Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exponential and integrating factor integrators — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples compute a diagonal stiff diffusion step with reaction, show transient growth under an exact exponential for a nonnormal matrix, evaluate the φ functions at zero without matrix division, exhibit decay under imaginary-time propagation, and verify norm preservation for real-time skew-Hermitian evolution. The exact-action examples distinguish properties of the mathematical step from errors of a certified numerical action implementation.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

A diagonal stiff diffusion step with linear reaction

Statement

Take A=diag⁡(−1,−1000), g(y)=1−y, y(0)=0, and h=10−3. Compute the exact first-step state and the exponential-Euler and ETD2 first-step states, showing how the diagonal linear diffusion is exponentiated while the reaction is approximated.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-dimensional ODE, initial state, step size, and exact step maps from Exponential Euler and the two-stage ETD2 step maps.

[F1]

Exponential Euler and the two-stage ETD2 step maps: exponential Euler is ehAy+hφ1(hA)g(y), while ETD2 uses the predictor ah and the φ1−φ2,φ2 correction.

[F2]

The phi-function family by everywhere-convergent series: φk(X)=∑j≥0Xj/(j+k)!, so the matrix functions used at finite arguments are defined by convergent series.

[F3]

The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡: the real exponential is differentiable with (et)′=et.

[F5]
[F8]

Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes: powers of a diagonal matrix are diagonal with the corresponding scalar powers on the diagonal.

[A1]

The displayed g is componentwise, gi(y)=1−yi.

Verification

1.1givenA1F3F4F5F6F7algebra

For coordinate i with λi∈{1,1000}, put a=λi+1>0. The exact equation is yi′=−ayi+1, yi(0)=0. The product rule [F6] and chain rule [F7] show (eatyi(t))′=eat. Integrating by [F4] gives eahyi(h)=∫0heas ds=(eah−1)/a, since [F3], [F7] give antiderivative eas/a. Dividing by the positive exponential using [F5] yields yi(h)=(1−e−ah)/a.

2.1F1F2F8step 1.1algebra

By [F8], powers of A=diag⁡(−λi) are diagonal with entries (−λi)j, so the series [F2] evaluates the matrix phi functions coordinatewise. The exact exponential-Euler map has e−λihyi(0)=0 and reaction value gi(0)=1, so its coordinate is hφ1(−λih). The ETD2 predictor has that same coordinate; hence gi(a)=1−hφ1(−λih) and the ETD2 coordinate is h[(φ1(−λih)−φ2(−λih))+φ2(−λih)(1−hφ1(−λih))]=h(φ1(−λih)−hφ1(−λih)φ2(−λih)).

3.1F1F2F8step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

In particular the stiff coordinate uses λ2h=1: its exact, exponential-Euler, and ETD2 values are respectively (1−e−1.001)/1001, 10−3φ1(−1), and 10−3(φ1(−1)−10−3φ1(−1)φ2(−1)). All exponential and phi actions are at explicit matrix/scalar arguments; any numerical implementation must return the certificates specified by Certified-action implementation of exponential Euler and ETD2.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Exact exponential stepping captures nonnormal transient growth

Statement

Let A=(−12e0−1),g=0,y(0)=(01). Here nonnormal means AA∗≠A∗A. Compute the exact solution, show its norm grows above its initial value before decaying, and verify that exact-action exponential Euler and ETD2 reproduce it at every grid point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite matrix, zero nonlinear term, initial state, and methods of Exponential Euler and the two-stage ETD2 step maps.

[F1]

Exponential Euler and the two-stage ETD2 step maps: when g=0, both exact maps reduce to y↦ehAy.

[F2]

The exponential series of a bounded operator: the finite-matrix exponential is defined by its convergent series and satisfies e(r+s)A=erAesA.

[F6]
[F7]

Variation of constants for a finite-matrix semilinear system: when g=0, a solution satisfies y(t)=etAy(0).

[A1]

The exact IVP starts at the stated y(0) and has g=0.

Verification

1.1givenF2F3F4inductionalgebra

Write A=−I+N with N=(02e00); direct multiplication gives N2=0 [F4]. The formula holds for n=1 since A=−I+N. If An=(−1)nI+n(−1)n−1N, multiplying by A=−I+N and using N2=0 gives An+1=(−1)n+1I+(n+1)(−1)nN, so induction proves it for every n≥1. Substituting in the absolutely convergent matrix-exponential series [F2] gives etA=e−tI+∑n≥1tn(−1)n−1N/(n−1)!=e−t(I+tN) by the scalar series [F3].

2.1A1F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1algebra

By [F7] and step 1.1, the solution is y(t)=e−t(2et,1)T. Direct multiplication using [F4] gives AA∗=(1+4e2−2e−2e1) and A∗A=(1−2e−2e1+4e2), which differ, so A is nonnormal. By [F5] and [F6], its initial norm is 1, whereas ∥y(1)∥2=e−14e2+1>2. For t>0, the exponential series gives et≥t2/2, and [F6] gives e−t=1/et≤2/t2; hence e−t→0 and te−t≤2/t→0, so y(t)→0.

3.1F1F2step 1.1algebrainduction∎

By [F1], every exact-action step is multiplication by ehA. Repeated use of the semigroup identity in [F2] gives (ehA)n=enhA, so the method returns y(tn) at every grid point. The transient growth is therefore present in the exact linear flow and is not removed by exponentiating this nonnormal matrix.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Phi functions at zero require no matrix division

Statement

For A=0, g(t,y)=t, y(0)=0, and a step h>0, compute the exponential-Euler and ETD2 steps directly from the series values φ1(0)=1 and φ2(0)=1/2. The ETD2 step is exact, while exponential Euler returns zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The scalar IVP and exact method maps of Exponential Euler and the two-stage ETD2 step maps.

[F1]

The phi-function family by everywhere-convergent series and The scalar and matrix phi series converge absolutely: at zero, φ1(0)=1, φ2(0)=1/2, and e0=1, directly from the convergent series.

[F2]

Exponential Euler and the two-stage ETD2 step maps: the ETD2 predictor is exponential Euler and its correction uses φ1−φ2 and φ2.

Verification

1.1givenF3algebra

By [F3], the exact solution is y(t)=∫0ts ds=t2/2, so y(h)=h2/2.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Since A=0, ehA=1 and g(0,y(0))=0. The exponential-Euler step is therefore 0+hφ1(0)0=0, and its predictor for ETD2 is also a=0.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

At the ETD2 endpoint, g(h,a)=h. Its update is 0+h(φ1(0)−φ2(0))0+hφ2(0)h=h2/2, which equals the exact value from step 1.1. This calculation evaluates φk(0) from the series and never divides by A or its eigenvalues.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Real-time unitary and imaginary-time finite-matrix propagation

Statement

Let H=diag⁡(1,2) and y0=(1,1)T. For imaginary time τ≥0, solve u′=−Hu, u(0)=y0, and compute its norm to exhibit the nonunitary decay. For real time t∈R, set A=−iH and solve y′=Ay, y(0)=y0; show that exact-action exponential Euler and ETD2 preserve the norm at grid points. For a certified implementation of the real-time methods with per-step action bounds δj, give the global error bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite matrix, initial vector, zero nonlinear term, and methods of Exponential Euler and the two-stage ETD2 step maps.

[F1]

A skew-Hermitian matrix exponential is unitary: if A∗=−A, then (etA)∗etA=I for every real t.

[F2]

Exponential Euler and the two-stage ETD2 step maps: with g=0, both exact step maps are y↦ehAy.

[F3]

Fixed-matrix global orders and certified-action error propagation: under its tube and regularity hypotheses, certified step action errors contribute at most K+K−eLpT∑jδj in addition to its local-defect term.

[F4]

The complex exponential by its power series: the scalar complex exponential is defined by its convergent power series.

[F5]

The exponential series of a bounded operator: the matrix exponential is defined by the same series, and its semigroup property holds.

[F6]

Variation of constants for a finite-matrix semilinear system: when g=0, a solution satisfies y(t)=etAy(0).

[A1]

Here Aim=−H and Art=−iH, g=0, and the exact initial state is used. The real-time uniform grid has T>0, N≥1, and h=T/N.

Verification

1.1A1F5F6F7algebra

The matrix series [F5] for Aim=−H is diagonal term by term and its diagonal series are the real exponential series from [F7], so eτAim=diag⁡(e−τ,e−2τ). By [F6], u(τ)=(e−τ,e−2τ)T. For τ>0, [F7] gives 0<e−τ<1 and 0<e−2τ<1, hence ∥u(τ)∥22=(e−τ)2+(e−2τ)2<2=∥u(0)∥22; this imaginary-time propagator is not unitary.

1.2A1F1F4F5F6algebra

The matrix series [F5] for Art=−iH is diagonal term by term and agrees with [F4], so etArt=diag⁡(e−it,e−2it). Since Art∗=−Art, [F1] gives a unitary propagator; [F6] yields y(t)=(e−it,e−2it)T and ∥y(t)∥2=2.

2.1F2F5step 1.2algebrainduction

By [F2], both exact-action methods reduce to multiplication by ehArt. The semigroup identity [F5] gives (ehArt)n=enhArt, so every grid value is the exact y(tn) from step 1.2 and has norm 2.

3.1A1F1F3F8F9step 1.2algebra∎

By [F8], R×C2 is identified with R5 using the realification and product Euclidean norm. For a finite certified real-time run, take D=R×C2 and g=0. Choose R>2 larger than the absolute values of every real and imaginary coordinate of its finitely many numerical states and ETD2 predictor stages. The box T=[0,T]×[−R,R]4 contains those states and stages, and the exact path from step 1.2 lies in it because its norm is 2. By [F9], T is compact; since D is the whole time-state space, it has positive margin. Here M=1, ω=0, K+=K−=1, Lg=Q1=Q2=0, and therefore Cp=Lp=0 in [F3]. With exact starting data, [F3] gives max⁡n∥y~n−y(tn)∥2≤∑j=0N−1δj.

Sources