Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 1 result · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 1 also cleared it.

Poisson Algebras, Symplectic Brackets, and Hamiltonian Actions: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This companion includes the newly computed quadratic sl2(R) comoment action and routes readers to existing canonical computations and boundary examples. The new carrier is homed here; the older linked items retain their existing homes and proofs.

Companion: poisson-algebras-and-hamiltonian-representations.

Worked computations

Failure cases and boundary conditions

  • An infinitesimal moment map is automatically equivariant refutes the claim that the component moment equations alone force equivariance: the counterexample uses translations of R2 with an abelian group and a nonconstant infinitesimal moment map.
  • Every symplectic action is Hamiltonian refutes the claim that every symplectic action admits a moment map: the translation action on the symplectic torus would require a global primitive of dy, but that one-form has nonzero period.

These carriers supply their own hypotheses, sign conventions, calculations, and proofs. In particular, the examples do not remove the connected-group condition in For connected groups, equivariance is equivalent to the moment-map Poisson bracket identity or the distinction between a symplectic action and a Hamiltonian action.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Quadratic sl2 comoment action on the symplectic plane

Example

Let M=R2 with coordinates (q,p) and ω=dq∧dp. Let g=sl2(R)={(abc−a):a,b,c∈R} with bracket [A,B]=AB−BA. Use the basis H=(100−1), E=(0100), and F=(0010). Define the real-linear map J:g→C∞(M,R) by

J(H)=−qp,J(E)=q22,J(F)=−p22.

Write ∂q and ∂p for the coordinate derivative operators. Then J is a comoment map under Symplectic comoment maps and Hamiltonian observable actions, and its observable operators are

ρJ(H)=q∂q−p∂p,ρJ(E)=q∂p,ρJ(F)=p∂q.

These operators give the real three-dimensional matrix Lie algebra its observable representation. By Comoment maps act on observables by Poisson derivations, they preserve both pointwise multiplication and the Poisson bracket on all smooth functions; the Verification also checks the commutators on an arbitrary smooth test function and gives explicit product and bracket-preservation calculations.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard symplectic plane (R2,dq∧dp), the real traceless 2×2 matrices with the commutator bracket, the displayed basis, and the map J in the Example. Assume ACω only when applying the coordinate-formula supplier.

[A1]

ACω is the Axiom of Countable Choice; it is the sole choice assumption used by the coordinate-formula supplier. No arbitrary-index choice is used here. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

A symplectic form is closed and restricts to a nondegenerate alternating form on every tangent space. Symplectic form and symplectic manifold

[F2]

A finite-dimensional real symplectic vector space has an alternating bilinear form whose map to the dual is an isomorphism; equivalently, only the zero vector pairs to zero with every vector. Symplectic vector space

[F3]

For a real vector space V, End⁡R(V) has the commutator Lie bracket, and a Lie-algebra representation is a bracket-preserving linear map into it. Representations of Lie algebras

[F4]

A real Lie algebra has a bilinear alternating bracket satisfying Jacobi. Lie algebras over a field

[F5]

In canonical (q,p) coordinates and under ACω, {A,B}=AqBp−ApBq. Coordinate formula for the Poisson bracket

[F6]

The comoment identity and observable action are J([ξ,η])={J(ξ),J(η)} and ρJ(ξ)A={J(ξ),A}. Symplectic comoment maps and Hamiltonian observable actions

[F7]

A comoment map defines a Lie-algebra representation on functions, and each operator is a Poisson derivation. Comoment maps act on observables by Poisson derivations

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The form ω=dq∧dp is smooth and alternating, and dω=0 because d(dq)=d(dp)=0. For v=a∂q+b∂p, ιvω=a dp−b dq; if this is zero, then a=b=0. Thus ω is nondegenerate at every point and is symplectic by [F1]–[F2].

1.2givenF3F4algebra

Every real traceless matrix is uniquely aH+bE+cF, so (H,E,F) is a basis of the stated vector space. Matrix multiplication gives HE=E, EH=−E, HF=−F, FH=F, EF=(1000), and FE=(0001). Consequently [H,E]=2E, [H,F]=−2F, and [E,F]=H; the span is closed under commutators. The ambient endomorphism algebra has the commutator Lie bracket by [F3], and the closed subspace therefore inherits its bilinearity, alternation, and Jacobi identity by [F4]. This verifies the stated sl2(R) convention without identifying it with the library's complex sl2(C).

1.3givenA1F4F5F6algebra

Differentiating the three quadratic functions gives (∂qJ(H),∂pJ(H))=(−p,−q), (∂qJ(E),∂pJ(E))=(q,0), and (∂qJ(F),∂pJ(F))=(0,−p). By [F5], {J(H),J(E)}=q2=2J(E)=J([H,E]), {J(H),J(F)}=p2=−2J(F)=J([H,F]), and {J(E),J(F)}=−qp=J(H)=J([E,F]). The matrix bracket is alternating by [F4], and swapping the inputs in the coordinate formula [F5] negates the Poisson bracket; both are bilinear. Since (H,E,F) is a basis, these three pairs, their reversals, and the zero diagonal pairs establish the comoment identity for every ξ,η∈g.

1.4givenA1F5F6F7algebra

Applying [F5] to arbitrary u∈C∞(R2,R) gives ρJ(H)u=quq−pup, ρJ(E)u=qup, and ρJ(F)u=puq. The result in [F7] supplies the two Poisson-derivation identities for every pair of smooth functions.

2.1givenstep 1.2algebra

Write uqp=∂q∂pu and upq=∂p∂qu; for smooth u these are equal. Direct composition gives [ρJ(H),ρJ(E)]u=(qup+q2uqp−pqupp)−(q2upq−qup−pqupp)=2qup=2ρJ(E)u, [ρJ(H),ρJ(F)]u=(pquqq−puq−p2uqp)−(puq+pquqq−p2upq)=−2puq=−2ρJ(F)u, and [ρJ(E),ρJ(F)]u=(quq+pquqp)−(pup+pqupq)=quq−pup=ρJ(H)u. These are exactly the three matrix brackets from step 1.2; bilinearity extends them from basis elements to all of g.

2.2givenA1F5step 1.4algebra

For u=p and v=q+p, ρJ(E)(uv)=q∂p(p(q+p))=q(q+2p)=q2+2pq, while ρJ(E)(u)v+uρJ(E)(v)=q(q+p)+pq=q2+2pq. Thus the product rule is directly verified on this nontrivial pair.

3.1givenA1F5F7step 1.4algebra∎

For u=q2/2 and v=p2/2, the coordinate bracket gives {u,v}=qp, so ρJ(H){u,v}=0. Also ρJ(H)u=q2 and ρJ(H)v=−p2, whence {ρJ(H)u,v}+{u,ρJ(H)v}={q2,p2/2}+{q2/2,−p2}=2qp−2qp=0. This checks bracket preservation directly on a nonconstant pair, while [F7] establishes it for all smooth functions.