Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unbiasedness and L2 consistency of the spatial window average

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω, as required by Van Hove sequences of spatial windows. Let X(s), s∈Rd, be a jointly measurable real random field on a probability space, with constant mean μ and finite second moments. Assume it is wide-sense stationary in the explicit sense that Cov⁡(X(s+h),X(s))=C(h) for all s,h∈Rd, and that C∈L1(Rd). Let (Wn) be a Van Hove sequence from Van Hove sequences of spatial windows. Then each spatial window average from Spatial window average is well-defined, satisfies E[XˉWn]=μ, and E[∣XˉWn−μ∣2]⟶0. Thus these averages are unbiased and converge to the mean in L2. No variance consistency for any other estimator, weak consistency, or central limit theorem is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: d≥1, a probability space (Ω,F,P), a jointly measurable real field X:Rd×Ω→R, E[X(s)]=μ, E[X(s)2]<∞ for every s, stationary covariance C(t−s), ∫Rd∣C(h)∣ dh<∞, and a Van Hove sequence (Wn).

[A1]

Van Hove sequences of spatial windows: under ACω, Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of Rn is Lebesgue measurable makes every Borel Wn Lebesgue measurable and Assuming countable choice, L(Rn) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λn is a complete measure extending elementary volume supplies Lebesgue measure; every Wn has finite positive volume, ∣Wn∣→∞, and for each compact K, ∣(Wn+K)∖Wn∣/∣Wn∣→0.

[A2]

Spatial window average: when a sample path is Lebesgue integrable, XˉWn=∣Wn∣−1∫WnX(s) ds.

[F1]

Random fields, stationarity, covariance, and variograms, Random elements and real random variables, and The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space: a field is a family of real random variables on one probability space; joint measurability is an additional hypothesis for spatial integration, and wide stationarity supplies a constant mean and displacement-indexed covariance.

[F2]

Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: variance is the expected centered square and covariance is the expected centered product; symmetry makes the reverse-lag convention in the Given equivalent to the supplier covariance convention.

[F3]

Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable: expectation is the Lebesgue integral against P.

[F4]

Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables: for U,V∈L2(P), E∣UV∣≤∥U∥2∥V∥2.

[F5]

The product measure of two sigma-finite measure spaces and Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: nonnegative product- measurable functions can be integrated in either order, and the section integral is measurable.

[F6]

Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals and Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product: absolutely integrable product-measurable functions have equal iterated and product integrals.

[F8]

Lp convergence for random variables: L2 convergence means that the L2 norm of the difference tends to zero.

[F9]

The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates, A measurable function between measurable spaces, Every section of a product-measurable function is measurable, and Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability: on (Rd×Rd×Ω,(B(Rd)⊗B(Rd))⊗F), the maps ((s,t),ω)↦(s,ω) and ((s,t),ω)↦(t,ω) are measurable because the preimages of generating rectangles A×E are respectively (A×Rd)×E and (Rd×A)×E. Composing with the jointly measurable field shows that (s,t,ω)↦X(s,ω) and (s,t,ω)↦X(t,ω) are measurable, so their centered product is measurable. Also, (s,h)↦s+h is continuous because ∥s+h−(s0+h0)∥2≤∥s−s0∥2+∥h−h0∥2. Every open subset of Rd×Rd is a countable union of rational open rectangles, hence belongs to B(Rd)⊗B(Rd). Thus inverse images of open sets under addition are product-measurable, and the class of sets with product-measurable preimage is a sigma-algebra containing all open sets, hence contains every Borel set. Therefore addition is measurable for the product sigma-algebra and (s,h)↦1Wn(s)1Wn(s+h) is measurable for Borel Wn. Under ACω in [A1], these Borel-measurable functions are also measurable for the product Lebesgue sigma-algebras used in Tonelli. Since C is Lebesgue measurable by C∈L1, its lift (s,h)↦C(h) is measurable for the product Lebesgue sigma-algebra: the preimage of a Lebesgue-measurable set E is Rd×E. Thus C(h)1Wn(s)1Wn(s+h) is product-measurable as well.

[F10]

Dominated convergence: pointwise convergence dominated by an integrable function permits passage of the limit through the integral.

[F11]

Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure: under the already assumed ACω, Lebesgue measure on Rd is sigma-finite, as witnessed by its increasing finite-measure cubes; its restriction to each bounded measurable Wn is finite.

Proof

Proof technique: establish the exact covariance double integral, then use the Van Hove overlap limit and dominated convergence.

1.1A1A2F1F3F4F5F6F9F11given

By [F11], Lebesgue measure on Rd is sigma-finite under the assumed ACω. Its restriction to Wn is finite by [A1], and the probability measure has total mass 1. Thus all measure factors used below satisfy the sigma-finiteness hypotheses of [F5] and [F6], including the unbounded lag-space factor in Wn×Rd. For every s, [F4] with V=1 gives E∣X(s)∣≤(E[X(s)2])1/2=M<∞, where M is constant by the stated first- and second-order stationarity. The map (s,ω)↦∣X(s,ω)∣ is product-measurable; Tonelli [F5] gives E∫Wn∣X(s)∣ ds=∫WnE∣X(s)∣ ds≤M∣Wn∣<∞. Therefore the sample path is absolutely integrable almost surely. Tonelli also makes the event where this integral is finite measurable; its probability is one. Applying Tonelli separately to X+ and X− makes both section integrals measurable, and their difference on that event, extended by zero on its null complement as in [A2], is measurable.

1.2A2F3F6F11givenalgebra

Since ∫WnE∣X(s)∣ ds<∞, Fubini [F6] applies to X on Wn×Ω. Its constant mean gives E[XˉWn]=1∣Wn∣∫WnE[X(s)] ds=1∣Wn∣∫Wnμ ds=μ.

1.3A2F2F4F5F6F9F11given

Put Z(s):=X(s)−μ. The rectangle-preimage argument in [F9] makes (s,t,ω)↦Z(s,ω)Z(t,ω) product-measurable. By [F4], E∣Z(s)Z(t)∣≤C(0) for all s,t. Iterated Tonelli [F5] therefore gives a finite integral, at most C(0)∣Wn∣2, of the absolute pair product over Wn×Wn×Ω. Each Ω-section is integrable by this bound, so Fubini [F6] makes (s,t)↦E[Z(s)Z(t)] measurable; it equals C(t−s) by [F2]. A second Fubini calculation yields E[(XˉWn−μ)2]=1∣Wn∣2∫Wn∫WnC(t−s) dt ds. This also proves XˉWn∈L2.

1.4A1F5F7F9F11algebra

Define qn(h):=∣Wn∩(Wn−h)∣/∣Wn∣. The addition-measurability argument in [F9] makes (s,h)↦1Wn(s)1Wn(s+h) product-measurable, so Tonelli [F5] gives measurability of its section integral qn. Also 0≤qn(h)≤1. For fixed h, translation invariance [F7] gives ∣Wn∖(Wn−h)∣=∣(Wn+h)∖Wn∣. The latter is bounded by ∣(Wn+{0,h})∖Wn∣, so the Van Hove condition [A1] implies qn(h)→1.

2.1step 1.3F5F6F7F9F11algebra

The product-measurable integrand C(h)1Wn(s)1Wn(s+h) is absolutely integrable: Tonelli and [F9] give ∫Rd∫Wn∣C(h)∣1Wn(s+h) ds dh≤∣Wn∣∥C∥1<∞. In the inner integral of step 1.3 set h=t−s; translation invariance [F7] gives ∫WnC(t−s) dt=∫RdC(h)1Wn(s+h) dh. Fubini [F6] then yields E[(XˉWn−μ)2]=1∣Wn∣2∫RdC(h)∣Wn∩(Wn−h)∣ dh. The overlap factor is the measure of those s∈Wn for which s+h∈Wn.

3.1A1F10step 2.1step 1.4given

Multiplying the formula in step 2.1 by ∣Wn∣ gives ∣Wn∣ E[(XˉWn−μ)2]=∫RdC(h)qn(h) dh. By [F10], the right side converges to ∫C(h) dh because ∣C(h)qn(h)∣≤∣C(h)∣∈L1. It is therefore bounded; since ∣Wn∣→∞, step 2.1 implies E[(XˉWn−μ)2]→0.

4.1F8step 1.2step 3.1∎

The mean identity in step 1.2 and the second-moment limit in step 3.1 are exactly L2 convergence to μ by [F8].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Spatial window average.

Dependency tree · two levels

95 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources