How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stochastic finite-armed bandits — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Probability Spaces and Random Variables
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Independence Borel Cantelli and Zero One Laws
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Online protocols and regret benchmarks
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Probability Spaces Random Variables and Expectation
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Stochastic finite-armed bandits
- Suprema and Infima
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Logical flowchart
3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A two-arm deterministic gap and explore-then-commit
Example
Let be an integer, let , and fix . In a two-arm -round bandit, let every reward-stack entry of arm 1 equal and every reward-stack entry of arm 2 equal . Under explore-then-commit with exploration count , the algorithm commits to arm 1 and has expected reward regret exactly . The expected-regret theorem gives the upper bound for this instance.
Example references
Finite stochastic bandit model, gaps, and regret: arm means, gaps, and expected reward regret.
Centered 1-sub-Gaussian reward: the mean-centred MGF condition checked for deterministic rewards.
The exponential is positive and satisfies : the exponential factor in the regret bound is positive.
Explore-then-commit for a finite stochastic bandit: the fixed round-robin exploration and empirical-mean commitment rule.
Expected regret of explore-then-commit: the expected-regret bound compared with the exact regret.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The deterministic reward table and explore-then-commit parameters in the example.
Arm means, gaps, and expected reward regret are defined by the stochastic-bandit model (Finite stochastic bandit model, gaps, and regret).
Each reward is 1-sub-Gaussian exactly when its mean-centred MGF satisfies the stated bound (Centered 1-sub-Gaussian reward).
Explore-then-commit samples each arm times, commits to a least-index empirical-mean maximizer, then repeats it (Explore-then-commit for a finite stochastic bandit).
Under the finite-mean 1-sub-Gaussian assumptions, the theorem bounds expected reward regret by the stated ETC expression (Expected regret of explore-then-commit).
The real exponential is positive at every real input (The exponential is positive and satisfies ).
Verification
The arm laws are point masses at and , so , , and . Each centered reward is identically , so its MGF is for every real and [F4] applies.
The exploration means equal the deterministic rewards, so [F3] commits to arm 1. During exploration it pulls arm 2 exactly times, each with gap ; all other pulls have gap . Therefore both the realized reward regret and its expectation equal .
Substituting and into [F4] gives , which is at least because , , and [F5] makes the exponential factor positive.
Deterministic zero-reward arms have zero regret
Example
Fix any horizon and take two arms with deterministic reward stacks for every . Then and . Every admissible policy has identically zero pseudo-regret and realized reward regret, so both expected regrets are zero.
Example references
Finite stochastic bandit model, gaps, and regret: the finite-arm means, gaps, pseudo-regret, and realized reward regret used in the example.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two-arm deterministic reward table in the example and the definitions of gaps and the two regret quantities.
The arm means, gaps, pseudo-regret, and realized reward regret are those in the finite stochastic bandit model (Finite stochastic bandit model, gaps, and regret).
Verification
Each arm's law is the point mass at , so both finite means equal . Hence and .
For every policy and every round, and the observed reward . The defining sums therefore give and pointwise.
Taking expectations of the two identically zero random variables shows that expected pseudo-regret and expected reward regret both equal zero.
A finite-mean polynomial-tail reward is not sub-Gaussian
Example
For , write , identifying each positive integer with its canonical real image. Let with its full power set, put , and define the probability measure by its countable weighted sum of Dirac measures. Let be the inclusion map and let be its law. The reward has finite mean , but for every . Thus this finite-mean reward lies outside the centered 1-sub-Gaussian model.
Example references
Finite stochastic bandit model, gaps, and regret: a stochastic arm law is a probability measure on the real Borel space with finite first absolute moment.
The zeta sums at 2 and 3 are finite: the two normalizing sums and are finite and positive.
Expectation of a countably valued nonnegative random variable is its weighted series: a countably valued nonnegative random variable has expectation equal to its weighted series.
Centered 1-sub-Gaussian reward: a 1-sub-Gaussian reward has a finite centered MGF bounded by for every real .
Probability measures and probability spaces: a probability measure has total mass one.
The Dirac set function at a point: the Dirac measure at a point assigns mass one to sets containing that point and zero otherwise.
A Dirac set function is a probability measure: each Dirac measure is a probability measure.
Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures: countable weighted sums of measures are defined pointwise by nonnegative extended sums.
Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures are measures: a countable nonnegative weighted sum of measures is a measure.
The real exponential function and the number by a power series: the real exponential is defined by its all-real-convergent power series.
The exponential function is strictly increasing: the real exponential is continuous, hence Borel measurable.
The exponential series converges absolutely for every real argument: the exponential power series converges absolutely at every real argument.
A series of nonnegative terms converges iff its partial sums are bounded, and then the sum is their supremum: partial sums of a nonnegative series are bounded above by its extended sum.
The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in : the factorial is recursively defined and in the natural numbers.
Integer powers : natural powers use recursive multiplication and negative powers of positive reals are reciprocals.
The canonical natural of a field: natural numbers in the real field are represented by their canonical images.
Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing: the canonical image of each positive natural is positive.
Every complete ordered field is Archimedean: the natural numbers are unbounded in the real field.
The exponential addition formula : for all real .
The exponential is positive and satisfies : for every real .
Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral: positive finite scalars factor out of nonnegative Lebesgue integrals.
Law or distribution of a random element: the law of a random element is its pushforward probability measure.
The law of a random element is a probability measure: the law of a random element is a probability measure.
Change of variables for expectation: for nonnegative measurable , .
Tor Lattimore and Csaba Szepesvári, Bandit Algorithms: §5.3, PDF pp. 86–88 / printed pp. 77–79; the local discrete construction and divergence proof are supplied here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two convergent sums , the positive-integer sample space and weights in the Example, the inclusion random variable , and the centered 1-sub-Gaussian definition.
The series and converge and are at least one (The zeta sums at 2 and 3 are finite).
Every Dirac measure is a probability measure; a countable weighted sum of measures is a measure, and a measure of total mass one is a probability measure (The Dirac set function at a point, A Dirac set function is a probability measure, Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures, Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures are measures, Probability measures and probability spaces).
If a nonnegative measurable random variable is constant on each cell of a countable measurable partition, its expectation is the series of those values weighted by cell probabilities; a finite series gives integrability (Expectation of a countably valued nonnegative random variable is its weighted series).
The inclusion is a measurable random element, its law is a probability measure, and expectation of a nonnegative measurable function of equals its integral against that law (Random elements and real random variables, Law or distribution of a random element, The law of a random element is a probability measure, Change of variables for expectation).
The exponential is continuous; for , its power-series terms are nonnegative and each finite partial sum is at most ; in particular , since (The real exponential function and the number by a power series, The exponential function is strictly increasing, The exponential series converges absolutely for every real argument, A series of nonnegative terms converges iff its partial sums are bounded, and then the sum is their supremum, Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series, Integer powers , The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in , The canonical natural of a field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).
The natural numbers are unbounded in (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).
The exponential addition formula holds and for every real (The exponential addition formula , The exponential is positive and satisfies ).
A centered 1-sub-Gaussian reward has finite MGF bounded by for every real (Centered 1-sub-Gaussian reward).
A positive finite scalar factors out of a nonnegative Lebesgue integral (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
A stochastic arm law is a probability measure on the real Borel space with finite first absolute moment, and its mean is the integral of the identity function (Finite stochastic bandit model, gaps, and regret).
Verification
By [F1], is finite and positive. For , the finite partial sum of the weights is , where . Given , choose with ; then , so . By [F2], the Dirac weighted sum is a measure and , so is a probability measure. The inclusion map from a full-power-set space is measurable, and [F4] makes its law a probability measure.
Fix . The variable is measurable on the full power set and equals on . The function is Borel measurable by continuity in [F5]. By [F3] and [F4], its expectation and the MGF under are . By [F5], , where . Thus the th partial sum is at least . For any real , [F6] gives an integer , so these partial sums are unbounded and the nonnegative extended sum is . Hence .
Apply [F3] to the singleton partition : . Its th partial sum is , where . Given , choose with ; then . Thus , so [F3] makes integrable. By [F4], this equals , the finite arm mean in the bandit model.
Let , finite by step 2.1 and equal to the arm-law mean by [F4, F10]. Pointwise, [F7] gives , with positive finite scalar . By [F9] and step 1.2, the centered MGF is still . The change-of-variables formula [F4] transfers this centered MGF to . This contradicts the finite bound required by [F8], so the arm law is not 1-sub-Gaussian.