Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

8 results · all verified · 6 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Topological Vector Bundles and Grassmannian Classification — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples compute the real and complex clutching classes over circles and spheres, identify the projective tautological lines and the Hopf sign convention, and make the rank-zero and empty-base cases literal. Oriented two-plane bundles over S2 are indexed by winding number, with orientation reversal sending m to m.

The counterexamples mark both limits of the main results. Even the tautological line over the paracompact CW complex RP has no finite-rank complement, so compactness in the finite complement theorem is essential. Assuming AC, the tangent line of the smooth long line shows that local triviality over a CGWH base does not replace numerability in the stable Grassmannian classification.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

The Möbius and trivial real lines over the circle

Example

The two isomorphism classes of real line bundles over S1 are the product line and the Möbius line. In the clutching description S1=ΣS0, they are distinguished by whether the two transition values lie in the same or opposite components of GL1(R)=R×.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real line bundle over S1.

[F1]

Clutching over S1 is the component/orbit case for maps S0GL1(R), with disk-extending gauge changes (Clutching classifies vector bundles over spheres in the stable range).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Write S0={a,b}. A clutching map is a pair (g(a),g(b)) of nonzero real numbers. A gauge on either interval has boundary values in the same sign component, so the sign of g(a)g(b)1 is unchanged. Conversely, multiply by a constant gauge and use paths within R>0 or R<0 to normalize the pair to (1,1) or (1,1). Thus [F1] gives at most and at least these two classes.

F1algebra
2.1

For (1,1) the two trivial intervals glue their fiber coordinates without a sign change, producing S1×R. For (1,1), cut the circle at one equatorial point; the remaining interval bundle closes by (0,t)(1,t), which is the Möbius line. These two witnesses realize the normalized classes.

F1step 1.1construct
3.1

The invariant in step 1.1 has values +1 and 1 on the two witnesses in step 2.1, so they are not isomorphic; exhaustion in step 1.1 shows there are no others.

step 1.1step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Tautological lines over projective spaces

Example

For F=R or C, the tautological line γ1 over FPN has fiber the line represented by its base point. For finite N, its inclusion in FPN×FN+1 has Grassmannian classifying map the standard finite-stage inclusion

Gr1(FN+1)Gr1(F).

For N= this map is the identity of BO(1)=RP or BU(1)=CP.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F=R or C and NN{}.

[F1]

Gr1(FM) consists of lines in FM, and its tautological bundle has fiber that line (Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles).

[F2]

The stable Grassmannians are denoted BO(n) and BU(n) in the real and complex models, respectively (Real and complex vector bundles are classified by stable Grassmannians).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For finite N, by definition FPN is the quotient of FN+1{0} by nonzero scalar multiplication, so a point is exactly a line FN+1. Hence FPN=Gr1(FN+1), and the set {(,v):v} is exactly the tautological bundle in [F1]. For N=, both projective space and its tautological line are the filtered unions of these finite stages inside F; no expression F+1 is used.

F1given
2.1

For finite N, the displayed bundle inclusion sends its fiber over to the same line in FN+1F. Taking image planes therefore sends to itself under the standard finite-stage inclusion, and pulling back γ1 returns the original pairs (,v). At N= the same assertion is the identity on the filtered union.

F1step 1.1
3.1

For N=, the finite-stage inclusions unite to the identity on Gr1(F). The classifying-space notation in [F2] gives BO(1) and BU(1), while step 1.1 gives RP and CP. All identifications are direct and use no choice principle.

F1F2step 1.1step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

The Hopf line bundle over S² by clutching

Example

Identify S2 with CP1. With the upper-to-lower coefficient convention fixed on the A page, the map

g:S1GL1(C),g(z)=z,

clutches the tautological Hopf line γ. Interchanging the two disk charts changes the transition to z1 and gives the dual line γ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: CP1, split into the two affine closed disks along z=1.

[F1]

The clutching relation sends a plus-chart coefficient v to the minus-chart coefficient g(z)v; swapping charts inverts g (Clutching construction for bundles over a suspension).

[F2]

The tautological line has fiber the represented line in C2 (Tautological lines over projective spaces).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

On the plus disk use points [z:1], z1, and the tautological frame s+(z)=(z,1). On the minus disk use [1:w], w1, with w=z1 on the equator, and frame s(w)=(1,w). These vectors span the represented lines by [F2].

F2construct
2.1

For z=1, one has s+(z)=(z,1)=z(1,z1)=zs(z1). Thus a physical vector with plus coefficient v has minus coefficient zv. By [F1], the clutching function is exactly g(z)=z, not its inverse.

F1step 1.1algebra
3.1

Interchanging the plus and minus charts reverses the coordinate change, so [F1] gives g1(z)=z1. Dualizing a line bundle inverts its scalar transition functions, hence this second clutching is γ. This completes the sign calculation without a choice principle.

F1step 2.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

All complex vector bundles over the circle are trivial

Example

Every finite-rank complex vector bundle over S1 is trivial, including the rank-zero bundle. This contrasts with the nontrivial Möbius real line bundle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a rank-n complex vector bundle ES1, where n0.

[F1]

Clutching over S1 represents E by a map g:S0GLn(C), and homotopic clutching maps give isomorphic bundles (Clutching classifies vector bundles over spheres in the stable range).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose first that n>0. Every AGLn(C) has polar form A=UP with U unitary and P positive definite. The path U((1t)P+tI) joins A to U through invertible matrices. By the finite-dimensional spectral theorem, U=Wdiag(eiθ1,,eiθn)W for real angles θj, and Wdiag(ei(1t)θ1,,ei(1t)θn)W joins U to I. Hence GLn(C) is path connected.

constructalgebra
2.1

The two values of g can therefore be joined independently to I, producing a homotopy S0×IGLn(C) from g to the constant identity map. By [F1], E is isomorphic to the identity-clutched bundle, which is S1×Cn.

F1step 1.1
3.1

If n=0, then GL0(C) is a point and the same conclusion is forced. The real argument fails at step 1.1 because GL1(R)=R× has two components; the clutching values in different components give the Möbius line. No choice principle is used.

F1step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Rank-zero and empty-base vector-bundle classification

Example

For every space X, the rank-zero vector bundle is, up to its unique bundle isomorphism, XidX. Thus Vect0F(X) and [X,Gr0(F)] are singletons. If X= and n is arbitrary, the unique empty total-space bundle and the unique map from the empty space likewise give singleton classification sets.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a space X, a field F{R,C}, and a nonnegative integer n.

[F1]

A rank-n vector bundle is locally a projection U×FnU (Real and complex topological vector bundles).

[F2]

Gr0(FN) and Gr0(F) are one-point spaces carrying the zero tautological bundle (Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Let p:EX have rank zero. Every fiber is the one-element vector space F0={0} by [F1], so p is bijective. Each bundle chart is a homeomorphism p1(U)U×{0}U over U, and these local inverses glue to the inverse of p. Thus p is a bundle isomorphism to idX:XX, and any bundle map over X between two such bundles is forced fiberwise. There is exactly one rank-zero isomorphism class.

F1construct
2.1

By [F2], there is exactly one map XGr0(F) and exactly one homotopy class of such maps. Pulling back the zero tautological bundle gives the bundle in step 1.1, so the two singleton sets correspond.

F2step 1.1
3.1

Now let X= and allow any n. A map E exists only when E=, and local triviality is vacuous, so this is the unique rank-n bundle. There is also exactly one function from to Grn(F) and exactly one homotopy between any two such functions. Hence both classification sets are again singletons. No choice principle is used.

F1F2construct
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Oriented two-plane bundles over the two-sphere by winding number

Example

Oriented real two-plane bundles over S2 are indexed by the winding number mZ of their clutching map in π1(SO(2)). Reversing the chosen fiber orientation sends m to m.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: oriented rank-two real vector bundles over S2.

[F1]

Oriented rank-n bundles over Sk are classified by [Sk1,SO(n)], and reversing the chosen fiber orientation conjugates the clutching map by a reflection (Oriented clutching classifies oriented bundles over spheres).

[F2]

The degree map identifies the fundamental group of the circle with Z (Deg:π1(R/Z,[0])(Z,+) is an isomorphism).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The map R:R/ZSO(2) defined by R([t])=(cos(2πt)sin(2πt)sin(2πt)cos(2πt)) is a continuous group isomorphism with continuous inverse obtained from the oriented angle of the first column. Hence [F2] gives π1(SO(2),I)Z, with the class of tR([mt]) corresponding to m.

F2construct
2.1

Apply [F1] with n=k=2. Since SO(2) is path connected, the unbased set [S1,SO(2)] is identified with its fundamental group; it is abelian, so changing the path used to the basepoint causes no conjugacy ambiguity. Step 1.1 therefore assigns exactly one integer m to each oriented bundle, and every m is realized by clutching with tR([mt]). In particular m=0 gives the trivial oriented bundle.

F1step 1.1
3.1

Take the reflection r=diag(1,1). Direct multiplication gives rR([t])r1=R([t]). Thus the orientation-reversal action from [F1] sends the loop of winding m to the loop of winding m, as asserted. The calculation uses no choice principle.

F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14Open item page →

The tautological line over RP∞ has no finite-rank complement

Statement refuted

False claim: compactness may be omitted from the finite-rank complement theorem; in particular, every finite-rank bundle over a paracompact Hausdorff CGWH base has a finite-rank complementary bundle inside a finite trivial bundle.

Assume AC. The tautological real line γ over RP refutes this claim: there is no finite-rank bundle η such that γη is trivial.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the tautological line γRP.

[F1]

RP=Gr1(R), its tautological line is γ, and its stable classifying map is the identity (Tautological lines over projective spaces).

[F2]

Under AC, pullback along stable Grassmannian maps gives a bijection between homotopy classes of maps and numerable vector-bundle isomorphism classes; the proof also establishes that the stable Grassmannian is paracompact (Real and complex vector bundles are classified by stable Grassmannians).

[F3]

The Schubert cells give RP=Gr1(R) its stable weak CW structure (Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure).

[F4]

The standard CW structure on each RPm has one cell in each degree 0,,m, and every cellular differential is zero over F2 (Real projective space cellular homology and the pinch map).

[F5]

Cellular homology computes singular homology, naturally for cellular maps (Cellular homology computes singular homology), and homotopic maps induce the same singular-homology map (Homotopic maps induce the same map on singular homology).

[F6]

A CW complex is Hausdorff and has the weak topology with respect to its closed cells (CW complex with closure finiteness and weak topology); CGWH means compactly generated and weak Hausdorff (Compactly generated conventions for based homotopy).

[A1]

AC means that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

Counterexample

technique · contradiction
1.1

Suppose for contradiction that a rank-r bundle η satisfies γηRP×Rr+1. The inclusion of the first summand followed by this isomorphism is a fiberwise-linear embedding e:γRP×Rr+1.

assume-contraconstruct
1.2

The base is in the scope of [F2]. It is paracompact by [F2] and a Hausdorff CW complex by [F3] and [F6]. To see compact generation directly, if A pulls back to a closed set under every compact-Hausdorff test map, then its pullback under every characteristic disk is closed; since a characteristic disk surjects onto its closed cell and the latter is Hausdorff, A meets every closed cell in a closed set, so the weak topology makes A closed. Hausdorffness makes compact images closed, hence the space is also weak Hausdorff. Thus it is CGWH.

F2F3F6
1.3

The rank-one Schubert symbols in [F3] give exactly one cell in every nonnegative dimension, with RPm as the m-skeleton. By [F4], the differential between any two such cells is zero over F2, since it already occurs in a sufficiently large finite skeleton. Hence [F5] gives Hk(RP;F2)F2 for every k0, while Hk(RPr;F2)=0 for k>r.

F3F4F5
2.1

Send x to the image line e(γx)Rr+1. In a local nonzero frame s for γ, this line is represented by the continuous nonzero vector e(s(x)), so the resulting map f:RPGr1(Rr+1)=RPr is continuous and fγrγ. If j:RPrRP is the standard inclusion, then (jf)γγ.

F1step 1.1construct
3.1

The identity also pulls γ back to itself by [F1]. The injective direction of the classification bijection [F2], applied using step 1.2, therefore gives jfidRP. This is the sole use of AC in the counterexample.

F1F2A1step 1.2step 2.1
4.1

Put k=r+1. On Hk(;F2), the map (jf)=jf is zero because it factors through the zero group Hk(RPr;F2) from step 1.3. But [F5] and the homotopy in step 3.1 say that (jf) is the identity on the nonzero group Hk(RP;F2)F2, a contradiction.

F5step 3.1step 1.3
5.1

Therefore the assumed finite-rank complement η cannot exist. The witness is paracompact Hausdorff and CGWH by step 1.2, so it specifically shows that those hypotheses do not replace compactness in the finite-rank complement theorem.

step 1.1step 1.2step 4.1discharge-contradiction
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Vector-bundle classification can fail without numerability

Statement refuted

False claim: every locally trivial rank-one real vector bundle over a CGWH base is pulled back from the tautological line over Gr1(R).

Assume AC. The tangent line bundle of the smooth long line is a counterexample.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the smooth long line L, and its tangent line bundle TL.

[F1]

Nyikos, Topology Proceedings 4 (1979), printed pp.271–272, states that the long line L is a connected Hausdorff differentiable one-manifold and is nonmetrizable. Being a Hausdorff one-manifold, it is locally compact and hence CGWH; it is outside the library's second-countable manifold convention.

[F2]

Under AC, every numerable real vector bundle admits a continuous positive-definite fiber inner product; with a supplied numeration the displayed weighted metric construction is choice-free (Numerable vector bundles admit bundle metrics).

[F3]

Under AC, the tautological bundle over the stable Grassmannian is numerable, and every pullback of its numeration is numerable (Real and complex vector bundles are classified by stable Grassmannians).

[A1]

AC means that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The tangent projection TLL is a locally trivial rank-one real vector bundle: its linear charts are the derivatives of the smooth coordinate charts on the one-manifold L. The base is CGWH and fails only the library's separate second-countability convention, by [F1]. Thus TL satisfies exactly the topological hypotheses in the false claim.

F1construct
1.2

Suppose TL were numerable. By [F2] it would have a continuous positive-definite fiber inner product g. We show directly that such a g metrizes L. Any two points of the connected one-manifold L can be joined by a piecewise smooth path: the points reachable from a fixed point by finite chains of coordinate intervals form a nonempty open-and-closed set. Define dg(p,q) as the infimum of the g-lengths of these paths. It is finite, symmetric, and satisfies the triangle inequality.

F1F2
2.1

To prove positivity and identify the topology, fix pq and choose a coordinate interval U about p, not containing q, with a smaller closed coordinate interval KU whose interior contains p. In the coordinate t, write g=a(t)dt2. On compact K, continuity and positivity give 0<maM. Every path from p to q must first leave K, so its coordinate variation before leaving is at least the positive coordinate distance from p to K; its length is therefore bounded below by that distance times m. Thus dg(p,q)>0. Conversely, within a still smaller coordinate interval, straight coordinate segments have length at most M times their coordinate displacement, while the preceding lower bound forces sufficiently small dg-balls to stay in any prescribed coordinate neighborhood. Hence dg induces exactly the topology of L, contradicting the nonmetrizability in [F1]. Therefore TL is not numerable. The implication from a supplied numeration to g, and this metric-topology argument, make no choices beyond the supplied data.

F1F2step 1.2algebracontradiction
3.1

By [F3], AC supplies a numeration of the tautological line γ1Gr1(R), and pulling this fixed numeration back along any map f:LGr1(R) gives a numeration of fγ1. Therefore TLfγ1 would contradict step 2.1. No such classifying map exists. This is the sole nonlocal use of AC, recorded by [A1]; the contradiction after a hypothetical numeration is choice-free.

F3A1step 2.1
4.1

Consequently the locally trivial rank-one bundle TL over the CGWH space L is the required witness, and the false claim fails precisely because it omitted numerability.

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1discharge-construct

Sources