Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complete longitudinal Fourier energy evolution in a rectangular PEC guide

Physical scope

The explicitly declared constant scalar Ohmic PEC energy classes of K10, including the lossless sigma=0 branch, with exact modal/Fourier completeness and energy balance. No arbitrary dispersive, nonlinear, hysteretic, nonsmooth-wall, open-end or junction-scattering claim; no empirical claim.

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) and the constant isotropic material branch of Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch with ε,μ>0, σ≥0, Jext=0 and initially zero volume charge. For an exact broadband physical interpretation retain the closure condition εμ≥c−2; without it this is the declared effective model with no universal front-speed claim. Put v2=(εμ)−1, γ=σ/ε. On the infinite straight rectangular guide Q=(0,a)×(0,b)×R of Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM, declare the finite-energy reflection class as follows. Extend in the two transverse variables to Tab2×R, Tab2=R/(2aZ)×R/(2bZ). The electric components have transverse parities even/odd, odd/even, odd/odd respectively; magnetic components have odd/even, even/odd, even/even respectively. Require the extended real fields to be L2 and have both divergences zero distributionally. When the reflected extensions are continuous across the walls, their odd components give the four-wall conditions n×E=0, n⋅B=0; it is a precise weak PEC realization, not an assertion about every rough trace class. There is no end cap and no junction or open-end scattering datum. (a) [Complete mixed transform] Let ϕmn(xt)=(4ab)−1/2eiπ(mx1/a+nx2/b), (m,n)∈Z2, be the orthonormal transverse characters. For each component first form Fmn(z)=∫Tab2F(xt,z)ϕmn(xt)‾ dxt, then apply the exact negative-sign 2π Fourier transform F2 of Plancherel theorem in z. Write F^mn(ξ)=F2Fmn(ξ) and β=2πξ. The transform is a unitary representation of L2(Tab2×R) by ℓ2(Z2;L2(R)), with inverse in L2 from L2 Fourier inversion, and ∥F∥L2(Q)2=14∑m,n∫R∣F^mn(ξ)∣2 dξ for these reflection fields. The parity and reality relations are retained, including F^−m,−n(−ξ)=F^mn(ξ)‾. With K=(πm/a,πn/b,2πξ), the divergence constraints become K⋅E^=K⋅B^=0 for almost every ξ. This is a complete transverse sin/cos and longitudinal L2 Fourier representation, not pointwise Fourier convergence or a finite-energy monochromatic plane wave. (b) [Unique energy evolution] Adopt in that weak reflection class the constant-Ohmic first-order material evolution Et=v2curl⁡B−γE, Bt=−curl⁡E, distributionally, consistent with the smooth The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources and Energy balance and Ohmic dissipation for the constant nondispersive linear model branches. For every initial pair in the class there is a unique C(R;L2(Q)) solution in the same class. Its mixed coefficients solve, for every transverse index and almost every ξ, ∂tE^=iv2K×B^−γE^,∂tB^=−iK×E^. Finite transverse sums and bounded longitudinal frequency truncations reconstruct the solution in energy norm uniformly on compact time intervals; such reconstructed fields are dense in the class at every time. They retain the divergence constraints and the original parities, including zero coefficient cases without dividing by K or ∣K∣. (c) [Energy and dispersion] The total stored energy of this whole infinite guide is finite and equals U(t)=18∑m,n∫R(ε∣E^∣2+μ−1∣B^∣2) dξ. For every t0<t1, U(t1)+σ∫t0t1∥E(t)∥L2(Q)2dt=U(t0), and U′(t)=−σ∥E(t)∥22. At σ=0 energy is conserved and each constrained electric coefficient satisfies E^′′+v2∣K∣2E^=0. A nonzero harmonic coefficient E^(t)=e e−iωt with e∈C3∖{0} and ω>0 therefore requires ω2=v2[(πm/a)2+(πn/b)2+β2]; the zero coefficient imposes no frequency condition. These are the exact finite transverse-mode matrices of the approved K10 branch; individual separated TE/TM candidate fields still have their own cutoff and zero-profile restrictions, and no TE00 mode is created by a scalar constant coefficient. For σ>0 the electric equation is E^′′+γE^′+v2∣K∣2E^=0 with the distinct/repeated-root alternatives of the choice-free finite-parameter clause of Constant-Ohmic PEC modal decay and exact energy-class completeness(c), here at λ=∣K∣2≥0. Its full-Choice smooth-cavity realization is not used. At K=0 keep the direct first-order equations E^′=−γE^, B^′=0, without dividing by K; the original parity and L2 relations still apply. No signal-speed or empirical inference is made. (d) [Scope] This theorem supplies the previously missing complete longitudinal L2 expansion of the declared straight rectangular guide, including its lossless and constant-Ohmic energy evolutions. It makes no completeness claim for arbitrary non-rectangular, dispersive, nonlocal, nonlinear, rough-wall or open-end/junction problems. The weak energy result is proved by linear mixed-transform evolution and modal limits, not by applying a nonlinear smooth Poynting identity to rough data.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)); the constant isotropic material branch of Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch with constants ε,μ>0 and σ≥0, Jext=0 and initially zero volume charge (with the closure condition εμ≥c−2 retained for the exact broadband interpretation); v2=(εμ)−1, γ=σ/ε; the infinite straight rectangular guide Q=(0,a)×(0,b)×R and its geometry of Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM; the finite-energy reflection class of the Statement, defined by transverse extension to Tab2×R with the stated electric and magnetic parities, L2 membership and distributionally zero divergences.

[F1]

The material and evolution branch: D=εE, B=μH, and with initially zero volume charge the macroscopic equations of The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources give the first-order system Et=v2curl⁡B−γE, Bt=−curl⁡E and zero divergences; the stored energy is U=12∫Q(ε∣E∣2+μ−1∣B∣2) (Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch (b), The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources (b), Energy balance and Ohmic dissipation for the constant nondispersive linear model).

[F2]

Transverse completeness: the characters ϕmn(xt)=(4ab)−1/2eiπ(mx1/a+nx2/b) are orthonormal in L2 of the fundamental rectangle of Tab2 by elementary exponential integration, and the product families of cosines and sines are complete orthogonal systems (The sine and cosine systems are complete orthogonal systems of L^2 on an interval and on a rectangle (a),(b), Rectangular PEC reflection class: Fourier completeness, weak solutions and energy conservation (i), Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space); Fubini and Tonelli apply to the product spaces (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F3]

Fourier analysis in z: the unitary Plancherel transform F2 with inverse in L2, the derivative Fourier identity on Schwartz functions, and Schwartz cutoffs from the standard smooth step function (Plancherel theorem, L2 Fourier inversion, Fourier transform acts continuously on Schwartz space, Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs).

[F5]

ODE tools: globally Lipschitz finite-dimensional systems have unique global solutions and their solutions depend continuously on initial data and parameters (A globally state-Lipschitz vector field on R×Rn has global solutions, Continuous dependence of ODE solutions on initial data and parameters); the characteristic alternatives for E^′′+γE^′+v2λE^=0 at λ≥0 are the finite-parameter classification of Constant-Ohmic PEC modal decay and exact energy-class completeness (c), whose smooth-cavity, full-Choice clauses are not used.

Proof

technique · direct: build the mixed transverse-character and longitudinal-Fourier representation, transport the divergence constraints and the evolution into coefficient form, solve the finite dimensional modal systems with uniform energy bounds, and pass cutoffs to the limit
1.1F2F3algebra

[Complete mixed transform] With the characters of [F2], first form for each component the transverse coefficients Fmn(z)=∫Tab2F(xt,z)ϕmn(xt)‾dxt and then F^mn(ξ)=F2Fmn(ξ) for the exact 2π-convention transform of [F3]; write β=2πξ. Then the map F↦(F^mn)(m,n)∈Z2 is a unitary isomorphism of L2(Tab2×R) onto ℓ2(Z2;L2(R)) and, for the reflection fields of the Statement, ∥F∥L2(Q)2=14∑m,n∫R∣F^mn(ξ)∣2dξ. Indeed the characters are orthonormal on the fundamental rectangle and, being products of the complete one-dimensional character systems, their finite span is dense in the transverse L2 of each torus fibre by [F2]; Fubini–Tonelli therefore gives, for almost every z, the transverse expansion together with ∫Tab2∣F(xt,z)∣2dxt=∑m,n∣Fmn(z)∣2 and, after integration in z, ∥F∥L2(Tab2×R)2=∑m,n∥Fmn∥L2(R)2. Applying the unitary Plancherel transform [F3] to each of the countably many scalar functions Fmn∈L2(R) gives the coefficient map and the isometry on the torus product, with inverse from the L2 inversion theorem of [F3]; the reflection extension doubles each transverse period, so the torus fundamental rectangle has 4ab-area and the physical norm is one quarter of the extended norm, which is the displayed factor 14. The parity relations follow from ϕ−m,−n=ϕmn‾ and the transverse parities by the coordinate changes xj↦−xj on the torus, and the reality relation F^−m,−n(−ξ)=F^mn(ξ)‾ holds first for real integrable compactly supported longitudinal data by the defining integral and passes to L2 by density and continuity of the transform [F3]. No pointwise reconstruction is asserted.

2.1step 1.1F2F3F6

[Divergence constraints in coefficient form] For K:=(πm/a,πn/b,2πξ) the distributionally zero divergence of the extended field is equivalent to K⋅E^=K⋅B^=0 for almost every ξ, and the finite-energy reflection class is exactly the class of coefficient families satisfying these almost-everywhere constraints together with the parities and L2 summability. The derivative correspondence is proved on the dense test class of finite transverse-character sums times longitudinal Schwartz functions: for such a test ψ, finite transverse integration by parts and the exact identity F2(∂zψ)=2πiξψ^ of [F3] turn the pairing ∫F⋅∇ψ into the sum of the coefficient pairings against iK⋅F^, and the compactly supported smooth tests used in the definition are obtained by multiplying with cutoffs χR of [F3] and passing to the limit, since the tests and their first derivatives converge in L2 and all pairings are bounded by Cauchy–Schwarz [F6]; conversely a test with K⋅F^=0 almost everywhere has zero weak divergence pairing, and the general compact smooth tests are reached through the transverse L2 expansions of their derivatives and the Schwartz transform isomorphism [F3]. Hence the exact constrained class corresponds to the stated almost-everywhere coefficient constraints, not merely to a scalar basis without Gauss equations; for fields smooth in the interior the divergences vanish pointwise, and if their reflected extensions are continuous across the walls then the four-wall PEC conditions hold by Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM(c).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F3F4F5F6

[Unique energy evolution in the class] Adopt the constant-Ohmic first-order system of [F1] distributionally in the reflection class of step 2.1. For every initial pair in the class there is a unique C(R;L2(Q)) solution in the same class, its mixed coefficients satisfy, for every (m,n) and almost every ξ, ∂tE^=iv2K×B^−γE^ and ∂tB^=−iK×E^, and finite transverse sums with bounded longitudinal frequency truncations reconstruct the solution in energy norm uniformly on compact time intervals and are dense in the class at every time, retaining the divergence constraints and parities without dividing by K or ∣K∣. Existence: for each (m,n,ξ) the real and imaginary parts of the displayed system form a real finite-dimensional constant-coefficient linear system on all of R, hence a globally Lipschitz system with a unique global solution through the initial coefficients by [F5]; the solution matrix depends continuously on ξ uniformly on compact parameter and time sets by the continuous-dependence theorem [F5] (applied on a common bounded state cylinder, which the uniform energy bound below supplies), so multiplying the measurable initial coefficient vector by the continuous fundamental matrix gives measurable coefficient trajectories [F6]; no uncountable choice of solutions is made, and the construction uses only the countable families of coefficients. Energy: with q:=ε∣E^∣2+μ−1∣B^∣2, conjugation and the triple-product cancellation of the displayed system give q′=−2σ∣E^∣2, whence q(t)≤e2γTq(0) for ∣t∣≤T and forward contractivity at σ≥0; the constraints K⋅E^=K⋅B^=0 and the parity and reality relations of step 1.1 are preserved because the right-hand side is linear, K⋅(K×B^)=0 and the parities are respected by the cross product with K. Cutoffs ∣m∣,∣n∣≤N, ∣ξ∣≤N preserve every relation; their initial energy tails tend to zero by Tonelli and dominated convergence [F4], and the uniform bound makes the time-dependent tails tend to zero uniformly on compact times; each truncated solution is strongly differentiable in L2 with bounded multiplier K on the cutoff, and its linear equations follow from the test derivative identity of step 2.1, so the compact-time L2 limits are continuous, have the prescribed data and satisfy the equations against compact smooth tests. Uniqueness: for any weak CtL2 reflection solution and bounded spectral cutoff N, project to the cutoff coefficients; the test identity of step 2.1 turns the evolution into f′=ANf distributionally in time in the cutoff Hilbert space with bounded constant matrix AN, and the finite transverse tests and smooth frequency tests supported in the cutoff interval, whose inverse transforms are Schwartz, are dense in the cutoff space, so the identity extends to every cutoff vector by the bounded multiplier and Cauchy–Schwarz [F6]. Subtracting the continuous Hilbert-valued primitive of ANf, constructed as the norm limit of finite Riemann sums (which is independent of the tags by the uniform oscillation bound on a compact interval, exists by completeness of L2, has the correct derivative by the average-increment bound, and is the vector version of the primitive argument of [F4]), pairing with every fixed cutoff vector and applying the scalar zero-derivative distribution theorem [F4] identifies the difference with its constant initial value; the difference d of two solutions with zero data satisfies d(t)=∫0tANd(s)ds, so on an interval of length h with h∥AN∥<1 the supremum norm forces d=0, and finitely iterating these intervals in either direction on any compact time interval gives d=0; letting the cutoffs exhaust the representation gives uniqueness of the whole field. The zero coefficient K=0 is treated directly by the same equations with K=0, without division by K or ∣K∣.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1F4F5F6algebra

[Energy and dispersion] The total stored energy of the whole infinite guide is finite and equals U(t)=18∑m,n∫R(ε∣E^∣2+μ−1∣B^∣2)dξ, and for every t0<t1 one has U(t1)+σ∫t0t1∥E(t)∥L2(Q)2dt=U(t0) with U′(t)=−σ∥E(t)∥22. Indeed, summing the finite/cutoff modal identities q′=−2σ∣E^∣2 of step 3.1 over the bounded cutoffs, integrating in ξ and summing the finite transverse indices gives the truncated balance, and dominated convergence with the compact-time tail bound of step 3.1 passes it to the limit; the physical energy carries the factor 12⋅14=18 from step 1.1, and the dissipation term is continuous in time, so ordinary FTC [F4] gives the derivative form. At σ=0 the energy is constant, and on the constrained coefficient subspace differentiating the first-order equation once and using K×(K×e)=K(K⋅e)−∣K∣2e together with K⋅E^=0 gives E^′′+v2∣K∣2E^=0. Substitution of a harmonic coefficient e e−iωt gives (v2∣K∣2−ω2)e=0, so for e≠0 and ω>0 the stated dispersion relation follows with β=2πξ; for e=0 it supplies no condition on ω; at K=0 the direct equations E^′=−γE^, B^′=0 are retained without dividing by K. For σ>0 the electric equation is E^′′+γE^′+v2∣K∣2E^=0 at λ=∣K∣2≥0 with the distinct/repeated-root alternatives of the finite-parameter classification [F5], including the zero-K case; the zero-profile restrictions and individual cutoffs of the separated TE/TM candidates are unaffected, and no TE00 mode is created by a scalar constant coefficient.

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1F1∎

[Scope] Clause (a) is steps 1.1 and 2.1, clause (b) is step 3.1, and clause (c) is step 4.1. The theorem supplies the complete longitudinal L2 expansion of the declared straight rectangular guide with its lossless and constant-Ohmic energy evolutions and makes no completeness claim for arbitrary non-rectangular, dispersive, nonlocal, nonlinear, rough-wall or open-end/junction problems; the weak energy result is proved by linear mixed-transform evolution and modal limits, not by applying a nonlinear smooth Poynting identity to rough data, and no signal-speed or empirical inference is made.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources