Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Thom Spectra and Unoriented Bordism Detection — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The companion collects four short computations illustrating the page's algebraic and homotopical inputs.

The first tabulates the admissible mod-two square monomials in degrees 0 through 4 together with three sample Adem reductions. The second exhibits the strict metastable Eilenberg–Mac Lane range for K(F2,3), where the endpoint i=3 is deliberately excluded. The third computes Sq3(U)=w3U in stable Thom cohomology and its rank-three and rank-two components, showing how instability kills the rank-two component. The fourth records the rational Hurewicz range for S4, an isomorphism in degrees 4, 5 and 6.

Every example depends only on items of the A page or on its published prerequisite closure, and none depends on another example.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Low-degree admissible Steenrod monomials

Example

Assume AC. The admissible bases in degrees 0–4 are respectively {1}, {Sq¹}, {Sq²}, {Sq³,Sq²Sq¹}, and {Sq⁴,Sq³Sq¹}. The Adem relations give Sq¹Sq¹=0, Sq¹Sq²=Sq³, and Sq²Sq²=Sq³Sq¹.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the admissible words of the mod-two square algebra in total degrees 0 through 4; and the three displayed composite pairs Sq1Sq1, Sq1Sq2, Sq2Sq2.

[F1]

The Adem-reduction lemma spans each homogeneous degree by admissible words, and the admissible composites form a basis of the square algebra in each degree (Adem reduction spans by admissible square composites, Admissible composites present the mod-two square algebra).

[F2]

The Adem relations hold in the square algebra for 0<a<2b, and the square algebra and its excess calculus are the local definition.

Verification

1.1givenF1

List the positive sequences of each total degree and retain those satisfying i_j≥2i_{j+1}; this gives exactly the displayed rows. The Adem-reduction item shows every other word reduces to an admissible combination.

2.1step 1.1F2algebra∎

The basis theorem proves the listed words are independent, so the table is a basis calculation rather than a dimension guess. Substitution in the displayed Adem relation gives the three sample reductions.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A strict metastable Eilenberg–Mac Lane range

Example

Assume AC. For K=K(F₂,3), H³(K;F₂)=F₂{ι₃}, H⁴(K;F₂)=F₂{Sq¹ι₃}, and H⁵(K;F₂)=F₂{Sq²ι₃}. The strict operation range has i<3; at degree 6 the polynomial presentation also has ι₃², so the endpoint is excluded.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the model K=K(F2,3); the strict metastable range i<3; and the low-degree admissible basis A0={1}, A1={Sq1}, A2={Sq2}.

[F1]

The strict metastable theorem identifies H~3+i(K;F2) with Ai for 0≤i<3 by evaluation on ι3 (Metastable cohomology of mod-two Eilenberg–Mac Lane spaces).

[F2]

The admissible composites form a basis of Ai in each degree (Admissible composites present the mod-two square algebra), and the full polynomial presentation of H∗(K;F2) gives the degree-six generators (Polynomial mod-two cohomology of Eilenberg–Mac Lane spaces).

Verification

1.1givenF1F2

The metastable theorem identifies each listed group with A^i by evaluation on ι₃. The low-degree admissible basis gives A⁰={1}, A¹={Sq¹}, A²={Sq²}; the normalized universal class and naturality identify the three images.

2.1step 1.1F1F2∎

The strict inequality excludes i=3, so the example does not extend the commissioned comparison range.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A Steenrod operation on the universal Thom class

Example

Assume AC, inherited from the cited bundle, cohomology, or operation suppliers. In stable mod-two Thom cohomology, Sq³(U)=w₃U. At rank 3, Sq³(u₃)=w₃(γ₃)u₃; at rank 2 the component is zero because w₃(γ₂)=0 and Sq³(u₂)=0 by instability.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the stable mod-two Thom cohomology module with its stable class U and component classes ur; the stable squares Sqi(U)=wiU; and the ranks 2 and 3.

[F1]

The stable-square lemma identifies every component of Sqi(U) with wi(γr)ur and proves compatibility under the inverse-system maps (Stable Steenrod squares on universal Thom cohomology); the top-square formula and instability govern the degree-two class u2, and w3(γ2)=0 for rank reasons.

Verification

1.1givenF1

The stable-square supplier identifies every component of Sq^i(U) with w_i(γ_r)u_r and proves compatibility under the inverse-system maps. The rank bound makes w₃(γ₂)=0; instability kills Sq³ on the degree-2 class u₂.

2.1step 1.1F1∎

At rank 3 the top-square formula agrees with the Thom identity.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The rational Hurewicz range for the four-sphere

Example

Assume AC. For S⁴, the rational Hurewicz map is an isomorphism in degrees 4, 5, and 6: π₄(S⁴)⊗Q≅H₄(S⁴;Q)≅Q, and both π_i(S⁴)⊗Q and H_i(S⁴;Q) vanish for i=5,6.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the standard based CW structure on S4 with one 0-cell and one 4-cell; the cell-pushing lemma for low-dimensional disks; and the sphere homology computation with coefficients in Q.

[F1]

The low-dimensional disk-pushing lemma deforms a based cube map of dimension j<4 into the 0-cell while fixing its boundary, so S4 is 3-connected (A low-dimensional disk can be pushed off a higher cell).

[F2]

The sphere homology computation with coefficient group Q gives the displayed rational homology groups (Homology of spheres), and the rational Hurewicz theorem applies with c=4 in the range c≤i≤2c−2, namely 4≤i≤6 (Rational Hurewicz for highly connected CW complexes).

[F3]

The rational sphere homotopy computation identifies πi(S4)⊗Q in that range (Rational sphere homotopy below the first unstable degree), and AC is inherited from the rational Hurewicz theorem (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

1.1givenF1F3

Give S⁴ its standard based CW structure with one 0-cell and one 4-cell. For each j=1,2,3, a based cubical representative f:Iʲ→S⁴ has boundary mapped to the 0-cell. Apply lem-a-low-dimensional-disk-can-be-pushed-off-a-higher-cell to the finite one-cell attachment (S⁴,*), with n=j<4. It deforms f into the 0-cell while fixing its boundary, so π₁(S⁴)=π₂(S⁴)=π₃(S⁴)=0. This writes out the one-cell connectivity argument using the published cell-pushing supplier; the stronger lem-high-relative-cells-do-not-change-lower-homotopy is also available in page 547's published prerequisite closure but is not needed as a direct dependency. cor-homology-of-spheres with coefficient group Q gives the displayed rational homology groups directly.

2.1step 1.1F2F3∎

Now apply the rational Hurewicz theorem with c=4; its range is c≤i≤2c−2, namely 4≤i≤6. The rational sphere lemma computes the three homotopy groups. The degree-4 map is the first-nonzero-degree Hurewicz isomorphism; in degrees 5 and 6 both sides vanish.

Sources