Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Additive spectral-estimation accuracy and cost

Statement

Let V be a finite-dimensional complex inner-product space, let H:V→V be Hermitian with σ(H)⊆[−1,1], let ψ be a normalized eigenvector of eigenvalue λ, and let U=eiH. Use a Hamiltonian spectral-estimation access instance whose system is V, whose state-preparation circuit prepares ψ, whose phase unitary is U, whose phase encoding is μ↦μ/(2π)(mod1) on σ(H), and whose decoder returns 2π times the principal representative in (−1/2,1/2]. For positive rational 0<ϵ≤1 and 0<δ<1, take certified rational upper enclosures π+>π and L+≥ln⁡(1/δ) and run Median-amplified spectral estimate on this instance with its least dyadic Q satisfying Qϵ≥6π+ and least positive odd r satisfying r≥8L+. In particular Qϵ≥6π and r≥8ln⁡(1/δ). In the exact model, its median λ~ satisfies Pr⁡(∣λ~−λ∣≤ϵ)≥1−δ. If each of the r executed trials has total state-vector deviation at most ξ from its exact trial (including preparation and all controlled simulation errors), then Pr⁡(∣λ~−λ∣≤ϵ)≥1−δ−rξ. An access interface that implements controlled-U by repeated calls uses r(Q−1) controlled-U calls, in addition to r state preparations, measurements, decodings, and the certified schedule/median costs. Exact power access instead uses the sum of its declared power-query costs over the r trials. The eigenvector hypothesis is essential to the fixed-eigenvalue guarantee; a counterexample in the more general injective phase-access model is included below.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The eigenstate promise, U=eiH, positive rational accuracy/failure inputs, certified rational schedule bounds, the spectral-estimation and median procedures, and the stated exact or approximate access costs. For an approximate run, ξ bounds the final unit-vector distance from the corresponding exact trial output before measurement.

[F1]

Phase-estimation nearest-grid and tail bounds: if K=⌊Qη⌋≥2, phase-QPE has circular tail at most 1/(2(K−1)).

[F2]

Median-amplified spectral estimate: the r trials reprepare the same eigenstate, run QPE independently, decode in the fixed principal branch, and return the median.

[F3]

Eigenvalue-estimation access and aliasing convention and Eigenphase estimation access model: the eigenvalue decoder is injective on the promised spectrum, the eigenphase convention is Uψ=e2πiθψ, and controlled powers or their construction and costs are explicit.

[F4]

The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for finite sums: for finite real lists (ay) and (by), ∑yayby≤∑yay2∑yby2 when the entries are nonnegative.

[F11]

Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨u,v⟩∣≤∥u∥∥v∥, with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors: in a complex inner-product space, ∣⟨u,v⟩∣≤∥u∥∥v∥.

[F12]

Quantum phase-estimation spectral sampler performs a finite projective readout on the phase register, and Finite projective measurements supplies mutually orthogonal projections Py with ∑yPy=I; hence ∑y∥Pyz∥2=∥z∥2 for every trial vector z.

[F5]

The integral logarithm L is the published natural logarithm and The integral logarithm is continuous and strictly increasing on (0,∞): for x>0, ln⁡x=∫1xdt/t and the logarithm is strictly increasing.

[F8]

Every complete ordered field is Archimedean: for every positive real cutoff, some natural number exceeds it.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F7F9givenalgebra

For the prepared eigenvector of eigenvalue λ∈[−1,1], put θ0=λ/(2π) and let θˉ∈[0,1) be the representative of its encoded phase class. By [F9], Uψ=e2πiθˉψ. Set η=ϵ/(2π); then Qη=Qϵ/(2π)≥3, so K=⌊Qη⌋≥3. Apply [F1] to θˉ: except with probability at most 1/(2(K−1))≤1/4, the circular phase error is less than η. On this event, the definition of the circular distance in [F1] gives an integer k with ∣y/Q+k−θˉ∣<η. Write θˉ=θ0+n for an integer n; then y/Q+k−n=θ0+e for some ∣e∣<η≤1/(2π). Consequently ∣θ0+e∣<1/π<1/2 by [F7], so this lift is the principal representative and the specified decoder returns an estimate with error 2π∣e∣<ϵ. Thus each exact trial succeeds with probability at least 3/4.

1.2F2F3givenalgebra

With controlled-U access, the QPE phase register uses powers U2j for j=0,…,m−1, whose repeated-call implementation uses ∑j2j=Q−1 calls per trial. There are r trials; each begins with a fresh charged state preparation and has one projective readout and one decoder. Exact supplied powers replace this count by their declared per-trial costs. No uncontrolled resource coordinate is inferred.

1.3F2F8giveninductionalgebra

The rational schedule search in [F2] terminates. Since ϵ>0 and π+,L+ are finite rationals, [F8] gives an integer N≥1 with N>6π+/ϵ and N>8L+. The bound 2n≥n+1 follows by induction: it is equality at n=0, and 2n+1≥2(n+1)≥n+2 whenever it holds at n. Thus 2Nϵ≥(N+1)ϵ>6π+ and the dyadic doubling search stops by exponent N. The odd integer 2N+1 exceeds 8L+, so the increasing odd search also stops by then. Each least schedule value is therefore found by a finite search, with rational comparisons.

2.1F2F5F6F10step 1.1givenalgebra

Let Xi be the indicator of success on trial i and S=∑i=1rXi. Exact independent fresh preparations make the Xi independent, with pi=Pr⁡(Xi=1)≥3/4 by step 1.1. For t=ln⁡3>0, on S≤r/2 we have e−tS≥e−tr/2, so summing the nonnegative finite expectation over this event gives Pr⁡(S≤r/2)≤etr/2E(e−tS)=etr/2∏i(1−pi+pie−t)≤(3/2)r. Each factor decreases in pi and at pi=3/4 the product factor is 3(1/4+1/4)=3/2. Since 2/3>8/7 (both sides are positive and 4/3>64/49 because 196>192) and [F10] applies to L on [1,8/7], there is c∈(1,8/7) with ln⁡(8/7)=L(8/7)−L(1)=(1/7)L′(c)=1/(7c)>1/8. Thus [F5] gives ln⁡(2/3)>1/8, and [F6] implies (3/2)r≤e−r/8. The schedule gives r/8≥L+≥ln⁡(1/δ), so [F6] and monotonicity of the exponential yield e−r/8≤e−ln⁡(1/δ)=δ. An odd median is inaccurate only if at least half the trials are inaccurate, which is contained in {S≤r/2}; this proves the exact claim.

3.1F4F11F12step 2.1givenalgebra

For one approximate trial, write the exact and implemented normalized vectors as v,w and put d=v−w. For each readout projector Py, the identity Py=Py∗=Py2 gives ⟨d,Pyv⟩=⟨Pyd,Pyv⟩ and ⟨w,Pyd⟩=⟨Pyw,Pyd⟩. Applying [F11] termwise, then [F4] to the nonnegative real lists of projected-vector norms and using [F12], bounds each of ∑y∣⟨d,Pyv⟩∣ and ∑y∣⟨w,Pyd⟩∣ by ∥d∥≤ξ, since ∥v∥=∥w∥=1. Expanding ⟨v,Pyv⟩−⟨w,Pyw⟩ as the sum of those two terms shows that the ℓ1 distance of the outcome laws is at most 2ξ, hence their total variation distance is at most ξ. For finite probability laws p,q and an event E, p(E)−q(E)=12(∑y∈E(py−qy)−∑y∉E(py−qy)), so ∣p(E)−q(E)∣≤12∑y∣py−qy∣. In a product of r trial laws, inserting hybrids that replace one factor at a time and using that every unchanged factor has mass one bounds the total variation distance by the sum of the single-trial distances, at most rξ. Applying the event bound to the median-success event and the exact probability from step 2.1 gives probability at least 1−δ−rξ.

4.1F1F2F3givenalgebra∎

The eigenstate promise cannot be dropped from the generic phase-access procedure. Consider the access instance U=diag⁡(1,−1) with encoded eigenvalue labels 0 and 1/2 assigned to phases 0 and 1/2, and input ψ=(∣0⟩+∣1⟩)/2. Choose any 0<ϵ<1/4 and a dyadic Q satisfying Qϵ≥6π; then Q is even. Both phases lie exactly on the QPE grid, so [F1] gives output 0 or 1/2 with probability 1/2 each. Fresh repetitions are independent; pairing each length-r sequence with the sequence obtained by swapping every 0 and 1/2 shows the median is each encoded eigenvalue with probability exactly 1/2. The two ϵ-neighborhoods are disjoint, so neither fixed label has success probability above 1/2. This counterexample uses the generic injective phase-encoding interface [F3], and shows why this theorem states the Hamiltonian guarantee for eigenstate input only.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

114 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources