Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Divergence and Almost Everywhere Convergence of Fourier Series — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples distinguish three claims: residual divergence at one point in a space of continuous functions, almost-everywhere divergence of an integrable function, and divergence in the L1 norm. Uniform Fejer convergence can coexist with unbounded ordinary sums at zero. Fejer kernels also give a local refutation of strong (1,1) boundedness, independently of the recorded Kolmogorov theorem.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

A residual set of continuous functions has unbounded partial sums at zero

Example

Assume DC. In the real Banach space C(T,R) with supremum norm, the set

U={f:supN0SNf(0)=}

is a dense Gδ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: DC, the period-one torus with Haar mass one, and real continuous functions with the supremum norm.

[F1]

For each N0, evaluation TNf=SNf(0) on real C(T) has norm DN1, and these norms are unbounded (Fourier partial-sum operator norm equals the Lebesgue constant).

[F2]

Under DC, a family of bounded linear maps from a Banach space to a normed space either has uniformly bounded norms or has a dense Gδ set of points with unbounded output norms (Baire dichotomy for a pointwise-defined family of bounded linear operators).

[F3]

For every nonempty compact metric space K, C(K,R) is complete in the supremum metric (C(K,R) is complete in the supremum metric for every nonempty compact metric space K).

Verification

technique · Banach–Steinhaus dichotomy on the periodic subspace
1.1

Real continuous periodic functions identify isometrically with X={fC([0,1],R):f(0)=f(1)}. A Cauchy sequence has a continuous uniform limit by completeness on the nonempty compact interval. Endpoint equality passes to that limit because evaluation at either endpoint changes by at most the uniform error. Hence X is Banach.

F3given
2.1

The family TN:XR consists of bounded linear maps, with unbounded operator norms. The bounded-norm alternative in the dichotomy is therefore excluded; its other alternative says precisely that U is dense and Gδ in X.

F1F2step 1.1
3.1

Explicitly, U=r=1N=0{fX:TNf>r}. Each inner set is open by continuity of TN, and the displayed membership condition is exactly unboundedness of the sequence of finite values. Thus the topology in this conclusion is topology on a space of functions; it asserts no full-measure set of points of the torus for any fixed function.

F1step 2.1algebra
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Uniform Fejer convergence can coexist with divergent ordinary partial sums

Statement refuted

Uniform convergence of the Fejer means of a continuous periodic function forces its ordinary Fourier partial sums to converge at every point.

Assume DC. There is a real continuous one-periodic f such that

σNff0,supN0SNf(0)=.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: DC and the period-one Fourier conventions with normalized Haar measure.

[F1]

Assuming DC, for every prescribed x0T there exists a real continuous periodic f with supN0SNf(x0)= (A continuous function with divergent Fourier series at a prescribed point).

[F2]

For every continuous one-periodic complex function f, supxRσNf(x)f(x)0 (Fejer means converge uniformly for continuous periodic functions).

Counterexample

technique · reuse of the continuous witness and uniform Fejer convergence
1.1

Apply the prescribed-point witness with x0=0. It supplies a real continuous periodic f whose finite partial-sum values at zero form an unbounded sequence. Such an f is nonzero, and this sequence cannot converge to a finite value.

F1given
2.1

Regard the same real f as complex-valued. It meets the continuity and periodicity hypotheses of uniform Fejer convergence, so σNff0. Thus the Cesaro averages σNf=(N+1)1j=0NSjf converge uniformly while the ordinary sums at zero diverge unboundedly. Both properties hold for the single function from step 1.1, refuting the claimed implication.

F2step 1.1
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07 rests on unproved materialOpen item page →

Reading the Kolmogorov example at the endpoint

Reading the endpoint witness

The function recorded in Kolmogorov almost-everywhere divergence — recorded theorem belongs to L1(T) and has unbounded Fourier partial sums almost everywhere. Integrability alone therefore does not entail almost-everywhere convergence.

Comparing that external assertion with Carleson–Hunt maximal bound and almost-everywhere convergence — recorded theorem , the same witness cannot belong to Lp(T) for any 1<p<. For any fixed such exponent, the two recorded conclusions would otherwise give convergence and unboundedness outside the union of two null sets, which is impossible. It cannot be essentially bounded either: on a torus of mass one, essential boundedness implies membership in L2.

This is an interpretation of the two literature records. No explicit formula or local verification of the Kolmogorov witness is supplied. Its almost-everywhere divergence does not assert divergence at any particular prescribed point, and it is different from unboundedness of the L1 norms of partial sums.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Carleson maximal operator is not strong type (1,1)

Statement refuted

There exists a finite constant bounding Cf1 by that constant times f1 for every fL1(T).

In fact, for every A>0 there is a nonnegative trigonometric polynomial f on the period-one torus, with Haar mass one, such that

f1=1,Cf1>A.

As a further consequence under DC, there exists a real hL1(T) with supNSNh1=.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A>0 and normalized Haar measure on T=R/Z. DC is assumed only for the further norm-divergence consequence.

[F1]

The measurable maximal operator is Cf=supN0SNf for fL1 (Carleson maximal partial-sum operator).

[F2]

The Fejer kernel satisfies FK(t)=(K+1)1j=0Ke2πijt20 and 01FK(t)dt=1 for every K0 (The Fejer kernel is a positive approximate identity).

[F3]

Fejer means of a continuous one-periodic complex function converge uniformly to that function (Fejer means converge uniformly for continuous periodic functions).

[F4]

For every one-period integrable f and every x, SNf(x)=(fDN)(x) (Fourier partial sums are Dirichlet convolutions).

[F5]

The quantities DN1 equal the norms of the partial-sum operators on continuous functions and are at least (3π)1log(N+1) for N1 (Fourier partial-sum operator norm equals the Lebesgue constant).

[F6]

For every measure space and 1p, Lp is complete in its norm (Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1p).

[F7]

Under DC, pointwise bounded families of bounded linear maps from a Banach space to a normed space have uniformly bounded norms (Uniform boundedness principle).

[F8]

For two sigma-finite measure spaces and a nonnegative product-measurable function, the product integral equals both iterated integrals (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

Counterexample

technique · Fejer-kernel tests, with an additional uniform-boundedness consequence
1.1

Choose an integer N1 with DN1>A+1, possible from the logarithmic lower bound. For each K0, the function FK is a real nonnegative trigonometric polynomial of L1 norm one.

F2F5given
1.2

Expanding the square formula for FK gives coefficient 1k/(K+1) for kK and zero otherwise. Orthogonality of finite characters therefore gives SNFK=FKDN=σKDN: either side has coefficient 1k/(K+1) for kmin{K,N} and zero elsewhere. Since DN is continuous, SNFKDN0 as K, with N fixed.

F2F3F4
1.3

For the additional consequence, let h be a real integrable periodic representative. The convolution formula, after a periodic change of variables, gives SNh(x)01h(u)DN(xu)du. The integrand is product-measurable: h(u) depends on one coordinate and DN(xu) is continuous. Both measure spaces are finite, so Tonelli and translation invariance give SNh101h(u)01DN(xu)dxdu=DN1h1. Thus SN is a bounded real linear operator on real L1.

F4F8
2.1

Choose K large enough that this uniform error is less than one. The measure has mass one, so SNFK1DN1SNFKDN1>A. Since CFKSNFK, the polynomial f=FK is the required witness. Its maximal function is finite and bounded: when the partial-sum index is at least K, the partial sum equals FK, so only finitely many distinct continuous polynomials enter its supremum. Thus the strict norm inequality is an ordinary finite integral, not an artifact of an infinite value.

F1step 1.1step 1.2
2.2

For each fixed N, step 1.2 and the unit-norm tests FK imply SN:L1(T,R)L1(T,R)limKSNFK1=DN1. These operator norms are consequently unbounded.

F2F5step 1.2step 1.3
3.1

Now assume DC. Real L1 is Banach by completeness. If supNSNh1 were finite for each h, uniform boundedness would contradict step 2.2. Therefore some real integrable h has unbounded L1 norms of its partial sums. This is a norm-divergence conclusion and does not assert almost-everywhere divergence.

F6F7step 1.3step 2.2given

Sources