How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Higher Homotopy Groups and Cofiber Sequences — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Covering Spaces and Lifting
- Cw Complexes and Cellular Homology
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Groups and Presentations
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Free Products and Amalgamation
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Higher Homotopy Groups and Cofiber Sequences
- Homology Axioms Degree and Classical Applications
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Metric Spaces
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Relative Homology Excision and Mayer Vietoris
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Simplicial Subdivision and Simplicial Approximation
- Singular Chains and Singular Homology
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Fundamental Group
- The Fundamental Group of the Circle
- The Seifert–van Kampen Theorem
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
Calculations cover products, disk–boundary pairs, degree-map cones and wedge cofibers. Two explicit counterexamples show why basepoint transport and the cofibration hypothesis matter.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Higher homotopy groups of a product
Example
For based spaces X,Y and n≥1, and their pointed component sets also correspond. No path-connectedness assumption is needed. For a concrete instance, take X=Y=R based at 0: the loop represents the pair of its two coordinate classes, and its product with has first-half value and second-half value .
Facts & Assumptions
A product-valued map is continuous exactly when both coordinates are continuous. A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice
Projections act by based postcomposition and preserve cubical products. Higher homotopy groups are functorial and based homotopy invariant
Verification
Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.
Send [a] to . Projecting a boundary-fixed homotopy gives boundary-fixed coordinate homotopies, so the map is well-defined. Conversely pair any representatives u,v to obtain , continuous by F1 and constant at (x0,y0) on the boundary. Pairing the two homotopies proves independence of representatives. The composites are the identity because projections of (u,v) are u,v and pairing the projections of a recovers a pointwise.
Projection commutes with both half-cube formulas, hence the bijection is a homomorphism by F2. Two product points are joined by a path exactly when both coordinate pairs are joined: project a path in one direction and pair the two paths in the other using F1. This proves the component statement. In the displayed instance, substitution of 2t and 2t−1 gives exactly the two polynomial formulas; both equal (0,0) at their common endpoint t=1/2. The homotopy also contracts that particular loop, with both endpoints fixed.
Relative homotopy of a disk boundary pair
Example
For m≥2 and , The positively oriented characteristic disk is the generator. For m=1, relative has exactly two elements as a pointed set, not an infinite cyclic group.
Facts & Assumptions
A straight-line homotopy into the convex disk is continuous. For continuous maps into a convex subset of , the straight-line formula defines a continuous homotopy
The based-pair sequence is exact, including its pointed-set low tail. Long exact sequence of relative homotopy groups
Lower-dimensional based sphere maps vanish, including the S0 path-component test. Lower-dimensional sphere maps are based nullhomotopic
Sphere self-map degree classifies based homotopy and adds under concatenation. Based sphere maps are classified by degree
Cubical and spherical based classes agree. Cubical and spherical models of higher homotopy agree
Verification
Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.
The homotopy stays in the disk by convexity, is continuous by F1 and fixes x0. Applying it to any based cubical representative proves every positive absolute group of trivial. Hence for k≥2 the exact segment makes the boundary map an isomorphism.
For , apply F3 with source sphere dimension k−1 and target dimension m−1, using F5, to make the target of this isomorphism zero. For k=m, F4 identifies it with Z. Restricting the oriented characteristic map gives the oriented boundary identity, whose degree is +1. Thus its relative class is the asserted generator; for example when m=2 the boundary sends that disk to the once-traversed oriented circle, with coefficient 1.
For m≥2, F3 at source dimension zero makes path-connected. The low tail then makes the relative pointed set a singleton by F2. For m=1, write the disk as [-1,1] and x0=1 (reflection gives the other case). A representative α starts at a∈{−1,1} and ends at 1. The interpolation is continuous, stays in the interval, and fixes both endpoints. Thus all representatives with the same a are equivalent. A relative homotopy cannot change a, since a continuous path into the discrete two-point set is constant. Representatives and therefore give exactly two classes.
Mapping cone of a degree d circle map
Example
For let , . Its unreduced mapping cone has and . For d=0, ; for d=±1 the fundamental group and reduced homology vanish. All homology coefficients here are integers.
Facts & Assumptions
The unreduced cone attaches the cone on the source circle to the target. Mapping cylinder and mapping cone
Degree is the integral sphere-homology multiplier. Degree of a self map of an oriented sphere
Local degree is the multiplier on the local oriented punctured-pair groups. Local degree at an isolated preimage
Degree is the sum over a finite fibre. Global sphere degree is the sum of local degrees
In dimension one identity, constant and reflection degrees are 1,0,−1. Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps
The cellular boundary coefficient is the attaching incidence degree. Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix
Cellular homology equals singular homology. Cellular homology computes singular homology
An open path-connected cover with path-connected intersection gives the fundamental-group pushout. Seifert–van Kampen identifies the fundamental group with a group pushout
The standard winding class identifies π1(R/Z) with Z. is an isomorphism
Verification
Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.
The map identifies the quotient circle with the unit circle: it is a continuous bijection, and inverse angular charts are continuous on arcs, including arcs crossing the quotient seam. Give it the counterclockwise orientation. Then . For d>0 the fibre over 1 is , 0≤k<d. In positive angular coordinates at each preimage and at 1, the map is u↦du. Interpolating the positive coefficient d to 1 on a sufficiently small arc gives a homotopy of punctured pairs. Thus F3 identifies its local multiplier with that of an orientation-preserving circle rotation, namely +1 by the identity and rotation homotopy, or the singleton-fibre case of F4. For d<0 the same calculation reduces to angular reflection, whose degree is −1 by the circle clause of F5. Hence F4 gives degree d for every nonzero d. For d=0 the map is constant and F5 gives degree zero.
For the fundamental group take U to be the target circle together with cone heights s<2/3, and V to be cone heights s>1/3 including its tip. They are open in the quotient, their union is the cone space, and their intersection is a circle times (1/3,2/3). U retracts to the target by decreasing height, V contracts to the tip by increasing height, and the intersection retracts to its circle. All are path-connected. Choose the basepoint at source [0], height 1/2 and transport to the target vertex along the height segment. The overlap generator maps to a^d in π1(U) by F9 and trivially in π1(V). Thus F8 gives the presentation . This calculation does not infer H1 from π1.
The cone on the source circle is the disk via ; its boundary at s=0 attaches by f_d. Thus the mapping cone has one vertex, one loop edge and one 2-cell. F2 and step 1.1 identify its attaching coefficient in F6 as d, so its cellular complex is . Direct kernels and images give the stated H0,H1,H2 and vanishing above dimension two, and F7 identifies them with singular homology.
When d=0 the cellular map is zero, so H1=H2=Z and the group relation is empty. When d=±1 the cellular map is an isomorphism and the group relation kills a, giving the claimed vanishings. For instance d=−2 gives H1=π1=Z/2Z and H2=0. No inference of contractibility from these invariants is made.
Cofiber sequence of a wedge summand inclusion
Example
For well-pointed based CGWH spaces U,V, the summand inclusion is a cofibration with quotient V. Its Puppe connecting map is based nullhomotopic. For example, the inclusion of the first circle in has cofiber equivalent to the second circle and zero connecting map.
Facts & Assumptions
The wedge identifies the two basepoints and no other points. The wedge of a family of pointed spaces
Pushouts preserve cofibrations. Pushouts and products preserve the cofibrations used here
The cofiber is formed by attaching the reduced cone. Reduced cone suspension and cofiber sequence
For a based cofibration collapsing its cone yields the quotient homotopy equivalence. Cofiber of a based cofibration is equivalent to the quotient
Verification
Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.
The inclusion U→U∨V is the pushout of the basepoint inclusion {* }→V along {* }→U. That inclusion is an unbased cofibration by well-pointedness, so F2 proves the claim. Collapsing U identifies the remaining V only at its existing basepoint, and compatible quotient maps in both directions give . F4 consequently identifies its cofiber with V up to based homotopy.
More explicitly that cofiber is : the original U is the base of the attached cone. On CU use and keep V fixed. At t=0 this is the identity, at t=1 all of CU is the tip, and the basepoint track is fixed. The quotient-times-I construction in F2 makes this a continuous based deformation onto V. The cofiber projection to ΣU collapses all of V, so its composite with the inclusion V→CU∨V is identically the basepoint. Under this explicit inverse of the equivalence, the connecting map is therefore constant. For U=V=S1 this gives the stated two-circle instance.
Unbased homotopic based maps need not induce the same based homotopy map without basepoint transport
Statement refuted
Freely homotopic based maps always induce equal endomorphisms of the fundamental group at the fixed basepoint.
Facts & Assumptions
A vertex inclusion in a finite CW complex has unbased HEP. Finite cw basepoints have explicit homotopy extension
Moving homotopies induce the transport relation, with conjugation by the first-traversed loop. Higher homotopy basepoint transport and moving homotopies
The fundamental group of the two-circle wedge is free on its two standard loops. The fundamental group of a finite wedge of circles is free of that rank
Different reduced words are different elements of the free group. Reduced words form the free group on an alphabet
Counterexample
Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.
Let W be the wedge of two quotient circles, with vertex w and standard loops a,b. It has one vertex and two attached 1-cells, hence is a finite CW complex. By F1 the loop a:w×I→W extends to a homotopy with H(-,0)=id. Set g=H(-,1). Since a(0)=a(1)=w, both id and g are based; H is a free homotopy between them with basepoint track a.
F2 gives and . Applying it to b and multiplying in the free group yields . By F3 and F4 this is the reduced three-letter word a inverse, b, a; it has no adjacent cancellation and differs from the one-letter reduced word b. Therefore , although the maps are freely homotopic.
An arbitrary subspace inclusion need not be a cofibration
Statement refuted
Every subspace inclusion is a cofibration, even when the subspace is closed.
Facts & Assumptions
HEP applies to every target and compatible initial map and homotopy. Cofibration and homotopy extension property
The subspace topology is inherited by taking traces of open sets. Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
A continuous real function on an interval takes every value between two of its values. Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on takes every value between and
Counterexample
Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.
Take and A={0}. The complement of A is open in X, since each point 1/n is isolated, so A is closed. Every path in X is constant: if two of its values differ, an irrational strictly between them would be a value of the composite real-valued path on the subinterval between those times by F3, but X contains only rational numbers.
If A→X had HEP, use target , initial map x↦(x,0), and homotopy (0,t)↦(0,t). F1 would give fixing those prescribed points. Its first coordinate along {1/n}×I is a path in X starting at 1/n and therefore constant by step 1.1. The only point of S with first coordinate 1/n is (1/n,0); hence for every n.
But in . Continuity would make the second coordinates of their R-images converge to the second coordinate of , namely 1. They are all zero by step 2.1, a contradiction. Thus this explicit closed inclusion is not a cofibration.