Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Cyclotomic Hecke and Quiver Hecke Algebras — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Objective. This companion page works the smallest nontrivial instances of the cyclotomic Hecke/KLR dictionary of cyclotomic-hecke-and-quiver-hecke-algebras and records its boundary phenomena: the homogeneous degree check for the corrected KLR braid relation (including the e=2 double-edge case), the degenerate level-one map for S3, the rank-two level-one cyclotomic KLR algebra at e=3, and the counterexample showing that the whole affine Hecke algebra is not one cyclotomic KLR block. All computations are finite and explicit over the stated fields.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Homogeneous degree check for the corrected KLR braid relation

Example

In the specialized cyclotomic KLR algebra of The type-A cyclotomic specialization of the QG-KLR algebras use the grading deg⁡e(i)=0, deg⁡yr=2, deg⁡ψre(i)=−air,ir+1 (The KLR grading and the diagrammatic multiplication). Fix a triple i=(ir,ir+1,ir+2) and put d(i):=−airir+1−airir+2−air+1ir+2, the degree of both three-crossing words ψrψr+1ψre(i) and ψr+1ψrψr+1e(i), computed on the successive permuted colour pairs. Then both sides of the corrected braid relation are homogeneous of degree d(i) and the correction term has the same degree: it is ±1 (degree 0) when ir+2=ir→ir+1 or ir+2=ir←ir+1, it is yr+yr+2−2yr+1 (degree 2) when ir+2=ir⇄ir+1 (the e=2 double edge), and it is 0 otherwise. In particular the single-edge corrected braid relations have degree 0 and the e=2 double-edge corrected braid relation has degree 2; both match the two sides.

Verification

technique · direct

Given: The specialized cyclotomic KLR algebra with the grading above, a

fixed colour triple i, and the cyclic Cartan entries (amm=2,

am,m±1=−1 for e≥3, and a01=a10=−2 for e=2).

1.1givenalgebra

The common degree of the two words. The three crossings of ψrψr+1ψre(i) cross the colour pairs (ir,ir+1), (ir,ir+2), (ir+1,ir+2) of the successive permuted sequences, so its degree is d(i); the other braid word has the same multiset of crossed pairs, hence the same degree d(i).

1.2givenalgebra

The four cases of the correction. Substituting the cyclic Cartan entries: (a) if ir+2=ir→ir+1 then d(i)=−(−1)−2−(−1)=0 and the correction is +1; (b) if ir+2=ir←ir+1 then d(i)=0 and the correction is −1; (c) if e=2 and ir+2=ir⇄ir+1, then airir+1=air+1ir+2=−2 and airir+2=a00=2, so d(i)=2+2−2=2, matching the degree 2 of yr+yr+2−2yr+1; (d) in all other cases the correction is 0. This is the source's case list, and the nonzero correction requires equal outer colours, while zero corrections remain homogeneous without asserting that their degree is zero.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Conclusion. In each nonzero case the correction term has degree d(i), equal to the common degree of the two braid words computed in step 1.1; in the remaining cases the correction vanishes, so the identity is homogeneous at degree d(i). Hence the single-edge corrected braid relations have degree 0 and the e=2 double-edge corrected braid relation has degree 2, both matching the two sides. The displayed source word order is ψrψr+1ψr−ψr+1ψrψr+1, which equals the native opposite-order τ-difference under ψ=−τ. No choice is used.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The degenerate level-one Hecke–KLR map for S_3

Example

Work over F=F3 with q=1 (so e=3), Λ=Λ0 at level one and d=3: then H3Λ≅F3S3 (Cyclotomic Hecke algebras of level one are finite Hecke algebras, Affine and cyclotomic type-A Hecke algebras) and exactly one block is nonzero, namely α=α0+α1+α2 with eα=1 (Residue-sequence idempotents and cyclotomic Hecke blocks). The residue sequences realised by standard tableaux all have residue multiset {0,1,2}. The degenerate KLR generators are the elements yr=∑i(xr−ir)e(i) with xr the Jucys–Murphy elements of F3S3 (so x1=0, x2=(12), x3=(13)+(23)) and ψr=∑iφrqr(i)−1e(i) with φr=sr+pr(i) and pr(i)=(ir−ir+1+yr−yr+1)−1 on unequal components (Cyclotomic Hecke intertwiners and local power series, Hecke intertwiners produce the local KLR generators). In this block the mixed relations ψ1y2e(i)=y1ψ1e(i)+e(i) for i1=i2 and ψ1y2e(i)=y1ψ1e(i) for i1≠i2, and the quadratic relation ψ12e(i)=(y2−y1)e(i) for i1→i2, are explicit identities in the six-dimensional algebra F3S3.

Verification

technique · direct

Given: The group algebra F3S3 with the transpositions

c=(12), s=(23), a=(13), the additive Jucys–Murphy elements

x1=0, x2=c, x3=(13)+(23), and the level-one conventions of the

Statement.

1.1givenalgebra

The two residue projectors and the y-values. Put C=c+a+s. Group multiplication in F3S3 gives C2=0, because the three squares contribute 3=0 and the six cross products contribute three copies of each 3-cycle; and Cc=Cs=1+(123)+(132). Put e+=(1+c)/2 and e−=(1−c)/2; since c2=1 and 2 is invertible in F3, these are idempotents, and they are the actual joint CRT projectors e(0,1,2) and e(0,2,1) of the two standard residue words. With x3=C−c one computes y1=y2=0 and y3=C: indeed (c−1)e+=(c−1)(1+c)/2=0, (c−2)e−=(c+1)(1−c)/2=0, and x3−i3 equals C on both projectors. All other residue words vanish, and both projectors are nonzero by the group basis.

1.2givenalgebra

There is exactly one block. The full center has basis 1, C, 1+(123)+(132) and its augmentation ideal is spanned by the last two elements, with (1+(123)+(132))2=0 and C(1+(123)+(132))=0; hence the augmentation ideal is square-zero and contains no nonzero idempotent. Therefore the only central idempotents are 0 and 1, so F3S3 is a single block and the two projectors combine as eα=e++e−=1.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

The ψ-generators and the explicit identities. For the explicit source choice of the power series, ψ1=0. On e+ one has p2=−1+C and q2=−1; on e− one has p2=1+C and q2=1. Thus ψ2e+=(1−s−C)e+ and ψ2e−=(s+1+C)e−. Direct group multiplication using c2=s2=1 and csc=scs gives ψ2e+=e−ψ2, ψ2e−=e+ψ2, ψ22e+=Ce+, ψ22e−=−Ce−, and Cψ2=ψ2C=0. These are exactly the claimed mixed and quadratic identities with y3=C and y2=0; the first-crossing mixed identities vanish on every surviving unequal-colour word, equal-first-colour words are absent, so the universal equal-colour formula also holds. The six group elements 1,c,s,cs,sc,csc give dimension 6, with no primitive-block citation or Hecke-basis dimension loop hidden.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The level-one rank-two cyclotomic KLR algebra at e=3

Example

Let F be algebraically closed of characteristic ≠3, let q∈F× be a primitive cube root of unity (so e=3), let Λ=Λ0 (level one) and d=2. Then:

(i) for i=(i1,i2)∈I2 the cyclotomic relation is y1δi1,0e(i)=0; thus y1e(i)=0 for the three sequences with i1=0, and e(i)=0 for all six sequences with i1≠0, because their exponent is zero and y10e(i)=e(i);

(ii) ψ12e(i) equals 0 if i1=i2, equals (y2−y1)e(i) if i2=i1+1 and equals (y1−y2)e(i) if i2=i1−1; for e=3 these are all cases;

(iii) the nonzero blocks of H2Λ are exactly Hα0+α1Λ and Hα0+α2Λ; both are one dimensional, with e((0,1))≠0 in the first (the block of the trivial module of HF,q(S2)) and e((0,2))≠0 in the second (the block of the sign module); the other four α-blocks of height 2 are zero (Residue-sequence idempotents and cyclotomic Hecke blocks, The type-A cyclotomic specialization of the QG-KLR algebras).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: F algebraically closed of characteristic ≠3, a primitive cube

root q, Λ=Λ0, d=2, and the KLR presentation of

1.1givenalgebra

The cyclotomic relation on I2. Enumerate I2={0,1,2}2. The cyclotomic exponent of the sequence i is the pairing (Λ0,αi1)=δi1,0, so the defining cyclotomic relation reads y1δi1,0e(i)=0. For the three sequences with i1=0 this is y1e(i)=0; for the six sequences with i1≠0 the exponent is zero and the relation is y10e(i)=e(i)=0, so those idempotents vanish rather than merely a degree-one dot relation.

1.2givenalgebra

The quadratic relation. The KLR quadratic relation distinguishes the colour cases: i1=i2, i2=i1+1, i2=i1−1. For e=3 and I={0,1,2} every ordered pair of distinct colours is adjacent in the 3-cycle, so these are all cases, and substituting gives ψ12e(i)=0, (y2−y1)e(i), and (y1−y2)e(i) respectively.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

The two nonzero blocks. By Cyclotomic Hecke algebras of level one are finite Hecke algebras the level-one algebra H2Λ is the finite Hecke algebra HF,q(S2) with standard basis {1,T1}, so it is two-dimensional, and T12−(q−1)T1−q=0 gives H2Λ≅F[T]/((T−q)(T+1))≅F×F, the two factors being distinct because q≠1 and q≠−1 for a primitive cube root in characteristic ≠3. Hence there are exactly two nonzero one-dimensional blocks. Their labels come from the polynomial generator: on the trivial module X1=q0=1 and X2=q−1T1X1T1=q−1q2=q, giving residue sequence (0,1); on the sign module X1=1 and X2=q−1(−1)2=q−1=q2, giving (0,2); equivalently these are the q-contents of the standard tableaux of (2) and (1,1) (The Hecke Jucys-Murphy action is dominance triangular). Every nonzero block contains at least one of these surviving idempotents, so the remaining four blocks of height 2 are zero.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

At positive rank the whole affine Hecke algebra is not one cyclotomic KLR block

Statement refuted

One might hope that for a fixed content-block isomorphism, replacing one side by the whole affine Hecke algebra, or by the whole cyclotomic quotient in the example below, still gives an isomorphism. This fails. The failure does not forbid summing all the central-sector isomorphisms on both sides.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The affine and cyclotomic presentation conventions [F1], the bounded basis and dimension of the cyclotomic quotient [F2], the residue-projector/block conventions [F3], and the blockwise isomorphism [F4].

[F1]

The affine Hecke algebra at rank one is F[X1±1] in the nondegenerate normalization and F[x1] in the degenerate normalization, and the cyclotomic quotient is obtained by imposing the first-variable cyclotomic relation (Affine and cyclotomic type-A Hecke algebras).

[F2]

The cyclotomic quotient has a bounded spanning family and finite dimension at most ℓdd! (Basis and dimension of the cyclotomic Hecke algebra).

[F3]

The nonzero central sectors HαΛ=eαHdΛ are the blocks, with the level-one Jucys–Murphy identification HdΛ≅HF,q(Sd) (Residue-sequence idempotents and cyclotomic Hecke blocks).

[F4]

The blockwise maps ρ ⁣:RαΛ→HαΛ are mutually inverse isomorphisms for every content with eα≠0 (The Brundan–Kleshchev blockwise Hecke–KLR isomorphism).

Counterexample

technique · direct

Given: The presentation and block conventions of [F1]–[F4].

1.1F1F2F4algebra

The positive-rank affine algebra is infinite dimensional. At rank one the affine presentation is F[X1±1] in NG and F[x1] in DG by [F1], and their distinct powers are independent. More generally for any d≥1, the NG assignments Tr↦qH, Xr↦qHr−1t give a surjection onto F[t,t−1]: the quadratic relation reads qH2=(qH−1)qH+qH, the Bernstein relation reads qH2qHr−1t=qHqHrt, and the commuting and braid relations are scalar identities. In DG the assignments sr↦1, xr↦t+(r−1)1F similarly give a surjection onto F[t], since the adjacent mixed relation reads t+(r−1)=(t+r)−1 and all other relations hold. The images contain t, so the affine algebras are infinite-dimensional at every positive rank. Every cyclotomic block is finite-dimensional by [F2], and its KLR partner has the same dimension by [F4]; thus neither is isomorphic to the whole positive-rank affine algebra. At rank zero both presentations give F, and the obstruction does not apply.

2.1F3F4step 1.1

The whole cyclotomic quotient is not one block. Take Λ=Λ0 (level one), d=2, e=3 and qH a primitive cube root of unity. By the level-one identification [F3] the algebra is HF,q(S2)≅F[T]/((T−qH)(T+1))≅F×F, since qH≠−1 in characteristic ≠3. Here X1=1 and X2=qH−1T12, so the two factors T1=qH and T1=−1 have polynomial eigenwords (1,qH) and (1,qH2), hence residue words (0,1) and (0,2). Thus there are two nonzero blocks Hα0+α1Λ and Hα0+α2Λ, each one dimensional with residue sequences (0,1) and (0,2). Therefore H2Λ has dimension 2 and is not isomorphic to either one-dimensional block; on the KLR side [F4] gives R2Λ=Rα0+α1Λ⊕Rα0+α2Λ, which is not isomorphic to a single block.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

Conclusion. Both branches of the attempted replacement fail: the affine algebra is infinite dimensional, and the whole cyclotomic quotient decomposes into more than one block. Summing the central-sector isomorphisms on both sides remains valid.

Remarks

At rank zero the affine algebra and the unique cyclotomic KLR content algebra are both F; there is no dimension obstruction or counterexample at that boundary. The counterexample separates the blockwise statement of the Brundan–Kleshchev theorem from two stronger readings: the rank-one affine algebra itself is not a cyclotomic block, and a cyclotomic quotient can have several blocks. No choice principle is used.

Sources