Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 5 results · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 4 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Cyclotomic KLR Algebras and Highest-Weight Categorification — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Objective. This companion page works the cyclotomic machinery of cyclotomic-klr-algebras-and-highest-weight-categorification on the smallest concrete blocks and at the exact boundaries of its normalizations. The items use earlier computations on this companion page and the foundational page. The explicit calculations use Laurent polynomials and nil-Hecke matrix units.

What the examples show

  • Cyclotomic KLR quotients in ranks zero, one and two computes the rank-zero, rank-one and rank-two blocks: RΛ(0)=k, RΛ(αi)=k[x]/xλ of graded dimension ∑r=0λ−1q2dir for λ≥1 (the block is zero when λ=0), the vanishing RΛ(nαi)=0 for n>λ, the rank-two decomposition NH2/(x12)≅Pi,2⊕(qi+qi−1) at λ=2, where qi=qdi, and the inhomogeneous boundary ai(u)=u(u−1) giving k⊕k at root αi: the standard graded hypothesis is substantive.

  • Self-dual shift normalization for a cyclotomic projective separates the two dualities on the rank-one regular module B=k[x]/xλ: projective Hom duality centers B at shift 0 while finite vector duality centers it at −(λ−1), and the general defect shift DψP≅P#{−2def⁡Λ(β)} does not redefine the lower-basis projective normalization.

  • The categorical sl2 commutator in a small cyclotomic weight verifies the categorical commutator at Λ=2Λ1, β=0: both the K0 and the G0 commutators equal (q2−q−2)/(q−q−1) at Ki=q2, with the two identity summands of the ⟨hi,λ⟩=2 case matching k⊕k{2}.

  • The projective-simple Cartan pairing in a small cyclotomic block computes the normalized cover/simple pairing T(Pr,Ss)=δrs in the λ=2 block, with the three normalized covers k, k[x]/x2 and the shifted column C{−1}, and shows that the regular classes [B1]=(1+q2)[S1], [B2]=(q+q−1)[S2] carry non-unit coefficients.

What the counterexample shows

  • Word projectives need not give lower global basis vectors shows that ordinary word-projective classes need not be lower global vectors under the vacuum-normalized integral isomorphism: in weight 2αi at Λ=2Λ1 the word projective class is (q+q−1)[Pi,2], the lower global vector is the divided power Fi(2)v, and the scalar q+q−1 is a nonunit. The integral divided-power class [Pi,2] supplies the lower vector directly.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Cyclotomic KLR quotients in ranks zero, one and two

Example

Work over any field k with a real symmetrizable Cartan datum, arbitrary symmetrizers di, dominant Λ and the STANDARD homogeneous polynomials ai=uλi. (a) RΛ(0)=k has one normalized simple and projective, the vacuum. (b) For every color i, RΛ(αi)=k[x]/xλi with deg⁡x=2di and graded dimension ∑r=0λi−1q2dir when λi≥1. Its unique normalized simple is k, its normalized projective HOM-self-dual cover is the regular module, and the coefficient-of-xλi−1 Frobenius FUNCTIONAL has degree −2di(λi−1). If λi=0 the block is zero and has NO simple; if λi=1 it is k. (c) In rank one I={i}, for n≥1 the algebra is the cyclotomic nil-Hecke quotient NHn/(x1λi); at n=0 it is k, as in (a). The root block is nonzero precisely for 0≤n≤λi. At each such root it has exactly one normalized self-dual simple, and zero blocks have none; hence there are λi+1 normalized simple classes in total, matching the rank-one highest-weight module. For 1≤n≤λi its symmetric corner is k[e1,…,en]/(hλi−n+1,…,hλi), the graded Grassmannian coinvariant ring, and the algebra is the associated graded polynomial-column matrix algebra. The normalized simple column has graded dimension [n]qi!, where qi=qdi. (d) Explicitly at λi=2,n=2, the block is End⁡k(C{−di}) with C=k[x1,x2]/(x1+x2,x1x2), its basis 1,x1 in degrees 0,2di. Its unique self-dual simple S2=C{−di} has graded dimension qi−1+qi and is also the normalized indecomposable projective P2. It is NOT a one-dimensional module with both dots zero. The regular class is [RΛ(2αi)]=[2]qi[P2] in K0 and [2]qi[S2] in G0. (e) Arbitrary monic ai gives the ungraded deformation: λi=2, ai=u(u−1) gives k⊕k at root αi. Ordinary finiteness/symmetry remain true, but this is not the standard graded V(2) identification.

Verification

technique · compute the nil-Hecke first-power ideal as a matrix-entry ideal over the symmetric polynomials, using a finite companion algebra and its unit trace-dual basis; then identify the unique graded simple column and the explicit rank-two block

Given: The standard homogeneous cyclotomic datum of the Example over any degree-zero field, with λi=⟨hi,Λ⟩ and qi=qdi.

[F1] The standard first-strand quotient is defined in The cyclotomic KLR quotient at a dominant integral weight. The rank-one nil-Hecke matrix model is NHn=End⁡Sn(Pn) with Sn=k[e1,…,en] and Pn=k[x1,…,xn], its Artin monomial basis, integral perfect trace and centered divided-power polynomial column (Nil-Hecke idempotents and divided-power KLR projectives, The PBW (monomial) basis theorem for KLR algebras).

[F2] The ordinary cyclotomic blocks are finite dimensional, including standard homogeneous specializations (Cyclotomic dot annihilators, finite-dimensional blocks, and finite root strings). This is used only after the exact matrix ideal calculation, not to infer its precise ideal or the exact pure-i cutoff.

1.1F1constructalgebra

The empty word gives RΛ(0)=k. One strand has no crossings, so its presentation is k[x]/xλi with deg⁡x=2di. For λi>0 the monomials 1,x,…,xλi−1 give the stated Hilbert series. The unique graded simple is k at degree zero, and the regular module is its indecomposable projective cover. Evaluation identifies HOM⁡B(B,B)ψ with B, so this is the projective Hom-self-dual normalization, without a vector-dual centering shift. The coefficient-of-xλi−1 functional pairs the monomial basis anti-diagonally with unit entries; it is a nondegenerate symmetric Frobenius functional of degree −2di(λi−1). If λi=0, its defining relation is 1=0, so the block is zero and has no simple; if λi=1, it is k.

1.2F1constructalgebra

For n≥1, put S=Sn and C=S[z]/(zn−e1zn−1+⋯+(−1)nen), embedded in Pn by z=x1. Let ea′ be the elementary symmetric functions of x2,…,xn. The identities ea=ea′+zea−1′, e0′=1, express the ea′ recursively in z,e1,…,ea; the final en′=0 is precisely the displayed monic relation. Hence C=k[x1,e1′,…,en−1′], and the Artin basis for the remaining n−1 variables makes Pn free of rank (n−1)! over C. On its S-basis 1,z,…,zn−1, multiplication by zλi is repeated (n−1)! times in multiplication by x1λi on Pn. In a full matrix algebra over S, left and right matrix units isolate each matrix entry and insert it into any chosen entry. Therefore its two-sided ideal is the matrix ideal of exactly those scalar entries, so the cyclotomic quotient is the polynomial-column matrix algebra over their quotient of S.

2.1F1step 1.2constructalgebra

Define ϵ:C→S to be the coefficient of zn−1 in the power basis. The matrix ϵ(za+b) for 0≤a,b<n is zero for a+b<n−1 and one for a+b=n−1, hence anti-triangular with unit anti-diagonal and invertible over S. Its dual basis is therefore integral over S. Pairing multiplication by zλi with this invertible trace matrix shows that its entry ideal is exactly the ideal generated by ϵ(zλi+a+b), 0≤a,b<n. Put hr=0 for r<0 and h0=1; the monic equation gives the recurrence hr=e1hr−1−e2hr−2+⋯+(−1)n−1enhr−n. Induction on the power gives ϵ(zn−1+r)=hr, including the stated initial values. All indices in the entry list are between λi−n+1 and λi+n−1. The first consecutive n indices hλi−n+1,…,hλi occur, and the recurrence expresses every higher one using them. Thus the exact corner ideal is (hλi−n+1,…,hλi).

3.1F2step 1.2step 2.1algebra

If n>λi, the consecutive list contains h0=1, and the quotient is zero. If 1≤n≤λi, every index in that list is positive, so the ideal is contained in the augmentation ideal of S and the corner quotient is nonzero. It is finite dimensional by F2 and the full matrix description of step 1.2. Its degree-zero part is k, and its positive-degree ideal is nilpotent because the graded vector space is finite and positively graded. It is therefore graded local with exactly one simple up to shift, its augmentation quotient. Matrix equivalence gives exactly one graded simple column in each nonzero root block. For n=0 there is the vacuum, so the total number of normalized rank-one simples is exactly λi+1.

4.1F1step 3.1algebra

The augmentation simple column is Pn⊗Sk, the ordinary coinvariant polynomial representation with its Artin basis, centered by −di(n2). Its Hilbert series is qi−(n2)∏r=1n(1+qi2+⋯+qi2(r−1))=[n]qi!. The integral perfect Artin trace in F1 pairs complementary degrees, so this centering makes its generator-fixing finite vector dual isomorphic to itself. This yields the unique normalized simple in every nonzero block. The same matrix model retains the symmetric corner of step 2.1 and its polynomial-column projectives, proving all ranks of part (c), rather than identifying the whole algebra with a commutative quotient.

5.1F1step 2.1step 4.1algebra

At n=λi=2, the corner is k[e1,e2]/(h1,h2)=k, since h1=e1, h2=e12−e2. The polynomial column is C2=k[x1,x2]/(x1+x2,x1x2), with basis 1,x1 and x2=−x1, x12=0, so its centered column S2=C2{−di} has Hilbert series qi−1+qi. The block is End⁡k(S2); its unique simple column is also its normalized indecomposable projective. The regular left module is S2⊗S2∗, with the second factor giving shifts ±di, and thus its class is [2]qi[P2] in projective K0 and [2]qi[S2] in module G0. The matrix identification and these formulas hold in characteristic two as well. A one-dimensional zero-dot module would violate the equal-colour mixed relation with unit right side, so no such simple exists.

6.1step 1.1step 3.1step 5.1algebra∎

Finally the coprime polynomials u,u−1 give k[u]/(u(u−1))=k⊕k, with two ordinary simples at root αi. This is the ungraded monic deformation: ordinary finiteness and symmetry retain their stated scope, but it is not the standard homogeneous graded rank-one highest-weight identification. Parts (a)–(d) follow from steps 1.1–5.1 with arbitrary symmetrizer and every field, and part (e) from this finite coprime-factor calculation.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Self-dual shift normalization for a cyclotomic projective

Example

For rank one di=1 and λ≥1, let B=k[x]/xλ and P=B. The PROJECTIVE Hom dual satisfies P#≅P, so the canonical normalized projective is P with no shift. Its finite vector dual is different: DψP≅P{−2(λ−1)}. The unique vector-dual-centered shift of this regular module is P{−(λ−1)}. For λ=1 both centers agree; for λ=2, projective Hom-self-duality centers P at 0 while vector-self-duality centers it at −1. If λ=0 the block is zero and there is no indecomposable projective here. For any normalized cyclotomic projective the general relation is DψP≅P#{−2def⁡Λ(β)}; it does not redefine the lower-basis projective normalization.

Verification

Given: The rank-one cyclotomic quotient B=k[x]/xλ of The cyclotomic KLR quotient at a dominant integral weight with di=1, λ≥1, and the two dualities of Cyclotomic diagram duality and graded module duals.

[F1] The vector dual DψM=HOM⁡k(M,k)ψ reverses internal shifts and satisfies Dψ2M≅M; the projective dual P#=HOM⁡B(P,B)ψ is a finite graded projective and the symmetric theorem gives DψP≅P#{tβ} with tβ=−2def⁡Λ(β) (Cyclotomic KLR blocks are finite-dimensional graded symmetric algebras).

1.1F1

Projective Hom self-duality. Evaluation HOM⁡B(B,B)≅B gives P#=HOM⁡B(B,B)ψ≅B=P directly, the generator-fixing anti-involution producing the same left module; hence the canonical normalized projective is P with no shift.

2.1step 1.1F1

Vector duality and the shift. The functional ϵ(xa)=0 for a<λ−1 and ϵ(xλ−1)=1 is the coefficient-of-xλ−1 trace; it has degree −2(λ−1) and its anti-diagonal pairing ϵ(xaxb)=δa+b,λ−1 is perfect over every field, so DψB≅B{−2(λ−1)}. Since Dψ(P{s})=DψP{−s}, vector self-duality of P{s} solves −2(λ−1)−s=s, namely s=−(λ−1), while projective Hom self-duality solves −s=s, namely s=0.

3.1step 2.1F1∎

The general defect shift and the boundary. For a general normalized cyclotomic projective the same computation with the symmetric theorem gives DψP≅P#{−2def⁡Λ(β)}, which is a comparison of the two dualities and does not redefine the projective normalization. At λ=1 the two centers agree; at λ=2 they differ by 1 as computed; at λ=0 the defining relation is 1=0 and the block vanishes, so there is no indecomposable projective here. The trace is never halved to pick the lower-basis class.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Word projectives need not give lower global basis vectors

Statement refuted

Once the isomorphism [Proj(RΛ)]≅VA(Λ) of The cyclotomic projective K0 is the integral highest-weight module is known, the classes of the word projectives RΛ(β)e(ν) are automatically lower global basis vectors.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rank-one datum I={i}, (αi∣αi)=2, di=1, qi=q, Λ=2Λ1, and the rank-two block RΛ(2αi)=NH2/(x12) of Cyclotomic KLR quotients in ranks zero, one and two.

[F1]

At λi=n=2, the exact matrix calculation of Cyclotomic KLR quotients in ranks zero, one and two identifies RΛ(2αi)=End⁡k(S2), where S2=C{−1} has degrees −1,1 and is the normalized divided-power projective Pi,2. Thus its regular module is Pi,2{1}⊕Pi,2{−1}. The divided-power construction is Nil-Hecke idempotents and divided-power KLR projectives.

[F2]

Counterexample

At root 2αi the regular word projective has the graded decomposition RΛ(2αi)≅Pi,2{1}⊕Pi,2{−1},[RΛ(2αi)]=(q+q−1)[Pi,2].

Under the vacuum-normalized identification the word class is Fi2v2Λ1, whereas the lower global vector is Fi(2)v2Λ1. Their ratio q+q−1 is a nonunit of A=Z[q,q−1]. The normalized indecomposable divided-power projective gives the lower vector in this weight; the ordinary word projective does not.

1.1F1

The word class. By [F1] the word projective decomposes as (q+q−1) copies of Pi,2, so [RΛ(2αi)]=(q+q−1)[Pi,2]; under the K_0 isomorphism of the integral projective theorem this is the class of the ordinary product Fi2v2Λ1.

1.2F2algebra

In the rank-one module V(2Λ1), the Kashiwara string is v,Fiv,Fi(2)v. These vectors generate its zero chart; they are bar fixed and generate the corresponding infinity chart. In weight 2αi the divided-power integral lattice is AFi(2)v: any divided word of that weight is an A-multiple of Fi(2)v, since Fi2v=[2]iFi(2)v. Since an integral Laurent polynomial regular at both 0 and infinity is an integer constant, the balanced intersection in that weight is ZFi(2)v, and its positive string residue selects Fi(2)v as the lower global lift.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F2algebra

By [F2], Fi2v=[2]iFi(2)v. The coefficient [2]i=q+q−1 is a nonunit: evaluation at q=1 sends it to 2, while an invertible Laurent polynomial must evaluate to a unit of Z. Hence the word class cannot be the lower global vector identified in step 1.2.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

This refutes the assertion that word-projective classes are automatically lower global vectors. Here the integral divided-power class [Pi,2] gives Fi(2)v directly, whereas the regular word class has the nonunit coefficient q+q−1. The finite example makes no general impossibility claim about extracting a basis from additional categorical or quantum-module structure.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The categorical sl2 commutator in a small cyclotomic weight

Example

Take I={i} with (αi∣αi)=2, di=1, qi=q, and Λ=2Λ1, so that ⟨hi,Λ⟩=2 and the standard cyclotomic quotient has relations x12e(ν)=0. Then:

(a) RΛ(0)=k, RΛ(αi)=k[x1]/(x12) with graded dimension 1+q2, and RΛ(nαi)=0 for n≥3, so the functors on the nonzero weights are FiΛk=RΛ(αi) and FiΛEiΛk=0;

(b) the categorical sl2 relation of The categorical sl2 commutator for cyclotomic KLR functors at β=0, λ=Λ (case ⟨hi,λ⟩=2≥0) reads q−2FiΛEiΛ⊕Id⊕q2Id≅EiΛFiΛ; on the vacuum it says EiΛFiΛk≅k⊕k{2}, which is exactly RΛ(αi)≅k⊕k{2};

(c) consequently, with the normalized operators of Cyclotomic KLR functors define an integrable quantum action on K0 and G0, on [Proj(RΛ(0))]: EiFi[1Λ]=(q+q−1)[1Λ] and FiEi[1Λ]=0, so [Ei,Fi][1Λ]=(q+q−1)[1Λ]=(Ki−Ki−1)/(qi−qi−1)[1Λ] with Ki[1Λ]=q2[1Λ]; on [Rep(RΛ(0))] the same commutator identity holds: Fi[k]=q−1[k⊕k{2}], Ei lowers back, FiEi[k]=0, and EiFi[k]=(q+q−1)[k]. This is the mixed relation of Cyclotomic KLR functors define an integrable quantum action on K0 and G0 verified at the first nontrivial weight.

Verification

Given: The rank-one datum I={i}, (αi∣αi)=2, di=1, qi=q, Λ=2Λ1, with the standard quotient x12e(ν)=0 and the functors of Cyclotomic KLR induction and restriction functors.

[F1] The rank-one quotients: RΛ(0)=k, RΛ(αi)=k[x]/(x2) of graded dimension 1+q2, RΛ(nαi)=0 for n≥3, and basic restriction of Fik is the vector space k⊕k{2} (Cyclotomic KLR quotients in ranks zero, one and two).

[F2] The categorical sl2 relation at target weight h=2 has identity shifts 0,2, so its vacuum evaluation is exactly k⊕k{2} (The categorical sl2 commutator for cyclotomic KLR functors).

[F3] The normalized operators on K0 carry q−1 on projective E at input root αi, while KK module F carries q−1 and KK E is raw, and the canonical module action shifts E and leaves F raw (Cyclotomic KLR functors define an integrable quantum action on K0 and G0).

Verification.

1.1F1

The blocks. The rank-zero block is k and the rank-one quotient is k[x]/(x2) with basis 1,x and degrees 0,2. Restriction of the vacuum has zero target. Thus the relevant functor values on the vacuum are FiΛk=RΛ(αi) and FiΛEiΛk=0.

2.1step 1.1F2

The commutator. The relation of [F2] evaluated on the vacuum gives EiΛFiΛk≅k⊕k{2}, which is RΛ(αi) by [F1], so q−2FiΛEiΛ⊕Id⊕q2Id≅EiΛFiΛ holds at the first nontrivial weight.

3.1step 2.1F3∎

The Grothendieck commutator. With the normalizations of [F3]: projective EiFi[1Λ]=q−1(1+q2)[1Λ]=(q+q−1)[1Λ] and FiEi[1Λ]=0; KK module F from the vacuum also carries q−1 while KK E is raw, and the canonical module action shifts E and leaves F raw, giving the same result in both module conventions. All agree with (q2−q−2)/(q−q−1), the mixed relation evaluated at Ki=q2. This verifies the commutator identity at the first nontrivial weight and is a finite rank-one computation using no choice.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The projective-simple Cartan pairing in a small cyclotomic block

Example

For rank one di=1, λ=2, let Br=RΛ(rαi). The normalized simples are S0=k, S1=k with x=0, and S2=C{−1} of graded dimension q−1+q, where C=k[x1,x2]/(x1+x2,x1x2). Their normalized projective covers are P0=k, P1=k[x]/x2, P2=S2. Then T(Pr,Ss)=δrs, with distinct roots paired by zero. Under the integral projective identification P0,P1,P2 map to v,Fv,F(2)v, respectively, while [B2]=(q+q−1)[P2] maps to F2v. In G0 the correct regular classes are [B1]=(1+q2)[S1] and [B2]=(q+q−1)[S2]. The canonical restricted-dual map sends Sr to the form-dual of the corresponding divided lower vector; it does not identify B1 with S1.

Verification

Given: The rank-one datum I={i}, (αi∣αi)=2, di=1, qi=q, λ=2, with the blocks Br=RΛ(rαi) of Cyclotomic KLR quotients in ranks zero, one and two.

[F1] The rank-one blocks: B0=k, B1=k[x]/x2, and B2=NH2/(x12)≅P2⊕(q+q−1), where P2=B2⊗NH2Pi,2=C{−1}; the centered polynomial column reproduces C=k[x1,x2]/(x1+x2,x1x2) with the shift −di (Cyclotomic KLR quotients in ranks zero, one and two, Nil-Hecke idempotents and divided-power KLR projectives).

[F2] The quotient-cover pairing: T(P,S)=gdim⁡(Pψ⊗BS)=δP,S in normalized cover/simple bases, and the normalized covers are the nonzero extensions of generic covers (Cyclotomic projective covers and dualities descend through the quotient).

[F3] The integral identifications: ϕ(P0)=v, ϕ(P1)=Fv, ϕ(P2)=F(2)v under the normalized projective basis, and the canonical restricted-dual map sends simples to form-dual lower vectors (The cyclotomic projective K0 is the integral highest-weight module, The cyclotomic module G0 is the restricted dual integral highest-weight module).

Verification.

1.1F1

The blocks and their composition structure. By [F1] the three nonzero blocks have graded dimensions 1, 1+q2 and (q+q−1)2; the first regular module B1 has two composition factors S1,S1{2} with graded dimensions 1+q2, and the second block is the endomorphism matrix algebra of the graded column S2, whose regular left module is the column tensored with its graded vector dual of dimension q+q−1.

2.1step 1.1F2F3

The Cartan pairing. The normalized cover-to-head Hom space is k in degree zero and there are no other simple types in a block, so quotient-cover evaluation of [F2] identifies the tensor pairing with T(Pr,Ss)=δrs, with distinct roots paired by zero. The integral identification of [F3] maps P0,P1,P2 to v,Fv,F(2)v and [B2]=(q+q−1)[P2] to F2v, and in G0 the regular classes are [B1]=(1+q2)[S1] and [B2]=(q+q−1)[S2].

3.1step 2.1F3∎

The restricted dual. The canonical restricted-dual map sends Sr to the form-dual of the corresponding divided lower vector, and since T pairs Pr with Ss by δrs it does not identify B1 with S1; the scalar q+q−1 is not removed by the pairing. This is a cover/simple pairing computation, not a claim that the Cartan matrix is all ones or that a trace removes a denominator, and it is a finite computation using no choice.

Sources