Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Higher Homotopy Groups and Cofiber Sequences — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Calculations cover products, disk–boundary pairs, degree-map cones and wedge cofibers. Two explicit counterexamples show why basepoint transport and the cofibration hypothesis matter.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Higher homotopy groups of a product

Example

For based spaces X,Y and n≥1, πn(X×Y,(x0,y0))πn(X,x0)×πn(Y,y0), and their pointed component sets also correspond. No path-connectedness assumption is needed. For a concrete instance, take X=Y=R based at 0: the loop a(t)=(t(1t),2t(1t)) represents the pair of its two coordinate classes, and its product with b(t)=(3t(1t),0) has first-half value (2t(12t),4t(12t)) and second-half value (3(2t1)(22t),0).

Verification

Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1

Send [a] to ([pXa],[pYa]). Projecting a boundary-fixed homotopy gives boundary-fixed coordinate homotopies, so the map is well-defined. Conversely pair any representatives u,v to obtain (u,v):InX×Y, continuous by F1 and constant at (x0,y0) on the boundary. Pairing the two homotopies proves independence of representatives. The composites are the identity because projections of (u,v) are u,v and pairing the projections of a recovers a pointwise.

F1F2
2.1

Projection commutes with both half-cube formulas, hence the bijection is a homomorphism by F2. Two product points are joined by a path exactly when both coordinate pairs are joined: project a path in one direction and pair the two paths in the other using F1. This proves the component statement. In the displayed instance, substitution of 2t and 2t−1 gives exactly the two polynomial formulas; both equal (0,0) at their common endpoint t=1/2. The homotopy (1s)a(t) also contracts that particular loop, with both endpoints fixed.

F1F2step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Relative homotopy of a disk boundary pair

Example

For m≥2 and x0Sm1, πk(Dm,Sm1,x0)=0(1k<m),πm(Dm,Sm1,x0)Z. The positively oriented characteristic disk is the generator. For m=1, relative π1(D1,S0,x0) has exactly two elements as a pointed set, not an infinite cyclic group.

Facts & Assumptions

[F2]

The based-pair sequence is exact, including its pointed-set low tail. Long exact sequence of relative homotopy groups

[F3]

Lower-dimensional based sphere maps vanish, including the S0 path-component test. Lower-dimensional sphere maps are based nullhomotopic

[F4]

Sphere self-map degree classifies based homotopy and adds under concatenation. Based sphere maps are classified by degree

[F5]

Cubical and spherical based classes agree. Cubical and spherical models of higher homotopy agree

Verification

Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1

The homotopy H(x,t)=(1t)x+tx0 stays in the disk by convexity, is continuous by F1 and fixes x0. Applying it to any based cubical representative proves every positive absolute group of Dm trivial. Hence for k≥2 the exact segment 0πk(Dm,Sm1)πk1(Sm1)0 makes the boundary map an isomorphism.

F1F2
2.1

For 2k<m, apply F3 with source sphere dimension k−1 and target dimension m−1, using F5, to make the target of this isomorphism zero. For k=m, F4 identifies it with Z. Restricting the oriented characteristic map id:DmDm gives the oriented boundary identity, whose degree is +1. Thus its relative class is the asserted generator; for example when m=2 the boundary sends that disk to the once-traversed oriented circle, with coefficient 1.

F2F3F4F5step 1.1
3.1

For m≥2, F3 at source dimension zero makes Sm1 path-connected. The low tail 0=π1(Dm)π1(Dm,Sm1)π0(Sm1) then makes the relative pointed set a singleton by F2. For m=1, write the disk as [-1,1] and x0=1 (reflection gives the other case). A representative α starts at a∈{−1,1} and ends at 1. The interpolation (1s)α(t)+s((1t)a+t) is continuous, stays in the interval, and fixes both endpoints. Thus all representatives with the same a are equivalent. A relative homotopy cannot change a, since a continuous path into the discrete two-point set is constant. Representatives t1 and t2t1 therefore give exactly two classes.

F1F2F3step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Mapping cone of a degree d circle map

Example

For dZ let fd:R/ZR/Z, fd([t])=[dt]. Its unreduced mapping cone has H0=Z,H1=Z/dZ,H2=ker(d:ZZ),Hj=0 (j>2), and π1Z/dZ. For d=0, π1=H1=H2=Z; for d=±1 the fundamental group and reduced homology vanish. All homology coefficients here are integers.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The unreduced cone attaches the cone on the source circle to the target. Mapping cylinder and mapping cone

[F2]

Degree is the integral sphere-homology multiplier. Degree of a self map of an oriented sphere

[F3]

Local degree is the multiplier on the local oriented punctured-pair groups. Local degree at an isolated preimage

[F4]

Degree is the sum over a finite fibre. Global sphere degree is the sum of local degrees

[F5]

In dimension one identity, constant and reflection degrees are 1,0,−1. Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps

[F6]

The cellular boundary coefficient is the attaching incidence degree. Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix

[F7]

Cellular homology equals singular homology. Cellular homology computes singular homology

[F8]

An open path-connected cover with path-connected intersection gives the fundamental-group pushout. Seifert–van Kampen identifies the fundamental group with a group pushout

[F9]

The standard winding class identifies π1(R/Z) with Z. Deg:π1(R/Z,[0])(Z,+) is an isomorphism

Verification

Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1

The map h([t])=e2πit identifies the quotient circle with the unit circle: it is a continuous bijection, and inverse angular charts are continuous on arcs, including arcs crossing the quotient seam. Give it the counterclockwise orientation. Then hfdh1(z)=zd. For d>0 the fibre over 1 is e2πik/d, 0≤k<d. In positive angular coordinates at each preimage and at 1, the map is u↦du. Interpolating the positive coefficient d to 1 on a sufficiently small arc gives a homotopy of punctured pairs. Thus F3 identifies its local multiplier with that of an orientation-preserving circle rotation, namely +1 by the identity and rotation homotopy, or the singleton-fibre case of F4. For d<0 the same calculation reduces to angular reflection, whose degree is −1 by the circle clause of F5. Hence F4 gives degree d for every nonzero d. For d=0 the map is constant and F5 gives degree zero.

F2F3F4F5
1.2

For the fundamental group take U to be the target circle together with cone heights s<2/3, and V to be cone heights s>1/3 including its tip. They are open in the quotient, their union is the cone space, and their intersection is a circle times (1/3,2/3). U retracts to the target by decreasing height, V contracts to the tip by increasing height, and the intersection retracts to its circle. All are path-connected. Choose the basepoint at source [0], height 1/2 and transport to the target vertex along the height segment. The overlap generator maps to a^d in π1(U) by F9 and trivially in π1(V). Thus F8 gives the presentation aad=1=Z/dZ. This calculation does not infer H1 from π1.

F1F8F9
2.1

The cone on the source circle is the disk via [z,s](1s)z; its boundary at s=0 attaches by f_d. Thus the mapping cone has one vertex, one loop edge and one 2-cell. F2 and step 1.1 identify its attaching coefficient in F6 as d, so its cellular complex is 0ZdZ0Z0. Direct kernels and images give the stated H0,H1,H2 and vanishing above dimension two, and F7 identifies them with singular homology.

F1F2F6F7step 1.1
3.1

When d=0 the cellular map is zero, so H1=H2=Z and the group relation is empty. When d=±1 the cellular map is an isomorphism and the group relation kills a, giving the claimed vanishings. For instance d=−2 gives H1=π1=Z/2Z and H2=0. No inference of contractibility from these invariants is made.

step 2.1step 1.2
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Cofiber sequence of a wedge summand inclusion

Example

For well-pointed based CGWH spaces U,V, the summand inclusion UUV is a cofibration with quotient V. Its Puppe connecting map VΣU is based nullhomotopic. For example, the inclusion of the first circle in S1S1 has cofiber equivalent to the second circle and zero connecting map.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The wedge identifies the two basepoints and no other points. The wedge of a family of pointed spaces

[F3]

The cofiber is formed by attaching the reduced cone. Reduced cone suspension and cofiber sequence

[F4]

For a based cofibration collapsing its cone yields the quotient homotopy equivalence. Cofiber of a based cofibration is equivalent to the quotient

Verification

Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1

The inclusion U→U∨V is the pushout of the basepoint inclusion {* }→V along {* }→U. That inclusion is an unbased cofibration by well-pointedness, so F2 proves the claim. Collapsing U identifies the remaining V only at its existing basepoint, and compatible quotient maps in both directions give (UV)/UV. F4 consequently identifies its cofiber with V up to based homotopy.

F1F2F4
2.1

More explicitly that cofiber is CUV: the original U is the base of the attached cone. On CU use [u,s][u,s+tst] and keep V fixed. At t=0 this is the identity, at t=1 all of CU is the tip, and the basepoint track is fixed. The quotient-times-I construction in F2 makes this a continuous based deformation onto V. The cofiber projection to ΣU collapses all of V, so its composite with the inclusion V→CU∨V is identically the basepoint. Under this explicit inverse of the equivalence, the connecting map is therefore constant. For U=V=S1 this gives the stated two-circle instance.

F1F2F3F4step 1.1
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Unbased homotopic based maps need not induce the same based homotopy map without basepoint transport

Statement refuted

Freely homotopic based maps always induce equal endomorphisms of the fundamental group at the fixed basepoint.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A vertex inclusion in a finite CW complex has unbased HEP. Finite cw basepoints have explicit homotopy extension

[F2]

Moving homotopies induce the transport relation, with conjugation by the first-traversed loop. Higher homotopy basepoint transport and moving homotopies

[F3]

The fundamental group of the two-circle wedge is free on its two standard loops. The fundamental group of a finite wedge of circles is free of that rank

[F4]

Different reduced words are different elements of the free group. Reduced words form the free group on an alphabet

Counterexample

Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1

Let W be the wedge of two quotient circles, with vertex w and standard loops a,b. It has one vertex and two attached 1-cells, hence is a finite CW complex. By F1 the loop a:w×I→W extends to a homotopy H:W×IW with H(-,0)=id. Set g=H(-,1). Since a(0)=a(1)=w, both id and g are based; H is a free homotopy between them with basepoint track a.

F1F3
2.1

F2 gives id=βag and βa(c)=aca1. Applying it to b and multiplying in the free group yields g(b)=a1ba. By F3 and F4 this is the reduced three-letter word a inverse, b, a; it has no adjacent cancellation and differs from the one-letter reduced word b. Therefore gid, although the maps are freely homotopic.

F2F3F4step 1.1
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

An arbitrary subspace inclusion need not be a cofibration

Statement refuted

Every subspace inclusion is a cofibration, even when the subspace is closed.

Facts & Assumptions

Counterexample

Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1

Take X={0}{1/n:n1}R and A={0}. The complement of A is open in X, since each point 1/n is isolated, so A is closed. Every path in X is constant: if two of its values differ, an irrational strictly between them would be a value of the composite real-valued path on the subinterval between those times by F3, but X contains only rational numbers.

F2F3
2.1

If A→X had HEP, use target S=X×{0}{0}×I, initial map x↦(x,0), and homotopy (0,t)↦(0,t). F1 would give R:X×IS fixing those prescribed points. Its first coordinate along {1/n}×I is a path in X starting at 1/n and therefore constant by step 1.1. The only point of S with first coordinate 1/n is (1/n,0); hence R(1/n,1)=(1/n,0) for every n.

F1F2step 1.1
3.1

But (1/n,1)(0,1) in X×I. Continuity would make the second coordinates of their R-images converge to the second coordinate of R(0,1)=(0,1), namely 1. They are all zero by step 2.1, a contradiction. Thus this explicit closed inclusion is not a cofibration.

F1F2step 2.1

Sources