Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Static isotropic Einstein-fluid and supplied EOS model — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples specialize the A-page results to half compactness and to a half-capacity finite bath, and exhibit the divergence of central pressure as the constant-density compactness approaches its family endpoint. The star calculations remain within the specified constant-density model; the bath calculation remains within the adopted scalar exchange law. They report no measurement, generic compactness bound, causal fluid dynamics, or stability property of a relativistic star.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Half-compactness constant-density Einstein star

Physical scope

The explicit constant-density family at u=1/2, with its adopted vacuum exterior; not an observed star, realistic EOS, or generic compactness result.

Example

Specialize the constant-density family of Verified constant-density static star and vacuum exterior to u=1/2. Then a=12,P(0)ε0=2−13−2∈(0,1),eϕ(0)=3/2−12>0. At the surface, b(R)=1/2 and eϕ(R)=1/2. The prescribed vacuum exterior has M=MR, b(r)=1−R/(2r) and eϕ(r)=b(r) for r≥R.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact static star family and its equations from Verified constant-density static star and vacuum exterior, with the specialization u=1/2.

[F1]

Verified constant-density static star and vacuum exterior gives a=1−u, B(r)=1−ur2/R2, P(0)/ε0=(1−a)/(3a−1), eϕ(0)=(3a−1)/2, and the vacuum exterior b(r)=1−uR/r, eϕ=b.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

Substitution of u=1/2 gives a=1/2 and hence P(0)/ε0=(2−1)/(3−2). Both numerator and denominator are positive, and 2−1<3−2 because 2<2; thus the ratio lies strictly between zero and one. Also eϕ(0)=(3/2−1)/2>0, b(R)=a2=1/2, and eϕ(R)=a=1/2.

2.1F1step 1.1∎

With u=1/2, the exterior formula in [F1] becomes b(r)=1−R/(2r); it is positive for r≥R and has eϕ=b. The theorem supplies the matching and field-equation verification for this family, so this specialization is a finite, positive-pressure example within the adopted model.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Central pressure is unbounded at the constant-density branch limit

Physical scope

A counterexample within the explicit constant-density branch as u approaches 8/9 from below; no general Buchdahl theorem or claim about realistic matter.

Statement refuted

For fixed energy density ε0>0, there is a finite constant K0 such that every radius R>0 with u=8πGε0R2/(3c4)∈(0,8/9) in the constant-density family satisfies P(0)≤K0ε0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The constant-density family from Verified constant-density static star and vacuum exterior, including its strict range 0<u<8/9 and central-pressure formula.

[F1]

Verified constant-density static star and vacuum exterior states P(0)/ε0=(1−a)/(3a−1) with a=1−u for every 0<u<8/9; this is a family-specific formula, not a general compactness theorem.

Counterexample

Given: Fixed ε0>0, varying radii with u=8πGε0R2/(3c4)∈(0,8/9), the uniform-bound statement above, and the family-specific formula [F1].

1.1givenF1constructalgebra

For each integer n≥2, set un=8/9−1/n and Rn=c23un/(8πGε0)>0. Keep ρ0=ε0/c2 fixed and set Mn=4πρ0Rn3/3. Then 2GMn/(c2Rn)=8πGε0Rn2/(3c4)=un∈(0,8/9), so every (ρ0,Rn) is an admissible member of [F1] at the fixed density. Moreover an=1−un=1/9+1/n>1/3 and an↓1/3.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

By [F1], Pn(0)/ε0=(1−an)/(3an−1). The numerator tends to 2/3>0 and the denominator tends to 0 through positive values, so the ratios tend to +∞. Therefore no finite K0 can bound all ratios, refuting the displayed statement. At the limiting value u=8/9, the denominator is zero and the endpoint is not an admissible regular finite-pressure member.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Half-capacity bath attracts the selected exchange state

Physical scope

A single common-temperature point of the adopted finite-bath scalar exchange model with C_b=|C_G|/2; no causal transport or generic star-stability claim.

Example

At a selected subsystem state with T∗>0 and CG<0, choose the finite bath capacity Cb=∣CG∣/2 and bath energy Eb=E0+CbT∗. In the adopted scalar exchange model, the common-temperature state is a strict local entropy maximum and is locally exponentially attracting; its entropy curvature is Stot′′(x∗)=−1T∗2∣CG∣<0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-bath exchange theorem Finite bath stabilizes the selected negative-capacity exchange model and its adopted matched-temperature point.

[F1]

Finite bath stabilizes the selected negative-capacity exchange model gives Stot′′(x∗)=−T∗−2(1/CG+1/Cb) and the strict local maximum, forward-invariant local basin, exponential attraction, and entropy production L(Stot′)2≥0 whenever CG<0 and 0<Cb<∣CG∣.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

With Cb=∣CG∣/2, the bath capacity is positive and satisfies Cb<∣CG∣. Setting Eb=E0+CbT∗ gives Tb=(Eb−E0)/Cb=T∗, so the selected state is common-temperature as required in [F1].

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Since CG<0, 1/CG=−1/∣CG∣ and 1/Cb=2/∣CG∣. Hence [F1] gives Stot′′(x∗)=−1/(T∗2∣CG∣)<0 and its stated local exponential attraction and nonnegative entropy production. This is the specified exchange ODE, not a stellar evolution law.

Sources