any path joining them, and the open rays would still separate the components. Thus only the truncated value, and never the auxiliary , may be passed to the cone formula.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A spherical simplex from a Gram matrix and its vertex-link Schur complement
Example
Let and let be the real symmetric matrix with diagonal entries and off-diagonal entries . Then:
(i) is positive definite: for every , , which is for because and .
(ii) By Spherical Gram simplices and angular links of Euclidean faces and Gram realisations, radial normalisation, finite spherical complexes and link Gram formulas(i), the Cholesky realisation gives four unit vectors with for ; the pairwise angular distances in the spherical simplex are all , and the barycentric ray coordinates of every point of are unique. The functional with is the pairing with the vector (from ), and on ; hence lies in the open hemisphere .
(iii) The vertex link of computed by the Schur formula of Gram realisations, radial normalisation, finite spherical complexes and link Gram formulas(iv) has Gram matrix with off-diagonal entries ; explicitly so the link is the spherical triangle with all vertex-to-vertex angular distances , and its positivity is exactly the Schur-complement positivity of Gram realisations, radial normalisation, finite spherical complexes and link Gram formulas(iv).
(iv) Iterating the formula once more gives the link of the face spanned by as the arc of angular length between the unit directions of the orthogonal projections of onto : the projected squared norms are and the projected inner product is , so the projected cosine is , the same value that the two-step Schur computation produces; the formula and the positivity check are otherwise the same, so the face-link computation is order-independent for this matrix.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The real symmetric matrix with diagonal entries and off-diagonal entries , and its Cholesky realisation of Spherical Gram simplices and angular links of Euclidean faces.
A real symmetric positive-definite matrix has a unique Cholesky factorisation with lower triangular factor and positive diagonal, and the bijection between positive-definite matrices and their Cholesky data (Hermitian positive-definite matrices and Cholesky factorisation A = LL* with positive diagonal, A matrix admits a Cholesky factorisation with positive diagonal exactly when it is Hermitian positive definite, and that factor is unique).
In a real inner-product space, is a norm, , orthogonal projections onto finite-dimensional subspaces exist with , and for a subspace with basis the projection is for the inverse Gram matrix (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length, The induced length is a norm, Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs, Gram realisations, radial normalisation, finite spherical complexes and link Gram formulas).
The Cholesky rows are unit vectors with ; the angular distance is ; the functional with satisfies and on ; the link of the face spanned by a set of vertices has the Schur-complement Gram matrix of Gram realisations, radial normalisation, finite spherical complexes and link Gram formulas(i), (ii) and (iv) (Spherical Gram simplices and angular links of Euclidean faces, Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine).
Verification
The quadratic form. Since has diagonal and off-diagonal , expanding gives ; with both coefficients are positive, so for and is positive definite.
The Gram realisation. By step 1.1 and [F1] the Cholesky factorisation exists with invertible, and [F3] gives that its rows are unit vectors with ; thus for , the pairwise angular distances are , and every point of has unique barycentric ray coordinates.
The hemisphere functional. Let and . Since every row of sums to , for each fixed one has ; hence for all , so by [F3] and on . Therefore , the open hemisphere.
The vertex link. By [F3] and the Schur formula with , the link of has Gram matrix whose diagonal entries are and whose off-diagonal entries are . Its quadratic form is , which is positive for ; so the link is the spherical triangle whose three angular distances are .
The face link by projection. Let be the Gram matrix of , so and ; the orthogonal projection onto is by [F2], so and ; hence and , so the projected cosine is and the link of the face is an arc of angular length .
The two-step Schur value. Iterating the Schur formula of [F3] over the vertices means applying it first to the Gram matrix of the link of , whose off-diagonal entries are by step 3.2, and then to a block; the resulting off-diagonal entry is , the same value as the projected cosine of step 3.3.
Order independence and conclusion. By [F3] the link of the face spanned by equals the Gram matrix of the normalised orthogonal projections of the remaining vertices onto , so the projection computation of step 3.3 and the iterated Schur computation of step 4.1 are two descriptions of the same matrix; they agree at the value , the face link is an arc of angular length , and the positivity check is the one of step 3.2 applied to this block, whose determinant is positive.
Remarks
- What the example checks. The example instantiates the definition and the four clauses of the Schur formula: positivity of the Gram matrix by an explicit quadratic form, the Cholesky realisation, the hemisphere functional , the vertex-link Schur complement with value , and the iterated two-step computation with value matching an independent projection computation.
- The hemisphere functional is written with the vertices. The vector representing is , which uses the eigen-identity ; it is not the vector of ambient coordinates, because the Cholesky rows are not the standard basis.
Link edge lengths versus dihedral mirror angles in type I_2(m)
Example
Let and let be the regular -gon in the Euclidean plane with centre the origin, circumradius and vertices , , in cyclic order; regard as a compact convex polyhedral cell whose facets are its edges (Finite convex cell complex and linear subdivision). Then:
(i) every interior angle of is : the centre triangle on two adjacent vertices has apex angle , hence base angles , and the interior angle is twice that; consequently the angular link of a vertex (Spherical Gram simplices and angular links of Euclidean faces) is the arc from one incident edge direction to the other and its two endpoints have angular distance ;
(ii) the two inward unit normals of the edges through the vertex make angular distance ; equivalently the link edge angular distance is minus the angle between the two incident facets;
(iii) the canonical rank-two form of type (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order) lives on with Gram matrix , , which is positive definite; the mirror lines and satisfy so the mirrors meet at angle , while the product is a rotation of through up to the choice of orientation;
(iv) the Gram matrix of the vertex link (with vertices labelled by the two facets through the vertex) is , because the link edge angular distance has cosine ; it is positive definite by the rank-two computation. Hence the link edge angular distance and the mirror angle are supplementary — their cosines are negatives of each other — and they are distinct for , while for both equal : they are not interchangeable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and the regular -gon with centre , circumradius , vertices in cyclic order and edges the segments ( mod , with ); the polygon is the convex hull of those vertices.
For a compact convex polyhedral cell and a nonempty face with inward unit facet normals and direction space , the tangent cone is , the angular link is , the set of all unit inward directions at a point of the relative interior of is , and the angular distance of unit directions is ; moreover is the closure of and, when is a vertex (the case used below), so that the two sets coincide with (Spherical Gram simplices and angular links of Euclidean faces).
The unit circle of a Euclidean plane consists of the unit vectors, and for unit vectors the angular distance is the number in whose cosine is ; is the inverse of restricted to (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length, The induced length is a norm, Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine).
for every real , and for every real (Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi, The addition formulas for sine and cosine); cosine is strictly decreasing on (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine).
For the canonical rank-two form of type : , on , and for (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps).
has Gram matrix with and is positive definite; each is linear, satisfies and preserves , so preserves ; moreover has determinant , trace , and satisfies , for (Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order).
For : for (Pi is the first positive zero of sine), and (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine); a finite-dimensional positive-definite inner-product space has an orthonormal basis (Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis).
Verification
Interior angle. Put . At , the addition and double-angle formulas give and . Since , the unit incident edge directions are and ; their inner product is . Their angular distance is therefore by [F2]. The directions bound the inward wedge at the vertex, so this is the interior angle. Rotation by preserves inner products and carries the configuration to , giving the same angle at every vertex.
Inward normals. At the edge has midpoint direction and the edge has midpoint direction ; the outward unit normals are these midpoint directions, and the inward unit normals are their negatives and . Then by [F3], so , since and is injective on .
The mirror lines. With and , , evaluating the bilinear form [F4] gives and , so and ; since is positive definite by [F5] and , each of the subspaces and is a line, so these inclusions are equalities. Moreover , and , so the ratio of the Statement is , the denominator being positive because for .
The link at a vertex. At the two facets through are the edges and , with edge directions and ; the angle between and is the interior angle of step 1.1. By [F1] the tangent cone is for the inward normals of the two edges. Its boundary lines are and , since is the unit direction along the facet whose inward normal is , so the cone is the intersection of the two closed half-planes bounded by these lines that contain and ; that intersection is exactly the wedge , whose unit section is the arc from to . The angular distance of its endpoints is .
The mirror angle. The angle of the nonzero vectors in the positive definite plane is the number in with , where ; by step 1.3 this cosine is , so and by [F2]. The mirror lines therefore meet at angle .
The product. Let . By [F5] is a -preserving linear map of the positive definite plane with and . Choose a -orthonormal basis of by [F6] and let be the matrix of in it; -preservation and give , so , whence and ; thus with and . Hence and by [F6], so for , where makes , and for . In every -orthonormal basis, therefore, acts by the rotation of angle or of angle : the product is a rotation of through up to the choice of orientation.
The link Gram matrix. By step 2.1 the vertex link is the arc with endpoints ; its Gram matrix as a spherical -simplex is the matrix with diagonal entries and off-diagonal entries , and by [F3] and [F4], so it equals the Gram matrix of displayed in the Statement. It is positive definite since and the diagonal entries are . Hence for the link edge angular distance and the mirror angle are distinct and supplementary, and they are equal to only in the square case ; in either case they must not be interchanged.
Remarks
- Two different angles. The link edge angular distance is the interior angle of the polygon at the vertex, i.e. the angle between the two incident edge directions; the mirror angle is the angle between the two facet hyperplanes, i.e. between the inward normals. They are supplementary: . The link Gram matrix and the Coxeter Gram matrix of type coincide because both encode the same pair of unit vectors at angular distance .
- The square case . The centre angle is , so , the mirror lines are -orthogonal, is a rotation through , the link edge angular distance is and the mirror angle is ; the two numbers coincide but the identity remains the correct correspondence.
The disconnected universal-Coxeter nerve and the angular truncation convention
Example
Let and let be the universal-Coxeter nerve: the finite spherical complex (Gram realisations, radial normalisation, finite spherical complexes and link Gram formulas(iii)) whose cells are one-point spherical simplices, the nerve of the Coxeter system on generators in which for all , so that no subset containing two distinct generators is spherical, and the nerve has no edge (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups; here the nerve has simplices the subsets whose standard parabolic subgroups are finite); the presentation argument is verified in step 1.1 below. Write for its componentwise intrinsic path distance and for its truncated angular metric (The angular path metric, the Euclidean cone and spherical joins). Then:
(i) every component of is a single point, for , and for . Thus is a metric of diameter that agrees with nowhere off the diagonal; the infinite value is not an ordinary metric value (Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric), which is precisely why the truncation is needed.
(ii) In the cone the distance of and with is : the formula of The angular path metric, the Euclidean cone and spherical joins(3) gives , and the path through the apex realises it. Hence is the metric star of rays of infinite length glued at the apex, and every path between two different rays passes through the apex.
(iii) is vacuously -geodesic: no pair of distinct points has distance . Hence The cone and join metrics and the local product chart of a polyhedral gluing(2) applies and shows that is a geodesic metric space, and a geodesic joining points of two different rays is the two-segment path through the apex.
(iv) Any truncation value would be inconsistent with this star geometry: with distance between the branches and every path between them passing through the apex, no geodesic would join the two branches, while with the value the through-apex path is one. Thus , and not , is the value the cone formula must receive, and the auxiliary infinity is never passed to a metric value.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and the finite spherical complex whose cells are the one-point spherical simplices with , the nerve of the universal Coxeter system on generators; in parts (ii)-(iv) also real numbers and distinct .
For a real symmetric positive-definite matrix with diagonal and Cholesky factor with rows , the positive cone is and the spherical simplex is ; for one has , and , a single point (Spherical Gram simplices and angular links of Euclidean faces).
A finite spherical complex is the quotient of the disjoint union of the spherical simplices by the vertex-wise identifications of faces, with the componentwise chain metric ; its components are the classes under the relation "joined by a chain of points in common cells" and the componentwise path distance is between distinct components, a value that is auxiliary notation only and is truncated in the cone formulas (Gram realisations, radial normalisation, finite spherical complexes and link Gram formulas(iii), (vi)).
The angular link carries the extension , the truncated angular metric is with the convention , the Euclidean cone is with and , and a link is -geodesic if every pair at distance is joined by a minimizing segment (The angular path metric, the Euclidean cone and spherical joins(1)-(4)).
is a metric of diameter at most and agrees with on every pair at distance ; if then the path through the apex has length and is minimizing; and if is -geodesic then is a geodesic space, every minimizing geodesic joining two of its points being contained in the closed ball of radius about (The cone and join metrics and the local product chart of a polyhedral gluing(1)-(2)).
A metric on a set is a function satisfying separation, symmetry and the triangle inequality, so every metric value is an honest real number; along a path and any partition the triangle inequality gives (Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric).
A geodesic segment from to in a metric space is a map with , and for all ; a metric space is geodesic when every two of its points are joined by one (Geodesics and geodesic metric spaces).
, and cosine is strictly decreasing on , hence injective there (Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine).
Endowed with the subspace topology of , the interval is a connected subset of ; the continuous image of a connected space is connected; and a nonempty connected subset of a discrete space is a singleton, because for in a connected set the sets and are nonempty, disjoint and open in (The connected subspaces of with its usual topology are exactly the order-convex subsets, the published characterisation transported by the identification of the two descriptions of "open in ", A continuous image of a connected space is connected, and connectedness is a topological property, Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets).
The universal Coxeter group has presentation : its universal property sends any assignment of involutions in a group to a homomorphism from (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups). Here the nerve means the complex whose simplices are the subsets with finite ; step 1.1 verifies that these are exactly the empty simplex and singletons. Bijections of form the group under composition (The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition, is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever has at least three distinct elements).
Verification
The nerve and its path distance. Fix distinct . Send to the involution , to , and every other generator to the identity in . By [F9] this extends to a homomorphism from . The product is the translation , whose -th power sends to ; these images are distinct for distinct nonnegative integers . Hence is infinite. Every with contains it, and is infinite; a singleton generates at most the two elements , so the nerve consists exactly of the empty simplex and the singletons. Every cell of its spherical realization is a point by [F1]. Any step of a chain in therefore has equal endpoints, and no chain joins distinct points. Thus [F2] gives and for .
The truncated metric. By [F3] and the convention , one has for , while by step 1.1. By [F4] the function is a metric of diameter at most , and since there is a pair with , so the diameter is exactly . Comparing values, agrees with exactly for and nowhere off the diagonal, and by [F5] a metric takes real values while is not a real number, so itself is not a metric on and the truncation is what produces one.
The cone distances. For the cone formula of [F3] and step 2.1 give, for , , so that , and, for , with by [F7], so that ; also . Restricting to one ray, the map with therefore satisfies on , an isometry onto the ray , and for all pairs on different rays satisfy .
The rays meet only at the apex. Let , and let be a path with and . By step 3.1 the ball of radius about consists of the points with , since a point with has distance ; so the open ray is open in , and likewise every . These open rays are pairwise disjoint with union , and the projection sending to is continuous for the discrete topology on , its fibres being open. If avoided , then would be a continuous map : by [F8] the interval is connected, so its image is connected, and a connected subset of the discrete space is a singleton, contradicting . Hence every path from to passes through the apex .
The through-apex geodesic and geodesic space. For and , step 2.1 gives , so [F4] shows that the two-segment path through has length and is minimizing; in particular it is a geodesic segment by [F6]. For the -condition, a pair with has by step 2.1 and is joined by the constant segment with , so the hypothesis of [F4] holds vacuously and is a geodesic metric space. Finally, if is a geodesic from to with , then is a path, so by step 4.1 there is with , and since is distance-preserving of length while and , one gets ; the restriction of to avoids , hence lies in the single ray by the argument of step 4.1, and for the distance to gives ; symmetrically for , with . So the geodesic is the two-segment path through the apex.
The truncation value is forced. Let and . The value is excluded at once: it would give for distinct points and violate separation, so let . If the cone formula received the value in place of , it would assign the points and the distance , which is because cosine is strictly decreasing on by [F7]; and the open rays would still be open for the distance function so defined, since a point of another branch is at distance at least from for every (the quadratic in is minimised at when this is nonnegative and at otherwise). Hence the argument of step 4.1 applies verbatim: a geodesic from to would be a path, hence would pass through the apex at some time ; distance-preservation would then give and , so , contradicting . Hence no geodesic joins the two branches once a value is used, whereas with the value the through-apex path is a geodesic by step 5.1: among the values in , only makes the metric star with its through-apex geodesics. Since a metric value must be a real number by [F5], the auxiliary value cannot be passed either; so the formula receives , the unique with by [F7].
Remarks
- The two conventions tested. The example separates the two degenerate values of the componentwise path distance: across components, which is never a metric value, and its truncation , which is. The star is the simplest cone in which the truncation is visible: the two rays meet only at the apex, and the through-apex path is the only way between them.
- Relation to the sources. The identity for is Bridson-Haefliger I.5.7, and the characterisation of geodesics through the cone point is I.5.10; Davis Appendix I.2 records the truncation in the cone formula. The example instantiates both on the discrete universal-Coxeter nerve, whose components are single points.