Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quantum Information Measures — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These finite examples compute the entropy of a diagonal qubit and the Holevo information of an orthogonal ensemble, exhibit normalized states with infinite quantum relative entropy when support inclusion fails, and calculate the negative conditional entropy of a Bell pair. They preserve the natural-log convention and make the zero-eigenvalue terms explicit.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Entropy of a diagonal qubit state

Example

For p∈[0,1], let ρp be the qubit state with matrix diag⁡(p,1−p). Its entropy is S(ρp)=−pln⁡p−(1−p)ln⁡(1−p) nats, with zero terms interpreted as 0ln⁡0=0. In bits it is h2(p):=−plog⁡2p−(1−p)log⁡2(1−p), where log⁡2u:=ln⁡u/ln⁡2, with the same endpoint convention. Thus pure basis states have entropy 0, and the maximally mixed qubit has entropy ln⁡2 nats, or one bit.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: p∈[0,1], the diagonal density operator ρp, and the entropy definition.

[F1]

Finite-dimensional von Neumann entropy: entropy is the negative sum of λln⁡λ over positive eigenvalues, and entropy in bits divides by ln⁡2.

[F3]

Density operator: a density operator is non-negative and has trace one.

[F4]

Verification

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

The diagonal entries p,1−p are nonnegative and sum to one, so ρp is a density operator by [F3]. By [F2] its eigenvalues are exactly p,1−p. Applying [F1] gives S(ρp)=−pln⁡p−(1−p)ln⁡(1−p), with a zero-eigenvalue term omitted.

2.1givenF1F4step 1.1algebracases∎

If p=0 or p=1, the only positive eigenvalue is 1, so S=0. If p=1/2, [F4] gives S=−2(12ln⁡12)=ln⁡2, and [F1] gives S2=1. For general p, the stated definition of log⁡2 gives S2=h2(p).

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

An orthogonal ensemble attains its Holevo information

Example

Let X have a finite probability vector (px) and let HB=C∣X∣ have orthonormal basis (ex)x∈X. Set ρx:=Px, where Pxv:=⟨v,ex⟩ex, and measure with the projective POVM (Py)y∈X. Define the joint law pxy:=pxtr⁡(ρxPy) and its output marginal pY(y):=∑xpxy. With H(p):=−∑x:px>0pxln⁡px and I(X:Y):=∑x,y:pxy>0pxyln⁡(pxy/(pxpY(y))), the Holevo information and the measurement mutual information both equal H(p).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The probability vector, orthonormal basis, ensemble, and POVM in the Example.

[F1]

Finite classical-quantum states and Holevo information: χ=S(ρˉ)−∑px>0pxS(ρx).

[F2]

Finite-dimensional von Neumann entropy: a state with eigenvalue list (λj) has entropy −∑λj>0λjln⁡λj.

[F3]

Finite POVMs and their outcome law and POVM outcome weights are probabilities: the outcome weight of Py in state ρx is tr⁡(ρxPy), and the weights form a probability vector.

[F4]

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The average state ρˉ=∑xpxPx is diagonal in (ex) with eigenvalues px, so S(ρˉ)=H(p) by [F2]. Each Px has eigenvalues 1 and zeros, hence S(Px)=0; [F1] gives χ=H(p).

2.1givenF3F4step 1.1algebra

By [F3], pxy=pxtr⁡(PxPy)=pxδxy. Thus pY(y)=py, and in the sum defining I(X:Y) only x=y with px>0 contributes, giving I(X:Y)=∑x:px>0pxln⁡(1/px)=H(p) by [F4].

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Combining steps 1.1 and 2.1 gives I(X:Y)=χ for the displayed orthogonal ensemble. This computation does not assert equality for a non-orthogonal ensemble.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Normalized states can have infinite quantum relative entropy

Statement refuted

Every pair of density operators on the same finite-dimensional space has finite quantum relative entropy.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A two-dimensional register H=C2 with computational orthonormal basis e0,e1.

[F1]

Finite-dimensional quantum relative entropy: D(ρ∥σ)=+∞ whenever supp⁡(ρ)⊈supp⁡(σ).

[F2]

Density operator: a density operator is a non-negative endomorphism of trace one.

[F3]

Counterexample

1.1givenF2F3F4construct

Define Pjx:=⟨x,ej⟩ej for j=0,1, and set ρ=P0, σ=P1. Each is an orthogonal rank-one projection, hence non-negative by [F4]; in the basis e0,e1 each has trace one, so both are density operators by [F2].

2.1givenF1F3step 1.1algebra∎

The range/support of P0 is Ce0, while the support of P1 is Ce1; these are orthogonal by [F3]. Thus supp⁡(ρ)⊈supp⁡(σ), and [F1] gives D(ρ∥σ)=+∞. This contradicts the asserted finiteness.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

A Bell pair has negative quantum conditional entropy

Example

Let HA=HB=C2 with computational bases e0,e1, let ϕ=(e0⊗e0+e1⊗e1)/2, and define the pure state ρABx:=⟨x,ϕ⟩ϕ. Then the conditional entropy is S(A∣B)ρ=−ln⁡2 nats.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two-qubit vector ϕ and the rank-one state ρAB in the Example.

[F1]

Finite quantum mutual, conditional, and conditional mutual information: S(A∣B)ρ=S(ρAB)−S(ρB).

[F2]

Finite-dimensional von Neumann entropy: S(ρ)=−∑λ>0λln⁡λ.

[F3]

Density operator: a state is non-negative with trace one.

[F4]

Partial trace over a finite tensor factor: Tr⁡B sums the matching second-factor basis indices.

[F5]

Partial trace over the first tensor factor: Tr⁡A sums the matching first-factor basis indices.

[F6]

Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm: ln⁡ is strictly increasing, ln⁡1=0, and ln⁡(1/2)=ln⁡1−ln⁡2=−ln⁡2.

Verification

1.1givenF2F3construct

The vector ϕ is a unit vector by orthonormality of the product basis, so the rank-one projection ρAB has eigenvalues 1,0,0,0 and is a state by [F3]. Hence S(ρAB)=0 by [F2].

2.1givenF4F5step 1.1algebra

Expanding ρAB gives diagonal terms 12Pe0⊗e0+12Pe1⊗e1 and two off-diagonal cross terms. The partial traces [F4]–[F5] remove those cross terms because their traced basis indices differ, and leave ρA=ρB=12(Pe0+Pe1)=I2/2.

3.1givenF1F2F6step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The eigenvalues of I2/2 are 1/2,1/2, so [F2] and [F6] give S(ρB)=−2(12ln⁡12)=ln⁡2. Since 2>1, strict increase in [F6] gives ln⁡2>ln⁡1=0. Substitution into [F1] and step 1.1 yields S(A∣B)ρ=0−ln⁡2=−ln⁡2<0.

Sources