Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The regular representation of the real line as a multiplicity-one integral of characters

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let G=R with its usual additive locally compact topology and Borel Lebesgue Haar measure mR. Give the Pontryagin dual R^ its compact-open topology and a dual Haar measure μ normalized compatibly with Plancherel. For each χ∈R^, set Hχ=C and πχ(t)z=χ(t)z. Then (Hχ) is the constant measurable Hilbert field over the standard-Borel, sigma-finite measure space (R^,μ), and (πχ) is a measurable field of strongly continuous one-dimensional unitary representations. Write F− for the library's conjugate-phase Plancherel transform, whose L1∩L2 formula is F−f(χ)=∫Rf(t)χ(t)‾ dmR(t), and define dual inversion by (Jφ)(χ)=φ(χ−1). Then F+:=JF− is a unitary; on L1∩L2 it has the positive-phase formula F+f(χ)=∫Rf(t)χ(t) dmR(t). Under the canonical identification ∫R^⊕C dμ≅L2(R^,μ) it intertwines the left regular representation with the direct integral: λR≅∫R^⊕πχ dμ(χ). The fibres have dimension one and the dual Haar measure has no point masses, giving the basic multiplicity-one continuous-spectrum model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; G=R with Borel Lebesgue Haar measure; the compact-open dual and compatible dual Haar measure; and the left regular representation.

[F1]

AC implies DC and countable choice, so the DC hypotheses of the Fourier and Plancherel results and the countable-choice hypotheses of the Lebesgue-measure results hold (The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F3]

With addition and inverse, R is a topological group; the local estimates ∣(x+y)−(x0+y0)∣≤∣x−x0∣+∣y−y0∣ and ∣(−x)−(−x0)∣=∣x−x0∣ verify continuity (Group and abelian group, Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous).

[F4]

Every continuous character of R has a unique form χξ(t)=e2πiξt; T is a compact metric group, the dual carries the compact-open topology, and complex exponentiation is continuous with eπi=e−πi=−1 (Continuous characters of the real line are exponentials, The multiplicative unit circle is a compact metrizable topological abelian group, The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology, The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself, exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0).

[F5]

The compact-open topology on R^ makes character multiplication and inversion continuous and makes evaluation jointly continuous; the dual of an LCA group is LCH abelian, and Haar measure is finite on compact sets. Step 2.2 identifies R^ homeomorphically with R, so the dual is second countable and its Borel space is standard Borel (The compact-open character group is a Hausdorff topological abelian group, Evaluation of characters is jointly continuous, The dual of a locally compact abelian group is locally compact abelian, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right, Left Haar integral and left Haar measure, Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures, Second-countable locally compact Hausdorff spaces are Polish, and homogeneous quotients are standard Borel, Standard Borel spaces).

[F7]

For the constant field Hχ=C, the section e0(χ)=1 is a countable fundamental family, the direct integral is the quotient of square-integrable measurable scalar sections, and it is a Hilbert space; with the scalar Haar L2 convention this gives the canonical unitary to L2(R^,μ) (Measurable Hilbert field from a countable fundamental family, Direct integral of a measurable Hilbert field, Direct integrals of measurable Hilbert fields are Hilbert spaces, Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

[F8]

Each πχ is a strongly continuous unitary representation because χ is a continuous character, and for fixed t the scalar operator field χ↦χ(t) is Borel by continuity of evaluation; the direct-integral representation is then defined by the in-run definition (Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners, Evaluation of characters is jointly continuous, Direct integrals of unitary representations).

[F9]

The library Fourier transform uses the conjugate phase and satisfies Ttf^(χ)=χ(t)‾f^(χ) for f∈L1; its Plancherel extension agrees with this transform on L1∩L2, is unitary under the compatible dual Haar normalization, and finite-measure-support simple functions are dense in L2 (The Fourier transform on an LCA group, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Fourier transform intertwines translation, modulation and convolution, Plancherel isometric extension on LCA groups, The Plancherel theorem for locally compact abelian groups, Simple functions with finite-measure support are dense in Lp(μ) for 1≤p<∞).

[F10]

Inversion on the LCA dual is Borel and preserves Haar measure; composing by it preserves Borel measurability, and the nonnegative integral is the supremum of the simple integrals of its simple minorants (Haar measure on an abelian group is invariant under inversion, Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability, The nonnegative Lebesgue integral, The integral of a nonnegative simple function).

[F11]

The left regular representation is given by [λ(t)f](x)=f(x−t) on the additive real line and is a strongly continuous unitary representation (Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group, The regular representations are unitary, strongly continuous, and the left one is faithful).

[F12]

Any two left Haar measures on an LCH group are positive scalar multiples; every countable subset of R is Lebesgue null (Uniqueness of left Haar measure up to scale, Every at most countable subset of Rn is Lebesgue null; in particular λ1(Q)=0).

Proof

technique · identify the dual explicitly, apply Plancherel in the library convention, then compose with inversion
1.1F1F6F9given

By [F1], the assumed AC supplies both DC and countable choice. Thus the DC hypotheses in [F9] and the countable-choice hypotheses in [F6] are met; the direct-integral assumptions are also covered by the given AC.

1.2F2F3F5given

The metric and compact intervals in [F2] make R Hausdorff and locally compact, and rational intervals give second countability. With the group operations verified in [F3], R is a second-countable LCA group. Therefore [F5] applies to show that R^ is LCH abelian.

1.3F4F5F9F10F7algebra

Let J initially act on Borel representatives by Jf(χ)=f(χ−1). Inversion preserves the dual Haar measure by [F10], and it is Borel by [F5], so composition preserves measurability and null equivalence. For every nonnegative Borel function g, the map s↦s∘ι bijects simple minorants of g and g∘ι; their simple integrals agree because inversion preserves the measures of their level sets. Taking suprema in the definition of the nonnegative integral [F10] gives ∫g∘ι dμ=∫g dμ. Applying this to g=∣f∣2 proves that J is a linear isometry on L2. Since inversion is involutive, J2=I, so J is unitary. Put F+:=JF−; it is unitary by [F9]. For every f and t, JMχ(t)‾f(χ)=χ−1(t)‾f(χ−1)=χ(t)Jf(χ).

2.1F4F9F11step 1.2given

By Step 1.2, the LCA hypotheses in [F9] hold. Let s be a simple function with finite-measure support. It lies in L1∩L2; [F9] says the L2 Plancherel transform F− agrees there with the integral Fourier transform. Since λ(t)s=Tts, the Fourier translation formula in [F9] gives F−λ(t)s=Mχ(t)‾F−s. Such simple functions are dense in L2 by [F9], while λ(t), Mχ(t)‾ and F− are bounded by [F4, F9, F11], so the equality extends to every f∈L2(R).

2.2F4F5F2step 1.2construct

By [F4], Φ:R→R^, Φ(ξ)=χξ, is a bijection and a group homomorphism. The evaluation formula is jointly continuous: near (ξ0,t0), ∣ξt−ξ0t0∣≤∣ξ∣ ∣t−t0∣+∣t0∣ ∣ξ−ξ0∣, and continuity of the complex exponential in [F4] then gives continuity of e2πiξt. For a subbasic compact-open neighborhood S(K,V)={χ:χ[K]⊆V} containing χξ0, this joint continuity and compactness of K give finitely many product neighborhoods covering {ξ0}×K on which the exponential remains in V; intersecting their parameter neighborhoods gives an interval around ξ0 mapped into S(K,V). The inverse is continuous at the identity character: for δ>0, put Kδ=[−1/(2δ),1/(2δ)] and V0={z∈T:∣z−1∣<1}. If χξ[Kδ]⊆V0 and ∣ξ∣≥δ, then t=1/(2∣ξ∣)∈Kδ and χξ(t)=e±πi=−1∉V0, a contradiction. Continuity of translations in the dual group from [F5] gives continuity of Φ−1 everywhere. Hence Φ is a homeomorphism.

3.1F5step 1.2step 2.2

The homeomorphism in Step 2.2 makes R^ second countable; it is LCH by Step 1.2. Thus [F5] gives its standard-Borel structure. The compact sets Kn=Φ([−n,n]) cover the dual, and [F5] gives μ(Kn)<∞; hence μ is sigma-finite by [F5].

4.1F4F7F8step 3.1given

Set e0(χ)=1 and en(χ)=0 for n>0. Its Gram coefficients are constant and its values span C, so [F7] makes (Hχ) the constant measurable Hilbert field. Every πχ is a unitary homomorphism and is strongly continuous by [F4, F8]. For fixed t, the scalar field χ↦χ(t) is continuous by [F8], hence weakly measurable. The standard-Borel sigma-finite base was established in Step 3.1, so the in-run definition [F8] applies and forms Π=∫⊕πχ dμ(χ).

5.1F7F8step 4.1

The map V:L2(R^,μ)→∫R^⊕C dμ, Vf=[χ↦f(χ)], is a unitary by the quotient definition in [F7]. From the pointwise definition of the direct-integral representation in [F8], V−1Π(t)V is multiplication by χ↦χ(t).

6.1F4F5F6F12step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2step 5.1algebra∎

By Steps 1.3 and 2.1, F+=JF− intertwines λ(t) with multiplication by χ(t). By Step 5.1 this is Π(t) under the canonical direct-integral identification, so VF+ intertwines the left regular representation with ∫⊕πχ dμ. Each fibre is exactly C, and [F4] parametrizes each character exactly once. The vector 1(0,1] is nonzero in L2(R) because mR((0,1])=1 by [F6], so the decomposition is not the zero Hilbert space. The homeomorphic group isomorphism Φ pulls μ back to a nonzero regular Borel measure finite on compact sets and invariant under translations, hence to a left Haar measure on R by [F6]. By [F12] it is a positive multiple of Lebesgue measure; its countable subsets are null, so the parameter measure has no point masses. This is the stated multiplicity-one continuous-spectrum model.

Remarks

Open supplier obligation: Direct integrals of unitary representations is the in-run supplier of this item, The regular representation of the real line as a multiplicity-one integral of characters. This proof provisionally uses it in Steps 4.1 and 5.1 to form the field's direct-integral representation and identify its pointwise multiplication action. The supplier remains draft and has no current Step 3 item decision, so reconcile its completed authoring and actual use before accepting this consumer; this item's decision must remain escalated until then.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

291 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources