Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Geometric Markov chains admit delayed adjacent-iid split tours with spare moments

Statement

Assume AC. Let P be a probability kernel on a nonempty standard-Borel space (S,S), with invariant probability π, finite measurable M:S→[0,∞) and 0<r<1 such that ∥Pn(x,⋅)−π∥TV≤M(x)rn(x∈S, n≥1). Let f:S→R be finite measurable, with π(f)=0 and π(∣f∣v)<∞ for some v>1. For every initial law, on an extension preserving the given chain there are an integer m≥1, an almost surely finite delay D∈mN, a standard-Borel seed space E, iid seeds (Uj)j≥0, and measurable finite-word and length functions W:E2→⨆k≥1Sk and L:E→mN with the following properties.

Put T0=D and Tj+1=Tj+L(Uj). Almost surely, simultaneously for all j≥0, (XTj,…,XTj+1−1)=W(Uj,Uj+1). Write Lj=L(Uj), Zj=∑t=TjTj+1−1f(Xt), and Hj=∑t=TjTj+1−1∣f(Xt)∣. Then Zj=z(Uj,Uj+1) and Hj=h(Uj,Uj+1) for measurable functions z,h, and EeaL0<∞ for some a>0,0<μL:=EL0<∞, EZ0=0,EH0q<∞(1≤q<v). For every nonnegative measurable b:S→[0,∞] the full-tour occupation identity is E∑t=T0T1−1b(Xt)=μLπ(b). For each specified initial law, the same m, iid seed law, W,L and post-delay tour law can be used also for the invariant initial law π; only the finite initial segment and coupling change.

In particular (Lj−μL,Zj) is an adjacent-iid centered vector sequence, while the lengths themselves are iid. Full tour words or rewards are not asserted to be iid. No moment of D or of the initial finite prefix is required, and the construction uses a useful multistep split chosen from P rather than requiring any supplied one-step minorization to have positive stationary mass.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the standard-Borel chain, geometric bound, invariant law, and finite centered observable in the Statement.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC supplies the inherited small-set, path-law, coding, product and disintegration conventions.

[F1]

Phi-irreducibility for a general-state Markov kernel and A countably generated phi-irreducible chain has a positive-measure small set: on a countably generated irreducible state space there is a positive-measure m-small set, with a minorizing probability giving that set positive mass.

[F2]

Geometric small-set renewal convergence gives an integrable exponential hitting moment: under its scalar geometric-return-probability hypothesis the explicitly specified split atom has an exponential positive return moment and finite mean.

[F3]

Disintegration of a joint law on standard borel spaces and Finite products of standard Borel spaces are standard Borel: finite standard-Borel joint laws have measurable conditional probability kernels.

[F4]

Standard borel spaces admit bimeasurable real codings, Standard Borel spaces, and Under the Axiom of Countable Choice, countable products and Gδ subspaces of Polish spaces are Polish: standard-Borel spaces have Borel real codings; countable sequences of such coordinates and finite words are standard Borel through Borel subsets of the Polish cube.

[F6]

Measurability of integration against a kernel, Monotone convergence for the integral, and Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: the kernel expectations and nonnegative sums below are measurable, and increasing limits pass through them.

[F8]

Invariant and stationary distribution for a Markov kernel and Iterated transition kernels: πP=π and iterated transitions are successive kernel integrations; consequently πPk=π for every k by induction.

[F9]

Dynkin's pi-lambda theorem: equality of probabilities or kernel identities extends from a countable generating algebra to all measurable events.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement and AC [A1].

1.1A1F1F4givenchooseconstruct

For every π-positive measurable set A, the geometric bound implies Pn(x,A)>0 for all sufficiently large n, for each x. Thus P is π-irreducible. By [F4], a standard-Borel space has a countable generating algebra, so [F1] gives m≥1, D0 with π(D0)>0, a probability ν0 with ν0(D0)>0, and ϵ0>0 such that Pm(x,⋅)≥ϵ0ν0 on D0. Choose an integer K so C=D0∩{M≤K} is positive under both π and ν0, and restrict ν0 to {M≤L} for a finite integer L≥K, then normalize. Decrease the minorization constant to 0<ϵ<1. With Q=Pm, the resulting probability ν satisfies Q(x,⋅)≥ϵν on C, ν(M)≤L and π(C)>0.

1.2A1F3F4F6construct

The bridge kernel has a jointly measurable uniform sampler. Code its standard-Borel word space into a Borel subset of [0,1] by [F4]. Its distribution-function evaluations at rational cuts are measurable. The generalized inverse, defined by an infimum over those cuts, is jointly measurable in the endpoints and a uniform variable and has the coded probability law. Its output lies in the coded image almost surely for each endpoint; use a fixed valid word on the Borel complement and decode. For completeness, the word and sequence spaces here are standard Borel: code S into a Borel subset A⊆[0,1]; AN is Borel in the Polish cube by coordinate tests, and finite words are the Borel union of length-marked sequences with fixed trailing coordinates. The extra uniform sequences have the same property.

2.1F2F8step 1.1given

Put p=ϵπ(C)>0. Invariance [F8] gives π≥pν. The geometric bound gives ∣νQn(C)−π(C)∣≤L(rm)n for n≥1; for n=0 use 1. Thus [F2] applies to this exact split. Its atom α=C×{1} has a positive return time τ with Ebτ<∞ for some b>1. The transition out of α draws the next skeleton state from ν independently of the previous state, and assigns its fresh flag with success probability ϵ1C.

3.1F5F6F8step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra

Define the substochastic failure kernel K0(x,dy)=Q(x,dy)−ϵ1C(x)ν(dy), and let a(x) be the probability of never obtaining a successful split coin, starting with a fresh coin at x. This is measurable by [F5] and [F6], lies in [0,1], and satisfies a=K0a=Qa−ϵ1Cν(a). Integrate against π to get pν(a)=0, hence ν(a)=0. Therefore a=Qa at every state and a=Qna for all n. Convergence of Qn(x,⋅) to π implies a(x)=π(a) for every x, since for a measurable [0,1]-valued function its expectation difference is bounded by total variation, by integrating level-set indicators. Integrating this constant against ν makes it zero. Thus every state and every initial law has a finite first success; its post-transition calendar time is an almost surely finite D∈mN.

4.1F5F6step 2.1step 3.1construct

A skeleton core starts from the ν endpoint just after a success and includes the successive states through the next successful coin, excluding that successful transition's endpoint. A core of length ℓ has probability measure ν(dx0)∏i=0ℓ−2K0(xi,dxi+1) ϵ1C(xℓ−1). The sum over ℓ≥1 has mass one by step 3.1. Its length has the law of τ in step 2.1: starting in the split atom, one transition draws its initial ν state, and the next atom visit occurs at precisely that core's inclusive coin count. Hence its length has an exponential moment. Taking iid copies of this core measure supplies all post-success cores; the first state of the next copy supplies the independent ν endpoint of the preceding successful transition. Multiplying these core kernels reconstructs the split skeleton law. The analogous initial core starts from the given initial law and ends at its first success, before the endpoint drawn from the first iid core.

4.2A1F3F6F8F9step 2.1step 3.1construct

To restore the intermediate states, choose ρ=12π+12∑k≥02−k−1μPk for the given initial law μ. Then π,μ≪ρ and ρP≪ρ, by the null-set calculation used directly on this displayed sum. Disintegrate the intermediate word (X1,…,Xm−1) conditional on (X0,Xm) under initial law ρ, using [F3]; for m=1 take the unique empty word. Denote the kernel by B(x,y;dw). Its bridge identity holds for ρ-almost every starting point, simultaneously as a probability identity by [F9]. Every starting distribution encountered in a split skeleton is ρ-absolutely continuous: K0≤Q propagates this through failures, and ν≪π≪ρ handles successes. Both success and failure endpoint-pair measures are absolutely continuous with respect to ρ(dx)Q(x,dy), because their endpoint kernels are bounded by Q. Thus this bridge identity holds on every transition actually sampled.

5.1F5F6F9step 4.1step 4.2step 1.2construct

Let Uj consist of the jth iid core and an independent infinite sequence of bridge uniforms, using [F5]. For a nonterminal core transition both skeleton endpoints lie in Uj. For its terminal successful transition the starting endpoint lies in Uj and the ending endpoint is the first state in Uj+1; use a uniform in Uj for its bridge. Concatenate each transition's starting state and its m−1 intermediate states, excluding its endpoint. This gives a measurable finite word W(Uj,Uj+1) of length L(Uj)=mℓ(Uj). Concatenate also the finite initial segment from step 4.1, with its terminal bridge ending at the first state's value in U0. Success and failure endpoint kernels add to Q, and step 4.2's bridge kernel then restores the original m-step path law. Iterating these identities gives the original full P-chain law from μ. Thus these words are the claimed delayed calendar tours in a chain copy, with rewards and absolute envelopes measurable functions of two adjacent seeds.

5.2F6F8step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra

The invariant identity is π=πK0+pν. Iteration gives π=p∑j=0n−1νK0j+πK0n. The remainder's total mass is the stationary probability of no successful coin in its first n opportunities, which tends to zero by step 3.1 and monotone convergence. Therefore the potential measure η=∑j≥0νK0j equals π/p. It counts every core state before its fresh coin is sampled, including the state of the terminal successful coin. In particular Eℓ=η(S)=1/p and EL=m/p.

6.1F6F7F8step 4.2step 5.1step 5.2

For nonnegative measurable b, set cb(x)=∑i=0m−1Pib(x). The event that a skeleton state is counted in the core is determined before its fresh coin and bridge are sampled. Averaging that coin, its endpoint and bridge makes the conditional expected calendar-block cost cb(x), because their endpoint mixture is Q and their restored block law is the original one. Hence [F6] and step 5.2 give E∑t in one full tourb(Xt)=η(cb)=π(cb)p=mpπ(b)=μLπ(b). This includes the cost inside the terminal successful bridge. Apply the identity to the positive and negative parts of f; π∣f∣<∞ follows from its stated vth moment and [F7]. Thus EZ0=0.

6.2F6F7F8step 2.1step 4.1step 5.1

By step 4.1, Eexp⁡(aL)<∞ for a=(log⁡b)/m>0. Starting just after a success, the reconstructed infinite chain has initial law ν and its original P-chain marginal, by step 5.1. Since π≥pν, invariance gives Eν∣f(Xt)∣v≤π(∣f∣v)/p at every calendar time. For 1≤q<v, Minkowski and Holder [F7], first on finite sums, imply ∥∑t=0L−1∣f(Xt)∣∥q≤(π(∣f∣v)p)1/v∑t≥0Pr⁡ν(L>t)1/q−1/v<∞. The exponential length moment makes the series finite; [F6] passes through the increasing finite sums. This proves every claimed spare moment, while ∣Z0∣≤H0.

7.1A1F3F4F5step 3.1step 1.2step 5.1step 6.1step 6.2

The constructed state path, its finite delay, and its iid seed sequence have a joint law on standard-Borel spaces by the explicit countable coding in step 1.2. Disintegrate that law conditional on the full state path by [F3], and evaluate the auxiliary kernel at the actual given chain path. Extend its probability space by [F5]. The original entire process is preserved, and its joint law with the seeds and delay is the constructed one. Thus the word equalities, iid seed law, occupation identity and moment conclusions hold on this extension. The initial segment is almost surely finite by step 3.1; since f is finite, its absolute reward is finite, even without an initial-law moment bound.

8.1F5step 4.2step 5.1step 5.2step 6.1step 6.2step 7.1∎

Each length depends only on Uj, so the lengths are iid with positive finite mean. Each reward and envelope depends on (Uj,Uj+1), so their joint sequence with the centered lengths is adjacent-iid, with EZ0=0 and all the stated moments. Disjoint seed pairs are independent, giving one-dependence without claiming iid full tours. The same m,C,ν and core law were selected from P,π,M, and the single bridge version in step 4.2 uses a ρ dominating both the specified initial law and π. Thus the same seed law and word functions work from either initial law; only the initial segment and its lifting kernel change. All properties in the Statement follow. The chosen split came from step 1.1 and never used positivity of any supplied one-step minorization, which can therefore be vacuous.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

116 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources