How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite generator master equations and uniformization — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Complete Metrizability, Čech-Completeness, and Baire Category
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Conditional Distributions and Regular Conditional Probability
- Conditional Expectation
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Event observation, censoring, truncation
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite generator master equations and uniformization
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Independence Borel Cantelli and Zero One Laws
- Infinite Product Measures and Kolmogorov Extension
- Krylov Subspaces, Arnoldi and GMRES
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Lebesgue-Stieltjes Measures and Distribution Functions
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Markov Kernels and Markov Chains
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Matrix Norms, Condition Numbers and Numerical Stability
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Parametric survival and reliability
- Poisson and Cox point processes
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Probability Spaces Random Variables and Expectation
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Standard-Borel Real Codings and Determining Classes
- Statistical Experiments, Models and Identifiability
- Stochastic Reaction Jump Simulation and Coupling
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Integral Logarithm and the Equivalence of Its Characterisations
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples check the column convention in a two-state gate, compute a finite birth-death Poisson prefix with a geometric tail certificate, and track escaped mass for a countable immigration-death chain projected to two states. A final pair of finite-state laws shows that equal deterministic mean trajectories need not specify equal probability vectors.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Two-state gating through uniformization
Example
For an off/on gate, let the rate from off to on be and the rate from on to off be . With column probability vector and , the generator is
Starting off, if the exact on probability is ; if the gate remains off. The case gives no opening, while gives .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The states are off and on; the transition rates are from off to on and from on to off; the initial vector is .
Finite column generator: the source state indexes the column, off-diagonal entries are nonnegative, and columns sum to zero.
Finite master equation and uniformization formula: the unique master-equation solution equals the Poisson-weighted sum of for any admissible .
The scalar Poisson count law and Normalization, moments, and generating function of the Poisson count law: the Poisson weights sum to one and the mass at zero is .
Verification
The matrix in the Example has off-diagonal entries and both columns sum to zero, so it satisfies [F1]; its exit rates are and .
Suppose and choose . Then . Both columns equal the probability vector . Therefore and , which by induction gives for every .
By [F2], the on-coordinate at time is . By [F3] the sum of the masses over is , so . The off-coordinate is because the solution is a probability vector.
If , nonnegativity of implies , so and the master equation keeps fixed. If and , the formula gives ; if , it gives . The endpoint cases agree with the stated rates.
Three-state birth-death chain with a certified Poisson tail
Example
On states , take birth rates from to and from to , and death rates from to and from to . Starting from , the generator and a uniformization rate are
At , the Poisson parameter is . Truncating after gives
The exact omitted-mass identity is mathematical, while the upper bound is the certified geometric tail used by the algorithm.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The three-state rates in the Example, initial vector , time , uniformization rate , and truncation index .
Finite column generator: is the rate from source column to destination row , and a finite generator has nonnegative off-diagonal entries and zero column sums.
The scalar Poisson count law and Normalization, moments, and generating function of the Poisson count law: the Poisson weight at for parameter is , and the full set of weights sums to one.
Verification
The off-diagonal entries of are nonnegative and its columns sum to zero; its exit rates are . Thus [F1] holds, dominates every exit rate, and .
Starting from , successive multiplication by this gives , , , and . Each vector is obtained by multiplying the preceding vector by the displayed matrix.
By [F4], the first five Poisson weights at parameter are . Weighting the five vectors from through and adding coordinatewise gives and total retained mass . By normalization [F4], the exact omitted mass is . This subtraction is an exact identity, not a floating-point tail-estimation rule.
Applying [F3] with and gives . This upper bound is computed from a positive geometric majorant and does not use a floating-point subtraction.
Immigration-death chain projected onto two states
Example
Consider immigration at rate and death at rate from state , starting at . For , the cemetery lift on is
Writing the lifted law as , the exact cemetery mass is
It equals the probability of having exited by time and therefore is the exact embedded killed-vector error. A path can exit and return: has positive probability for every , so the full marginal at state can exceed the killed projection there.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: State space , immigration rate , death rate at state , initial state , and finite projection .
Finite-channel reaction propensity systems and their generator: a finite-channel reaction system has a countable state set, integer increments, finite propensities, and generator when that finite sum is defined.
A proper Lyapunov bound prevents reaction-network explosion: under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice, a proper with for finite implies that the constructed reaction process is nonexplosive.
Given countable nonexplosive pure-jump chain with finite rates: the countable chain used by the projection is already given and nonexplosive; the definition does not prove this from rates alone.
Killed finite-state projection and cemetery lift: the killed projection stays at after the first exit, and its finite lift adds the aggregate exit rate into the cemetery row.
Finite master equation and uniformization formula: a finite column generator evolves the initial column law by the unique solution of .
Finite-state killed projection has an exact lost-mass certificate: the cemetery mass equals the first-exit probability and the embedded killed-vector error.
Countable Choice and Dependent Choice are assumed only for the nonexplosion conclusion [F2]. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)
Verification
The system has two channels, increments and , and propensities and ; the death channel is inactive at , so every positive-propensity poststate remains in and the total rate is finite. Thus [F1] applies.
Let . Its sublevel set is finite for each integer , so is proper. For , ; at the same value satisfies this bound. Hence [F2] with and [A1] proves the immigration-death chain is nonexplosive, as required by [F3].
On , state jumps to at rate ; state jumps to at rate and exits to at rate . These off-diagonal rates are nonnegative, and the cemetery construction [F4] gives the displayed with zero column sums. Multiplying by the lifted probability vector gives , , and , with initial vector .
From we have ; differentiating and using yields , with and . The characteristic roots are and , so the unique solution is .
Since and , integrating the expression in step 2.1 gives the displayed formula for . By [F6], this coordinate is and equals the embedded killed-vector error.
Fix and choose ordered times . The joint density for jumps at , at , and at , followed by no further jump through , is , which is strictly positive; integrating this positive density over the nonempty ordered-time simplex gives positive probability. Such paths contribute to the full marginal at state but have already been killed at their first exit from .
Equal mean trajectories do not determine a master-equation state
Example
On states , compare with
both with initial vector . For the law stays . For it is
Both mean trajectories equal , so both obey the same deterministic mean equation , . For every the probability vectors differ. Thus an equation for the mean alone does not solve or determine the full master-equation state.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite state set , initial vector , and generators displayed in the Example.
Finite column generator: a finite column generator has nonnegative off-diagonal entries and every source column sums to zero.
Finite master equation and uniformization formula: the full probability vector is the unique solution of from its initial vector.
Verification
is a finite column generator, and the constant vector solves with the stated initial value. By [F2] it is the unique law, and its mean is .
The off-diagonal entries of are nonnegative and its columns sum to zero, so [F1] applies. Writing , its master equation is , , with initial values . Solving gives and ; direct differentiation verifies these formulas and their initial data, and [F2] makes this the unique law.
The mean under is , the same as the mean under , while has positive mass at for and has none. Thus the same mean trajectory corresponds to two different full distributions.