How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exchange symmetry, Schur–Weyl and Temperley–Lieb spin algebra — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Characters and the Orthogonality Relations
- Clifford Theory over Normal Subgroups
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Conjugacy in Sₙ, Generation, and the Simplicity of Aₙ
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exchange symmetry, Schur–Weyl and Temperley–Lieb spin algebra
- Finite Averaging and Character-Theory Prerequisites
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lie Algebra Representations, Enveloping Algebras, and PBW
- Limits of Real Functions
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Maschke's Theorem, Complete Reducibility and the Structure of k[G]
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Permutation Statistics, Inversions and Eulerian Numbers
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Qm Math Orbital And Spin
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Specht Modules and the Irreducibles of the Symmetric Group
- Splitting Fields
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Symmetric Polynomials and the Fundamental Theorem of Symmetric Functions
- Temperley–Lieb Diagram Algebra and Catalan Basis
- Tensor Coherence and Algebraic Descent
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Branching Rule and the Young Graph
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The Spectral Theorem, Positive Operators and Singular Value Decomposition
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Young Diagrams Tableaux and Permutation Modules
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
Permutation invariance alone does not select a statistics sector
Statement refuted
The false claim is: if a linear operator on commutes with the transposition that swaps the two tensor factors, then the whole space must lie in one exchange eigenspace, either the symmetric eigenspace or the antisymmetric eigenspace. More generally, the claim that permutation invariance by itself chooses one of those two sectors is false.
Witness
Take the identity operator and the swap . Then . But , while for the normalized singlet one has . Both vectors are nonzero, so contains nonzero vectors in both eigenspaces and cannot be contained in either one. Thus invariance under permutations preserves the sector decomposition but does not select a sector.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the factor swap , and the identity operator .
Finite spin-half tensor chains: the two-factor tensor space has the ordered basis , and the swap interchanges the two factors. The product inner product is linear in its first argument and satisfies , where ; thus the four displayed basis words are orthonormal.
Commuting symmetric-group and linear actions on a tensor power: permutations act by left place permutations on tensor factors.
Unitary exchange blocks for collective spins: the tensor space decomposes into Specht exchange factors and their nonzero multiplicity spaces; the transposition acts on the Specht factor and as identity on multiplicity.
Counterexample
The identity commutes with every endomorphism, so in particular . By [F1], . Also ; the two vectors are nonzero and orthogonal because is orthogonal to both one-zero/one-one basis vectors. By [F2], this swap is exactly the left place action of the transposition. Thus both exchange eigenspaces in are nonzero.
The operator satisfies the claimed permutation invariance, but step 1.1 shows that its underlying space is contained in neither single exchange eigenspace. This is a counterexample to the universal claim. The Schur–Weyl decomposition [F3] records both exchange factors and their multiplicity spaces; it does not add a rule that removes one of them.
Remarks
The physical assignment of a symmetric or antisymmetric sector remains the separate adopted physical postulate P6 in the identical-particle framework. This mathematical counterexample neither derives nor modifies that postulate; permutation invariance is an algebraic symmetry statement.
Three spin-half factors: the quartet and the two exchange-coupled doublets
Example
Use the standard Pauli matrices and let act by on tensor factor and identity on the other factors. Let for . In define These eight vectors form an orthonormal basis. With and , the -vectors form the spin- ladder and the - and -pairs form two spin- ladders. For , their lowering actions are the adjoints of the raising actions displayed below: with the highest vectors killed by and the stated subscripts giving the eigenvalues. The adjacent swaps act as identity on the quartet and on each magnetic pair and by For , set , and for real couplings define This finite-chain exchange operator is the scalar on the quartet and, on each doublet multiplicity basis , has matrix The latter matrix has eigenvalues each repeated for the two magnetic states.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ordered tensor basis of , the Pauli matrices, and real couplings .
Finite spin-half tensor chains, The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product: the eight binary tensor words form a basis of and are orthonormal for the product inner product linear in its first argument, whose elementary-tensor formula is with ; acts by the Pauli matrix on factor .
Finite spin matrices: in the ordered basis , , , and , , , and ; these raising and lowering matrices are adjoints.
Spin-half swaps realize the Temperley–Lieb algebra at loop weight two: on three sites, and ; these are the loop-weight-two Temperley–Lieb generators.
The finite isotropic spin-half exchange Hamiltonian is a Temperley–Lieb element: a real-coupled finite chain has the exact bond identity .
Unitary exchange blocks for collective spins: permutation operators act on Specht factors and collective unitary operators act on multiplicity factors.
Verification
The coefficient vectors of and in the ordered one-down subspace are and ; their squared norms are and their inner product is . The one-up pair has coefficient vectors and in the ordered basis , again with norm and inner product . Each -vector has norm ; the two three-term -vectors are orthogonal to the corresponding vectors because their coefficient vectors are constant while the latter have coefficient sum zero. Vectors with different numbers of entries equal to are orthogonal. Thus the eight vectors are orthonormal, and [F1] says the ambient space has dimension eight; they are a basis.
Applying counts for each and for each , which gives the subscripts in the statement. By [F2], changes one to with coefficient . Summing over positions gives the top states are killed because their coefficients cancel or they contain no . The lowering actions are the adjoints of these raising actions because the displayed basis is orthonormal and each local lowering matrix is the adjoint of its raising matrix by [F2]. This verifies both ladder directions.
The swaps fix every symmetric -vector. On both magnetic pairs, changes the sign of and fixes , by their displayed coefficients. For the upper pair, and direct substitution gives . On the lower pair the same substitution gives These are exactly the two matrices stated.
The two matrices act on the same coordinate pair and , while and act on the magnetic labels with the same coefficients for either exchange coordinate. The two-dimensional exchange representation is irreducible: the only invariant lines of are the two coordinate axes, and mixes both axes because its off-diagonal entries are nonzero. Thus this basis displays a spin- block with trivial exchange and a two-dimensional exchange factor repeated over the two spin- magnetic states, in the factor placement of [F5].
By [F3]–[F4], each bond contributes . On the quartet both swaps are , so both 's vanish and the total is . On either doublet pair, Therefore the two bond matrices are and their real-coupled sum is the displayed doublet matrix, identical for and . For and , its trace is and determinant is ; solving the quadratic characteristic equation gives . This proves the exact block decomposition and multiplicity of these eigenvalues.
Remarks
In the English convention, the parts of a shape give the left-aligned row lengths from top to bottom. A standard tableau fills these three boxes with , each exactly once, with entries strictly increasing from left to right along rows and from top to bottom down columns. The standard tableaux below label the Specht factors of shapes and . The spin-coupling basis is a singlet/triplet coupling basis for the two-dimensional multiplicity space; it is not asserted to be the displayed tableau basis. The diagram is an index convention, not part of the proof.
Sources
- Chetan Nayak, Steven H. Simon, Ady Stern, Michael Freedman, and Sankar Das Sarma, Non-Abelian Anyons and Topological Quantum Computation, §II.A.1
- Yacine Ikhlef, Jesper Lykke Jacobsen, and Hubert Saleur, A Temperley–Lieb quantum chain with two- and three-site interactions, §2
- Representation Theory, CT, Lent 2005, complete course notes, Chapters 23–24