Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Divergence and Almost Everywhere Convergence of Fourier Series — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples distinguish three claims: residual divergence at one point in a space of continuous functions, almost-everywhere divergence of an integrable function, and divergence in the L1 norm. Uniform Fejer convergence can coexist with unbounded ordinary sums at zero. Fejer kernels also give a local refutation of strong (1,1) boundedness, independently of the recorded Kolmogorov theorem.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

A residual set of continuous functions has unbounded partial sums at zero

Example

Assume DC. In the real Banach space C(T,R) with supremum norm, the set

U={f:sup⁡N≥0∣SNf(0)∣=∞}

is a dense Gδ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: DC, the period-one torus with Haar mass one, and real continuous functions with the supremum norm.

[F1]

For each N≥0, evaluation TNf=SNf(0) on real C(T) has norm ∥DN∥1, and these norms are unbounded (Fourier partial-sum operator norm equals the Lebesgue constant).

[F2]

Under DC, a family of bounded linear maps from a Banach space to a normed space either has uniformly bounded norms or has a dense Gδ set of points with unbounded output norms (Baire dichotomy for a pointwise-defined family of bounded linear operators).

[F3]

For every nonempty compact metric space K, C(K,R) is complete in the supremum metric (C(K,R) is complete in the supremum metric for every nonempty compact metric space K).

Verification

technique · Banach–Steinhaus dichotomy on the periodic subspace
1.1F3given

Real continuous periodic functions identify isometrically with X={f∈C([0,1],R):f(0)=f(1)}. A Cauchy sequence has a continuous uniform limit by completeness on the nonempty compact interval. Endpoint equality passes to that limit because evaluation at either endpoint changes by at most the uniform error. Hence X is Banach.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

The family TN:X→R consists of bounded linear maps, with unbounded operator norms. The bounded-norm alternative in the dichotomy is therefore excluded; its other alternative says precisely that U is dense and Gδ in X.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra∎

Explicitly, U=⋂r=1∞⋃N=0∞{f∈X:∣TNf∣>r}. Each inner set is open by continuity of TN, and the displayed membership condition is exactly unboundedness of the sequence of finite values. Thus the topology in this conclusion is topology on a space of functions; it asserts no full-measure set of points of the torus for any fixed function.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Uniform Fejer convergence can coexist with divergent ordinary partial sums

Statement refuted

Uniform convergence of the Fejer means of a continuous periodic function forces its ordinary Fourier partial sums to converge at every point.

Assume DC. There is a real continuous one-periodic f such that

∥σNf−f∥∞→0,sup⁡N≥0∣SNf(0)∣=∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: DC and the period-one Fourier conventions with normalized Haar measure.

[F1]

Assuming DC, for every prescribed x0∈T there exists a real continuous periodic f with sup⁡N≥0∣SNf(x0)∣=∞ (A continuous function with divergent Fourier series at a prescribed point).

[F2]

For every continuous one-periodic complex function f, sup⁡x∈R∣σNf(x)−f(x)∣→0 (Fejer means converge uniformly for continuous periodic functions).

Counterexample

technique · reuse of the continuous witness and uniform Fejer convergence
1.1F1given

Apply the prescribed-point witness with x0=0. It supplies a real continuous periodic f whose finite partial-sum values at zero form an unbounded sequence. Such an f is nonzero, and this sequence cannot converge to a finite value.

2.1F2step 1.1∎

Regard the same real f as complex-valued. It meets the continuity and periodicity hypotheses of uniform Fejer convergence, so ∥σNf−f∥∞→0. Thus the Cesaro averages σNf=(N+1)−1∑j=0NSjf converge uniformly while the ordinary sums at zero diverge unboundedly. Both properties hold for the single function from step 1.1, refuting the claimed implication.

RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Reading the Kolmogorov example at the endpoint

Reading the endpoint witness

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). The proved theorem Kolmogorov lone fourier series diverges almost everywhere supplies a complex f∈L1(T) whose symmetric Fourier partial sums are unbounded almost everywhere, with normalized period-one torus conventions. Since every convergent sequence of complex numbers is bounded, integrability alone does not entail almost-everywhere convergence.

This witness cannot belong to Lp(T) for any fixed 1<p<∞. If it did, Carleson hunt maximal inequality on the torus would give ∫(Cf)p dm<∞, hence Cf<∞ almost everywhere, contrary to the witness. A nonnegative function with finite integral is finite almost everywhere: if its infinity set had positive measure, every positive constant times the indicator of that set would be an integrable lower bound of arbitrarily large integral. Essential boundedness is also impossible, since on the mass-one torus ∥f∥2≤∥f∥∞ would put it in L2.

The divergence conclusion concerns a full-measure set and does not identify any prescribed point. Unbounded partial sums almost everywhere and unbounded operator norms on L1 are distinct assertions. AC is inherited from the two local theorems; no additional choice is used in this interpretation.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

The Carleson maximal operator is not strong type (1,1)

Statement refuted

Under Countable Choice, there exists a finite constant bounding ∥Cf∥1 by that constant times ∥f∥1 for every f∈L1(T).

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. In fact, for every A>0 there is a nonnegative trigonometric polynomial f on the period-one torus, with Haar mass one, such that

∥f∥1=1,∥Cf∥1>A.

As a further consequence under DC, there exists a real h∈L1(T) with sup⁡N∥SNh∥1=∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, A>0, and normalized Haar measure on T=R/Z. DC is assumed only for the further norm-divergence consequence.

[F1]

The measurable maximal operator is Cf=sup⁡N≥0∣SNf∣ for f∈L1 (Carleson maximal partial-sum operator).

[F2]

The Fejer kernel satisfies FK(t)=(K+1)−1∣∑j=0Ke2πijt∣2≥0 and ∫01FK(t) dt=1 for every K≥0 (The Fejer kernel is a positive approximate identity).

[F3]

Fejer means of a continuous one-periodic complex function converge uniformly to that function (Fejer means converge uniformly for continuous periodic functions).

[F4]

For every one-period integrable f and every x, SNf(x)=(f∗DN)(x) (Fourier partial sums are Dirichlet convolutions).

[F5]

The quantities ∥DN∥1 equal the norms of the partial-sum operators on continuous functions and are at least (3π)−1log⁡(N+1) for N≥1 (Fourier partial-sum operator norm equals the Lebesgue constant).

[F6]

For every measure space and 1≤p≤∞, Lp is complete in its norm (Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1≤p≤∞).

[F7]

Under DC, pointwise bounded families of bounded linear maps from a Banach space to a normed space have uniformly bounded norms (Uniform boundedness principle).

[F8]

For two sigma-finite measure spaces and a nonnegative product-measurable function, the product integral equals both iterated integrals (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

Counterexample

technique · Fejer-kernel tests, with an additional uniform-boundedness consequence
1.1F2F5given

Choose an integer N≥1 with ∥DN∥1>A+1, possible from the logarithmic lower bound. For each K≥0, the function FK is a real nonnegative trigonometric polynomial of L1 norm one.

1.2F2F3F4

Expanding the square formula for FK gives coefficient 1−∣k∣/(K+1) for ∣k∣≤K and zero otherwise. Orthogonality of finite characters therefore gives SNFK=FK∗DN=σKDN: either side has coefficient 1−∣k∣/(K+1) for ∣k∣≤min⁡{K,N} and zero elsewhere. Since DN is continuous, ∥SNFK−DN∥∞→0 as K→∞, with N fixed.

1.3F4F8

For the additional consequence, let h be a real integrable periodic representative. The convolution formula, after a periodic change of variables, gives ∣SNh(x)∣≤∫01∣h(u)∣∣DN(x−u)∣ du. The integrand is product-measurable: h(u) depends on one coordinate and DN(x−u) is continuous. Both measure spaces are finite, so Tonelli and translation invariance give ∥SNh∥1≤∫01∣h(u)∣∫01∣DN(x−u)∣ dx du=∥DN∥1∥h∥1. Thus SN is a bounded real linear operator on real L1.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2

Choose K large enough that this uniform error is less than one. The measure has mass one, so ∥SNFK∥1≥∥DN∥1−∥SNFK−DN∥1>A. Since CFK≥∣SNFK∣, the polynomial f=FK is the required witness. Its maximal function is finite and bounded: when the partial-sum index is at least K, the partial sum equals FK, so only finitely many distinct continuous polynomials enter its supremum. Thus the strict norm inequality is an ordinary finite integral, not an artifact of an infinite value.

2.2F2F5step 1.2step 1.3

For each fixed N, step 1.2 and the unit-norm tests FK imply ∥SN:L1(T,R)→L1(T,R)∥≥lim⁡K→∞∥SNFK∥1=∥DN∥1. These operator norms are consequently unbounded.

3.1F6F7step 1.3step 2.2given∎

Now assume DC. Real L1 is Banach by completeness. If sup⁡N∥SNh∥1 were finite for each h, uniform boundedness would contradict step 2.2. Therefore some real integrable h has unbounded L1 norms of its partial sums. This is a norm-divergence conclusion and does not assert almost-everywhere divergence.

Sources