Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Existence and boost-coordinate description of Hawking-flow heights

PDF p. 17: Proof of Lemma 3.4, before (3.9)

Statement

Adopt the regular stationary vacuum construction and stationary vacuum model, with T∣S≢0, maximal original exterior section Σ1, and mass normalized to one. Fix δ∈(0,1) and q∈[δ,1]. Assume an existing connected smooth spacelike maximal section Σq with boundary S, whose interior is the stationary graph t=uq(x) over Σ1∘ and satisfies the end hypotheses of the positive transformed-lapse result. Here the stationary product has T=∂t and Σ1∘={t=0}.

Let V be the common reference collar, K=T+ΩHZ its complete Hawking field on the stationary collar saturation, and κ>0 its normal boost rate. For every x∈V∖S there is exactly one real number uqK(x) such that ϕuqK(x)K(x)∈Σq. This height is smooth on V∖S and extends smoothly to S, for each fixed q.

More precisely, for the metric gq, let nˉq be the future unit normal of Σ1 at S and νˉq its unit normal to S pointing into its exterior. In a sufficiently small normal-exponential collar, the two sections have representations exp⁡ϑ(q)(r(cosh⁡αq νˉq+sinh⁡αq nˉq)) and exp⁡ϑ(q)(r(cosh⁡βq νˉq+sinh⁡βq nˉq)), respectively, with r≥0, ϑ∈S, and smooth rapidities αq,βq. At corresponding values of (r,ϑ), αq+κuqK=βq. Since αq(0,ϑ)=0, the boundary value is uqK∣S=βq(0,ϑ)/κ. The collar needed for these coordinates may depend on q; no uniform bound on the boundary values is asserted here.

The original-section maximality premise is imposed on the actual physical exterior section C=Σ0∩E for the original metric g, so Hg∣C=0. Where this result uses the original reference section Σ1, it denotes the closure B=C∪S of this actual section. Maximality of a separately labelled chart-side region or another supplied section is not substituted for this premise. The spherical identification and the physical stationary end chart remain independent. Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The model and regularity data provide the stationary spacetime, bifurcation sphere and stated maximal original section. A stationary graph is the image of x↦(uq(x),x) in the open stationary product; the supplied section is separately smooth up to its boundary. Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data

[F1]

The original stationary flow identifies the exterior with R×Σ1∘. On the common collar saturation, K and Z are complete commuting fields, Z is periodic, K=T+ΩHZ, and K is future timelike for gq along the complete K-orbits from V∖S. Remark 1.3: lapse bounds and stationary product Lemma 3.3: common spacelike reference collar Local Hawking and axial fields, boost and pole

[F2]

The lapse −gq(T,nq) of the supplied candidate section is positive in its interior. Its translates under the stationary isometry are spacelike graphs. Transformed lapse equation and bounds Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data

[F3]

At S, K=0 and the differential of its flow acts on the oriented normal plane by a boost of rapidity κs. The normal exponential map gives a tube around compact S in the smooth frame (nˉq,νˉq). The boost acts in this frame; smooth rapidity graphs for both sections, including the tilted candidate, are constructed in steps 2.1 and 3.1. Normal boost action and invariant two-forms at a fixed surface A compact spacelike surface has a normal exponential tube Circle-invariant normal coordinates linearize a bifurcate Killing boost

[F4]

A smooth equation with invertible derivative in its unknown block has a locally unique smooth solution in its remaining parameters. Apply this in charts, using local smooth extensions at a boundary. The parametrized implicit function theorem with Cᵏ regularity

[F5]

Continuous functions on closed intervals are Riemann integrable. Newton–Leibniz identifies the endpoint difference of a continuous function, differentiable in the interior, with the integral of its Riemann-integrable derivative extension. A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative

[F6]

A continuous parameter derivative on a compact rectangle can be passed through its Riemann integral, including one-sided derivatives at parameter endpoints. Integrals on [0,1] differ by at most the uniform error between their integrands. Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral Uniformly close integrable functions have integrals differing by at most the interval length times their uniform error

[F7]

A continuous real function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains its extrema. Closed Euclidean intervals are compact. An open neighborhood of a compact factor times a point contains a product neighborhood of that slice. For extrema on S, use the metric pulled back from the unit sphere under its supplied smooth spherical identification; its topology is the given compact topology of S. A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value Heine-Borel in ℝⁿ: with the Euclidean metric a subset of ℝⁿ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line Tube lemma: if K is compact and an open N ⊆ X × Z contains K × {z₀}, then N contains K × W for some open W ∋ z₀

[F8]
[F9]

For the original metric g1=g, the horizon-axis lemma identifies the local exterior in the normal tube Ξ1(ϑ,a,b)=exp⁡ϑ(1)(anˉ1+bνˉ1) as E∩O={b>∣a∣}. Its end is the designated stationary end, its two boundaries are those of the regularity definition, and its hypersurface is Σ0 with specified side B=C∪S. The original-product result supplies this smooth side, and its inward boundary-normal collar in the common reference collar has positive points in C⊂E, matching the lemma's side hypothesis. This is a statement about the original chronological exterior, not a claim that E is defined by the chronological sets of gq. Smooth transverse horizon branches are the null axes of the normal tube Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Remark 1.3: lapse bounds and stationary product Lemma 3.3: common spacelike reference collar

Proof

Given: The construction, fixed positive q, supplied candidate section, and collar in the Statement.

Goal: Prove unique intersection, interior smoothness, and the stated smooth boundary extension.

1.1givenA1F1F2F8

Put F(t,x)=t−uq(x). Its level sets are stationary translates of the spacelike candidate graph. The positive T-lapse fixes dF to be positive on future timelike vectors: dF(T)=1 and T has positive normal component. Thus dF(K)>0 on each complete orbit under consideration. The mean value theorem on every finite orbit-parameter interval shows that s↦F(ϕsKx) is strictly increasing.

1.2givenA1F1F3F9algebra

At y∈S, put By=(dK)y. Because K∣S=0, the connection term vanishes there, so this is ∇(q)K for every q, including the original member. It annihilates TyS and is invertible on each metric's normal plane by [F3]. Thus both normal planes equal the same rank-two image im⁡By. Their intersections with TyΣ1 are the same line. Both νˉq and νˉ1 point into the same actual reference side C, so νˉq=cqνˉ1 for some cq>0. The positive boost identities Byνˉq=κnˉq and Byνˉ1=κnˉ1 then give nˉq=cqnˉ1. Choose any local inward candidate-boundary curve γ(λ), with λ≥0, γ(0)=y and γ′(0) transverse to TyS, using its supplied embedded boundary parametrization. Decompose γ′(0)=ξ+Unˉq+Vνˉq, where ξ∈TyS. Subtracting ξ leaves a nonzero candidate tangent vector, so its spacelikeness gives V2−U2>0. The zero-section differential of the normal tubes identifies the derivatives of its original coordinates as a′(0)=cqU and b′(0)=cqV. For λ>0 sufficiently small, γ(λ) is in the stationary graph and hence in the original exterior E. By [F9], b(λ)>∣a(λ)∣. Divide by λ and take its one-sided limit to obtain V≥∣U∣; together with V2−U2>0 this gives V>0. The candidate therefore enters the positive-v side of the gq normal tube, where v is the coefficient of νˉq. The reference enters that side by its definition. Only the differentials of the two normal tubes at S have been compared; their coordinate maps are not identified away from S.

1.3F1F7

Commutation gives ϕsK=ϕsT∘ϕΩHsZ on the complete collar saturation. Since T=∂t and uq is independent of t, F(ϕsKx)=s+F(ϕΩHsZx). For a positive common period P of Z, the function a↦F(ϕaZx) is continuous on the nonempty compact metric interval [0,P] and is bounded there by [F7]. Periodicity extends that bound to every real a, hence to a=ΩHs. Thus F(ϕsKx) tends to opposite infinities as s→±∞.

2.1givenA1F3F4F5F6F7step 1.2

In the normal tube from [F3], write u for the coefficient of nˉq and v for that of νˉq. Projection of either spacelike section to (v,ϑ) has invertible derivative at S: its kernel would be a timelike tangent vector, whereas the section is spacelike. Apply [F4] to the projection of a local smooth extension of a boundary parametrization, obtaining u=w(v,ϑ) with w(0,ϑ)=0. Step 1.2 identifies the actual section side of each such graph as v≥0. Local uniqueness glues these graphs, and compactness and the product-neighborhood assertion in [F7] give a common smaller collar. Spacelikeness gives ∣∂vw(0,ϑ)∣<1, with no zero-slope requirement for the candidate. Define h(v,ϑ)=∫01∂vw(av,ϑ) da. For v>0, [F5] applied to a↦w(av,ϑ) gives w(v,ϑ)=vh(v,ϑ); at zero this identity still holds and h(0,ϑ)=∂vw(0,ϑ). On closed coordinate rectangles, successive applications of [F6] differentiate this integral in every parameter. These derivatives are jointly continuous: for any resulting continuous integrand H(a,p) and fixed p0, the open set ∣H(a,p)−H(a,p0)∣<η contains [0,1]×{p0}. Compactness of [0,1] and the tube lemma in [F7] make this bound uniform in a near p0, and the integral-error bound in [F6] gives continuity of its integral. Applying this to all derivative orders proves that h is jointly smooth, including at v=0 using the local smooth extensions.

2.2F4F8step 1.1step 1.3

Choose finite parameters with opposite signs of F(ϕsKx) using step 1.3. The intermediate value theorem on that closed parameter interval gives a zero, and strict increase from step 1.1 gives uniqueness. At the zero the derivative in s is dF(K)>0, so [F4] applied in interior charts gives smooth dependence of that zero on x. Uniqueness makes these local solutions agree, proving interior smoothness of uqK.

3.1F3F4F7F8step 2.1

For each section, [F7] on S gives m=max⁡ϑ∣h(0,ϑ)∣<1. Fix m<θ<1 and shrink by the tube lemma to obtain ∣h∣<θ on a common collar. Put R(v,ϑ)=v1−h(v,ϑ)2; then ∂vR(0,ϑ)=1−h(0,ϑ)2≥1−m2. A further use of the tube lemma gives ∂vR>c=121−m2>0 there. Choose ε>0 with the closed interval 0≤v≤ε in that collar. The mean value theorem gives strict increase and R(ε,ϑ)>cε; the intermediate value theorem gives the unique inverse v=b(r,ϑ) for 0≤r<cε. By [F4], this inverse is smooth, using local extensions also at zero. Thus the rapidity is arctanh⁡h(b(r,ϑ),ϑ), and the normal coordinates are u=rsinh⁡(rapidity), v=rcosh⁡(rapidity). This constructs the smooth functions αq and βq on a common smaller collar for the two sections. The reference tangent is νˉq, so its slope is zero and αq(0,ϑ)=0.

4.1F1F3F7step 3.1step 2.2∎

The K-flow fixes each ϑ∈S, is an isometry of gq, and commutes with the normal exponential map wherever the displayed expressions are defined. Its differential adds κs to normal rapidity while preserving r and ϑ. Consequently the local intersection of the two rapidity graphs occurs at s=(βq−αq)/κ. Their boundary values are bounded on S by [F7], and continuity and the tube lemma give bounded rapidities on a smaller collar. Throughout this bounded flow segment the normal-vector coefficients are bounded by a constant times r, so a further shrinking keeps the entire segment in the tube. This local intersection is the unique global intersection from step 2.2. Its smooth formula extends uqK to r=0 and gives uqK∣S=βq(0,ϑ)/κ.

Source notes

The article reference attributes the intersection and boundary-extension claims. The proof above uses the stated completed suppliers and does not infer uniform boundary estimates from smoothness for an individual q.

These premises specify the generated conditional scope and are not attributed to the original article. The substantive local horizon conclusions are retained. The immutable original extraction is unchanged; in particular, original Theorem 1.1 retains its unresolved source-assessment status.

Depends on

Used by · 6

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources