Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Adaptive empirical-Bayes credible-set calibration and failure — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

A polynomial-tail truth satisfies the polished-tail block-energy condition and has conservative frequentist coverage after sufficiently large inflation. The sparse-gap truth lies in a polynomial hyperrectangle but has coverage tending to zero along a subsequence, when its regularity cap exceeds the smoothness index and its scale and inflation satisfy the stated bounds.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

A power-law truth lies in the polished-tail class

Example

Fix β>0, M>0, and ρ≥2. Set θ0,1=0 and θ0,i=M i−1/2−β for i≥2. Let N0=2 and L0=(2β+1)/(1−ρ−2β). Then θ0∈Θβ(M)∩Θpt(L0,N0,ρ). Consequently, under the hypotheses of Conservative coverage of adaptive empirical-Bayes credible balls on polished tails, an admissible sufficiently large inflation gives conservative frequentist coverage tending to one for this truth.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: β>0, M>0, ρ≥2, and the sequence in the Example.

[F1]

Membership in Θβ(M) means sup⁡ii1+2βθi2≤M. Hyperrectangle classes in a Gaussian sequence model

[F2]

Membership in Θpt(L0,N0,ρ) means ∑i=N∞θi2≤L0∑i=N⌊ρN⌋θi2 for every integer N≥N0. Polished-tail class for a Gaussian sequence

[F3]

For a truth in this polished-tail class with θ0,1=0, the source theorem gives an inflation L with frequentist coverage tending to one. Conservative coverage of adaptive empirical-Bayes credible balls on polished tails

Verification

1.1F1givenalgebra

The sequence is square summable because ∑i=2∞i−1−2β≤1+∫1∞x−1−2β dx<∞. For every i≥2, i1+2βθ0,i2=M, and the first coordinate is zero. Thus [F1] holds.

1.2F2givenalgebra

For N≥2, monotonicity of x−1−2β gives ∑i=N∞i−1−2β≤N−1−2β+∫N∞x−1−2β dx≤(1+12β)N−2β and ∑i=N⌊ρN⌋i−1−2β≥∫N⌊ρN⌋+1x−1−2β dx≥1−ρ−2β2βN−2β. Multiplying by M shows that the tail-to-block ratio is at most (2β+1)/(1−ρ−2β)=L0, so [F2] holds.

2.1F3step 1.2∎

The truth has θ0,1=0 and satisfies [F2], so the theorem [F3] supplies a sufficiently large inflation for which its frequentist coverage tends to one.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

A sparse-gap truth lies in a hyperrectangle but is undercovered

Example

Assume AC. Fix β>0, p≥0, C≥1, γ∈(0,1), and a finite A>β. Run the Gaussian sequence procedure in the cited counterexample with cap An=A and take 0<M≤(1984C8)−1. Put s=1+2β+2p, ρj=2j, n1=2, and recursively let nj+1=⌈(2ρj+12)snj⌉. Put Nj=nj1/s. Then 1<N1<ρ1 and nj+1≥(2ρj+12)snj. Define θ0,i≥0 by θ0,i2={0,Nj/ρj<i≤Nj for some j,0,2Nj<i≤ρjNj for some j,Mi−1−2β,otherwise. The verification below proves θ0,1=0 and θ0∈Θβ(M). For every deterministic nonnegative inflation sequence for which there exist KL∈(0,∞) and j0∈N such that, for every j≥j0, Lnj≤KLM ρj(1+2p)/(8+8β+8p) coverage of this fixed truth tends to zero along nj, by Sparse-gap truth causes empirical-Bayes credible-set undercoverage.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameters and sparse-gap sequence in the Example.

[F1]

Θβ(M) consists of square-summable sequences satisfying sup⁡ii1+2βθi2≤M. Hyperrectangle classes in a Gaussian sequence model

[F2]

For the stated cap and small-M regime, the sparse-gap counterexample proves vanishing coverage along nj for the specified inflation sequences. Sparse-gap truth causes empirical-Bayes credible-set undercoverage

Verification

1.1F1givenalgebra

The growth condition implies Nj+1≥2ρj+12Nj, so Nj+1/ρj+1≥2ρj+1Nj≥2ρjNj. Each next first gap therefore begins beyond the preceding second gap; the two gaps with the same index are disjoint because the first ends at Nj and the second begins strictly after 2Nj. Every coordinate is zero or has squared value Mi−1−2β. Hence sup⁡ii1+2βθ0,i2≤M, and ∑iθ0,i2≤M(1+∫1∞x−1−2β dx)<∞. Thus [F1] holds.

1.2givenalgebra

Since N1=21/s with s>1, N1/ρ1<1<N1. Therefore coordinate 1 lies in the first zero gap and θ0,1=0.

2.1F2step 1.1step 1.2∎

The construction and its cap, credibility level and small-M assumptions match [F2]. Thus the claimed vanishing coverage follows from [F2], while step 1.1 gives hyperrectangle membership.

Sources