How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cyclotomic Hecke and Quiver Hecke Algebras — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Blocks Defect Groups and the Brauer Homomorphism
- Braided and Symmetric Monoidal Categories
- Brauer Characters and Decomposition Matrices
- Bruhat Decomposition and Flags over Finite Fields
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Characters and the Orthogonality Relations
- Combinatorial Classes and the Symbolic Method
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Conjugacy in Sₙ, Generation, and the Simplicity of Aₙ
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cores, Quotients, and Blocks of Symmetric Groups
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Coxeter Presentations, Exchange, and Reduced Word Theorems
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Cyclotomic Hecke and Quiver Hecke Algebras
- Cyclotomic KLR Algebras and Highest-Weight Categorification
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Divided Powers, Integral Forms, and Quantum Highest Weights
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Finite Averaging and Character-Theory Prerequisites
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Finite Weyl Invariants, Bruhat Order, and Kostant Harmonics
- Formal Power Series
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Groups and Presentations
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Graded Bimodules and Tensor Functors
- Grothendieck Groups and Graded Cartan Pairings
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Harish Chandra Isomorphism Casimir and Central Characters
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Induced Representations, Frobenius Reciprocity and Applications
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Integrable Highest Weight Kac Moody Modules
- Integral Specht Modules and Modular Simple Modules
- Inverse Limits and Noetherian Completion
- Jucys–Murphy Elements and Seminormal Forms
- Kac Moody Algebras from Generalized Cartan Matrices
- Kashiwara Operators and Crystal Lattices
- KLR Algebras, Induction, and Quantum-Serre Categorification
- Lie Algebra Representations, Enveloping Algebras, and PBW
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Maschke's Theorem, Complete Reducibility and the Structure of k[G]
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Modular Representations and Projective Covers
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Ordinary Hecke Specht Polytabloids and Signed Murphy Comparison
- Permutation Statistics, Inversions and Eulerian Numbers
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Principal Series Representations of GL N over a Finite Field
- Quantized Enveloping Algebras and Quantum Serre Relations
- Quantum Affine Type A and Level-One Fock Space
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rim Hooks and the Murnaghan–Nakayama Rule
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Specht Modules and the Irreducibles of the Symmetric Group
- Splitting Fields
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Functions, the Hall Inner Product, and Schur Bases
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Symmetric Polynomials and the Fundamental Theorem of Symmetric Functions
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Burau Representations
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The Hook Length Formula and Rsk Correspondence
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Type-A Hecke Specht Modules and Cellular Bases
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Young Diagrams Tableaux and Permutation Modules
2 · Summary
Objective. This companion page works the smallest nontrivial instances of the cyclotomic Hecke/KLR dictionary of cyclotomic-hecke-and-quiver-hecke-algebras and records its boundary phenomena: the homogeneous degree check for the corrected KLR braid relation (including the double-edge case), the degenerate level-one map for , the rank-two level-one cyclotomic KLR algebra at , and the counterexample showing that the whole affine Hecke algebra is not one cyclotomic KLR block. All computations are finite and explicit over the stated fields.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Homogeneous degree check for the corrected KLR braid relation
Example
In the specialized cyclotomic KLR algebra of The type-A cyclotomic specialization of the QG-KLR algebras use the grading , , (The KLR grading and the diagrammatic multiplication). Fix a triple and put the degree of both three-crossing words and , computed on the successive permuted colour pairs. Then both sides of the corrected braid relation are homogeneous of degree and the correction term has the same degree: it is (degree ) when or , it is (degree ) when (the double edge), and it is otherwise. In particular the single-edge corrected braid relations have degree and the double-edge corrected braid relation has degree ; both match the two sides.
Verification
Given: The specialized cyclotomic KLR algebra with the grading above, a
fixed colour triple , and the cyclic Cartan entries (,
for , and for ).
The common degree of the two words. The three crossings of cross the colour pairs , , of the successive permuted sequences, so its degree is ; the other braid word has the same multiset of crossed pairs, hence the same degree .
The four cases of the correction. Substituting the cyclic Cartan entries: (a) if then and the correction is ; (b) if then and the correction is ; (c) if and , then and , so , matching the degree of ; (d) in all other cases the correction is . This is the source's case list, and the nonzero correction requires equal outer colours, while zero corrections remain homogeneous without asserting that their degree is zero.
Conclusion. In each nonzero case the correction term has degree , equal to the common degree of the two braid words computed in step 1.1; in the remaining cases the correction vanishes, so the identity is homogeneous at degree . Hence the single-edge corrected braid relations have degree and the double-edge corrected braid relation has degree , both matching the two sides. The displayed source word order is , which equals the native opposite-order -difference under . No choice is used.
The degenerate level-one Hecke–KLR map for S_3
Example
Work over with (so ), at level one and : then (Cyclotomic Hecke algebras of level one are finite Hecke algebras, Affine and cyclotomic type-A Hecke algebras) and exactly one block is nonzero, namely with (Residue-sequence idempotents and cyclotomic Hecke blocks). The residue sequences realised by standard tableaux all have residue multiset . The degenerate KLR generators are the elements with the Jucys–Murphy elements of (so , , ) and with and on unequal components (Cyclotomic Hecke intertwiners and local power series, Hecke intertwiners produce the local KLR generators). In this block the mixed relations for and for , and the quadratic relation for , are explicit identities in the six-dimensional algebra .
Verification
Given: The group algebra with the transpositions
, , , the additive Jucys–Murphy elements
, , , and the level-one conventions of the
Statement.
The two residue projectors and the -values. Put . Group multiplication in gives , because the three squares contribute and the six cross products contribute three copies of each 3-cycle; and . Put and ; since and is invertible in , these are idempotents, and they are the actual joint CRT projectors and of the two standard residue words. With one computes and : indeed , , and equals on both projectors. All other residue words vanish, and both projectors are nonzero by the group basis.
There is exactly one block. The full center has basis , , and its augmentation ideal is spanned by the last two elements, with and ; hence the augmentation ideal is square-zero and contains no nonzero idempotent. Therefore the only central idempotents are and , so is a single block and the two projectors combine as .
The -generators and the explicit identities. For the explicit source choice of the power series, . On one has and ; on one has and . Thus and . Direct group multiplication using and gives , , , , and . These are exactly the claimed mixed and quadratic identities with and ; the first-crossing mixed identities vanish on every surviving unequal-colour word, equal-first-colour words are absent, so the universal equal-colour formula also holds. The six group elements give dimension , with no primitive-block citation or Hecke-basis dimension loop hidden.
The level-one rank-two cyclotomic KLR algebra at e=3
Example
Let be algebraically closed of characteristic , let be a primitive cube root of unity (so ), let (level one) and . Then:
(i) for the cyclotomic relation is ; thus for the three sequences with , and for all six sequences with , because their exponent is zero and ;
(ii) equals if , equals if and equals if ; for these are all cases;
(iii) the nonzero blocks of are exactly and ; both are one dimensional, with in the first (the block of the trivial module of ) and in the second (the block of the sign module); the other four -blocks of height are zero (Residue-sequence idempotents and cyclotomic Hecke blocks, The type-A cyclotomic specialization of the QG-KLR algebras).
Verification
Given: algebraically closed of characteristic , a primitive cube
root , , , and the KLR presentation of
The cyclotomic relation on . Enumerate . The cyclotomic exponent of the sequence is the pairing , so the defining cyclotomic relation reads . For the three sequences with this is ; for the six sequences with the exponent is zero and the relation is , so those idempotents vanish rather than merely a degree-one dot relation.
The quadratic relation. The KLR quadratic relation distinguishes the colour cases: , , . For and every ordered pair of distinct colours is adjacent in the -cycle, so these are all cases, and substituting gives , , and respectively.
The two nonzero blocks. By Cyclotomic Hecke algebras of level one are finite Hecke algebras the level-one algebra is the finite Hecke algebra with standard basis , so it is two-dimensional, and gives , the two factors being distinct because and for a primitive cube root in characteristic . Hence there are exactly two nonzero one-dimensional blocks. Their labels come from the polynomial generator: on the trivial module and , giving residue sequence ; on the sign module and , giving ; equivalently these are the -contents of the standard tableaux of and (The Hecke Jucys-Murphy action is dominance triangular). Every nonzero block contains at least one of these surviving idempotents, so the remaining four blocks of height are zero.
At positive rank the whole affine Hecke algebra is not one cyclotomic KLR block
Statement refuted
One might hope that for a fixed content-block isomorphism, replacing one side by the whole affine Hecke algebra, or by the whole cyclotomic quotient in the example below, still gives an isomorphism. This fails. The failure does not forbid summing all the central-sector isomorphisms on both sides.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The affine and cyclotomic presentation conventions [F1], the bounded basis and dimension of the cyclotomic quotient [F2], the residue-projector/block conventions [F3], and the blockwise isomorphism [F4].
The affine Hecke algebra at rank one is in the nondegenerate normalization and in the degenerate normalization, and the cyclotomic quotient is obtained by imposing the first-variable cyclotomic relation (Affine and cyclotomic type-A Hecke algebras).
The cyclotomic quotient has a bounded spanning family and finite dimension at most (Basis and dimension of the cyclotomic Hecke algebra).
The nonzero central sectors are the blocks, with the level-one Jucys–Murphy identification (Residue-sequence idempotents and cyclotomic Hecke blocks).
The blockwise maps are mutually inverse isomorphisms for every content with (The Brundan–Kleshchev blockwise Hecke–KLR isomorphism).
Counterexample
Given: The presentation and block conventions of [F1]–[F4].
The positive-rank affine algebra is infinite dimensional. At rank one the affine presentation is in NG and in DG by [F1], and their distinct powers are independent. More generally for any , the NG assignments , give a surjection onto : the quadratic relation reads , the Bernstein relation reads , and the commuting and braid relations are scalar identities. In DG the assignments , similarly give a surjection onto , since the adjacent mixed relation reads and all other relations hold. The images contain , so the affine algebras are infinite-dimensional at every positive rank. Every cyclotomic block is finite-dimensional by [F2], and its KLR partner has the same dimension by [F4]; thus neither is isomorphic to the whole positive-rank affine algebra. At rank zero both presentations give , and the obstruction does not apply.
The whole cyclotomic quotient is not one block. Take (level one), , and a primitive cube root of unity. By the level-one identification [F3] the algebra is , since in characteristic . Here and , so the two factors and have polynomial eigenwords and , hence residue words and . Thus there are two nonzero blocks and , each one dimensional with residue sequences and . Therefore has dimension and is not isomorphic to either one-dimensional block; on the KLR side [F4] gives , which is not isomorphic to a single block.
Conclusion. Both branches of the attempted replacement fail: the affine algebra is infinite dimensional, and the whole cyclotomic quotient decomposes into more than one block. Summing the central-sector isomorphisms on both sides remains valid.
Remarks
At rank zero the affine algebra and the unique cyclotomic KLR content algebra are both ; there is no dimension obstruction or counterexample at that boundary. The counterexample separates the blockwise statement of the Brundan–Kleshchev theorem from two stronger readings: the rank-one affine algebra itself is not a cyclotomic block, and a cyclotomic quotient can have several blocks. No choice principle is used.
Sources
- Mikhail Khovanov and Aaron D. Lauda, A diagrammatic approach to categorification of quantum groups I, arXiv:0803.4121v3, Represent. Theory 13 (2009) 309–347 (complete 53-page article)
- Jonathan Brundan and Alexander Kleshchev, Blocks of cyclotomic Hecke algebras and Khovanov-Lauda algebras, arXiv:0808.2032v3, Invent. Math. 178 (2009) 451–484 (complete 32-page article)
- Alexander Kleshchev, Representation theory of symmetric groups and related Hecke algebras, arXiv:0909.4844v1, Bull. AMS 47 (2010) 419–481 (complete 66-page survey)
- Jonathan Brundan and Alexander Kleshchev, Blocks of cyclotomic Hecke algebras and Khovanov–Lauda algebras, arXiv:0808.2032v3, Invent. Math. 178 (2009) 451–484 (complete 32-page article)
- Jun Hu and Andrew Mathas, Seminormal forms and cyclotomic quiver Hecke algebras of type A, arXiv:1304.0906v3 (published in Math. Ann.), complete 51-page article
- Jonathan Brundan and Alexander Kleshchev, Graded decomposition numbers for cyclotomic Hecke algebras, arXiv:0901.4450v3, Adv. Math. 222 (2009) 1883–1942 (complete 57-page article)