How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Spectral calculus, Gaussian fields and covariance normalization prerequisites — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Banach Alaoglu Goldstine and Krein Milman
- Banach Algebras Spectrum and Holomorphic Functional Calculus
- Banach Valued Integration and the Radon Nikodym Property
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compact Operators and Riesz Schauder Theory
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Coordinate and Path Transport
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Complex Subspace Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Continuous Functional Calculus for Self Adjoint and Normal Operators
- Contour Integration
- Convergence: Nets and Filters
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces Adjoint Operators and Annihilators
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gelfand Theory and Commutative C Star Algebras
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Spectral calculus, Gaussian fields and covariance normalization prerequisites
- Spectral Measures and Borel Functional Calculus
- Stone–Weierstrass in General
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Analytic Hahn Banach Theorem
- The Baire Principles of Functional Analysis
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Unbounded Self Adjoint Operators and Stones Theorem
- Urysohn's Lemma and the Tietze Extension Theorem
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
Injective resolvents need not be bounded below
Statement refuted
False assertion: for every densely defined nonnegative self-adjoint operator on a nonzero complex Hilbert space, if is injective then .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice, over , where , and the definitions of and in the Counterexample.
The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function.
Positive unbounded spectral calculus from a bounded resolvent: under the Axiom of Choice, is bounded positive self-adjoint on a nonzero complex Hilbert space, and its compact spectrum has a unique regular spectral PVM on its Borel sets with ; the push-forward under has domain and operator , and the theorem permits while .
Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs: for square-summable complex sequences , .
Counterexample
Given: [A1], [F1]–[F2], and the false assertion in the Statement.
On , with inner product and standard basis given by if and otherwise, all coordinate indices below range over . Define and . Finite sequences lie in and are dense. For , Cauchy–Schwarz [F2] gives , so and is nonnegative.
The operator is self-adjoint. If , there is with for every finite sequence ; choosing gives , so and . Conversely, if then satisfies the adjoint identity for every : both inner-product series converge by [F2] because , and their terms agree. Thus and .
The inverse of is the bounded diagonal operator . Indeed for any , satisfies , and . The operator is positive and injective, but it is not bounded below because for unit vectors . The vector belongs to : for , , so . It is not in , since would require for every , which is not square-summable. Hence is not surjective and .
Define for Borel . Its values are orthogonal coordinate projections, and the coordinate definition gives , , and . For disjoint Borel , each coordinate occurs in at most one projection, so the partial sums converge in to : the squared norm of the omitted coordinates is a tail of the convergent nonnegative series . Thus is strongly countably additive. It integrates the coordinate function to , because its integral acts diagonally by on each . For every , its finite scalar measure is . For any Borel , the finite set is compact and contained in , and because . Hence is inner regular on every Borel set. Since is compact, for any Borel and , inner regularity of gives a compact with ; then the open set contains and its excess measure is less than . Thus is also outer regular, so is a regular PVM. Hence [F1] identifies it with the bounded-resolvent spectral PVM. Since no atom is at zero, , although step 3.1 proves . This refutes the asserted implication and shows why a zero spectral projection must be distinguished from a spectral value.