Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The distributional gradient of a locally integrable function smooth off one point

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) for the Lebesgue and product-measure interfaces (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Use the explicit one-based labels xk:=x(k−1) for k=1,…,n; here ∂k denotes differentiation in x(k−1), corresponding to ∂k−1 in the zero-based supplier convention of Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn. Let n≥2, let p∈Rn, and let u∈Lloc1(Rn) be continuous on Rn∖{p} and of class C1 there, with each classical partial derivative ∂iu:Rn∖{p}→R (extended by 0 at p) again in Lloc1(Rn) (A locally integrable function on Rn). Then for every i=1,…,n, with Tu∈D′(Rn) the regular distribution of u (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Locally integrable functions embed in distributions) and ∂i the distributional derivative (Distributional derivative), ∂iTu=T∂iuin D′(Rn), that is, ⟨∂iTu,ψ⟩=∫Rn∂iu ψ dλn for every ψ∈Cc∞(Rn) (Test function space d of an open set). The value assigned to ∂iu at the single point p is immaterial, because a singleton is Lebesgue null (A box with a degenerate side is Lebesgue null, and so is every coordinate hyperplane in Rn, A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes, Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree). Both hypotheses are used: u must be locally integrable and continuous away from p, and each classical partial must be locally integrable; the lemma is asserted for one exceptional point, not for an exceptional set of positive surface measure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, n≥2, p∈Rn, and a function u∈Lloc1(Rn) that is continuous on Rn∖{p} and C1 there, with every classical partial ∂iu (extended by 0 at p) in Lloc1(Rn). Fix an index i∈{1,…,n} and a test function ψ∈Cc∞(Rn).

[F1]

For f∈Lloc1(Rn) the regular distribution is ⟨Tf,φ⟩=∫Rnfφ dλn, and the embedding f↦Tf is complex-linear and injective modulo almost-everywhere equality (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Locally integrable functions embed in distributions).

[F2]

The distributional derivative is defined by ⟨∂iT,φ⟩=−⟨T,∂iφ⟩, and the pairing is bilinear with no conjugation (Distributional derivative).

[F3]

The test space Cc∞(Rn) consists of smooth compactly supported functions; each such ψ is bounded and its support is a compact subset of Rn (Test function space d of an open set, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).

[F5]

Measurable real functions are closed under pointwise-defined sums, scalar multiples and absolute values; a nonnegative measurable function may be restricted by a measurable-set indicator, and increasing limits are measurable (Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral). Integrability means finiteness of the integral of the absolute value, and the nonnegative integral is monotone and homogeneous (Integral over a measurable subset, Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral). Measurability of the particular products in this proof is established locally in step 1.1.

[F6]

f∈Lloc1(Rn) means that f is measurable and ∫B(x,r)∣f∣ dλn<∞ for every Euclidean ball (A locally integrable function on Rn, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space); the Lebesgue and product-measure interfaces used below carry the declared Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F7]

Under the standard identification Rn=Rn−1×R, the Borel sigma-algebras satisfy B(Rn−1)⊗B(R)=B(Rn), and λn is the completion of the product measure λn−1×λ1 (The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}, The Euclidean Lebesgue measure is the completion of the product of the factor Lebesgue measures).

[F8]

Fubini and Tonelli hold for the completed product of two sigma-finite measure spaces: for G∈L1(λn) the sections are integrable almost everywhere and the repeated integrals agree with the integral against λn (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability).

[F9]

A coordinate permutation of Rn is a linear isometry for the Euclidean norm, hence an orthogonal operator, and every orthogonal operator has ∣det⁡T∣=1; for a C1 diffeomorphism T and F∈L1(λn), ∫F dλn=∫F∘T ∣det⁡DT∣ dλn (Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, Linear isometries, and orthogonal or unitary operators on finite-dimensional inner product spaces, Orthogonal and unitary operators form groups, and their determinants have modulus one, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

[F10]

Integration by parts holds on a compact interval for functions differentiable at every point whose derivatives are integrable, continuous functions on a compact interval are Darboux integrable, and a bounded Borel Riemann integrable function on a box has equal Riemann and Lebesgue integrals (If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u′,v′ integrable, then ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v, A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, Riemann–Lebesgue comparison for distribution test integrands).

[F11]

The classical partial derivative ∂iu is the derivative of the one-variable function obtained by freezing all other coordinates (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF3F4F5F6

Set F:=∂iu⋅ψ and H:=u⋅∂iψ on Rn. By [F4] replace u and each ∂iu at p by 0 without changing their local integrability classes or integrals. On O:=Rn∖{p} these functions, and the real and imaginary parts of F,H, are continuous. For any one of these real functions v extended by 0 at p and every real a, the set {v>a}∩O is open in O, hence open in Rn; the full superlevel set is this open set with {p} added when 0>a. It is therefore Borel, so the real and imaginary parts of F,H are Borel measurable. Choose a ball containing the compact support of ψ and its derivatives. On it ∣F∣≤∥ψ∥∞∣∂iu∣ and ∣H∣≤∥∂iψ∥∞∣u∣, and both products vanish outside it; monotonicity and homogeneity yield F,H∈L1(λn).

2.1step 1.1F5F9

Let π:Rn→Rn be the coordinate permutation moving the i-th coordinate to the last position, π(x)=(x1,…,xi−1,xi+1,…,xn,xi). Then ∥π(x)∥2=∑jxj2=∥x∥2, so π is a linear isometry, hence an orthogonal operator with ∣det⁡Dπ∣=∣det⁡π∣=1 ([F9]); π is a C1 diffeomorphism of Rn onto itself. Applying the change-of-variables identity of [F9] to F and to H, and using ∣det⁡Dπ∣=1, gives ∫RnF dλn=∫RnF∘π−1 dλn,∫RnH dλn=∫RnH∘π−1 dλn. The compositions F∘π−1 and H∘π−1 are Borel and in L1(λn) because ∫∣F∘π−1∣ dλn=∫∣F∣ dλn<∞ and likewise for H.

3.1step 2.1F7F8

Identify Rn with Rn−1×R by the standard ordering, so that a point with last coordinate t and remaining coordinates y is written (y,t); the permutation of step 2.1 then satisfies π(x)=(y(x),xi) where y(x) lists the coordinates other than the i-th. Define G(y,t):=F(x(y,t)) and K(y,t):=H(x(y,t)), where x(y,t)∈Rn is the point with i-th coordinate t and remaining coordinates y. Then G=F∘π−1 and K=H∘π−1 under the identification, so step 2.1 reads ∫F dλn=∫G dλn and ∫H dλn=∫K dλn; by [F7] and [F8] these equal the repeated integrals ∫Rn−1(∫RG(y,t) dt)dy and ∫Rn−1(∫RK(y,t) dt)dy, the inner sections being integrable for almost every y.

4.1step 3.1F3F4F10F11

Fix y∈Rn−1 such that the line Ly={x(y,t):t∈R} does not pass through p; the excluded set of y is the single point y∗ listing the coordinates of p other than pi, which is a degenerate box and hence λn−1-null ([F4]). For such y, the map t↦u(x(y,t)) is C1 on R with derivative t↦∂iu(x(y,t)) ([F11]), and t↦ψ(x(y,t)) is smooth with compact support ([F3]). Choose a<b with the support of t↦ψ(x(y,t)) contained in (a,b). Then v(t):=u(x(y,t)) ψ(x(y,t)) is differentiable at every point of [a,b] with continuous derivative v′=∂iu ψ+u ∂iψ there, so v′ is integrable in the Darboux sense ([F10]); applying the real integration-by-parts formula of [F10] to the real and imaginary parts of both factors on [a,b], combining the resulting identities bilinearly and using that the boundary terms vanish gives ∫RG(y,t) dt=−∫RK(y,t) dt, where the Darboux integrals have been replaced by the equal Lebesgue integrals of the continuous compactly supported integrands ([F10]).

5.1step 3.1step 4.1F1F2F5∎

The equality of step 4.1 holds for every y outside the null set {y∗} ([F4]), hence almost everywhere, and the section functions are integrable there by step 3.1. Integrating the identity over Rn−1 and using the linearity of the integral gives ∫F dλn=∫G dλn=−∫K dλn=−∫H dλn. Therefore, by [F1] and [F2], ⟨∂iTu,ψ⟩=−⟨Tu,∂iψ⟩=−∫Rnu ∂iψ dλn=−∫RnH dλn=∫RnF dλn=∫Rn∂iu ψ dλn=⟨T∂iu,ψ⟩. Since ψ∈Cc∞(Rn) was arbitrary, ∂iTu=T∂iu in D′(Rn), as claimed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources