Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Symmetric-power SU2 representation

Statement

Fix an integer n≥0, let V:=C2 carry the standard inner product linear in the first argument, with orthonormal basis (e+,e−) where e+:=(1,0) and e−:=(0,1) (Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument), and let V⊗n be the n-fold algebraic tensor power with its finite string basis (The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product) made orthonormal. Use Sn=Sym⁡({0,…,n−1}) as in The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation. For n≥1 define the bijection bn:{0,…,n−1}→{1,…,n} by bn(a)=a+1, and for π∈Sn put π^:=bn∘π∘bn−1. Define Uπ to be the place action of π^ in Commuting symmetric-group and linear actions on a tensor power: explicitly, for x1,…,xn∈V, Uπ(x1⊗⋯⊗xn)=xπ−1(0)+1⊗⋯⊗xπ−1(n−1)+1, extended linearly. Use the diagonal action W⊗n of W∈M2(C) and the operators Δ(T):=∑j=1n1⊗(j−1)⊗T⊗1⊗(n−j). Put

P+:=1n!∑π∈SnUπ,Sn:=ran⁡P+⊆V⊗n,SU(2):={W∈M2(C):W∗W=I2, det⁡W=1},

where W∗:=W‾T is the conjugate transpose of W and I2 the identity matrix (Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes, For n≥1, the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and ∣det⁡A∣ for a real matrix). For W∈SU(2) define Un(W):=W⊗n∣Sn. For k∈{0,…,n} let sk be the sum of the elementary tensors eε1⊗⋯⊗eεn over all 2n strings (ε1,…,εn)∈{+,−}n containing exactly k entries −, and put vk:=(nk)−1/2sk.

For n=0 use V⊗0=C, the empty string s0=v0=1, 0!=(00)=1, the trivial group S0, Uπ=P+=IC, W⊗0=IC for every W, and Δ(T)=0. These conventions define S0=C and the trivial representation U0, with Jx=Jy=Jz=0.

Then:

(a) P+ is the orthogonal projection onto the closed subspace Sn, Uπ and W⊗n commute for every π∈Sn and every W, and W⊗n(Sn)⊆Sn; the assignment W↦Un(W) is well defined on all of M2(C), and Un(W′)Un(W)=Un(W′W) holds for all W,W′;

(b) SU(2) is a subgroup of the multiplicative monoid of M2(C) with identity I2; for W∈SU(2) the operator Un(W) is unitary with inverse Un(W−1)=Un(W)∗, so Un:SU(2)→U(Sn) is a group homomorphism (Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners, Linear isometries, and orthogonal or unitary operators on finite-dimensional inner product spaces);

(c) the vectors v0,…,vn form an orthonormal basis of Sn; in particular Sn is (n+1)-dimensional;

(d) the operators Ji:=12Δ(σi)∣Sn, i=x,y,z, where σx,σy,σz are the Pauli matrices of Finite spin matrices, are self-adjoint and satisfy, with J±:=Jx±iJy, J2:=Jx2+Jy2+Jz2,

Jzvk=(n2−k)vk,J+vk=k(n−k+1) vk−1,J−vk=(k+1)(n−k) vk+1,

with v−1:=0 and vn+1:=0; moreover [Jz,J±]=±J±, [J+,J−]=2Jz, [Ji,Jj]=i∑kεijkJk and J2=n2(n2+1)ISn; the map vk↦en/2−k is a unitary equivalence of (Jx,Jy,Jz) with the spin-n2 matrices of Finite spin matrices;

(e) for each i the curve Ai(t):=cos⁡(t/2)I2−isin⁡(t/2)σi (t∈R) lies in SU(2), satisfies Ai(s)Ai(t)=Ai(s+t) and Ai′(0)=−i2σi, and t↦Vi(t):=Un(Ai(t)) is a strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group on Sn (Strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group) whose infinitesimal generator Gi (Infinitesimal generator of a unitary group) is Gi=−iJi on all of Sn; equivalently 1t(Vi(t)v−v)→−iJiv for every v∈Sn;

(f) Un is strongly continuous on SU(2): if Wm→W0 in M2(C) with all Wm∈SU(2) and W0∈SU(2), then ∥Un(Wm)−Un(W0)∥→0 in the operator norm on Sn.

This is finite-dimensional linear algebra: the theorem constructs a unitary representation of SU(2) and its generators. It does not assert that SU(2) or any spin observable describes a physical particle, and it makes no measurement or statistics claim.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: n≥0; the space V=C2 with its orthonormal basis (e+,e−); the tensor power V⊗n; the place permutations Uπ and diagonal actions W⊗n; the projection P+; the subspace Sn; the strings sk and vectors vk; the group SU(2); the Pauli matrices σx,σy,σz; the operators Δ(T) and Ji.

[F1]

For n≥1, iterating The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product gives the finite basis of all 2n strings eε1⊗⋯⊗eεn; for n=0 the basis is 1∈C. Define the inner product by ⟨∑cεeε,∑dεeε⟩=∑cεdε‾. Expansion on elementary tensors gives the product inner product. The finite tensor product is thus the standard finite-dimensional coordinate inner product space; no completion or countable choice is used. The universal multilinear property is Finite iterated tensor products represent multilinear maps independently of parenthesization.

[F2]

For n≥1, conjugation by bn is a bijection from the zero-indexed Sn of The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation to the group on tensor positions {1,…,n} of Commuting symmetric-group and linear actions on a tensor power; it preserves composition because π^σ^=bnπσbn−1=πσ^, and π^−1(j)=π−1(j−1)+1 for 1≤j≤n. Thus the stated Uπ are well-defined linear maps by [F1], permute the orthonormal string basis, are unitary, satisfy UπUσ=Uπσ and have Uπ∗=Uπ−1. There are n! permutations: prescribing the images of 0,…,n−1 successively leaves n,n−1,…,1 possibilities. In the finite average P+=(1/n!)∑πUπ, inversion and left or right multiplication by a permutation reindex the summands. Thus P+∗=P+, UπP+=P+Uπ=P+ and P+2=P+; its range consists exactly of the invariant vectors, since every invariant vector v satisfies P+v=v. For n=1, π^(1)=1 and Uπ=IV; for n=0, all identities follow from the separate empty-tensor conventions.

[F3]

On the spanning string basis, expansion of matrix entries gives (S⊗T)(S′⊗T′)=(SS′)⊗(TT′), and evaluation of the inner products of [F1] gives (S⊗T)∗=S∗⊗T∗. Thus a tensor product of unitary matrices is unitary. Applying the same W to every factor commutes with any place permutation, since both rules send v1⊗⋯⊗vn to the tensor of the same permuted list Wvj; this identity is also valid for n=0 (Commuting symmetric-group and linear actions on a tensor power).

[F4]

For a bounded operator L on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, the operator norm is ∥L∥=sup⁡∥z∥≤1∥Lz∥, and ∥L∥≤∑j∥Lej∥ for every orthonormal basis (ej); a linear map with finite-dimensional domain is bounded, and ∥Lz∥≤∥L∥ ∥z∥ (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum, A bounded linear operator between normed spaces). In orthonormal product coordinates, writing z=∑bzb⊗eb gives ∥(S⊗I)z∥2=∑b∥Szb∥2≤∥S∥2∑b∥zb∥2; similarly ∥I⊗T∥≤∥T∥. Since S⊗T=(S⊗I)(I⊗T) and ∥LMz∥≤∥L∥∥M∥∥z∥, this proves ∥S⊗T∥≤∥S∥∥T∥, and iteration supplies the tensor estimates below.

[F6]

The Pauli matrices satisfy σi∗=σi, σx2=σy2=σz2=I2, σxσy=iσz, σyσz=iσx, σzσx=iσy; also σ++σ−=2σx and σ+−σ−=2iσy for σ+:=σx+iσy, σ−:=σx−iσy, and σ+e−=2e+, σ+e+=0, σ−e+=2e−, σ−e−=0, σze±=±e± (Finite spin matrices).

[F8]

For integers 0≤k≤n, (nk)=n!/(k!(n−k)!)>0 and (nk)=(nn−k) and (nk−1)/(nk)=k/(n−k+1) for 1≤k≤n; the ratio follows by cancelling the factorials using k!=k(k−1)! and (n−k+1)!=(n−k+1)(n−k)!. Each string with k minus signs corresponds bijectively to its set of minus positions, so there are (nk) such strings and the string sums split accordingly ((nk) k! (n−k)!=n! for k≤n; hence (nk) k!=nk‾, the quotient n!/(k!(n−k)!) is a natural number, and (nk)=(nn−k), The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N, The set [A]k of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient (nk):=∣[n]k∣, A finite sum in a commutative monoid indexed by an arbitrary finite set).

[F10]

For s=n2 the operators Jz,J±,Jx,Jy,J2 of Finite spin matrices act on their orthonormal basis em, −s≤m≤s, by Jzem=mem, J+em=(s−m)(s+m+1)em+1, J−em=(s+m)(s−m+1)em−1, with endpoint conventions es+1=e−s−1=0, have self-adjoint Jx,Jy,Jz and J−=J+∗, satisfy [Jz,J±]=±J±, [J+,J−]=2Jz and J2=s(s+1)I, and have ∥J+em∥2=(s−m)(s+m+1).

Proof

1.1givenF10algebra

[The zero tensor power] For n=0, the conventions give P+=I, S0=Cv0, U0(W)=I, and Ji=0. Clauses (a)-(c) follow immediately; all ladder and Casimir formulas in (d) vanish, and v0↦e0 identifies the zero operators with the spin-zero model [F10]. Each Vi(t)=I has derivative zero and is strongly continuous, and U0 is constant, proving (e)-(f); the subgroup and Ai assertions, independent of n, are proved below. For the tensor and basis calculations in the remaining steps assume n≥1.

1.2F2F3algebra

[The symmetric subspace and invariance] By [F2] P+ is an orthogonal projection and UπP+=P+; hence P+v=v exactly for v∈Sn, and Sn=ker⁡(I−P+) is closed because the finite matrix I−P+ is continuous. For W∈M2(C) and π∈Sn, [F3] gives W⊗nP+=1n!∑πW⊗nUπ=1n!∑πUπW⊗n=P+W⊗n, so v∈Sn implies P+(W⊗nv)=W⊗nP+v=W⊗nv, i.e. W⊗n(Sn)⊆Sn; therefore Un(W):=W⊗n∣Sn is a well-defined linear map on Sn for every W.

1.3F6F7F9algebra

[The curves Ai] Using I2∗=I2, σi∗=σi, σi2=I2, [F7] and [F9]: Ai(t)∗Ai(t)=cos⁡(t/2)2I2+sin⁡(t/2)2σi2−icos⁡(t/2)sin⁡(t/2)(σi−σi∗)=(cos⁡2+sin⁡2)(t/2)I2=I2, and direct computation of the three 2×2 determinants from the displayed matrices gives det⁡Ai(t)=cos⁡2(t/2)+sin⁡2(t/2)=1; so Ai(t)∈SU(2). The identities cos⁡(s+t)=cos⁡scos⁡t−sin⁡ssin⁡t and sin⁡(s+t)=sin⁡scos⁡t+cos⁡ssin⁡t, applied with σi2=I2, give Ai(s)Ai(t)=Ai(s+t). Differentiating the displayed formula at t=0 with [F7] and [F9] gives Ai′(0)=−i2σi.

2.1step 1.2F3F5algebra

[Representation law and unitarity] For W,W′∈M2(C), [F3] gives (W′)⊗nW⊗n=(W′W)⊗n on V⊗n, hence on Sn by step 1.2 and restriction: Un(W′)Un(W)=Un(W′W). If W∈SU(2), then W is unitary by [F5], [F6]; by [F3] W⊗n is unitary on V⊗n, and for v∈Sn, ∥Un(W)v∥=∥W⊗nv∥=∥v∥ with W⊗n mapping Sn bijectively onto Sn (its inverse is (W−1)⊗n restricted, where W−1=W∗∈SU(2)); hence Un(W) is unitary with (Un(W))∗=Un(W−1). This gives the operator statements of (a) and (b).

2.2step 1.2F1F2F8algebra

[The basis vk and the dimension] Fix k and let w=eε1⊗⋯⊗eεn have exactly k minus entries. In n!P+w=∑πUπw every string with exactly k minus entries occurs once for each of the k!(n−k)! permutations carrying the pattern of w to it, so n!P+w=k!(n−k)! sk and P+w=(nk)−1sk by [F8]; since the 2n elementary tensors span V⊗n [F1], this shows Sn=ran⁡P+⊆span⁡{s0,…,sn}, while sk∈Sn because each Uπ permutes the strings with k minus entries, so P+sk=sk. Distinct elementary tensors are orthonormal [F1], and two summands from sk and sl with k≠l are distinct elementary tensors, so ⟨sk,sl⟩=δkl(nk) by [F8]; hence v0,…,vn are orthonormal and span Sn, an orthonormal basis of the (n+1)-dimensional space Sn.

2.3step 1.2F2F3F6algebra

[The operators Δ(σi) and their commutation] For T,T′∈M2(C) the place sums satisfy [Δ(T),Δ(T′)]=Δ([T,T′]) and Δ(T)∗=Δ(T∗): expanding the definitions, the summands at different places commute and the summand at a common place contributes [T,T′], while the adjoint of a place sum is the place sum of the adjoints [F3]. Consequently [Δ(σi),Δ(σj)]=Δ([σi,σj]); and Δ(σi) commutes with every Uπ because permuting places preserves the multiset of places, so by [F2] each Δ(σi) preserves Sn, and its restriction Ji=12Δ(σi)∣Sn is self-adjoint.

3.1step 2.1F5F9algebra

[SU(2) is a subgroup] If W,W′∈SU(2), then (WW′)∗(WW′)=W′∗W∗WW′=W′∗W′=I2 and det⁡(WW′)=det⁡Wdet⁡W′=1, so WW′∈SU(2); I2∗I2=I2 and det⁡I2=1, so I2∈SU(2); and for W∈SU(2) one has W∗W=WW∗=I2 (multiplying W∗W=I2 by W−1 on the right gives W∗=W−1, whence WW∗=I2) and det⁡W∗=det⁡W‾=1, so W−1=W∗∈SU(2). Hence SU(2) is a subgroup, and Un is a group homomorphism by step 2.1.

3.2step 2.1step 2.3step 1.3F1F3F4F6F7algebra

[Generator of t↦Un(Ai(t))] By step 2.1, Vi(t):=Un(Ai(t)) satisfies Vi(s)Vi(t)=Vi(s+t) and Vi(0)=I, and each Vi(t) is unitary. The telescoping identity W⊗k−W0⊗k=∑j=1k(W⊗(j−1)⊗(W−W0)⊗W0⊗(k−j)), valid by [F3] with W⊗0:=I, gives ∥W⊗k−W0⊗k∥≤kmax⁡(∥W∥,∥W0∥)k−1∥W−W0∥ by [F4]; with W=Ai(t), W0=Ai(t0) and ∥Ai(⋅)∥=1, the explicit formula for Ai and [F7] show that ∥Vi(t)v−Vi(t0)v∥ is bounded by n∥Ai(t)−Ai(t0)∥ ∥v∥ for all v∈Sn by the operator-norm bound; so Vi is a strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group. For the derivative, write Ai(t)=I2+tAi′(0)+r(t) with ∥r(t)∥≤∣t∣η(t) and η(t)→0 by [F6], [F7] and step 1.3; the same telescoping expansion with W=Ai(t), W0=I2, using ∥Ai(t)∥≤1 and ∥r(t)∥≤∣t∣η(t), gives Ai(t)⊗n−I2⊗n=t∑j=1n1⊗(j−1)⊗Ai′(0)⊗1⊗(n−j)+R(t) with ∥R(t)∥≤n∣t∣ η′(t) and η′(t)→0 as t→0; restricting to Sn and using step 2.3 and Ai′(0)=−i2σi of step 1.3 gives 1t(Vi(t)v−v)→−i2Δ(σi)v=−iJiv for every v∈Sn. Hence the infinitesimal generator is Gi=−iJi with domain D(Gi)=Sn.

3.3step 2.2step 2.3F1F6F8algebra

[Actions on the basis vectors] Fix 0≤k≤n. On an elementary tensor with k minus entries, Δ(σz) acts by #+−#−=n−2k, and by linearity Δ(σz)sk=(n−2k)sk, so Jzvk=(n/2−k)vk. For σ+=σx+iσy one has σ+e+=0 and σ+e−=2e+ by [F6]. If 1≤k≤n, each target string with k−1 minus entries in Δ(σ+)sk occurs with coefficient 2 from each of its n−k+1 plus positions, so Δ(σ+)sk=2(n−k+1)sk−1 and J+vk=(n−k+1)(nk−1)/(nk)vk−1=k(n−k+1)vk−1 by [F8]. For k=0, every factor is e+, so J+v0=0, agreeing with the stated v−1=0 convention. Similarly, if 0≤k<n, σ−e−=0 and σ−e+=2e− give Δ(σ−)sk=2(k+1)sk+1, hence J−vk=(k+1)(nk+1)/(nk)vk+1=(k+1)(n−k)vk+1 by [F8]. For k=n, every factor is e−, so J−vn=0, agreeing with vn+1=0.

4.1step 3.3F10algebra

[Commutators and identification with the spin-n/2 model] By steps 2.3 and 3.3, Jz,J± satisfy [Jz,J±]=±J± and [J+,J−]=2Jz on the basis (vk); substituting Jx=12(J++J−), Jy=12i(J+−J−) and expanding gives [Jx,Jy]=iJz, [Jy,Jz]=iJx, [Jz,Jx]=iJy. Since vk↦en/2−k maps the basis of Sn onto the basis of the spin-n2 space of Finite spin matrices, and by step 3.3 the three operators have there exactly the action prescribed in that proposition, the described map is a unitary equivalence intertwining (Jx,Jy,Jz) with the spin-n2 matrices and carrying J2 to s(s+1)I with s=n/2; in particular J2=n2(n2+1)ISn. This proves (a)-(d) except the strong-continuity clause.

5.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2F3F4algebra∎

[Strong continuity] Let Wm→W0 in M2(C). By the telescoping identity of step 3.2 with [F3], ∥Wm⊗n−W0⊗n∥≤nmax⁡(∥Wm∥,∥W0∥)n−1∥Wm−W0∥, and max⁡(∥Wm∥,∥W0∥) is bounded because ∥Wm∥→∥W0∥ by [F4] and convergence of the entries; hence ∥Wm⊗n−W0⊗n∥→0. Restricting the operators to the invariant subspace Sn can only decrease the operator norm, so ∥Un(Wm)−Un(W0)∥→0, proving (f); in particular Un is strongly continuous on SU(2), since norm continuity implies strong continuity by [F4]. This completes (a)-(f).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources