Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Explicit persistence under the stated forward and conjugated-inverse bounds: coded chaos, hyperbolic fixed points and transverse homoclinic points

Statement

Fix a≥100 and put

R:=a+3,l:=a−3≥7,Q:=[−R−1,R+1]2,Σ(x,y):=(y,x).

Let C=C(a,R) be the constant of Root bounds and C1 dependence for the perturbed scalar recurrence v2−a−u−w+e(u,v,w)=0, let 0<ε≤1/6 with η:=Cε≤1, and let U⊆R2 be open with Q⊆U. Let G=(A,B):U→R2 be a C2 diffeomorphism onto its image whose components satisfy, on Q,

∣A(x,y)−y∣≤ε,∣∂xA(x,y)∣≤ε,∣∂yA(x,y)−1∣≤ε,

∣B(x,y)−(y2−a−x)∣≤ε,∣∂xB(x,y)+1∣≤ε,∣∂yB(x,y)−2y∣≤ε,

and assume in addition that H:=Σ∘G−1∘Σ is defined and of class C2 on a neighbourhood of Q and satisfies the same six inequalities on Q with the same constant ε. For each sign u let Mu be the root map of Root bounds and C1 dependence for the perturbed scalar recurrence v2−a−u−w+e(u,v,w)=0 applied to G, let V be the inverse branch of A C2 map C1-close to F has a unique inverse branch for its first component, with O(ε) derivative bounds, and let MuH,VH be the corresponding objects for H.

For a nonzero real x, write sign⁡x:=+1 if x>0 and sign⁡x:=−1 if x<0; the sequence coordinates used below are nonzero because their absolute values are at least l≥7. Then:

  1. (coding) for every s∈X± there is exactly one q(s)∈BR with qn(s)=Msn(qn−1(s),qn+1(s)) for all n∈Z; it satisfies l≤∣qn(s)∣≤R, sign⁡qn(s)=sn and R−∣qn(s)∣≥34, ∣qn(s)∣−l≥34; setting vn(s):=V(qn(s),qn+1(s)) and

zn(s):=(qn(s),vn(s)),hG(s):=z0(s)=(q0(s),V(q0(s),q1(s))),

one has G(zn(s))=zn+1(s) for all n; 2. (conjugacy and chaos) hG is a continuous bijection of (X±,D±) onto ΛG:=hG(X±); granting the Axiom of Countable Choice (used once through the equivalence between closed and sequentially closed subsets of R2), it is a homeomorphism, and G∘hG=hG∘S±, so ΛG is G-invariant. The set ΛG is sequentially compact and is compact under ACω+DC. Under ACω, G∣ΛG is continuous, topologically mixing, and has dense periodic points; it is sensitive with sensitivity constant 2l. Hence under ACω it is chaotic in the stated sense. 3. (fixed points) for each sign u the constant code uˉ gives a fixed point zuˉ:=hG(uˉ)=(ρu,V(ρu,ρu)), where ρu=Mu(ρu,ρu) is the unique element of u [l,R] with ρu=Mu(ρu,ρu); these two fixed points are hyperbolic; 4. (transverse homoclinic points) let s∈X± be nonconstant with sn=u for ∣n∣≥N. Then z∗:=hG(s)≠zuˉ, and there are C1 curves γs,γu:(−ε0,ε0)→R2 with γs(0)=γu(0)=z∗, γs((−ε0,ε0))⊆WGs(zuˉ), γu((−ε0,ε0))⊆WGu(zuˉ), tangent vectors γs′(0)∈C3/4s, γu′(0)∈C3/4u; since C3/4s∩C3/4u={0} the tangent lines are distinct, so z∗ is a transverse homoclinic point of zuˉ (Stable and unstable cones, invariant line slopes, stable and unstable sets, and transverse homoclinic points of the quadratic family).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data a,R,l,Q,Σ,ε,η,C, the maps G,H, the root maps Mu,MuH, the inverse branches V,VH, the shift space X± with metric D± and shift S±, the ball BR, and the cones Cks,Cku and stable/unstable sets of Stable and unstable cones, invariant line slopes, stable and unstable sets, and transverse homoclinic points of the quadratic family.

[F1]

Root and defect bounds (Root bounds and C1 dependence for the perturbed scalar recurrence v2−a−u−w+e(u,v,w)=0): proof step 5.1 supplies C2 extensions of Mu on an open neighborhood of [−R,R]2; in particular Mu is C1 on [−R,R]2 with values in u [l,R], ∣∂iMu∣≤d where d≤2/13, 2d≤4/13<1, d(θ+θ−1)≤5/13<1 for θ=1/2 and d/(1−dθ)≤1/6; the defect e satisfies ∣e∣,∣∂ie∣≤η≤1 on the cube; every root satisfies the margins ∣Mu(u′,w′)∣−l≥34 and R−∣Mu(u′,w′)∣≥34, because the endpoint values of P are at least 4a−16 and 4a+2 in absolute value while ∣∂vP∣≤2R+η≤2a+7, and (4a−16)/(2a+7)≥34 and (4a+2)/(2a+7)≥34 for a≥10; and clause 4 of the same lemma: for all (u,v,w)∈[−R,R]3, Pu,w(v)=0 if and only if B(u,V(u,v))=V(v,w).

[F2]

Inverse-branch estimates (A C2 map C1-close to F has a unique inverse branch for its first component, with O(ε) derivative bounds): V is C1 on [−R,R]2 with ∣V(q,q′)−q′∣≤ε, ∣∂qV∣≤ε/(1−ε), ∣∂q′V−1∣≤ε/(1−ε); here ε≤1/6, so ε/(1−ε)≤1/5 and 1/(1−ε)≤6/5.

[F3]

Weighted half-tail lemma (Weighted half-tail contractions for qn=Msn(qn−1,qn+1) give a unique C1 curve with tangent slope bounded by c/(1−q)): under its hypotheses with parameters θ,c,q and a reference half-orbit, the maps Tb have unique fixed points u(b), the map b↦u(b) is continuously differentiable with ∥du/db∥θ≤c/(1−q), and every derivative entry satisfies ∣dn∣≤θn c/(1−q).

[F7]

Cones and slope vocabulary (Stable and unstable cones, invariant line slopes, stable and unstable sets, and transverse homoclinic points of the quadratic family): C3/4u={∣u∣≤34∣v∣}, C3/4s={∣v∣≤34∣u∣}, and C3/4u∩C3/4s={0}; the phase curve of a half-tail with boundary value b and sequence xn(b) is the map b↦(b,V(b,x0(b))) at the index −1.

Proof

direct; run a contraction for the perturbed recurrence, transfer the shift's chaos through the coding homeomorphism as in the unperturbed case, and build the two curves by the weighted half-tail lemma applied to G and to H=ΣG−1Σ.

1.1givenF1F8algebra

Constants: by [F1], d≤2/13, 2d≤4/13, and d/(1−dθ)≤1/6; also R≥13, l≥7, and R−l=a+3−(a−3)=6>0. Setting ν:=2d≤4/13<1.

2.1givenstep 1.1F1F4algebra

Coded sequence: for s∈X± define Ts on BR by (Tsq)n:=Msn(qn−1,qn+1). The values lie in sn[l,R]⊆[−R,R] by [F1], so Ts maps BR into itself; and ∥Tsq−Tsq′∥∞≤2d∥q−q′∥∞=ν∥q−q′∥∞ by [F1]. By [F4] and ν<1, Ts has exactly one fixed point q(s)∈BR; and qn(s)∈sn[l,R], so sign⁡qn(s)=sn. The margins of [F1] give R−∣qn(s)∣≥34 and ∣qn(s)∣−l≥34.

3.1givenstep 2.1F1F2

Orbits: with vn:=V(qn(s),qn+1(s)) of [F2], clause 4 of [F1] states that Pu,w(v)=0 is equivalent to B(u,V(u,v))=V(v,w). With (u,v,w)=(qn−1(s),qn(s),qn+1(s)), clause 1 gives Pu,w(v)=0, hence B(qn−1(s),vn−1)=vn; and the defining identity of V gives A(qn−1(s),vn−1)=qn(s). Hence G(qn−1(s),vn−1)=(qn(s),vn), i.e. G(zn−1(s))=zn(s) for all n, and clause 1 is proved.

3.2givenstep 2.1F2F4F5F8algebra

Locality and continuity: iterating Ts from 0, one proves by induction on m that (Tsm0)n depends only on the symbols sj with ∣j−n∣≤m−1, exactly as in the unperturbed case, and that ∥Tsm0−q(s)∥∞≤νm∥Ts0∥∞/(1−ν)≤2Rνm by [F4] and clause 3 of A contraction of a nonempty complete metric space into itself has exactly one fixed point, the limit of the iterates from any starting point; hence for s,t agreeing on ∣j∣≤m one has ∣qn(s)−qn(t)∣≤4Rνm for ∣n∣≤1. By [F2], ∣∂qV∣≤ε/(1−ε)≤15 and ∣∂q′V∣≤1+ε/(1−ε)≤65, so the mean value inequality gives ∣V(q0(s),q1(s))−V(q0(t),q1(t))∣≤15⋅4Rνm+65⋅4Rνm=75⋅4Rνm; with Ch:=125=1+15+65 one therefore has ∥hG(s)−hG(t)∥2≤Δq0+ΔV≤4R Ch νm whenever s,t agree on ∣j∣≤m. Given ε′>0, choose m with 4R Ch νm<ε′ and δ:=2−m; if D±(s,t)<2−m then ([F5], cylinder property) s,t agree for ∣j∣≤m, so ∥hG(s)−hG(t)∥2<ε′. This proves continuity of hG.

3.3givenstep 2.1F1F4F7

Constant codes: for each sign u, the map ρ↦Mu(ρ,ρ) maps the closed interval u[l,R] into itself by [F1] and is a contraction with constant 2d≤4/13<1; hence it has exactly one fixed point ρu∈u[l,R], and the constant sequence qn:=ρu is a fixed point of Tuˉ, so q(uˉ) is constant and zuˉ=hG(uˉ)=(ρu,V(ρu,ρu)) is a fixed point of G.

4.1givenstep 3.1F1

Injectivity: if hG(s)=hG(t) then z0(s)=z0(t); applying the bijection G forward and G−1 (which exists because G is a diffeomorphism onto its image, and z0(s) lies in that image as G(z−1(s))) backward gives zn(s)=zn(t) for all n∈Z by induction; hence qn(s)=qn(t) for all n, and sn=sign⁡qn(s)=sign⁡qn(t)=tn by [F1], so s=t.

4.2givenstep 3.1F1F2

Conjugacy: define q~n:=qn+1(s). Then q~ is a fixed point of TS±s, because (TS±sq~)n=Msn+1(qn(s),qn+2(s))=qn+1(s)=q~n by [F1]; by uniqueness q~=q(S±s), i.e. qn(S±s)=qn+1(s). Hence G(hG(s))=G(q0(s),v0(s))=(q1(s),v1(s))=(q0(S±s),V(q0(S±s),q1(S±s)))=hG(S±s): the conjugacy identity, and G(ΛG)=ΛG follows as in the unperturbed case because S± is bijective.

4.3givenstep 3.3F1F2F8algebra

Hyperbolicity: put M:=DG(zuˉ), E:=M−DF(zuˉ)=(a11a12b1b2) and vu:=V(ρu,ρu). At zuˉ the six closeness hypotheses give ∣a11∣,∣a12∣,∣b1∣≤ε and ∣b2∣≤ε, while [F2] gives ∣vu−ρu∣≤ε and ∣vu∣≤R+1. Since DF(x,y)=(01−12y), expanding trace and determinant of M=DF(zuˉ)+E gives tr⁡M=2vu+a11+b2,det⁡M=1+a11(2vu+b2)+a12−b1−a12b1, so ∣tr⁡M−2ρu∣≤4ε and ∣det⁡M−1∣≤(2R+4)ε+2ε2≤(2l+16)ε+2ε2. Because ε≤16 and l≥7, ∣tr⁡M∣≥2l−4ε≥2l−23,∣det⁡M∣≤1+2l+166+236=l3+6718, and the discriminant is bounded below by tr⁡2M−4det⁡M ≥ (2l−23)2−4(1+2l+166+236) = 4l2−4l−1309 > 0, since 4l2−4l=168 at l=7 and l↦4l2−4l is increasing for l≥1. Hence the eigenvalues are real. Let λ+ be the one of larger modulus; then ∣λ+∣≥12∣tr⁡M∣≥l−13>1, and ∣λ−∣=∣det⁡M∣∣λ+∣≤2∣det⁡M∣∣tr⁡M∣≤2(l3+6718)2l−23<1, the last inequality being equivalent to 7318<2l3, which holds because l≥7 and 143>7318. Thus ∣λ+∣>1>∣λ−∣≥0: zuˉ is hyperbolic.

4.4step 3.2step 3.3F2F8

Tail convergence: suppose sn=u for all ∣n∣≥N, and let m≥0. For n≥N+m+1 every j with ∣j−n∣≤m−1 satisfies j>N, so (Tsm0)n=(Tuˉm0)n; for n≤−N−(m+1) every such j satisfies j<−N, so again (Tsm0)n=(Tuˉm0)n. Hence, by the uniform error estimate of step 3.2 and q(uˉ) constant by step 3.3, ∣qn(s)−ρu∣≤4Rνm whenever ∣n∣≥N+m+1. Letting m→∞ gives qn(s)→ρu as n→±∞; consequently zn(s)→(ρu,V(ρu,ρu))=zuˉ in both directions, by continuity of V ([F2]).

4.5givenstep 3.1F1F2F8algebra

Backward orbit under H: put w:=Σ(z∗) and define wn:=Σ(z−n(s)) for n∈Z. Since qj(s)∈[−R,R] and ∣vj(s)−qj+1(s)∣≤ε≤16 by [F1] and [F2], every zj(s) lies in Q, so every wn lies in the domain where H=Σ∘G−1∘Σ is defined. The orbit identity of step 3.1 gives G−1(z−n(s))=z−n−1(s); hence H(wn)=wn+1, so (wn)n∈Z is the corresponding full H orbit. Its coordinates are (wn)1=v−n(s) and (wn)2=q−n(s), and for every n, ∣(wn)1∣∈[l+712,R−712], because ∣qj+1(s)∣∈[l+34,R−34] by [F1] and ∣vj(s)−qj+1(s)∣≤16 by [F2]; the sign of (wn)1 may depend on n. Set xn:=(wn)1. By definition of the inverse branch VH of the first component H1 of H, the orbit relations H1(wn−1)=(wn)1, H2(wn−1)=(wn)2 say VH(xn−1,xn)=(wn−1)2 and H2(xn−1,VH(xn−1,xn))=VH(xn,xn+1); by clause 4 of [F1] applied to H, this gives Pxn−1,xn+1H(xn)=0. Since xn∈sign⁡(xn)[l,R], clause 1 of [F1] applied to H yields xn=Msign⁡xnH(xn−1,xn+1)(n∈Z).

5.1givenstep 3.2step 4.1F5F6

Topology: let C⊆X± be closed. A sequence in C has a subsequence converging in the sequentially compact space X± ([F5] and the isometry φ of [F6]), and its limit lies in C because closed sets are sequentially closed by the choice-free direction of [F6]; hence C is sequentially compact. The continuous image hG(C) is sequentially compact: given a sequence (hG(xk)) with xk∈C, pick a subsequence xkj→x∈C and use continuity of hG; hence hG(C) is sequentially closed (any convergent sequence in it has a subsequence converging to a point of hG(C), and limits are unique by [F6]), and by the ACω direction of [F6] it is closed in R2. Thus hG is a closed map, so hG−1 is continuous. Under the Axioms of Countable and Dependent Choice, X± is compact by [F5] and hG(X±)=ΛG is a continuous image of it, hence compact.

5.2givenstep 2.1step 3.3step 4.4F1F2F3F7F8algebra

Stable curve for G: let s be nonconstant with sn=u for ∣n∣≥N, and set yn:=qn+1(s) for n≥0, b∗:=q0(s). Then yn=Msn+1(yn−1,yn+1) for n≥0 with y−1:=b∗, and ∣yn∣∈[l+34,R−34] by [F1]. Apply Weighted half-tail contractions for qn=Msn(qn−1,qn+1) give a unique C1 curve with tangent slope bounded by c/(1−q) with θ=1/2, c=d≤2/13, q=d(θ+θ−1)≤5/13<1, J=[−R,R], ρˉ=12, δ∗=14, and update Msn+1. The half-orbit margin follows from the root margins, [b∗−δ∗,b∗+δ∗]⊆J follows from ∣q0(s)∣≤R−34, and δ∗<(1−q)ρˉ/d because d≤2/13. By [F3] there is a C1 family u(b) with ∣d0∣≤d/(1−q)≤1/4, and the phase curve Z(b):=(b,V(b,y0+u0(b))) through Z(b∗)=(q0(s),V(q0(s),q1(s)))=z∗ has tangent (1,T) with T=∂qV(b∗,y0)+∂q′V(b∗,y0)d0,∣T∣≤ε1−ε+11−ε⋅14≤15+65⋅14=12≤34. Thus the tangent lies in C3/4s. The recurrence coordinates remain in [−R,R] by the weighted-ball construction; their phase points (xn,V(xn,xn+1)) lie in Q⊆U because ∣V(xn,xn+1)∣≤R+ε<R+1. Step 3.1 therefore gives every forward iterate without leaving the domain of G. Every point Z(b) has forward orbit tracking that of z∗, which converges to zuˉ by step 4.4; hence these points lie in WGs(zuˉ) near b∗.

5.3step 1.1step 3.2step 4.2F1F6algebra

Sensitivity: let s∈X± and let r>0. Choose m≥0 such that 4RChνm<r, using 0<ν<1 from step 1.1, and define t∈X± by tj=sj for j≠m+1 and tm+1=−sm+1. Since s,t agree on ∣j∣≤m, the estimate in step 3.2 gives ∥hG(s)−hG(t)∥2<r. At coordinate 0, the codes S±m+1s and S±m+1t have opposite signs; by [F1] their coded first coordinates have opposite signs and absolute values at least l+34. Therefore ∥hG(S±m+1s)−hG(S±m+1t)∥2≥2(l+34)>2l. Iterating the conjugacy of step 4.2 identifies these two points with Gm+1(hG(s)) and Gm+1(hG(t)). Thus for every point of ΛG and every radius r>0 there is a point within distance r whose forward iterates are separated by at least 2l, proving sensitivity with constant 2l under the definition in [F6].

6.1givenstep 4.2step 4.1step 5.1F5F6

Mixing and dense periodic points: G is C2 on an open set containing ΛG, so its restriction to ΛG is continuous. Under ACω, hG is a homeomorphism by step 5.1. If U,V⊆ΛG are nonempty and relatively open, then hG−1(U) and hG−1(V) are nonempty open subsets of X±. The shift S± is topologically mixing by [F5], so there is N such that S±n(hG−1(U))∩hG−1(V)≠∅ for all n≥N. By the conjugacy in step 4.2, this gives Gn(U)∩V≠∅ for all n≥N, proving mixing. The same conjugacy and injectivity show that hG maps periodic shift codes exactly to periodic points of G∣ΛG; since periodic shift codes are dense by [F5] and hG is a homeomorphism, these periodic points are dense in ΛG.

6.2givenstep 4.1step 4.4step 5.2step 4.5F1F2F3F7algebra

Unstable curve for G: shift the H-reference to yn′:=xn+1 (n≥0) with y−1′:=x0=v0(s), and apply Weighted half-tail contractions for qn=Msn(qn−1,qn+1) give a unique C1 curve with tangent slope bounded by c/(1−q) to H with θ=1/2, c=d, q≤5/13, J=[−R,R], ρˉ=12, and δ∗=14. The reference recurrence holds by step 4.5. Its margins satisfy ∣yn′∣≥l+34−ε≥l+712>l+12 and ∣yn′∣≤R−34+ε≤R−712<R−12; also ∣y−1′∣=∣v0(s)∣≤R−712, so the margin and parameter interval conditions hold. Moreover δ∗<(1−q)ρˉ/d because d≤2/13. By [F3] we obtain a C1 recurrence curve γH(b)=(b,y0′+u0(b)); composing with the H-phase map gives ZH(b):=(b,VH(b,y0′+u0(b))) through ZH(y−1′)=(v0(s),VH(v0(s),v−1(s)))=w, with tangent (1,TH) and ∣TH∣≤1/5+(6/5)(1/4)=1/2. The reference orbit wn=Σ(z−n) converges to Σ(zuˉ) by step 4.4, so the tracked points lie in WHs(Σ(zuˉ)). Thus γu(t):=Σ(ZH(v0(s)+t)) for sufficiently small ∣t∣ is a C1 curve through z∗ in WGu(zuˉ), since G−n(Σξ)=ΣHn(ξ)→Σ(Σ(zuˉ))=zuˉ. Its tangent is Σ(1,TH)=(TH,1)∈C3/4u. Finally z∗≠zuˉ because hG is injective by step 4.1 and s≠uˉ.

7.1step 3.1step 6.1step 5.3step 4.3step 6.2F7∎

Conclusion: clause 1 is step 3.1; clause 2 consists of step 3.2 (continuity), step 4.1 (injectivity), step 4.2 (conjugacy), step 5.1 (homeomorphism and compactness), and step 6.1 (mixing and density of periodic points), with the topological transfers conditional on ACω; the sensitivity assertion is step 5.3. Clause 3 consists of step 3.3 (constant codes) and step 4.3 (hyperbolicity). Clause 4 consists of step 4.4 (tail convergence), step 5.2 (stable curve), step 4.5 (backward orbit), and step 6.2 (unstable curve): choose ε0>0 smaller than both parameter-neighbourhood radii and define γs(t):=Z(b∗+t) and γu(t):=Σ(ZH(v0(s)+t)) for ∣t∣<ε0. Then both curves pass through z∗, are injective because their first coordinate is their parameter and Σ is invertible, lie in the respective stable and unstable sets, and have tangents in C3/4s and C3/4u. Those cones intersect only at zero, so the tangent lines are distinct and z∗ is transverse.

Remarks

  • The theorem is deliberately explicit: the constants d≤2/13, q≤5/13, the margins ≥34 and the cone aperture 3/4 are all uniform for a≥100 and ε≤1/6, so the hypothesis on ε is a finite, checkable condition rather than an abstract smallness statement. The genuine smallness requirement is only η=Cε≤1 together with ε≤1/6.

  • The second hypothesis, that H=ΣG−1Σ is again close to F, is what makes the unstable curve available by the same forward half-tail construction. It is verified for the smooth periodic oscillator in The rescaled pulse endpoint map converges to the kick K(q,p)=(q,p+q2−a) in C1, and the period map is smooth, symplectic and C1-close to F.

  • No structural-stability theorem is invoked: the coded set, its conjugacy with the shift and the two curves are constructed directly.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources