Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 4 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 4 also cleared it.

Direct Integral Decomposition and Type I Groups — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These cases compare discrete, continuous and noncanonical irreducible decompositions. The regular representation of the real line becomes a continuous integral of characters under Fourier transform. For a compact second-countable group, Peter–Weyl instead gives a countable atomic model: square-summable isotypic components form a completed Hilbert sum, and the regular multiplicities are the irreducible dimensions.

For an infinite ICC discrete group, the regular von Neumann algebra has a faithful finite trace and scalar centre, yet is not type I. Its central decomposition therefore has one non-irreducible factor fibre. The free group on two generators illustrates the resulting distinction sharply: inducing circle characters from either cyclic free factor gives the same regular representation, while every irreducible in one integral is inequivalent to every irreducible in the other. Central factor data and irreducible multiplicity data thus answer different questions.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

The regular representation of the real line as a multiplicity-one integral of characters

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let G=R with its usual additive locally compact topology and Borel Lebesgue Haar measure mR. Give the Pontryagin dual R^ its compact-open topology and a dual Haar measure μ normalized compatibly with Plancherel. For each χ∈R^, set Hχ=C and πχ(t)z=χ(t)z. Then (Hχ) is the constant measurable Hilbert field over the standard-Borel, sigma-finite measure space (R^,μ), and (πχ) is a measurable field of strongly continuous one-dimensional unitary representations. Write F− for the library's conjugate-phase Plancherel transform, whose L1∩L2 formula is F−f(χ)=∫Rf(t)χ(t)‾ dmR(t), and define dual inversion by (Jφ)(χ)=φ(χ−1). Then F+:=JF− is a unitary; on L1∩L2 it has the positive-phase formula F+f(χ)=∫Rf(t)χ(t) dmR(t). Under the canonical identification ∫R^⊕C dμ≅L2(R^,μ) it intertwines the left regular representation with the direct integral: λR≅∫R^⊕πχ dμ(χ). The fibres have dimension one and the dual Haar measure has no point masses, giving the basic multiplicity-one continuous-spectrum model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; G=R with Borel Lebesgue Haar measure; the compact-open dual and compatible dual Haar measure; and the left regular representation.

[F1]

AC implies DC and countable choice, so the DC hypotheses of the Fourier and Plancherel results and the countable-choice hypotheses of the Lebesgue-measure results hold (The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F3]

With addition and inverse, R is a topological group; the local estimates ∣(x+y)−(x0+y0)∣≤∣x−x0∣+∣y−y0∣ and ∣(−x)−(−x0)∣=∣x−x0∣ verify continuity (Group and abelian group, Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous).

[F4]

Every continuous character of R has a unique form χξ(t)=e2πiξt; T is a compact metric group, the dual carries the compact-open topology, and complex exponentiation is continuous with eπi=e−πi=−1 (Continuous characters of the real line are exponentials, The multiplicative unit circle is a compact metrizable topological abelian group, The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology, The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself, exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0).

[F5]

The compact-open topology on R^ makes character multiplication and inversion continuous and makes evaluation jointly continuous; the dual of an LCA group is LCH abelian, and Haar measure is finite on compact sets. Step 2.2 identifies R^ homeomorphically with R, so the dual is second countable and its Borel space is standard Borel (The compact-open character group is a Hausdorff topological abelian group, Evaluation of characters is jointly continuous, The dual of a locally compact abelian group is locally compact abelian, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right, Left Haar integral and left Haar measure, Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures, Second-countable locally compact Hausdorff spaces are Polish, and homogeneous quotients are standard Borel, Standard Borel spaces).

[F7]

For the constant field Hχ=C, the section e0(χ)=1 is a countable fundamental family, the direct integral is the quotient of square-integrable measurable scalar sections, and it is a Hilbert space; with the scalar Haar L2 convention this gives the canonical unitary to L2(R^,μ) (Measurable Hilbert field from a countable fundamental family, Direct integral of a measurable Hilbert field, Direct integrals of measurable Hilbert fields are Hilbert spaces, Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

[F8]

Each πχ is a strongly continuous unitary representation because χ is a continuous character, and for fixed t the scalar operator field χ↦χ(t) is Borel by continuity of evaluation; the direct-integral representation is then defined by the in-run definition (Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners, Evaluation of characters is jointly continuous, Direct integrals of unitary representations).

[F9]

The library Fourier transform uses the conjugate phase and satisfies Ttf^(χ)=χ(t)‾f^(χ) for f∈L1; its Plancherel extension agrees with this transform on L1∩L2, is unitary under the compatible dual Haar normalization, and finite-measure-support simple functions are dense in L2 (The Fourier transform on an LCA group, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Fourier transform intertwines translation, modulation and convolution, Plancherel isometric extension on LCA groups, The Plancherel theorem for locally compact abelian groups, Simple functions with finite-measure support are dense in Lp(μ) for 1≤p<∞).

[F10]

Inversion on the LCA dual is Borel and preserves Haar measure; composing by it preserves Borel measurability, and the nonnegative integral is the supremum of the simple integrals of its simple minorants (Haar measure on an abelian group is invariant under inversion, Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability, The nonnegative Lebesgue integral, The integral of a nonnegative simple function).

[F11]

The left regular representation is given by [λ(t)f](x)=f(x−t) on the additive real line and is a strongly continuous unitary representation (Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group, The regular representations are unitary, strongly continuous, and the left one is faithful).

[F12]

Any two left Haar measures on an LCH group are positive scalar multiples; every countable subset of R is Lebesgue null (Uniqueness of left Haar measure up to scale, Every at most countable subset of Rn is Lebesgue null; in particular λ1(Q)=0).

Proof

technique · identify the dual explicitly, apply Plancherel in the library convention, then compose with inversion
1.1F1F6F9given

By [F1], the assumed AC supplies both DC and countable choice. Thus the DC hypotheses in [F9] and the countable-choice hypotheses in [F6] are met; the direct-integral assumptions are also covered by the given AC.

1.2F2F3F5given

The metric and compact intervals in [F2] make R Hausdorff and locally compact, and rational intervals give second countability. With the group operations verified in [F3], R is a second-countable LCA group. Therefore [F5] applies to show that R^ is LCH abelian.

1.3F4F5F9F10F7algebra

Let J initially act on Borel representatives by Jf(χ)=f(χ−1). Inversion preserves the dual Haar measure by [F10], and it is Borel by [F5], so composition preserves measurability and null equivalence. For every nonnegative Borel function g, the map s↦s∘ι bijects simple minorants of g and g∘ι; their simple integrals agree because inversion preserves the measures of their level sets. Taking suprema in the definition of the nonnegative integral [F10] gives ∫g∘ι dμ=∫g dμ. Applying this to g=∣f∣2 proves that J is a linear isometry on L2. Since inversion is involutive, J2=I, so J is unitary. Put F+:=JF−; it is unitary by [F9]. For every f and t, JMχ(t)‾f(χ)=χ−1(t)‾f(χ−1)=χ(t)Jf(χ).

2.1F4F9F11step 1.2given

By Step 1.2, the LCA hypotheses in [F9] hold. Let s be a simple function with finite-measure support. It lies in L1∩L2; [F9] says the L2 Plancherel transform F− agrees there with the integral Fourier transform. Since λ(t)s=Tts, the Fourier translation formula in [F9] gives F−λ(t)s=Mχ(t)‾F−s. Such simple functions are dense in L2 by [F9], while λ(t), Mχ(t)‾ and F− are bounded by [F4, F9, F11], so the equality extends to every f∈L2(R).

2.2F4F5F2step 1.2construct

By [F4], Φ:R→R^, Φ(ξ)=χξ, is a bijection and a group homomorphism. The evaluation formula is jointly continuous: near (ξ0,t0), ∣ξt−ξ0t0∣≤∣ξ∣ ∣t−t0∣+∣t0∣ ∣ξ−ξ0∣, and continuity of the complex exponential in [F4] then gives continuity of e2πiξt. For a subbasic compact-open neighborhood S(K,V)={χ:χ[K]⊆V} containing χξ0, this joint continuity and compactness of K give finitely many product neighborhoods covering {ξ0}×K on which the exponential remains in V; intersecting their parameter neighborhoods gives an interval around ξ0 mapped into S(K,V). The inverse is continuous at the identity character: for δ>0, put Kδ=[−1/(2δ),1/(2δ)] and V0={z∈T:∣z−1∣<1}. If χξ[Kδ]⊆V0 and ∣ξ∣≥δ, then t=1/(2∣ξ∣)∈Kδ and χξ(t)=e±πi=−1∉V0, a contradiction. Continuity of translations in the dual group from [F5] gives continuity of Φ−1 everywhere. Hence Φ is a homeomorphism.

3.1F5step 1.2step 2.2

The homeomorphism in Step 2.2 makes R^ second countable; it is LCH by Step 1.2. Thus [F5] gives its standard-Borel structure. The compact sets Kn=Φ([−n,n]) cover the dual, and [F5] gives μ(Kn)<∞; hence μ is sigma-finite by [F5].

4.1F4F7F8step 3.1given

Set e0(χ)=1 and en(χ)=0 for n>0. Its Gram coefficients are constant and its values span C, so [F7] makes (Hχ) the constant measurable Hilbert field. Every πχ is a unitary homomorphism and is strongly continuous by [F4, F8]. For fixed t, the scalar field χ↦χ(t) is continuous by [F8], hence weakly measurable. The standard-Borel sigma-finite base was established in Step 3.1, so the in-run definition [F8] applies and forms Π=∫⊕πχ dμ(χ).

5.1F7F8step 4.1

The map V:L2(R^,μ)→∫R^⊕C dμ, Vf=[χ↦f(χ)], is a unitary by the quotient definition in [F7]. From the pointwise definition of the direct-integral representation in [F8], V−1Π(t)V is multiplication by χ↦χ(t).

6.1F4F5F6F12step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2step 5.1algebra∎

By Steps 1.3 and 2.1, F+=JF− intertwines λ(t) with multiplication by χ(t). By Step 5.1 this is Π(t) under the canonical direct-integral identification, so VF+ intertwines the left regular representation with ∫⊕πχ dμ. Each fibre is exactly C, and [F4] parametrizes each character exactly once. The vector 1(0,1] is nonzero in L2(R) because mR((0,1])=1 by [F6], so the decomposition is not the zero Hilbert space. The homeomorphic group isomorphism Φ pulls μ back to a nonzero regular Borel measure finite on compact sets and invariant under translations, hence to a left Haar measure on R by [F6]. By [F12] it is a positive multiple of Lebesgue measure; its countable subsets are null, so the parameter measure has no point masses. This is the stated multiplicity-one continuous-spectrum model.

Remarks

Open supplier obligation: Direct integrals of unitary representations is the in-run supplier of this item, The regular representation of the real line as a multiplicity-one integral of characters. This proof provisionally uses it in Steps 4.1 and 5.1 to form the field's direct-integral representation and identify its pointwise multiplication action. The supplier remains draft and has no current Step 3 item decision, so reconcile its completed authoring and actual use before accepting this consumer; this item's decision must remain escalated until then.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

The left regular factor of an ICC discrete group is a non-type-I factor

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let Γ be a countably infinite group in which every nonidentity conjugacy class is infinite (ICC), for instance the free group on two generators or the group of finitely supported permutations of N. Let λΓ be the left regular representation on ℓ2(Γ) and L(Γ):=W∗(λΓ(Γ))⊆B(ℓ2(Γ)). Then: (1) τ(T):=⟨Tδe,δe⟩ is a faithful normal tracial state on L(Γ) with τ(I)=1, and L(Γ) is infinite dimensional; (2) L(Γ) is a factor, i.e. Z(L(Γ))=CI; (3) L(Γ) is not a type I factor, hence λΓ is a factor representation that is not a multiple of an irreducible representation. Thus the canonical central decomposition of λΓ has a single non-irreducible factor fibre, exhibiting that factor representations need not be irreducible and that the type I hypothesis in the irreducible disintegration theorem is essential.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The left and right regular representations are strongly continuous and unitary; in the discrete case λ(g)δh=δgh, ρ(g)δh=δhg−1, and the two actions commute (Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group, The regular representations are unitary, strongly continuous, and the left one is faithful).

[F2]

The group von Neumann algebra is the WOT closure of the unital star algebra spanned by λ(g); commutants are WOT-closed, and multiplication by a fixed bounded operator is WOT-continuous. The bicommutant theorem identifies this algebra with λ(Γ)′′ (Von Neumann algebras and commutants, The double commutant theorem for concrete von Neumann algebras).

[F3]

A faithful normal tracial state is positive, unital and tracial, faithful on T∗T, and normal; vector functionals are WOT-continuous (States, tracial states and faithful normal traces on a von Neumann algebra).

[F4]

A factor representation has scalar centre. A separable type I factor has spatial form B(E)⊗IL for nonzero separable E,L, and is equivalent to a multiple of an irreducible representation, with the converse also valid (Factor (primary) representations, A separable type I factor is a multiple of an irreducible representation).

[F5]

In F2=⟨a⟩∗⟨b⟩, the infinite cyclic factors A=⟨a⟩ and B=⟨b⟩ are self-commensurating and have trivial intersections with conjugates of the other factor (The two cyclic basis factors of the rank-two free group are self-commensurating with trivial cross-conjugate intersections).

[F6]

AC permits orthonormal bases and the spatial type I splitting used here (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

Given: AC and a countably infinite discrete ICC group Γ.

1.1F1F2F3

The vector functional τ is positive and unital, since τ(T∗T)=∥Tδe∥2 and ∥δe∥=1, and is WOT-continuous, hence normal. On generators, τ(λ(g)λ(h))=1gh=e=1hg=e=τ(λ(h)λ(g)). Bilinearity proves the trace identity on their linear span. For fixed A in that span, approximate B∈M in WOT and use separate multiplication continuity to obtain τ(AB)=τ(BA); then fix this B and approximate arbitrary A∈M, proving traciality on M. Every T∈M commutes with ρ(Γ) by [F1,F2]. If τ(T∗T)=0, then Tδe=0 and Tδg=Tρ(g−1)δe=ρ(g−1)Tδe=0 for all g, so T=0 on a dense basis. Thus τ is faithful. The operators λ(g) are linearly independent: applying a finite linear relation to δe gives the corresponding relation among the distinct basis vectors δg. Hence M is infinite dimensional.

2.1F1F2F4step 1.1

Let T∈Z(M) and write Tδe=∑gcgδg. For s∈Γ the unitary Cs=λ(s)ρ(s) fixes δe and sends δg to δsgs−1. Centrality and [F1,F2] imply that T commutes with both factors of Cs, so CsTδe=Tδe. Thus cg is constant on each conjugacy class. An ℓ2 sequence cannot have a nonzero constant value on an infinite set, so ICC gives Tδe=ceδe. Commutation with ρ then gives Tδg=ceδg for every g. Therefore T=ceI, proving the factor assertion.

3.1F3F4F6step 1.1step 2.1choose

If M were type I, [F4] would give the spatial algebra B(E)⊗IL. Finite-dimensional E would make M finite dimensional. If E is infinite dimensional and separable, choose a countable orthonormal basis and the isometries V1,V2 onto its even and odd basis subspaces. Their range projections p,q are orthogonal. Transferring Vi⊗IL to M, traciality gives τ(p)=τ(V1∗V1)=1 and τ(q)=1, while positivity and p+q≤I give 2=τ(p+q)≤1, a contradiction. Thus M is not type I and [F4] excludes an irreducible multiple. In particular λ is not irreducible. Its one-point integral is a central factor decomposition, since diagonal operators on that point are CI=Z(M); any central diagonal model must have a one-atom measure algebra on its effective support, because its diagonal algebra is scalar. The fibre therefore remains this non-irreducible factor, rather than an irreducible.

4.1F5step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1construct∎

For completeness, F2 is countable by its finite reduced words and infinite by the powers of a. If w∉A, all conjugates anwa−n are distinct: equality at two different integers would make w commute with a nonzero power ak. Then A∩w−1Aw contains ⟨ak⟩, of finite index in both infinite cyclic groups, contradicting Comm⁡F2(A)=A from [F5]. If w∈A∖{e}, then w∉B by [F5], and the same argument with b gives infinitely many conjugates. Thus F2 is ICC. The finite-support permutation group is a countable union of finite permutation groups and is infinite. For a nonidentity permutation with finite moved support S, move S to infinitely many pairwise disjoint blocks of the same size by finite permutations. Its conjugates then have distinct moved supports and are distinct, proving ICC. Both examples therefore satisfy all conclusions above.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

Canonical compact-group decompositions are atomic Hilbert sums

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let K be a second-countable compact group with normalized Haar measure and let (π,H) be a strongly continuous unitary representation on a separable complex Hilbert space. Its canonical isotypic decomposition is π≅⨁α∈Imαπα, with I⊆K^ at most countable, πα finite dimensional and mα∈{1,2,…,∞}. In fact K^ is countable. Give it its discrete sigma-algebra and counting measure, and put Hα=Cmα⊗Vα for occurring classes, where C∞ means ℓ2(N), and Hα=0 for the others. This measurable field realizes π as the atomic direct integral of mαπα over the full dual. Its Hilbert space is the completed square-summable orthogonal sum. For the left regular representation mα=dim⁡Vα.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The compact corollary supplies the canonical countable isotypic Hilbert decomposition and its regular multiplicities (Compact groups are type I and their direct integrals collapse to discrete Hilbert sums).

[F2]

The compact dual is the set of finite-dimensional irreducible classes, and Peter--Weyl assigns every class a nonzero coefficient block in L2(K); distinct blocks are orthogonal (The unitary dual of a compact group, Peter-Weyl decomposition of the regular representation).

[F3]

A sigma-finite countably generated measure space has separable real L2 under Countable Choice (If μ is sigma-finite and A is countably generated, then Lp(μ) is separable for 1≤p<∞). AC implies Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F4]

A countable fundamental family defines a measurable Hilbert field, and its direct integral consists of measurable sections with integrable squared norm, modulo Borel null sets. A measurable field of unitary representations acts fibrewise (Measurable Hilbert field from a countable fundamental family, Direct integral of a measurable Hilbert field, Direct integrals of unitary representations). The Hilbert direct sum uses square-summable components (Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations).

Verification

Given: AC, K, normalized Haar measure, and (π,H) as in the Example.

1.1F2F3choose

A countable open base generates the Borel sigma-algebra of K, and normalized Haar measure is finite. By [F3] real L2(K) has a countable dense subset D; the set D+iD is countable and dense in complex L2(K), since real and imaginary parts can be approximated separately. Choose a unit vector in each nonzero Peter--Weyl coefficient block [F2]. These vectors are orthogonal, so pairwise disjoint balls of radius 1/3 each meet a countable dense set. Assigning the first dense point in each ball proves that K^ is at most countable.

2.1F1F4step 1.1construct

Use [F1] to choose the representatives and multiplicity spaces stated above. The countable dual with discrete metric is complete and separable, hence standard Borel, and its counting measure is sigma-finite. Choose an orthonormal basis in each nonzero separable fibre and enumerate all pairs consisting of an atom and a basis vector. The section associated with a pair equals that vector at its atom and zero elsewhere. Their Gram coefficients are measurable and their values span densely at each atom, so they form a countable fundamental family in [F4]; if all fibres are zero, use a sequence of zero sections. Every section is measurable because every scalar function on a countable discrete space is measurable. For fixed k∈K, all matrix coefficients of the fibre action are likewise measurable.

3.1F1F4step 2.1∎

Counting integration gives ∥ξ∥2=∑α∈K^∥ξ(α)∥2, and its only null subset is empty. Thus the direct integral is exactly the completed Hilbert direct sum, with precisely the isotypic action of [F1]. This action is strongly continuous: approximate a vector by its finitely many nonzero coordinates, use continuity on those coordinates, and bound the remaining displacement by twice the tail norm. The regular multiplicity assertion follows from [F1], including its conjugate-class reindexing convention.

Remarks

The full-dual counting presentation is redundant at classes outside I: these are positive-measure atoms with zero Hilbert fibre. The canonical effective measure class is supported on the occurring set I; equivalently give zero measure to K^∖I, or discard those zero-carrier atoms, before applying uniqueness results requiring nonzero fibres.

“Atomic” describes the effective canonical isotypic model. It does not force an original redundant parameter measure to be atomic: the constant trivial one-dimensional representation over a nonatomic probability interval integrates to the trivial representation on L2([0,1]), a countably infinite multiple of the trivial irreducible. Nor is a countable Hilbert sum merely its algebraic finite-support subspace.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

Irreducible multiplicity data is not canonical outside type I

Statement refuted

False claim: for every second-countable locally compact group, the irreducible direct-integral data of a representation - the measure class on the unitary dual and the multiplicity function - is canonically determined. Counterexample: let F=⟨a,b⟩ be the free group on two generators, A=⟨a⟩, B=⟨b⟩, and let λF be the left regular representation on ℓ2(F). Then there are two direct integral decompositions into irreducible representations λF≅∫A^⊕Ind⁡AFχ dμ(χ)≅∫B^⊕Ind⁡BFψ dν(ψ), where μ,ν are Haar measures on the compact duals A^,B^≅T, every fibre Ind⁡AFχ and Ind⁡BFψ is irreducible, and Ind⁡AFχ≇Ind⁡BFψ for all (χ,ψ)∈A^×B^. Moreover F is not type I, because L(F) is an infinite-dimensional non-type-I factor (The left regular factor of an ICC discrete group is a non-type-I factor). Hence the two decompositions have disjoint supports in the dual and there is no uniqueness of irreducible multiplicity data: only the central factor decomposition is canonical.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Assume AC. For F=F2=⟨a,b⟩, the infinite cyclic subgroups A=⟨a⟩ and B=⟨b⟩ are self-commensurating and g−1Bg∩A={e} for all g∈F (The Axiom of Choice, The two cyclic basis factors of the rank-two free group are self-commensurating with trivial cross-conjugate intersections).

[F2]

For a subgroup D of a discrete group and a unitary character χ, choose a right transversal T of the left cosets D\F, containing e. Write tg=α(t,g)(t⋅g) with α(t,g)∈D. The monomial representation on ℓ2(T) is (πχ(g)u)(t)=χ(α(t,g))u(t⋅g). It satisfies πχ(t−1)δe=δt, πχ(d)δe=χ(d)δe, and its δe coefficient is χ(g) if g∈D and zero otherwise (Commensurator, unitary characters and monomial induced representations in the transversal model, Matrix-coefficient properties of the transversal model of a monomial representation).

[F3]

Inducing a character from a self-commensurating open subgroup gives an irreducible representation. The inequivalence criterion applies vacuously when all cross intersections have infinite index in the first subgroup (Mackey-Shoda irreducibility criterion for monomial representations, Mackey-Shoda non-equivalence criterion for monomial representations).

[F4]

A constant separable Hilbert field with a countable orthonormal fundamental family is measurable; a field of unitary representations with measurable matrix coefficients integrates by fibrewise action (Measurable Hilbert field from a countable fundamental family, Direct integral of a measurable Hilbert field, Direct integrals of unitary representations).

[F5]

On the probability torus, the characters z↦zn, n∈Z, have integral zero except for n=0, and their span is dense in complex L2 (The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral, The trigonometric characters are orthonormal in L2 of the torus, The trigonometric system is complete in L2 of the torus). AC supplies their Countable Choice premise (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F6]

Two strongly continuous cyclic unitary representations with the same pointed diagonal coefficient are unitarily equivalent (Uniqueness of the pointed cyclic GNS representation). The regular representation has cyclic vector δe and coefficient 1g=e (Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group, The regular representations are unitary, strongly continuous, and the left one is faithful).

[F7]

The regular representation of F2 is a non-type-I factor representation (The left regular factor of an ICC discrete group is a non-type-I factor); a type I group has no such separable factor representation (Type I factor representations and type I groups).

Counterexample

Given: AC, the discrete second-countable locally compact group F=F2, and its infinite cyclic free factors A,B.

1.1F1F2F4F5construct

A character of A is uniquely determined by z=χ(a)∈{z∈C:∣z∣=1}, with χ(an)=zn. This identifies A^ with the torus: compact subsets of the discrete cyclic group are finite, so its compact-open character topology is exactly the topology of this evaluation. Transport normalized torus Haar measure to A^; do the same for B and ψ(b). These are standard-Borel probability parameter spaces. A transversal T of A\F is countable. Realize all πz=Ind⁡AFχz on the fixed space ℓ2(T) as in [F2]. For fixed g every basis matrix coefficient is zero or a monomial zn, hence continuous in z. Thus [F4] defines ΠA=∫A^⊕πz dμ(z) on L2(A^;ℓ2(T)). The pointwise group law is exact for every parameter; since F is discrete, the integrated unitary representation is automatically strongly continuous.

2.1F2F4F5step 1.1

The constant section ξ(z)=δe is a unit vector. Its diagonal coefficient at g is the integral of the coefficient in [F2]: it is zero if g∉A, and if g=an it is ∫zn dμ(z)=1n=0. Hence it equals 1g=e. Crucially, ξ is cyclic for the entire integral. Indeed, for every t∈T and n∈Z, the group law and [F2] give ΠA(t−1an)ξ(z)=znδt. The span of these orbit vectors contains every finite sum of Fourier polynomials times coset basis vectors. Such sums are dense: the squared norm is the sum of the scalar-coordinate squared L2 norms, so truncating the countable coset coordinates makes the tail arbitrarily small, and [F5] approximates each of the finitely many remaining coordinates by Fourier polynomials. This proves global cyclicity, without inferring it from fibrewise cyclicity.

3.1F6step 1.1step 2.1

The regular representation and (ΠA,ξ) now have the same diagonal coefficient and cyclic unit vectors, so [F6] gives λF≅ΠA. Repeating steps 1.1 and 2.1 with B gives λF≅∫A^⊕Ind⁡AFχ dμ(χ)≅∫B^⊕Ind⁡BFψ dν(ψ). Both measures are normalized Haar probabilities.

4.1F1F3step 3.1

By self-commensuration in [F1], [F3] makes every fibre in both integrals irreducible. Every intersection g−1Bg∩A is trivial, hence has infinite index in the infinite group A. The cross-family inequivalence hypothesis is therefore vacuous, and [F3] gives Ind⁡AFχ≇Ind⁡BFψ for every pair of parameters. Within one family, distinct characters also give inequivalent fibres: if the intersection g−1Ag∩A has finite index in both groups, self-commensuration forces g∈A; conjugation then fixes every character of the abelian A, and different characters differ on A. The same inequivalence criterion applies, and similarly for B. Thus each model has multiplicity one on its own irreducible classes, and the two sets of classes are disjoint.

5.1F7step 3.1step 4.1∎

No removal of null parameter sets, change of measure within its class, or parameter identification can match the irreducible fibres of these two probability models: every cross pair is inequivalent by step 4.1. This refutes canonical irreducible measure-class/multiplicity data. No standard-Borel structure on the full dual F^ is being assumed; the two models already use standard-Borel circles and disjoint images among irreducible classes. Moreover [F7] proves that F is not type I. In this example the central factor datum remains the one-point non-irreducible regular factor of [F7]; the two irreducible disintegrations are not central diagonalizations. Hence the uniqueness appropriate to central factor decompositions cannot be transferred to irreducible multiplicity data outside type I.

Sources