How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Crossed Homomorphisms Complements and First Cohomology — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Crossed Homomorphisms Complements and First Cohomology
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Semidirect Products, Automorphism Groups and Split Extensions
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
These examples keep the degree-one formulas concrete. Trivial actions recover ordinary homomorphisms, a cyclic source is determined by the value on one generator, and complements in affine or semidirect-product models can be written down explicitly.
The final two examples show the genuinely nonabelian and genuinely non-homomorphic behavior that the A page warns about.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
With trivial action, H^1(C_2,C_3) is zero
Example
For the trivial action of on ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The trivial action of on .
For a trivial action, (For a trivial action, first cohomology is Hom).
A group of order is cyclic, and every nonidentity element has order (Every cyclic group is isomorphic to or to for its finite order ).
Verification
By [L1], it is enough to compute homomorphisms .
The generator of must map to an element whose order divides , but [L2] says the only such element of is the identity. So every homomorphism is trivial, and therefore .
Crossed homomorphisms from a cyclic group are determined by the value on a generator
Example
Let be cyclic and let be a -group. A crossed homomorphism is determined by the single value .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A cyclic group acting on a group , and a crossed homomorphism .
Crossed homomorphisms satisfy (Crossed homomorphism for a G-group).
Verification
Repeatedly applying [L1] gives for every integer . So all positive powers of are determined by .
Since , the value on is determined by the already known value on . Therefore every value of is determined by .
The affine group AGL(1,p) has one kernel-conjugacy class of complements to its translation subgroup
Example
Let be prime. In the affine group
all complements to the translation subgroup are conjugate by translations.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A prime and the semidirect product .
First cohomology classifies complements up to kernel conjugacy (First cohomology classifies complements up to kernel conjugacy).
The two operations on make it a field (For every prime , the two operations on make it a field).
The multiplicative group is cyclic, and crossed homomorphisms from a cyclic group are determined by the value on a generator (The multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic, Crossed homomorphisms from a cyclic group are determined by the value on a generator).
First cohomology is the quotient of crossed homomorphisms by principal crossed homomorphisms (First cohomology via crossed homomorphisms).
Verification
If , then is trivial, so the only crossed homomorphism is the zero map. Hence by [L4].
Suppose . By [L2] and [L3], choose a generator of the cyclic group . Any crossed homomorphism is determined by , so it suffices to show that is always principal.
Because , the generator is not , so in the field . By [L2] it is therefore invertible. Choose with . Then the principal cocycle agrees with on the generator , hence everywhere by [L3]. Thus every crossed homomorphism is principal, and [L4] gives .
Steps 1.1 and 2.1 show that for every prime . Now [L1] shows that there is exactly one -conjugacy class of complements to the translation subgroup in .
Kernel-conjugate complements differ by a principal crossed homomorphism
Example
Let act on an abelian group . If is a crossed homomorphism and , then the complements and are conjugate by a kernel element, where
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An action of on an abelian group , a crossed homomorphism , and an element .
Conjugating by a kernel element changes the crossed homomorphism by a principal one (Kernel conjugation by an element of the coefficient group corresponds to a principal crossed homomorphism).
First cohomology identifies kernel-conjugacy classes of complements (First cohomology classifies complements up to kernel conjugacy).
Verification
Define on every by the displayed formula. Fact [L1] gives . So the two complements are conjugate by the kernel element .
Therefore they determine the same class under the bijection of [L2], exactly because their defining cocycles differ by the principal crossed homomorphism attached to .
With trivial C_2-action on S_3, the nonabelian H^1 pointed set has two classes
Example
For the trivial action of on , the pointed set has exactly two elements.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The trivial action of on (The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition).
Nonabelian first cohomology is the orbit set of crossed homomorphisms under coefficient-group conjugation (First nonabelian cohomology as a pointed set).
It classifies complements as a pointed set (Nonabelian first cohomology classifies complements as a pointed set).
Verification
Under the trivial action, a cocycle is just a homomorphism . The image of the generator is therefore either the identity or an element of order , that is, a transposition.
All transpositions are conjugate in , so [L1] leaves exactly two orbits of cocycles: the trivial one and the orbit of any transposition-valued cocycle. Thus has two points, with the trivial one as basepoint. This matches the complement picture from [L2].
The inversion crossed homomorphism C_2 → Z is not an ordinary homomorphism
Statement refuted
Every crossed homomorphism is an ordinary homomorphism.
Let the nontrivial element of act on by negation. Then the map , is a crossed homomorphism but not a homomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The false claim of FALSE: every crossed homomorphism is an ordinary homomorphism.
The crossed-homomorphism identity for abelian coefficients is (FALSE: every crossed homomorphism is an ordinary homomorphism).
Counterexample
With the negation action, , so is a crossed homomorphism.
But has infinite order in , so cannot be an ordinary homomorphism from the order-two group . Therefore the displayed map is a counterexample to the claim.