Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gaussian regularization preserves finite-action continuity equations

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let T>0, d≥1, and let (μt,vt) be a narrowly continuous finite-action solution of the continuity equation on [0,T]×Rd, with space-time law M(dt,dx)=dt μt(dx). Put a(t)=∫∣vt(y)∣2dμt(y) and N={t:a(t)=+∞}. Then a is measurable, N is Borel and Lebesgue-null, and the Borel representative vˉ(t,x)=0 for t∈N and vˉ(t,x)=v(t,x) for t∉N agrees with v M-almost everywhere. For ε>0, let ρε be the strictly positive centered Gaussian probability density with covariance εId, and define ptε(x)=∫ρε(x−y)dμt(y),jtε(x)=∫ρε(x−y)vˉt(y)dμt(y),vtε(x)=jtε(x)/ptε(x). Then ptε is a strictly positive smooth probability density for each t, t↦μtε is narrowly continuous, vtε is Borel and locally Lipschitz in x with local magnitude and Lipschitz bounds integrable in time, and (μt∗ρε,vtε) solves the continuity equation. For almost every t, ∫∣vtε(x)∣2ptε(x)dx≤∫∣vt(y)∣2dμt(y).

Statement references

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; T,d,ε, the probability curve μt, its Borel vector field v, finite action, and the distributional continuity equation.

[F1]

The space-time law M is finite and integrates nonnegative Borel functions by time sections; in particular a(t)=∫∣vt∣2dμt is measurable and integrable. A narrow probability curve defines its space-time measure Finite-action continuity equation in Euclidean space

[F2]

The Gaussian kernel is strictly positive, smooth, has integral one and second moment dε. By differentiating its explicit density, each derivative has the form of a polynomial times the Gaussian, so every derivative is bounded and integrable. The d-dimensional law is the product of d one-dimensional normals. Standard normal and normal laws The standard normal density has total mass one Location-scale normal laws have their stated mean and variance The product measure of two sigma-finite measure spaces For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique

[F3]

Kernel integration preserves Borel measurability; Tonelli and Fubini apply to the nonnegative and integrable convolution terms. Measurability of integration against a kernel Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product

[F4]

Holder bounds first moments by second moments on finite probability spaces; monotone convergence applies to increasing nonnegative limits, and sums and scalar multiples of finite real measurable functions are measurable. Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases Monotone convergence for the integral Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral

[F5]

Dominated convergence passes the cutoff limits through the space-time integrals. Dominated convergence

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3F4

The Gaussian second moment is finite: in one dimension x2e−x2/(2ε) is bounded on [−1,1] and, outside it, is bounded by a constant times e−x2/(4ε), which is integrable; product integration gives ∫∣z∣2ρε(z)dz=dε. Hence μt∗ρε has finite second moment by ∣y+z∣2≤2∣y∣2+2∣z∣2. For bounded continuous f, y↦∫f(y+z)ρε(z)dz is bounded and continuous by dominated convergence, so narrow continuity of μt gives narrow continuity of μtε. By [F1], a∈L1(0,T) and N is a Borel null set. Use vˉ from the statement; because vˉ=v M-almost everywhere, the distributional equation and action are unchanged. Set g(t)=a(t) for t∉N and g(t)=0 on N. Holder gives ∫∣vˉt∣dμt≤g(t) for every t and g∈L1(0,T), so all integrals defining j are finite for every t. By [F3], p,j are Borel in (t,x). Positivity of ρε and total mass one give ptε(x)>0. For every component i and real r, {(t,x):vt,iε(x)>r}={(t,x):jt,iε(x)−rptε(x)>0} is Borel by the sum and scalar-multiple closure in [F4]. Hence each component of vε is Borel. For every spatial multi-index, the Gaussian derivative is bounded by [F2], so differentiation under the integral is justified for p and for j's first derivatives by domination by a constant times 1+∣vˉt∣. Thus ptε is smooth in x and jtε is continuously differentiable in x. Also ∫ptεdx=1 by [F2] and Tonelli.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1

Fix a compact spatial ball K. Narrow continuity of μt and bounded continuity of each Gaussian derivative imply joint continuity of ptε(x) and its spatial derivatives in (t,x): for tn→t, xn→x, the spatial difference is uniformly bounded by a derivative bound times ∣xn−x∣, and the remaining integral converges by narrow continuity. On [0,T]×K the positive density therefore has a positive minimum. For every first spatial derivative, boundedness of the corresponding Gaussian derivative gives ∣jtε(x)∣+∣∇jtε(x)∣≤Cε∫∣vˉt∣dμt≤Cεg(t) and ∣∇ptε(x)∣≤Cε. The quotient rule and the positive lower bound for p show that ∣vtε(x)∣+∣∇vtε(x)∣≤CK,εg(t) on K. The right side is time-integrable, proving the local magnitude and Lipschitz bounds required for the Carathéodory flow.

2.2F1F2F3step 1.1

For every t, the probability measure ptε(x)−1ρε(x−y)dμt(y) averages vˉt to vtε(x). Cauchy--Schwarz for this probability gives ∣jtε(x)∣2ptε(x)≤∫ρε(x−y)∣vˉt(y)∣2dμt(y). Integrate in x and use Tonelli and ∫ρε(x−y)dx=1 to obtain ∫∣vtε∣2ptεdx≤∫∣vˉt∣2dμt for every t; since vˉ=v M-almost everywhere, this is the asserted a.e. action inequality.

3.1givenF1F3F4F5step 1.1step 2.1∎

Since vˉ=v M-almost everywhere, the distributional continuity-equation identity also holds with vˉ. Let φ∈Cc∞((0,T)×Rd) and set ψ(t,y)=∫φ(t,x)ρε(x−y)dx. This function and its derivatives decay rapidly in y, but are not compactly supported. Choose smooth cutoffs χR equal to one on BR, supported in B2R, with ∣∇χR∣≤C/R, and apply the equation with vˉ to χR(y)ψ(t,y). As R→∞, dominated convergence [F5] sends the terms with χR to their uncut values: ∂tψ and ∇yψ are bounded, while ∣v∣ is integrable against M by [F1]. The extra term ψv⋅∇χR tends to zero, bounded in absolute integral by C∥ψ∥∞R−1∫∣v∣dM. Thus ∫(∂tψ+∇yψ⋅vt(y))dμt(y)dt=0. Differentiating the convolution and integrating by parts in x gives ∇yψ(t,y)=∫∇xφ(t,x)ρε(x−y)dx. Fubini then rewrites the last identity as ∫0T∫(∂tφ(t,x)ptε(x)+∇xφ(t,x)⋅jtε(x))dxdt=0, which is exactly the continuity equation for density ptε and velocity vtε=jtε/ptε.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

90 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources