Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Adiabatic Computation and Circuit Equivalence — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples compute an avoided-crossing gap and its finite JRS bound, show explicitly why a path with a closing gap can fail to follow its ground state, and expand a padded two-gate history state together with its propagation terms. The examples use the conventions and hypotheses from adiabatic-computation-and-circuit-equivalence.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Two-level avoided crossing

Statement

Consider H(s)=(s−1/2)Z+X/2 on C2, where X=(0110) and Z=(100−1). Compute its full ground-to-excited gap, derivative bounds, and rank-one JRS error bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite path and rank-one JRS estimate from Finite adiabatic path model and Finite JRS adiabatic projector bound.

[F2]

For a rank-one band, the JRS bound is A1(1)=1T(∥H′(0)∥g(0)2+∥H′(1)∥g(1)2+∫01(∥H′′(s)∥g(s)2+7∥H′(s)∥2g(s)3)ds) (Finite JRS adiabatic projector bound).

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Put x=s−1/2. Direct multiplication gives H(s)2=(x2+1/4)I, so its eigenvalues are ±x2+1/4. The ground-to-excited gap is therefore g(s)=2x2+1/4, whose minimum is 1 at s=1/2 and whose endpoint values are 2. The ground band is uniformly isolated and has rank one.

1.2givenalgebra

Differentiating gives H′(s)=Z and H′′(s)=0. Since Z∗Z=I, ∥H′(s)∥=1 for every s.

2.1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Substituting the endpoint values and derivatives from steps 1.1–1.2 into [F2] gives endpoint contribution 1/2+1/2=1. For the integral, with x=s−1/2, ∫017g(s)3 ds=78∫−1/21/2dx(x2+1/4)3/2=72, using the antiderivative x/((1/4)x2+1/4). Hence A1(1)=(1+7/2)/T.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra∎

The JRS conclusion consequently bounds the projector deviation by (1+7/2)/T and the transition probability out of the ground band by its square. For example, any T≥4(1+7/2)/ε makes the projector deviation at most ε/4.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Gap closing invalidates a uniform adiabatic bound

Statement

The C2 path H(s)=(s−1/2)Z has a closing gap and its exact evolution from the initial ground state ends orthogonal to the final ground state. Thus C2 regularity alone does not imply ground-state following or satisfy the uniform-gap hypothesis of the finite JRS theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite path and the uniform positive-gap hypothesis of Finite adiabatic path model and Finite JRS adiabatic projector bound.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

The path is linear in s, hence twice continuously differentiable. Since Z=diag⁡(1,−1), its eigenvalues are s−1/2 and −(s−1/2); the gap is g(s)=2∣s−1/2∣, which vanishes at s=1/2. Therefore no positive uniform full gap exists.

1.2givenF1algebra

At s=0, H(0)=−Z/2 has unique ground vector ∣0⟩; at s=1, H(1)=Z/2 has unique ground vector ∣1⟩. The Hamiltonians commute for all times and are diagonal, so the solution of i∂sUT=TH(s)UT maps ∣0⟩ to a scalar phase times ∣0⟩. Its final overlap with the final ground vector is zero, and its transition probability out of the final ground space is exactly 1 for every T>0.

2.1givenstep 1.1step 1.2∎

The path satisfies the smoothness assumption but violates the strictly positive uniform-gap hypothesis in Finite JRS adiabatic projector bound. Step 1.2 shows directly that the desired ground-state-following conclusion can fail completely when that hypothesis is removed.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Two-gate padded history state

Example

Take the algebraic one-qubit macro-gate circuit U1=X, U2=Z and tolerance ε=1. Applying the propagation formula at this macro-step level gives K=4, N=6, and U3=⋯=U6=I. Write its legal clocks as c0=000000,c1=100000,…,c6=111111. This is an algebraic illustration of the propagation formula, rather than a literal fixed-alphabet input to the uniform-circuit construction: expanding X=HT4H and Z=T4 changes the gate count and padding. The normalized history state is ∣η⟩=17(∣0⟩∣c0⟩+∣1⟩∣c1⟩−∣1⟩∣c2⟩−∣1⟩∣c3⟩−∣1⟩∣c4⟩−∣1⟩∣c5⟩−∣1⟩∣c6⟩).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The unary-clock propagation formula and padded circuit conventions from Five-local history-state adiabatic path and History state and padded output.

[F1]

Each propagation term couples only its two adjacent legal clocks and its kernel condition on their data amplitudes is ϕℓ=Uℓϕℓ−1 (History state and padded output).

[F2]

Dirac kets denote the corresponding computational basis vectors (Dirac Notation Conversion).

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

At the algebraic macro-step level, the padding count is K=⌈2⋅2/1⌉=4, so N=6. The prefix states are V0∣0⟩=∣0⟩, V1∣0⟩=X∣0⟩=∣1⟩, and V2∣0⟩=ZX∣0⟩=Z∣1⟩=−∣1⟩. Since U3,…,U6 are identities, all later prefix states remain −∣1⟩. Substitution in the history-state formula of [F1] gives the displayed normalized vector.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

For ℓ=1, the endpoint patterns are a1=00,b1=10 on clock bits (1,2); for ℓ=2,3,4,5, the internal patterns are aℓ=100,bℓ=110 on bits (ℓ−1,ℓ,ℓ+1); for ℓ=6, the endpoint patterns are a6=10,b6=11 on bits (5,6). On every adjacent pair (cℓ−1,cℓ), the data amplitudes in step 1.1 satisfy ϕℓ=Uℓϕℓ−1: the first two transitions apply X and Z, and the last four apply I.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra∎

By [F1], each hℓ restricted to its pattern pair has quadratic form 12∥ϕℓ−Uℓϕℓ−1∥2. Step 2.1 makes this zero for each ℓ=1,…,6; all other legal clock amplitudes are outside that term's two-pattern support. Thus every propagation term annihilates ∣η⟩, and the sum Hprop does as well.

Sources