How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Distributions Integral Manifolds and the Frobenius Theorem: Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Distributions Integral Manifolds and the Frobenius Theorem
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Group of the Circle
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Seifert–van Kampen Theorem
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples keep the regular Frobenius theory concrete: coordinate-plane and kernel distributions, regular level-set foliations, product and orbit foliations, dense irrational leaves, the Mobius-band line foliation, the standard contact counterexample, and a singular variable-rank family that sits outside the constant-rank theorem.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The coordinate-plane distribution and its affine leaves
Example
On , fix and let
Its maximal connected integral manifolds, or leaves, are the affine coordinate -planes with constant. Connected open subsets of those planes are also integral manifolds.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard coordinates on and the span of the first coordinate fields.
The remaining coordinates are constant along the displayed planes.
Verification
The fields are smooth and pointwise [given] independent, so they define a smooth rank- distribution.
For fixed constants , the affine plane [given] has tangent space spanned by those same coordinate fields at every point. Hence it is an integral manifold.
Every connected integral manifold has constant transverse coordinates, so it [given] lies in one of the affine planes from step 1.2. Those full planes are connected and cannot be enlarged while retaining that property. Therefore they are exactly the maximal leaves.
The kernel of a submersion as an integrable distribution
Example
Consider Since is never zero, is a submersion. Therefore is a rank- integrable distribution whose leaves are the connected surfaces
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The submersion .
Its differential never vanishes.
Verification
Because the third partial derivative of is , the map is a [given] submersion everywhere.
The kernel distribution is therefore integrable, and its maximal connected [given] integral manifolds are the connected components of the level sets of . Each level set here is a connected paraboloid.
Thus is an explicit integrable distribution. [given] ∎
The level-set foliation of a regular function
Example
On the punctured plane , the function has no critical points. Its level sets are the circles of positive radius, and they form a regular foliation of the punctured plane.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The regular function on .
Its differential is .
Verification
On the punctured plane, the differential is never zero, so is a [given] submersion to .
Therefore is an integrable line distribution, and its leaves are [given] the connected components of the level sets . Those components are exactly the circles of radius .
The correspondence between integrable distributions and regular foliations [given] turns this family of circles into a regular foliation of .
The product foliation
Example
On a product manifold , the connected components of the fibres for form a regular foliation of leaf dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The product smooth structure on .
Product charts have the form .
Verification
In a product chart, the slices are exactly the local [given] pieces of the fibres . Their connected components are therefore the local plaques.
Transition maps preserve the second coordinate up to a change depending only [given] on the old second coordinate, so these charts satisfy the defining condition of a regular foliation atlas.
Hence the connected components of the fibres of the projection [given] form the product foliation.
Orbit circles of rotation as a foliation away from the origin
Example
On , the rotation field is nowhere zero. Its flow is rotation about the origin, so its leaves are the circles centered at the origin. The origin is excluded because there the field vanishes and the rank drops.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rotation vector field on the punctured plane.
Its flow preserves the radius function .
Verification
The field is nowhere zero on , so it defines a [given] regular one-dimensional distribution there.
Along the flow, [given] so the radius is constant on every orbit. The orbits are therefore contained in circles about the origin, and conversely each such circle is an orbit.
Hence the punctured plane is foliated by the rotation circles. At the [given] origin the field vanishes, so the regular rank-one hypothesis fails there.
The irrational linear foliation of the two-torus
Example
Let . On , the constant vector field induced by defines a regular foliation. Its leaves are the images of and each leaf is dense in the torus.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An irrational number .
Translation by on descends to the torus.
Equip with its standard quotient smooth structure, equivalently the product smooth structure on two circles.
Verification
On the smooth torus of [A2], the constant line field spanned by [A2] is smooth and nowhere zero, so it gives a regular one-dimensional distribution on .
The integral curve through is the projected affine line [given] . For , fix a point of the torus and a neighborhood of it. Because is irrational, the set of classes is dense in . Choose so that is arbitrarily close to , and set . Then has first coordinate and second coordinate arbitrarily close to . Thus the leaf through is dense. Every other leaf is a torus translate of this one, and translations are homeomorphisms, so every leaf is dense.
Therefore the torus carries a regular foliation with dense, nonembedded [given] leaves.
The Mobius-band line foliation
Example
Model the Mobius band as the quotient of by the identification . The horizontal lines descend to a regular one-dimensional foliation.
The line becomes the central circle leaf, while every leaf with is a circle: one traversal of the horizontal segment changes the transverse sign, and a second traversal returns to the starting point.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The strip model of the Mobius band and its horizontal lines.
The gluing preserves horizontality.
Verification
The quotient map identifies horizontal tangent directions with horizontal [given] tangent directions, so the horizontal line field descends to a smooth one-dimensional distribution on the Mobius band.
Its local plaques are the images of small horizontal intervals, and the [given] quotient charts preserve that plaque structure. Hence the descended line field defines a regular foliation.
The line closes up to the central circle. If , then [given] the endpoint is identified with , so one horizontal pass through the quotient changes the transverse sign; a second pass along the line returns to the original class. Thus the leaf through is also a circle.
This yields the standard line foliation of the Mobius band. [given] ∎
The standard contact plane field is not integrable
Statement refuted
The standard contact rank- distribution on is integrable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Let and let .
This is the kernel of the -form .
Every integrable smooth distribution is involutive (Integrable distributions are involutive).
Counterexample
The two fields and are smooth and pointwise independent, so [given] they define a smooth rank- distribution on .
Their bracket is [given] which is not a linear combination of and . Therefore the distribution is not involutive, even on this global frame.
By [L1], an integrable distribution would have to be involutive. Hence this standard [L1] contact distribution is a counterexample to the claim that it is integrable.
Therefore the displayed statement is refuted. [given] ∎
A bracket-closed variable-rank family outside regular Frobenius
Statement refuted
Any variable-rank family of tangent subspaces satisfying a bracket-closure condition is covered by the regular Frobenius theorem.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: On , let
The rank is at the origin and elsewhere.
Counterexample
Any smooth vector field tangent to this family must vanish at the origin. [given] The Lie bracket of two such fields also vanishes at the origin, so the tangent fields are closed under bracket in this loose sense.
Nevertheless the family is not a smooth distribution of constant rank, so [given] it does not satisfy the hypotheses of the regular Frobenius theorem.
Hence variable-rank bracket closure does not place a family inside regular [given] Frobenius theory.
Leaves of a Lie subalgebra distribution
Example
Let and let be the one-dimensional Lie subalgebra spanned by The left translates form a rank- distribution on . Its leaves are the left cosets of the subgroup
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The subgroup of .
Through each point of an integrable distribution there is a unique maximal connected integral manifold, its leaf (Existence and uniqueness of maximal connected integral manifolds).
Left translation sends to tangent lines of left cosets of .
Verification
The map is a one-parameter subgroup because [given] , so Hence is a connected immersed Lie subgroup with tangent space .
For any , the left coset has tangent line [given] at the point . Thus each coset is an integral manifold of the distribution .
For each , the curve has image and [given] derivative so it is an integral curve of the nowhere-zero rank- distribution . Hence any connected integral manifold through is locally an open piece of that same integral curve and is contained in . Since step 1.2 shows that itself is a connected integral manifold through , [L1] identifies as the leaf through . Varying gives all leaves.