How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Curved geometry, mesh generation and conservative transfer — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Certified geometric predicates
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Curved geometry, mesh generation and conservative transfer
- Delaunay triangulations and voronoi computation
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite-element meshes and interpolation
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Outward rounded interval and ball arithmetic
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Weak Derivatives and Sobolev Spaces
2 · Summary
The examples calculate an inverted map, construct a ten-cell isoparametric unit-disk cover, verify a conservative remap between opposite-diagonal curved meshes, and check a parabolic geometry approximation. The three-dimensional counterexample shows why an empty-sphere condition alone does not bound tetrahedral shape.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
An orientation-reversing cell fails the Jacobian certificate
Example
Take the reference triangle with vertices and the affine map . Its Jacobian determinant is , so it cannot satisfy the admissibility condition .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit reference triangle and the map .
Admissible isoparametric curved cells: admissibility requires an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism with determinant bounded below by a positive constant.
Verification
The derivative matrix is , whose determinant is .
Since is not bounded below by any positive , this map is rejected by the admissibility certificate.
A ten-cell isoparametric mesh exactly covers the unit disk
Example
Assume Countable Choice. Let and . Map the reference square to the central square by and split it into two triangles. For the top annular sector use the parameter rectangle with coordinates , set , , and map by ; split this rectangle into two triangles and rotate it for the other three sides. These ten mapped triangles have positive Jacobians, matching traces, and union equal to the closed unit disk.
Geometry sketch
The central square and four annular sectors are shown with their shared radial rays. Dashed lines indicate the chosen splits of the mapped sector rectangles; their exact curved images are given by above and the rotations, so the sketch is topological and is not used in the coverage proof.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; , the central map , the sector map , and four rotations by multiples of .
Admissible isoparametric curved cells: each cell map must have a positive Jacobian and neighboring mapped traces must agree.
Pullback gradients and induced surface metrics: under Countable Choice, the metric and surface factors are determined by the Gram matrices of the map derivatives.
A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: under Countable Choice, a diffeomorphism changes variables with its positive Jacobian.
Countable Choice is used through [F2] and [F3] (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Verification
, so maps bijectively onto , since and . Its Gram determinant gives the same volume factor by [F2]. On the top sector, and because . Polar-coordinate differentiation gives ; the Gram determinant satisfies . Rotations preserve these determinants.
At , , which is exactly the trace of on its top edge; at , , so the outer trace is the unit-circle arc from angle to . The two radial side traces match those of adjacent rotated sectors. Hence all ten pieces meet only along identical mapped edges.
For each angle , the square boundary on that ray has radius and the unit-circle boundary has radius . The sector map covers exactly the radii between them. Four rotated angular ranges cover the annulus outside the central square, with shared corner rays only; covers the central square. Therefore the ten mapped triangles cover the unit disk without interior overlap.
The central area is . By [F3], the sector area is the polar integral . Since , this equals . Four rotated sectors have total area , so the union area is , consistent with the unit disk.
Opposite diagonals conserve mass under a curved shear
Example
Assume Countable Choice. Map by the area-preserving shear . Triangulate the square once along the southwest-to-northeast diagonal and once along the other diagonal; map both meshes by the same . Every source-target overlap has area . If the source cell values are and , each target average is , source and target total mass are both , and all target values remain nonnegative.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the square, the shear , opposite-diagonal triangulations, and source values .
Curved-domain geometry approximation errors: geometry maps carry a Jacobian and define the physical image domain.
Intersection-volume conservative remapping: under Countable Choice, target values are exact overlap-weighted averages.
Overlap remapping is an L2 projection, conservative and positive: assuming Countable Choice, exact overlap remapping conserves mass and preserves nonnegativity.
A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: under Countable Choice, a diffeomorphism changes variables with its positive Jacobian.
Countable Choice is used through [F2], [F3], and [F4] (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Verification
The shear is a global diffeomorphism with inverse and derivative of determinant . Apply [F4] to each overlap to see that its physical area equals the reference overlap area. In the reference square, the two diagonals meet at the center; the two diagonals divide the square into four corner triangles, each with base along a side and altitude to the center, so each nonempty source-target overlap has area .
Each target triangle has area and receives source mass , so its target average is . The source mass is , and target mass is .
The exact remap therefore has source values , four nonempty overlaps of area , target cell areas , and target averages . This explicitly verifies the remap formula.
A parabolic shear has certified linear geometry approximations
Example
Assume Countable Choice. On , the exact shear maps each straight reference edge to a straight or parabolic arc. Its determinant is . On any shape-regular affine mesh, the nodal P1 geometry map satisfies , , and for small enough . Consequently its Laplace tensor differs from the exact pulled-back tensor by at most in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; a matching shape-regular affine triangulation of the square and the map .
Curved-domain geometry approximation errors: admissible cellwise geometry maps have matching traces, positive Jacobians and common image topology; measure their uniform value and derivative errors, and boundary-trace compatibility must be stated separately.
P1 approximation of a parabolic shear map: under Countable Choice, the vertexwise P1 map has , , for small , and is globally injective.
Derivative geometry error controls the Laplace tensor defect: with both Jacobians bounded below by and both map derivatives uniformly bounded, derivative error bounds the Laplace tensor gap by .
A continuous bijection from a compact metric space onto a metric space carries open sets to open sets, so its inverse is continuous: a continuous bijection from a compact metric space to a metric space has continuous inverse.
Countable Choice is the explicit hypothesis of [F2] (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Verification
Differentiate to obtain and . The quadratic term makes the image of a nonvertical straight edge a parabolic arc, while vertical edges remain vertical.
Apply [F2] on the shape-regular mesh to get the stated value error, derivative error, and positive-Jacobian certificate.
On each shared reference edge, the two affine traces of agree at its endpoints and therefore agree everywhere on that edge. Thus has matching traces; the exact map is globally smooth and has matching traces as well. On each boundary edge, is the straight segment joining the exact images of its vertices. The vertical boundary traces agree exactly with ; on each horizontal boundary segment, , so the boundary discrepancy is bounded by from step 1.2. Compatibility here does not assert equality of the exact parabolic arcs and their straight approximations. By [F2], is continuous and injective on the compact square, hence by [F4] is a homeomorphism onto its image, as is . Its cell restrictions are invertible affine maps extending to neighborhood diffeomorphisms; the exact restrictions extend by the global shear. These facts verify matching and boundary-trace compatibility and common image topology in [F1].
Step 1.1 bounds uniformly, and step 1.2 gives and determinant lower bounds , . Apply [F3] cellwise, with the compatible maps from step 2.1, and substitute from step 1.2. This yields with constants uniform over the mesh family.
An empty-sphere tetrahedron can be arbitrarily flat
Statement refuted
For each integer , set and take the four unweighted sites with distinct stable identifiers at , , , and . All coordinates are dyadic. They span one tetrahedron. Its circumsphere is empty of other sites because there are no other sites, so it is a Delaunay tetrahedron, while its inradius tends to zero and its diameter is at least as .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: For each integer , the four unweighted sites with distinct stable identifiers and coordinates as specified, with .
Three-dimensional Delaunay and weighted regular triangulations by lifting: in the unweighted full-dimensional case the regular subdivision is ordinary Delaunay, and tetrahedra have empty circumspheres.
Counterexample
For every , and the four sites therefore satisfy the dyadic-coordinate input condition of [F1]. The first three points are noncollinear in and has positive height, so the four points are affinely independent and form a nondegenerate tetrahedron. Its volume is one third of base area times height , namely . With only these four sites, its circumsphere contains no other site in its interior, so [F1] makes it an empty-sphere Delaunay tetrahedron.
The total face area is at least the base area and is bounded above uniformly in , since every edge length is at most and each of the four face areas is at most half the product of two such edge lengths; in particular . The inradius is , so and . The diameter is at least . Thus empty-sphere Delaunay membership imposes no positive uniform inradius-to-diameter bound in three dimensions.
Sources
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661 Fall 2023, Part III, Chapter 8
- Gerald Dziuk and Charles M. Elliott, Finite element methods for surface PDEs, Acta Numerica 22 (2013)
- Devon Powell and Tom Abel, An exact general remeshing scheme applied to physically conservative voxelization
- Zhengru Zhang, Moving Mesh Method with Conservative Interpolation Based on L2-Projection, Commun. Comput. Phys. 1 (2006), 930–944
- Jonathan R. Shewchuk, Delaunay Refinement Mesh Generation, 1999