Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 6 results · all verified · 5 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Frobenius Groups and the Normal Complement Theorem — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples and counterexamples anchor the abstract theory. S3 is computed as a Frobenius group with kernel A3 and any transposition subgroup as complement, and the affine group F+⋊F× of a finite field with q>2 elements is shown to be Frobenius with translation kernel and dilation complement, with q=2 the excluded regular boundary. On the negative side, the natural action of S4 on four letters is transitive but not Frobenius, since the transposition (0 1) fixes two letters, and in A5 at p=5 the Sylow 5-subgroups are cyclic while the automizer NA5(P)/CA5(P) is C2, so no normal 5-complement exists. A remark records that product closure of the candidate kernel set is exactly what the character-theoretic theorem supplies, and the S3 pair (G,2) is worked through the three equivalent conditions of the Frobenius normal p-complement theorem.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27Open item page →

S3 as a Frobenius group

Example

Let S3 be the symmetric group on the three letters 0,1,2 (The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation) and let H:=⟨(0 1)⟩={id⁡,(0 1)} be the subgroup generated by the transposition (0 1) (The subgroup ⟨S⟩ generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup ⟨g⟩, and cyclic groups). Then:

  1. H is a Frobenius complement of S3 (Frobenius complement and frobenius group); equivalently S3 is a Frobenius group with complement H;
  2. the Frobenius kernel of S3 with respect to H is the alternating group A3={id⁡,(0 1 2),(0 2 1)} (The alternating group An=ker⁡(sgn⁡) of even permutations), so that S3=A3⋊H is an internal semidirect product with A3≅C3 and H≅C2 (An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup);
  3. every transposition subgroup ⟨(a b)⟩ of S3 is a Frobenius complement of S3 as well, and A3 is its Frobenius kernel.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The symmetric group S3=Sym⁡({0,1,2}), the transposition (0 1), and H=⟨(0 1)⟩.

[F1]

Elements and conjugacy classes of S3: one-line notation identifies the permutations of {0,1,2} with the lists [b0,b1,b2] whose entries are 0,1,2 each occurring once, so ∣S3∣=3⋅2⋅1=6; in cycle notation the six elements are id⁡=[0,1,2], (0 1)=[1,0,2], (0 2)=[2,1,0], (1 2)=[0,2,1], (0 1 2)=[1,2,0] and (0 2 1)=[2,0,1], that is S3={id⁡,(0 1),(0 2),(1 2),(0 1 2),(0 2 1)}. Conjugating a cycle relabels its entries: g(a b)g−1=(g(a) g(b)) and g(a b c)g−1=(g(a) g(b) g(c)) for g∈S3. Hence every conjugate of the transposition (0 1) is again a transposition, and as g runs through S3 the ordered pair (g(0),g(1)) runs through all six ordered pairs of distinct entries, so the conjugate (g(0) g(1)) takes each of the three values (0 1),(0 2),(1 2) and the conjugacy class of (0 1) is {(0 1),(0 2),(1 2)}; every conjugate of the 3-cycle (0 1 2) is again a 3-cycle, and g=id⁡ and g=(0 1) give the conjugates (0 1 2) and (1 0 2)=(0 2 1), so the conjugacy class of (0 1 2) is {(0 1 2),(0 2 1)}; and the identity is conjugate only to itself. These three classes partition the six elements of S3, so they are its conjugacy classes (The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation, Conjugating a cycle relabels each entry: g(a1 … ak)g−1=(g(a1) … g(ak))).

[F2]

Orders in S3: a transposition (a b) satisfies (a b)2=id⁡ and (a b)≠id⁡, so has order 2; a 3-cycle σ satisfies σ3=id⁡ and σ≠id⁡, so has order 3 (The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation, The order ∣G∣ of a finite group and the order ord⁡(g) of an element, with ord⁡(g)=∞ when no positive power of g is the identity, ⟨g⟩={ gn:n∈Z }, and every cyclic group is abelian).

[F3]

A3≤S3 is a normal subgroup of order 3, and A3≠S3; a group of order 3 is cyclic, hence contains an element of order 3, so A3 consists of the identity together with the two elements of order 3 of S3, namely A3={id⁡,(0 1 2),(0 2 1)} by [F1] and [F2] (The alternating group An=ker⁡(sgn⁡) of even permutations, An is normal in Sn; for n≥2, 2 ∣An∣=n!, while An=Sn for n=0,1, A finite group of prime order is cyclic and every nonidentity element generates it, Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation, Subgroup).

[F4]

Orders and subgroups: ∣S3∣=6 by [F1]; a subgroup's order divides the group order; the intersection of two subgroups is a subgroup; and two distinct subgroups of order 2 have trivial intersection, because their intersection is a subgroup of each of them, so has order dividing 2, and has order 2 only if it equals both, which would make them equal (Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G, The intersection of a nonempty family of subgroups of G is a subgroup of G, One-step subgroup test: a nonempty H⊆G is a subgroup iff gh−1∈H for all g,h∈H; the identity and the inverses of H are then those of G, Subgroup).

[F5]

Conjugation of cycle symbols: for g∈S3 and a cycle (a1 … ak) of S3, g(a1 … ak)g−1=(g(a1) … g(ak)); in particular conjugation sends a transposition to a transposition and a 3-cycle to a 3-cycle, and for the 3-cycle (0 1 2) and h=(0 1) it gives h(0 1 2)h−1=(h(0) h(1) h(2))=(1 0 2)=(0 2 1) (Conjugating a cycle relabels each entry: g(a1 … ak)g−1=(g(a1) … g(ak)), The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation).

[F6]

Free-action criterion and uniqueness: if N,H≤G with G=N⋊H, 1<N, 1<H and every 1≠h∈H fixes only the identity of N under conjugation, then H is a Frobenius complement of G; and if G is a Frobenius group with complement H and kernel set N, then N⊴G, G=NH, N∩H={1}, and N is the unique normal subgroup M⊴G with MH=G and M∩H={1} (Frobenius groups and fixed point free actions, Frobenius semidirect product decomposition, An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup, Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions, Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation).

[F7]

Conjugation invariance of the Frobenius-complement property: if H is a Frobenius complement of G and g∈G, then Hg=gHg−1 is a subgroup of G isomorphic to H, and it is again a Frobenius complement, because Hg∩xHgx−1=(H∩g−1xHx−1g)g (Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism, The conjugacy class Cl⁡G(x) and centralizer CG(x) of an element, In a group e−1=e, (g−1)−1=g and (gh)−1=h−1g−1, the order of the last product being essential, Subgroup).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

H={id⁡,(0 1)} is a subgroup of S3 of order 2 by [F1] and [F2], so 1<H<S3 because ∣S3∣=6 by [F4]. The conjugates of (0 1) in S3 are, by [F1], exactly the three transpositions, so the conjugates Hg=gHg−1 of H are exactly the three subgroups {id⁡,(0 1)},{id⁡,(0 2)},{id⁡,(1 2)} of order 2; in particular Hg=H exactly when g∈H, and for g∉H the conjugate Hg is a subgroup of order 2 different from H.

F1F2F4F7
1.2

By [F3], A3 is normal in S3 of order 3, so A3∩H={1} because ∣A3∣=3 and ∣H∣=2 are coprime and the intersection is a subgroup of both by [F4]. Moreover A3H is a subgroup of S3; its order is divisible by ∣H∣=2 and by ∣A3∣=3, hence by 6=∣S3∣, so A3H=S3 by [F4].

F3F4
1.3

We compute the conjugation action of the nonidentity element h=(0 1) of H on A3 using [F5]: h(0 1 2)h−1=(h(0) h(1) h(2))=(1 0 2)=(0 2 1)≠(0 1 2), and h(0 2 1)h−1=(h(0) h(2) h(1))=(1 2 0)=(0 1 2)≠(0 2 1); also hid⁡h−1=id⁡. So the only element of A3 fixed by h is the identity.

F3F5
2.1

Let g∈S3∖H. By step 1.1 the subgroups H and Hg are distinct of order 2, so H∩gHg−1={1} by [F4]. Hence H∩gHg−1={1} for every g∈S3∖H, which is assertion 1.

F4step 1.1
2.2

Steps 1.2 and 1.3 exhibit S3=A3⋊H with 1<A3, 1<H and with every nonidentity element of H fixing only the identity of A3; by [F6] the subgroup H is a Frobenius complement of S3, and the kernel set N of S3 with respect to H satisfies N⊴S3, NH=S3, N∩H={1}, and it is the unique such normal subgroup. Since A3 is normal in S3 with A3H=S3 and A3∩H={1} by [F3] and step 1.2, the uniqueness forces N=A3. This is assertion 2.

F3F6step 1.2step 1.3
3.1

Let ⟨(a b)⟩ be a transposition subgroup of S3. By [F1] the transposition (a b) lies in the conjugacy class of (0 1), so there is g∈S3 with (a b)=g(0 1)g−1, hence ⟨(a b)⟩=Hg; by step 2.1 and [F7] this is a Frobenius complement of S3. Moreover A3⊴S3 by [F3], A3Hg=A3H=S3 by step 1.2, and A3∩Hg={1} by [F4] since ∣A3∣=3 and ∣Hg∣=2 are coprime; so the uniqueness in [F6] identifies the Frobenius kernel of S3 with respect to Hg with A3. This is assertion 3, and the example is complete. ∎

F3F4F6F7step 1.2step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27Open item page →

Affine linear Frobenius groups over finite fields

Example

Let F be a finite field with q:=∣F∣ elements, where q>2 (Finite fields and their order, Field), with additive group F+=(F,+) and multiplicative group F×=(F∖{0},⋅) (Field). Let

G:={ fa,b:F→F∣fa,b(x)=ax+b, a∈F×, b∈F }

be the set of affine maps of F, with composition as operation (The symmetric group Sym⁡(X): the bijections of a set X under composition). Then:

  1. G is a subgroup of Sym⁡(F) of order q(q−1);
  2. the translation set K:={f1,b:b∈F} is a normal subgroup of G isomorphic to F+, the dilation set H:={fa,0:a∈F×} is a subgroup isomorphic to F×, and G=K⋊H is an internal semidirect product (An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup, Group isomorphisms, automorphisms and the set Aut⁡(G));
  3. H is a Frobenius complement of G and its Frobenius kernel is K (Frobenius complement and frobenius group).

Thus the affine group F+⋊F× acting on F by x↦ax+b is a Frobenius group whose kernel is the translation group and whose complement is the group of nontrivial dilations; the hypothesis q>2 is exactly what makes H nontrivial, and q=2 is the excluded boundary case in which the action is regular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite field F with ∣F∣=q>2, its additive group F+ and multiplicative group F×, and the set G of affine maps fa,b.

[F1]

Field arithmetic (Field): 0≠1; (F,+) is an abelian group with identity 0, so F+=(F,+) is a group with ∣F+∣=q; (F∖{0},⋅) is an abelian group with identity 1, so F×=(F∖{0},⋅) is a group, where a∈F× means a≠0 and then a has a multiplicative inverse a−1 with aa−1=1; multiplication distributes over addition, so a(x+y)=ax+ay and (a+c)x=ax+cx; from a≠1 and (a−1)b=0 it follows that b=0, because a−1≠0 is invertible; and ∣F×∣=q−1 because F×=F∖{0} has the q elements of F except 0.

[F2]

Composition and inversion of affine maps: for a,c∈F× and b,d∈F, fa,b∘fc,d=fac, ad+b, and fa,b is a bijection with two-sided inverse fa−1, −a−1b; in particular f1,0=id⁡F (The symmetric group Sym⁡(X): the bijections of a set X under composition, Field).

[F4]

Cardinalities: ∣F∣=q, ∣F×∣=q−1, ∣F××F∣=∣F×∣⋅∣F∣=(q−1)q, and ∣F+∣=q (The cardinality ∣A∣ of a finite set, The product rule: ∣A×B∣=∣A∣ ∣B∣, and ∣∏i<mAi∣=∏i<m∣Ai∣, [F1]).

[F5]

Normal subgroups and internal semidirect products: K⊴G means gKg−1=K for all g∈G; if K,H≤G with K⊴G, G=KH and K∩H={1}, then G=K⋊H is an internal semidirect product (Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation, An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup, Subgroup).

[F6]

Conjugation is an automorphism and c∈CG(R) centralizes every element of a subgroup R; f∈G fixes an element k∈K under conjugation exactly when fkf−1=k (Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism, The conjugacy class Cl⁡G(x) and centralizer CG(x) of an element, In a group e−1=e, (g−1)−1=g and (gh)−1=h−1g−1, the order of the last product being essential).

[F7]

Free-action criterion and kernel uniqueness: if N,H≤G with G=N⋊H, 1<N, 1<H and every 1≠h∈H fixes only the identity of N under conjugation, then H is a Frobenius complement of G; and for a Frobenius group G with complement H and kernel N one has N⊴G, G=NH, N∩H={1} and N is the unique normal subgroup M with MH=G and M∩H={1} (Frobenius groups and fixed point free actions, Frobenius semidirect product decomposition, Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [F2], each fa,b is a bijection F→F, so G⊆Sym⁡(F); G contains id⁡F=f1,0, is closed under composition and under inverses by the formulas of [F2] (with ac∈F× and a−1∈F×), so G is a subgroup of Sym⁡(F) by [F3]. The map F××F→G, (a,b)↦fa,b, is bijective: it is surjective by the definition of G, and if fa,b=fc,d then evaluating at 0 gives b=d and then evaluating at 1 gives a=c. Hence ∣G∣=∣F××F∣=(q−1)q by [F4]. This is assertion 1.

F2F3F4given
1.2

The maps τ:F+→K, τ(b)=f1,b, and δ:F×→H, δ(a)=fa,0, are bijections; by the composition formula [F2], f1,b∘f1,c=f1,b+c and fa,0∘fc,0=fac,0, while τ(0)=f1,0=id⁡F=δ(1) is the common identity; so τ and δ are group isomorphisms onto K and H, and K≤G, H≤G are subgroups.

F2F3F5given
1.3

For g=fa,c∈G and f1,b∈K we compute, using [F2] twice, g f1,b g−1=fa, ab+c∘fa−1, −a−1c=f1, a(−a−1c)+ab+c=f1,ab, which lies in K; since conjugation by g is a bijection G→G and K is a subgroup, Kg=K for every g∈G, that is K⊴G by [F5].

F2F5F6given
1.4

Also K∩H={id⁡F}: if f1,b=fa,0, evaluating at 0 gives b=0 and then evaluating at 1 gives 1=a, so f1,b=f1,0. Moreover G=KH: for fa,b∈G we have fa,b=fa,0∘f1,a−1b by [F2], and fa,0∈H, f1,a−1b∈K. Finally 1<∣K∣=q and 1<∣H∣=q−1, because q>2. So G=K⋊H is an internal semidirect product by [F5], which completes assertion 2.

F2F4F5given
2.1

We verify that the conjugation action of H on K∖{id⁡} is free. Let h=fa,0∈H with h≠id⁡F, so a≠1, since fa,0(1)=a while id⁡F(1)=1; and let k=f1,b∈K with k≠id⁡F, so b≠0. By step 1.3 with c=0, hkh−1=f1,ab, and ab≠b because (a−1)b≠0 by [F1]; hence hkh−1≠k, that is, h fixes no nonidentity element of K.

F1F6step 1.2step 1.3
3.1

By [F7] applied to the internal semidirect product G=K⋊H of step 1.4 and the free action of step 2.1, the subgroup H is a Frobenius complement of G; and by the uniqueness statement of [F7], applied to the normal subgroup K with KH=G and K∩H={1}, the Frobenius kernel of G with respect to H is K. This is assertion 3. ∎

F7step 1.4step 2.1
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27Open item page →

A transitive action need not be Frobenius

Statement refuted

Let S4 be the symmetric group on the four letters 0,1,2,3 (The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation), acting on {0,1,2,3} naturally, and let H:={σ∈S4:σ(2)=2} be the stabilizer of the letter 2 (The orbit G⋅x and stabilizer Gx of a point in a group action, Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions). Then the action is transitive and nonregular, but it is not a Frobenius action: H is not a Frobenius complement of S4 (Frobenius complement and frobenius group). Explicitly:

  1. the transposition (0 1) fixes the two letters 2 and 3, so some nonidentity element fixes more than one point;
  2. for g=(2 3)∉H the stabilizer gHg−1 of the letter 3 meets H in {id⁡,(0 1)}≠{id⁡}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The symmetric group S4=Sym⁡({0,1,2,3}), its natural action on {0,1,2,3}, and H={σ∈S4:σ(2)=2}.

[F1]

Cycle notation: a transposition (a b) exchanges a and b and fixes every other letter; (a b)2=id⁡; and a permutation of the four letters fixing two of them is determined by what it does to the remaining two, so the permutations fixing both 2 and 3 are exactly id⁡ and (0 1) (The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation).

[F2]

Stabilizers, cosets and conjugation: for a group G acting on a set X and x∈X, the stabilizer Gx={g:g⋅x=x} is a subgroup; point stabilizers of points in one orbit are conjugate: for g∈G one has gGxg−1=Gg⋅x, because gσg−1 fixes g⋅x exactly when σ fixes x (The orbit G⋅x and stabilizer Gx of a point in a group action, Orbit-stabiliser: G/Gx→G⋅x, gGx↦g⋅x, is a well-defined bijection, Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions, Subgroup, Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism, The conjugacy class Cl⁡G(x) and centralizer CG(x) of an element, In a group e−1=e, (g−1)−1=g and (gh)−1=h−1g−1, the order of the last product being essential).

[F3]

The transitivity of the natural action is the statement that for all i,j∈{0,1,2,3} there is σ∈S4 with σ(i)=j: if i=j take σ=id⁡, and if i≠j take the transposition σ=(i j), which sends i to j by [F1]; the action is nonregular because the nonidentity element (0 1) fixes the point 2 by [F1] (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).

[F4]

Characterization of Frobenius complements by the coset action: for a finite group G and a subgroup {1}<H<G, the subgroup H is a Frobenius complement exactly when the left action of G on G/H is transitive, nonregular, and every nonidentity element of G fixes at most one coset (Frobenius permutation action characterization, Left and right cosets gH and Hg of a subgroup, x∈aH iff a−1x∈H, and aH=bH iff a−1b∈H).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The action of S4 on {0,1,2,3} is transitive and nonregular by [F3]. The stabilizer H=G2 is a subgroup by [F2]; it contains id⁡ and (0 1) by [F1], and it does not contain (2 3) because (2 3) sends 2 to 3, so {id⁡}<H<S4.

F1F2F3
2.1

Take g=(2 3). Then g∉H by step 1.1, and by [F2] the conjugate gHg−1 is the stabilizer Gg⋅2=G3 of the letter 3. The permutations lying in H∩G3 fix both 2 and 3, so by [F1] this intersection is exactly {id⁡,(0 1)}.

F1F2step 1.1
3.1

It follows that H is not a Frobenius complement of S4: with g=(2 3)∉H one has H∩gHg−1={id⁡,(0 1)}≠{id⁡}, whereas a Frobenius complement must satisfy H∩xHx−1={1} for every x∈S4∖H.

F4step 2.1
4.1

The same failure is visible in the coset picture. The map S4/H→{0,1,2,3}, σH↦σ(2), is a bijection, and it is equivariant for the left action on cosets and the natural action on letters: τ⋅(σH)=(τσ)H↦(τσ)(2)=τ(σ(2)) for all τ,σ∈S4. So the coset action is the natural action on four letters; it is transitive and nonregular by [F3], and the transposition (0 1) fixes the two letters 2 and 3 by [F1], hence fixes the two corresponding cosets, violating the condition in [F4] that a nonidentity element fix at most one coset. Therefore the natural transitive action of S4 on four letters is not a Frobenius action. ∎

F1F4step 3.1
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27Open item page →

Frobenius kernel closure is the content of the theorem

Statement

Let G be a finite Frobenius group with complement H and let

N=(G∖⋃x∈GxHx−1)∪{1}

be the associated candidate kernel set (Frobenius kernel set, Frobenius complement and frobenius group). Then N is defined by a membership condition on individual elements: g∈N means that g=1 or that g lies in no conjugate of H. Nothing in the definition asserts that N is closed under products, and the counting statement ∣N∣=[G:H], N∩H={1} of Frobenius kernel cardinality likewise says nothing about products of elements of N.

The remark. The passage from this candidate set to a subgroup is not formal; it is the content of the Frobenius kernel theorem (Frobenius kernel theorem), which proves that N is a normal subgroup of G by character-theoretic means. In particular, the theorem is not a consequence of the cardinality computation, and a proof of the kernel theorem must somewhere use more than the definition of N and the orbit-counting identities.

Remarks

The reason no product closure is available for free is that N is described by a negative condition on conjugation, while a product gg′ of two elements avoiding every conjugate of H need not avoid them; the subgroups Hx=xHx−1 are numerous and the description of N quantifies over all of them. This is visible already in the smallest case G=S3 with H=⟨(0 1)⟩, where the kernel is A3 (S3 as a Frobenius group): the two nonidentity elements of A3 are 3-cycles, and the product of either one with itself is the other, while their mutual product is the identity, so closure holds there — but this is a computation in one group, not a general structural reason.

Conversely, the reverse implication is immediate: if a normal subgroup K with K≤N, G=KH and K∩H={1} is exhibited by other means, then K is the Frobenius kernel by the uniqueness statement of Frobenius semidirect product decomposition. The character-theoretic theorem is exactly the tool that produces such a K from the Frobenius condition alone.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-27Open item page →

Frobenius normal two complement for S_3

Example

Let G=S3 be the symmetric group on 0,1,2 and let p=2 (The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation). Then:

  1. A3={id⁡,(0 1 2),(0 2 1)} is a normal 2-complement of S3, so that S3 is 2-nilpotent (Normal p complement and p nilpotent group, The alternating group An=ker⁡(sgn⁡) of even permutations);
  2. for a Sylow 2-subgroup P of S3 the only nontrivial 2-local normalizer NG(Q) with 1≠Q≤P is NS3(P)=P itself, so there is one such normalizer for fixed P. As P varies, these are the three subgroups of order 2, forming one conjugacy class (P local normalizer for normal complement theory); each is a finite 2-group, hence 2-nilpotent with trivial normal 2-complement;
  3. a Sylow 2-subgroup of S3 controls its own element fusion (Control of fusion in a sylow p subgroup).

Consequently all three conditions of the Frobenius normal p-complement theorem hold for (S3,2), in accordance with Frobenius normal p complement theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The symmetric group S3=Sym⁡({0,1,2}) and the prime p=2.

[F1]

Elements, conjugacy classes and order-2 subgroups of S3: one-line notation identifies the permutations of {0,1,2} with the lists [b0,b1,b2] whose entries are 0,1,2 each occurring once, so ∣S3∣=3⋅2⋅1=6 and S3={id⁡,(0 1),(0 2),(1 2),(0 1 2),(0 2 1)}; conjugation relabels the entries of a cycle, g(a b)g−1=(g(a) g(b)) and g(a b c)g−1=(g(a) g(b) g(c)), so the conjugacy classes are {id⁡}, {(0 1),(0 2),(1 2)} and {(0 1 2),(0 2 1)}; and the conjugates ⟨(0 1)⟩g=⟨(g(0) g(1))⟩ of ⟨(0 1)⟩ are exactly the three subgroups {id⁡,(0 1)},{id⁡,(0 2)},{id⁡,(1 2)} of order 2 (The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation, Conjugating a cycle relabels each entry: g(a1 … ak)g−1=(g(a1) … g(ak)), S3 as a Frobenius group).

[F3]

Sylow and subgroup order facts: ∣S3∣=6=2⋅3, so the exact power of 2 dividing ∣S3∣ is 2, and every subgroup of order 2 is a Sylow 2-subgroup; a subgroup of S3 has order dividing 6, so every 2-subgroup of S3 has order 1 or 2; a group of order 2 is a finite 2-group (Sylow p-subgroups of a finite group, Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G, A finite p-group has order pn for a prime p and some n∈N, Every subgroup of a finite p-group has order a power of p).

[F4]

Normal p-complement: a normal subgroup K⊴G with p∤∣K∣ and [G:K] a power of p is a normal p-complement of G; the trivial subgroup has order 1, which is prime to every p, and if G is a finite p-group then K={1} is a normal p-complement because [G:{1}]=∣G∣ is a power of p (Normal p complement and p nilpotent group, Sylow p-subgroups of a finite group, A finite p-group has order pn for a prime p and some n∈N, Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

[F5]

Local normalizers and fusion: for 1≠Q≤P with P∈Syl⁡p(G) the normalizer NG(Q) is the local subgroup of the theory; and P controls fusion in P with respect to G when every G-conjugacy between two elements of P is realized by an element of P (P local normalizer for normal complement theory, Control of fusion in a sylow p subgroup, The conjugacy class Cl⁡G(x) and centralizer CG(x) of an element, Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism).

[F6]

Frobenius normal p-complement theorem: for a finite group G, a prime p and P∈Syl⁡p(G), the conditions (a) G has a normal p-complement, (b) every NG(Q) with 1≠Q≤P has a normal p-complement, and (c) P controls fusion in P, are equivalent (Frobenius normal p complement theorem).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

P:={id⁡,(0 1)} is a subgroup of S3 of order 2 by [F1], hence is a Sylow 2-subgroup of S3 by [F3].

F1F3
1.2

A3 is normal in S3 of order 3 by [F2], so 2∤∣A3∣ and [S3:A3]=6/3=2=21 is a power of 2 by [F1] and [F3]; hence A3 is a normal 2-complement of S3 by [F4]. This is assertion 1.

F1F2F3F4
2.1

Let Q≠{1} be a 2-subgroup of P. By [F3] the order of Q divides ∣P∣=2, so Q=P; hence the only nontrivial 2-local normalizer with respect to P is NS3(P). By [F1] the conjugates of P=⟨(0 1)⟩ are the three distinct subgroups of order 2 of S3, and Pg=P means {g(0),g(1)}={0,1}, which holds exactly for g∈P, that is NS3(P)=P: for this fixed P, condition (b) contains only NS3(P)=P. Varying P yields three conjugate subgroups, each equal to its own normalizer.

F1F3F5step 1.1
2.2

We show that P controls fusion in P with respect to S3. Let x,y∈P and g∈S3 with y=xg. If x=id⁡ then y=id⁡=xid⁡ with id⁡∈P. If x≠id⁡ then x=(0 1) by [F1], and y=xg is a transposition, hence lies in the conjugacy class {(0 1),(0 2),(1 2)} of x by [F1]; as y∈P={id⁡,(0 1)} we get y=(0 1)=x=xid⁡. In both cases y is conjugate to x by an element of P. This is assertion 3.

F1F5step 1.1
3.1

Each of these local normalizers is a group of order 2, hence a finite 2-group by [F3]; therefore its trivial subgroup is a normal 2-complement by [F4].

F3F4step 2.1
4.1

By step 1.2 condition (a) holds, by steps 2.1 and 3.1 condition (b) holds, and by step 2.2 condition (c) holds; in accordance with [F6] the three equivalent conditions of the Frobenius normal p-complement theorem are satisfied for (S3,2). ∎

F6step 1.2step 3.1step 2.2
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27Open item page →

Cyclic sylow does not alone imply a normal p complement

Statement refuted

Let A5 be the alternating group on the five letters 0,1,2,3,4 and let p=5 (The alternating group An=ker⁡(sgn⁡) of even permutations, The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation). Then:

  1. ∣A5∣=60 and every Sylow 5-subgroup P of A5 is cyclic of order 5 (Sylow p-subgroups of a finite group, A finite group of prime order is cyclic and every nonidentity element generates it);
  2. A5 has no normal 5-complement (Normal p complement and p nilpotent group);
  3. for such a Sylow P the automizer is NA5(P)/CA5(P)≅C2, so it is not a 5-group and the automizer criterion of Frobenius automizer criterion for p nilpotence fails.

Thus a cyclic Sylow p-subgroup does not by itself imply the existence of a normal p-complement: the defect is detected by the automizer, not by the isomorphism type of the Sylow subgroup.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The alternating group A5 and the prime p=5.

[F2]

A5 is simple, and A5≠{1} because ∣A5∣=60 (An is simple for every n≥5, [F1]).

[F3]

Sylow counting: n5(A5)≡1(mod5) and n5(A5)∣12, so n5(A5)∈{1,6} because the divisors of 12 are 1,2,3,4,6,12; and if n5(A5)=1 then the unique Sylow 5-subgroup is fixed by conjugation by every element of A5, hence is normal, of order 5, so nontrivial and proper, contradicting [F2]; therefore n5(A5)=6 and, whenever P∈Syl⁡5(A5), [A5:NA5(P)]=6 so ∣NA5(P)∣=10 (Sylow III: np≡1(modp) and np∣m when ∣G∣=pam with p∤m, Sylow II: in a finite group every p-subgroup lies in a conjugate of any Sylow p-subgroup, and the Sylow p-subgroups form a single conjugacy class, Sylow III*: np(G)=[G:NG(P)], The number np(G) of Sylow p-subgroups, Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation, Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G, [F1], [F2]).

[F5]

Automorphism group of a cyclic group of prime order: Aut⁡(P)≅(Z/5Z)× has order 4 ( Aut⁡(Cn)≅(Z/nZ)×, Group isomorphisms, automorphisms and the set Aut⁡(G)).

[F7]

Cycle signs and conjugations: a cycle of length k has sign (−1)k−1, and the sign is a homomorphism, so a 5-cycle and a product of two transpositions are even and lie in A5=ker⁡(sgn⁡); and for a cycle σ=(a0 a1 a2 a3 a4) and a permutation g one has gσg−1=(g(a0) g(a1) g(a2) g(a3) g(a4)) (A k-cycle has sign (−1)k−1, and sgn⁡(σ)=(−1)n−c(σ) when fixed points are counted as cycles, The sign is a homomorphism Sn→{+1,−1}, surjective exactly when n≥2, The alternating group An=ker⁡(sgn⁡) of even permutations, Conjugating a cycle relabels each entry: g(a1 … ak)g−1=(g(a1) … g(ak))).

[F8]

Automizer criterion: for a finite group G, a prime p and P∈Syl⁡p(G), the group G has a normal p-complement if and only if NG(Q)/CG(Q) is a p-group for every Q with 1≠Q≤P (Frobenius automizer criterion for p nilpotence, Normal p complement and p nilpotent group).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

By [F1] and [F3], ∣A5∣=60=5⋅12 and the exact power of 5 dividing ∣A5∣ is 5; so a Sylow 5-subgroup has order 5, and a group of order 5 is cyclic by [F4]. Moreover n5(A5)=6. This is assertion 1.

F1F3F4
2.1

Put σ:=(0 1 2 3 4) and P:=⟨σ⟩≤A5. By [F7] the 5-cycle σ is even, so σ∈A5; P has order 5 because σ has order 5; hence P∈Syl⁡5(A5) by step 1.1, and P={id⁡,σ,σ2,σ3,σ4} is abelian.

F4F7step 1.1
3.1

Put t:=(1 4)(2 3). By [F7] the sign of each transposition is −1, so t has sign (−1)2=1 and t∈A5. By the conjugation formula of [F7], tσt−1=(t(0) t(1) t(2) t(3) t(4))=(0 4 3 2 1)=σ−1, which lies in P; hence t∈NA5(P).

F7step 2.1
4.1

Moreover t∉CA5(P): if t centralized P then in particular tσt−1=σ, but step 3.1 gives tσt−1=σ−1, and σ−1≠σ because σ has order 5≠2 so σ2≠id⁡, whereas σ−1=σ would give σ2=id⁡. Hence NA5(P)≠CA5(P).

F4step 3.1
5.1

By [F6] the quotient NA5(P)/CA5(P) is isomorphic to a subgroup of Aut⁡(P), so its order divides 4 by [F5]; it also divides ∣NA5(P)∣=10 by [F3] and [F6]. Since it is not 1 by step 4.1, its order divides gcd⁡(4,10)=2 and is >1; hence ∣NA5(P)/CA5(P)∣=2, and this group is cyclic of order 2, that is NA5(P)/CA5(P)≅C2. This is assertion 3.

F3F5F6step 4.1
6.1

The group C2 has order 2, which is not a power of the prime 5; so the automizer of the nontrivial 5-subgroup P≤P is not a 5-group, and the criterion [F8] fails in its second condition; therefore A5 has no normal 5-complement. This is assertion 2.

F4F8step 5.1
7.1

The same conclusion follows directly from simplicity: a normal 5-complement would be a normal subgroup of index 5, hence a proper nontrivial normal subgroup of A5, contradicting [F2].

F1F2step 6.1
8.1

Combining: the Sylow 5-subgroup P is cyclic by assertion 1, yet A5 has no normal 5-complement by steps 6.1 and 7.1, while its automizer NA5(P)/CA5(P)≅C2 is not a 5-group by assertion 3. This is the announced counterexample, and it shows that cyclicity of the Sylow subgroup alone carries no normal p-complement. ∎

step 1.1step 5.1step 6.1step 7.1

Sources