Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Retarded potentials of a point history as the retarded convolution of the point sources, and the off-worldline Lienard-Wiechert fields

Statement

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let c>0, q∈R, ε0>0, put μ0:=(c2ε0)−1 and C:=q/(4πε0), and let z:R→R3 be of class C3 with ∣z′(s)∣≤v∗<c for every s∈R (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral). Write Ω:=R3×R and Γ:={(z(s),s):s∈R}⊆Ω. For (x,t)∈Ω∖Γ let s=s(x,t) be the unique retarded root of Global existence, uniqueness and differentiability of the retarded root with t−s=∣x−z(s)∣/c, and put R:=x−z(s), r:=∣R∣>0, n:=R/r, β:=z′(s)/c, κ:=1−n⋅β, N:=n⋅β, D:=κr, β˙:=z′′(s)/c and d:=n⋅β˙ (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn). Then:

(a) the scalar distribution ρ∈D′(Ω) and the vector distribution J∈(D′(Ω))3 of Point-support spacetime densities: distributions, continuity equation and endpoint fluxes,

⟨ρ,ψ⟩=q∫Rψ(z(s),s) ds,⟨J,ψ⟩=q∫Rz′(s) ψ(z(s),s) ds,

satisfy ∂tρ+div⁡J=0.

(b) Let K be the retarded wave kernel of The retarded wave kernel is a distribution supported on the cone, solves the point-wave equation, and convolves to the retarded solution and, for ψ∈D(Ω) and τ∈R, y∈R3, put (K⊛ψ)(y,τ):=⟨K,ψ(y+⋅,τ+⋅)⟩. Define the retarded-history pairings by the explicit integrals

⟨Φ,ψ⟩:=qε0∫R(K⊛ψ)(z(s),s) ds,⟨Υ,ψ⟩:=μ0q∫Rz′(s)(K⊛ψ)(z(s),s) ds.

Here the second integral is componentwise. The notation ε0−1⟨ρ,K⊛ψ⟩ and μ0⟨J,K⊛ψ⟩, if used, means precisely these explicit history integrals, rather than ordinary distribution action on a compactly supported test. These pairings define distributions on Ω, are finite for every ψ∈D(Ω) and satisfy the exact retarded-convolution identities

⟨Φ,ψ⟩=∫Ω∖ΓC ψ(x,t)κ(x,t) r(x,t) dx dt,⟨Υ,ψ⟩=∫Ω∖Γβ(x,t)c C ψ(x,t)κ(x,t) r(x,t) dx dt

(for Υ, componentwise against ψ∈D(Ω); both integrands are continuous on the open set Ω∖Γ and integrable there against ψ). Consequently the potentials are the C2 functions

φ:=CD=Cκr:Ω∖Γ→R,A:=β φc=β Cc κr:Ω∖Γ→R3

off the worldline, and the zero extensions φ~,A~ on Γ belong to Lloc1(Ω); Φ is the regular distribution of φ~, and Υ that of A~ (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function).

(c) Let E:=−∇φ−∂tA and B:=curl⁡A on Ω∖Γ (Scalar-vector potential pairs, gauge transformation, Lorenz divergence and the wave expression). Then, off the worldline,

E=C[(1−∣β∣2)(n−β)κ3r2+n×((n−β)×β˙)c κ3r],B=n×Ec.

The fields E,B are C1 off the worldline. More generally, if z∈Ck, k≥3, the retarded root is Ck, the potentials are Ck−1 and the fields are Ck−2 there; if z∈C∞, all these objects are smooth off the worldline. The result is a mathematical model computation for the stipulated uniformly subluminal smooth worldline and the retarded choice; no self-force law, no radiation-reaction postulate and no physical Maxwell coupling is asserted or proved.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The constants c,q,ε0,μ0,C, the all-time uniformly subluminal C3 trajectory z, the domain Ω=R3×R with its worldline graph Γ, and the retarded data s,R,r,n,β,κ,N,D,β˙,d of the Statement.

[F1]

For an open interval I, a C1 trajectory z:I→R3 whose graph map into an open Ω is proper, and ψ∈D(Ω), the functionals ⟨ρ,ψ⟩=q∫Iψ(z(s),s)ds and ⟨J,ψ⟩=q∫Iz′(s)ψ(z(s),s)ds are distributions and satisfy ∂tρ+div⁡J=0; properness is automatic for I=R (Point-support spacetime densities: distributions, continuity equation and endpoint fluxes).

[F2]

For c>0 and C1 z with ∣z′∣≤v∗<c there is exactly one retarded root s of t−s=∣x−z(s)∣/c, with s≤t and equality exactly on the worldline; off it s<t, r=∣x−z(s)∣ satisfies r=c(t−s)>0, κ=1−n⋅z′(s)/c obeys 1−v∗/c≤κ≤1+v∗/c, and ∂ts=1/κ, ∇s=−n/(cκ); a Ck trajectory gives a Ck root on the off-worldline domain, in particular C3 for C3 z (Global existence, uniqueness and differentiability of the retarded root).

[F3]

For the retarded kernel K one has (K⊛ψ)(y,τ)=(4π)−1∫ψ(y+w,τ+∣w∣/c)∣w∣−1dw for ψ∈D(Ω) (The retarded wave kernel is a distribution supported on the cone, solves the point-wave equation, and convolves to the retarded solution).

[F4]

For a potential pair, E=−∇φ−∂tA, B=curl⁡A (Scalar-vector potential pairs, gauge transformation, Lorenz divergence and the wave expression).

[F5]

A locally integrable function defines the regular functional uf(φ)=∫fφ; distributions are the continuous complex-linear functionals on the LF test space, whose fixed-support seminorms bound absolute pairings (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Distribution, Test function topology).

[F6]

Under ACω, for nonnegative Borel g on Rn, ∫Rng dλn=∫0∞∫Sn−1g(rω)rn−1dσ(ω)dr; in particular ∫BL∣w∣−1dw=σ(S2)L2/2 (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F7]

Tonelli and Fubini on sigma-finite products: nonnegative measurable functions may be integrated in either order, and for f∈L1(μ×ν) the three integrals agree (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F8]

Euclidean Borel sets are the Borel sets of the product structure, and the Lebesgue product measure agrees with Euclidean Lebesgue measure on Borel sets (The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}, On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}).

[F9]

Under ACω, for a C1 diffeomorphism T:U→V of open sets, ∫Vg=∫Ug(T)∣det⁡DT∣ for nonnegative Borel g, and ∫Vf=∫Uf(T)∣det⁡DT∣ for f∈L1(V) (Borel change of variables from the compact-support formula and Radon uniqueness, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

[F10]

The integral is linear on L1, satisfies ∣∫f∣≤∫∣f∣, nonnegative integrals are monotone and scale, and a nonnegative measurable function has zero integral exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ), The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere).

[F12]

The gradient, the coordinate partial derivatives, and the divergence and curl on C1 fields are those fixed by the cited definitions; vector-valued one-variable derivatives and integrals are defined componentwise (The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn, Divergence and curl of a C1 vector field, The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral).

[F14]

The Euclidean inner product is bilinear and symmetric and the cross product is bilinear and alternating; in particular n×(n−β)=−n×β (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, The cross product in R3, The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors).

[F15]

The divergence and curl obey curl⁡(fF)=∇f×F+fcurl⁡F (Divergence and curl are linear and satisfy the scalar product rules).

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F11

Since z is C3, it is C1, and I:=R is open; the graph map s↦(z(s),s) into Ω=R3×R is proper because a compact subset of Ω has bounded time coordinate, so its inverse image in R is closed and bounded. Hence [F1] applies with q,ε0 as given: the functionals ρ,J of the Statement are distributions on Ω and ∂tρ+div⁡J=0, which is (a).

1.2givenF3F5F6F10F11A1

Finiteness and bounds for the history pairings. Fix ψ∈D(Ω); by compactness of its support choose reals M≥0 and t0≤t1 with supp⁡ψ⊆{(x,t):∣x∣≤M, t0≤t≤t1}, and put Aψ:=sup⁡∣ψ∣<∞, Z:=∣z(0)∣, S:=max⁡{0,(M+Z−ct0)/(c−v∗)}, H:=max⁡{S,∣t1∣}, L:=1+M+Z+v∗H, T:=max⁡{0,t1+S} and MQ:=Tσ(S2)L2/(8π). If g(s,w):=(z(s)+w,s+∣w∣/c) lies in supp⁡ψ, then s≤t1; and for s≤0 the bound ∣z(s)∣≤Z+v∗∣s∣ gives t0≤s+∣w∣/c≤−(1−v∗/c)∣s∣+(M+Z)/c, so s≥−S. Also ∣w∣≤M+∣z(s)∣≤M+Z+v∗H<L. Therefore ∣⟨Φ,ψ⟩∣≤∣q∣ε0∫−St114π∫BLAψ∣w∣ dw ds≤∣q∣MQAψε0, and componentwise ∣⟨Υj,ψ⟩∣≤μ0∣q∣v∗MQAψ. These bounds are fixed-support seminorms, so Φ and the components of Υ are distributions.

1.3givenF2F9F13F14

The retarded substitution map. Put U:=R×(R3∖{0}), V:=Ω∖Γ and g(s,w):=(z(s)+w, s+∣w∣/c). Then V is open: Γ is closed, since a convergent sequence (z(sj),sj)→(x,t) has sj→t, hence x=z(t) by continuity. The map g:U→V is a bijection with inverse (x,t)↦(s(x,t),x−z(s(x,t))): the root s(x,t) of [F2] exists, satisfies x−z(s)≠0 exactly off the worldline, and s(x,t) is C1 there because z is C3; conversely no image point lies on Γ, for ∣w∣=∣z(t)−z(s)∣≤v∗∣t−s∣=v∗∣w∣/c is impossible for w≠0. The map is C1 with derivative matrix (in the order s,w1,w2,w3) whose last row is (1,w/(c∣w∣)) and whose first column is (z′(s),1) with the identity in the remaining block; expanding along the last row gives det⁡Dg(s,w)=−1+z′(s)⋅w/(c∣w∣)=−κ(s,w), so ∣det⁡Dg∣=κ, and κ≥1−v∗/c>0 by [F2]. If g(s,w)=g(s′,w′) then ∣s−s′∣=∣∣w′∣−∣w∣∣/c≤∣z(s′)−z(s)∣/c≤(v∗/c)∣s−s′∣, hence s=s′ and w=w′. By [F9], for every nonnegative Borel h on V one has ∫Vh=∫Uh(g)κ ds dw, and for every f∈L1(V), ∫Vf=∫Uf(g)κ ds dw.

1.4givenF2F12F13F14

Retarded derivative identities. On V, with s=s(x,t) the root of [F2]: st=1/κ and ∇s=−n/(cκ). Hence rt=n⋅(−z′(s)st)=−cN/κ and ∇r=n/κ; Rt=−z′(s)st=−cβ/κ and ∂iR=ei+βni/κ; βt=β˙st=β˙/κ and ∂iβ=β˙ ∂is=−β˙ni/(cκ). Since κ=1−N and D=κr=r−R⋅β, the product rules with the bilinearity of the inner product give Dt=rt−Rt⋅β−R⋅βt=(c(∣β∣2−N)−rd)/κ and, componentwise, ∂iD=∂ir−(∂iR)⋅β−R⋅∂iβ=ni(1−∣β∣2+rd/c)/κ−βi, that is, ∇D=((1−∣β∣2+rd/c)/κ)n−β.

1.5F14algebra

The needed triple-product identity follows directly from the coordinate definition in [F14]. For arbitrary a,b,u∈R3, the first component of a×(b×u) is a2(b1u2−b2u1)−a3(b3u1−b1u3)=b1(a2u2+a3u3)−u1(a2b2+a3b3)=b1(a⋅u)−u1(a⋅b), since the terms b1a1u1−u1a1b1 cancel. Cyclic permutation gives the other two components, so a×(b×u)=b(a⋅u)−u(a⋅b). With a=n, b=n−β, u=β˙ this gives n×((n−β)×β˙)=d(n−β)−κβ˙, since n⋅n=1.

2.1step 1.2step 1.3F3F7F9F10

Scalar pairing identity. Insert the kernel identity [F3] into the definition of Φ: ⟨Φ,ψ⟩=q4πε0∫R∫R3ψ(g(s,w))∣w∣−1 dw ds. The double integral is absolutely convergent by the cylinder estimate of step 1.2, so Fubini's theorem reorders it, and the substitution identity of step 1.3 for the L1 function ψ/(κr) on V (whose absolute integral is finite by the same cylinder estimate) turns it into ⟨Φ,ψ⟩=∫VCψ(x,t)κ(x,t)r(x,t) dx dt, since r(g(s,w))=∣w∣, κ(g(s,w))=κ(s,w) and the Jacobian factor κ cancels κ−1.

2.2step 1.2step 1.3F3F7F9F10F14

Vector pairing identity. Componentwise, ⟨Υj,ψ⟩=μ0q4π∫R∫R3zj′(s)ψ(g(s,w))∣w∣−1 dw ds; the double integral is absolutely bounded by μ0∣q∣v∗ times the scalar majorant of step 1.2, Fubini applies, and the substitution of step 1.3 gives ⟨Υj,ψ⟩=μ0qc4π∫Vβjψκr dx dt, where βj(s)=βj(g(s,w)) and zj′=cβj. Since μ0qc4π=μ0ε0c⋅q4πε0=Cc⋅c2μ0ε0=Cc, this is ⟨Υj,ψ⟩=∫Vβj(x,t)cCψκr dx dt.

3.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2F2F5F7F8F9F10

Potentials and regular distributions. By [F2] the root is C3 off the worldline, so r,n are C3, β is C2, κ is C2 and D=κr is C2 with D>0 on V; hence φ=C/D and A=βφ/c are of class C2 on V, and the identities of steps 2.1 and 2.2 read ⟨Φ,ψ⟩=∫Vφψ and ⟨Υj,ψ⟩=∫VAjψ for every test ψ. The graph Γ is closed, hence Borel, and null: for each time t its spatial section {z(t)} is a singleton, so Tonelli together with the product identification of Euclidean measure gives λ4(Γ)=∫Rλ3({z(t)}) dt=0. Therefore ∫Vφψ=∫Ωφ~ ψ and ∫VAjψ=∫ΩA~jψ for the zero extensions. Finally φ~,A~ are locally integrable: for a compact Q⊆Ω the substitution identity of step 1.3 and the cylinder bound of step 1.2 give ∫Ω∣φ~∣1Q≤∣C∣∫U1Q(g)∣w∣−1ds dw≤4π∣C∣ MQ′ with MQ′=T′σ(S2)L′2/(8π)<∞ for the window constants of Q. Hence the regular functionals of φ~,A~ are distributions and Φ=uφ~, Υ=uA~.

4.1step 1.4step 1.5step 3.1F4F12F13F14

The electric field. On V, ∇φ=−C∇D/D2, φt=−CDt/D2 and A=βφ/c, so At=(β˙φ/κ+βφt)/c=β˙C/(cκD)−βCDt/(cD2) and E=−∇φ−At=CD2(∇D+βDtc)−Cβ˙cκD. Substituting the identities of step 1.4, the bracket equals 1κ(1−∣β∣2+rdc)(n−β), so E=C(1−∣β∣2)(n−β)+rd(n−β)/cκ3r2−Cβ˙cκD=Cκ3r2[(1−∣β∣2)(n−β)+rc(d(n−β)−κβ˙)], using D=κr to write the second summand over the common denominator. The cross-product identity n×((n−β)×β˙)=d(n−β)−κβ˙ of step 1.5 then gives the displayed electric field.

5.1step 1.4step 4.1F2F4F13F14F15∎

The magnetic field and regularity. By [F15] and the chain rule, curl⁡A=∇(φ/c)×β+(φ/c)curl⁡β with curl⁡β=∇s×β˙, so curl⁡A=−C∇D×βcD2−C n×β˙c2κ2r. Substituting ∇D from step 1.4 and using n×(n−β)=−n×β gives curl⁡A=−C[1−∣β∣2+rd/ccκ3r2(n×β)+n×β˙c2κ2r]. Crossing the field of step 4.1 with n/c gives the same expression, because n×n=0, n×(n−β)=−n×β and n×(d(n−β)−κβ˙)=−d(n×β)−κ(n×β˙); hence B=n×E/c. Since for z∈C3 the root is C3 and ∇D,Dt,β,β˙,κ,r,n are as in step 1.4 with κr>0 on V, both displayed fields are C1 on V; the same computation with a Ck trajectory uses the Ck root branch of [F2] and gives Ck−2 fields, and the smooth branch gives smooth fields.

Remarks

  • Choice accounting. ACω is used through the polar formula and the two change-of-variables theorems (step 1.3 and the polar bound of step 1.2); the root lemma, the current continuity and the algebraic computations are choice-free as stated in their own items.

  • What the retarded selection does and does not do. The pairings select the retarded history s<t through the kernel K and the root of [F2]. No statement is made about exactly two solutions, about arbitrary nonzero Cauchy data, about finite self-energy or about a self-force law; the fields are computed from the stipulated potential pair off the worldline only.

  • Signs. The conventions E=−∇φ−∂tA, B=curl⁡A and C=q/(4πε0), μ0=(c2ε0)−1 are those fixed in [F4] and the Statement; the formula for B is the consequence B=n×E/c, not an independent convention.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources