Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 5 results · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 4 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Curved geometry, mesh generation and conservative transfer — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples calculate an inverted map, construct a ten-cell isoparametric unit-disk cover, verify a conservative remap between opposite-diagonal curved meshes, and check a parabolic geometry approximation. The three-dimensional counterexample shows why an empty-sphere condition alone does not bound tetrahedral shape.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

An orientation-reversing cell fails the Jacobian certificate

Example

Take the reference triangle with vertices (0,0),(1,0),(0,1) and the affine map F(x,y)=(y,x). Its Jacobian determinant is −1, so it cannot satisfy the admissibility condition JF≥j0>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The unit reference triangle and the map F(x,y)=(y,x).

[F1]

Admissible isoparametric curved cells: admissibility requires an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism with determinant bounded below by a positive constant.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

The derivative matrix is DF=(0110), whose determinant is −1.

2.1F1step 1.1∎

Since −1 is not bounded below by any positive j0, this map is rejected by the admissibility certificate.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

A ten-cell isoparametric mesh exactly covers the unit disk

Example

Assume Countable Choice. Let a=1/2 and g(t)=atan⁡(πt/4). Map the reference square [−1,1]2 to the central square [−a,a]2 by H(t,q)=(g(t),g(q)) and split it into two triangles. For the top annular sector use the parameter rectangle [−1,1]×[0,1] with coordinates (t,s), set θ(t)=π/2−πt/4, r(s,t)=(1−s)a/sin⁡θ(t)+s, and map by F(t,s)=r(s,t)(cos⁡θ(t),sin⁡θ(t)); split this rectangle into two triangles and rotate it for the other three sides. These ten mapped triangles have positive Jacobians, matching traces, and union equal to the closed unit disk.

Geometry sketch

The central square and four annular sectors are shown with their shared radial rays. Dashed lines indicate the chosen splits of the mapped sector rectangles; their exact curved images are given by F above and the rotations, so the sketch is topological and is not used in the coverage proof.

2centralcells8sectorcells

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; a=1/2, the central map H, the sector map F, and four rotations by multiples of π/2.

[F1]

Admissible isoparametric curved cells: each cell map must have a positive Jacobian and neighboring mapped traces must agree.

[F2]

Pullback gradients and induced surface metrics: under Countable Choice, the metric and surface factors are determined by the Gram matrices of the map derivatives.

[F3]

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: under Countable Choice, a C1 diffeomorphism changes variables with its positive Jacobian.

[A1]

Countable Choice is used through [F2] and [F3] (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Verification

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

g′(t)=a(π/4)sec⁡2(πt/4)>0, so H maps [−1,1]2 bijectively onto [−a,a]2, since g(−1)=−a and g(1)=a. Its Gram determinant gives the same volume factor by [F2]. On the top sector, θ′=−π/4 and rs=1−a/sin⁡θ≥1−a2>0 because sin⁡θ≥2/2. Polar-coordinate differentiation gives det⁡DF=rrs(−θ′)>0; the Gram determinant satisfies det⁡(DFTDF)=det⁡DF. Rotations preserve these determinants.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

At s=0, F(t,0)=(acot⁡θ(t),a)=(g(t),a), which is exactly the trace of H on its top edge; at s=1, r=1, so the outer trace is the unit-circle arc from angle 3π/4 to π/4. The two radial side traces match those of adjacent rotated sectors. Hence all ten pieces meet only along identical mapped edges.

3.1givenstep 2.1algebra

For each angle θ∈[π/4,3π/4], the square boundary on that ray has radius a/sin⁡θ and the unit-circle boundary has radius 1. The sector map covers exactly the radii between them. Four rotated angular ranges cover the annulus outside the central square, with shared corner rays only; H covers the central square. Therefore the ten mapped triangles cover the unit disk without interior overlap.

4.1F3A1step 3.1algebra∎

The central area is 4a2=1. By [F3], the sector area is the polar integral 12∫π/43π/4(1−a2csc⁡2θ)dθ. Since [−cot⁡θ]π/43π/4=2, this equals π/4−a2=(π−1)/4. Four rotated sectors have total area π−1, so the union area is π, consistent with the unit disk.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Opposite diagonals conserve mass under a curved shear

Example

Assume Countable Choice. Map [−1,1]2 by the area-preserving shear Φ(x,y)=(x,y+x2/4). Triangulate the square once along the southwest-to-northeast diagonal and once along the other diagonal; map both meshes by the same Φ. Every source-target overlap has area 1. If the source cell values are 2 and 0, each target average is 1, source and target total mass are both 4, and all target values remain nonnegative.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the square, the shear Φ(x,y)=(x,y+x2/4), opposite-diagonal triangulations, and source values 2,0.

[F1]

Curved-domain geometry approximation errors: geometry maps carry a Jacobian and define the physical image domain.

[F2]

Intersection-volume conservative remapping: under Countable Choice, target values are exact overlap-weighted averages.

[F3]

Overlap remapping is an L2 projection, conservative and positive: assuming Countable Choice, exact overlap remapping conserves mass and preserves nonnegativity.

[F4]

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: under Countable Choice, a C1 diffeomorphism changes variables with its positive Jacobian.

[A1]

Countable Choice is used through [F2], [F3], and [F4] (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Verification

1.1F1F4A1givenalgebra

The shear is a global C1 diffeomorphism with inverse (X,Y)↦(X,Y−X2/4) and derivative (10x/21) of determinant 1. Apply [F4] to each overlap to see that its physical area equals the reference overlap area. In the reference square, the two diagonals meet at the center; the two diagonals divide the square into four corner triangles, each with base 2 along a side and altitude 1 to the center, so each nonempty source-target overlap has area 1.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Each target triangle has area 2 and receives source mass 2(1)+0(1)=2, so its target average is 1. The source mass is 2⋅2+0⋅2=4, and target mass is 2(1)+2(1)=4.

3.1F2step 2.1∎

The exact remap therefore has source values (2,0), four nonempty overlaps of area 1, target cell areas 2, and target averages (1,1). This explicitly verifies the remap formula.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

A parabolic shear has certified linear geometry approximations

Example

Assume Countable Choice. On [−1,1]2, the exact shear Φ(x,y)=(x,y+x2/4) maps each straight reference edge to a straight or parabolic arc. Its determinant is 1. On any shape-regular affine mesh, the nodal P1 geometry map satisfies e0≤Ch2, e1≤Ch, and Jh≥1/2 for small enough h. Consequently its Laplace tensor differs from the exact pulled-back tensor by at most Ch in L∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; a matching shape-regular affine triangulation of the square and the map Φ(x,y)=(x,y+x2/4).

[F1]

Curved-domain geometry approximation errors: admissible cellwise geometry maps have matching traces, positive Jacobians and common image topology; e0,e1 measure their uniform value and derivative errors, and boundary-trace compatibility must be stated separately.

[F2]

P1 approximation of a parabolic shear map: under Countable Choice, the vertexwise P1 map Φh=(x,y+Ih(x2/4)) has e0≤Ch2, e1≤Ch, det⁡DΦh≥1/2 for small h, and is globally injective.

[F3]

Derivative geometry error controls the Laplace tensor defect: with both Jacobians bounded below by j∗>0 and both map derivatives uniformly bounded, derivative error e1 bounds the Laplace tensor gap by Ce1.

[F4]

A continuous bijection from a compact metric space onto a metric space carries open sets to open sets, so its inverse is continuous: a continuous bijection from a compact metric space to a metric space has continuous inverse.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the explicit hypothesis of [F2] (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

Differentiate Φ to obtain DΦ=(10x/21) and det⁡DΦ=1. The quadratic term makes the image of a nonvertical straight edge a parabolic arc, while vertical edges remain vertical.

1.2F1F2A1given

Apply [F2] on the shape-regular mesh to get the stated value error, derivative error, and positive-Jacobian certificate.

2.1F1F2F4A1givenstep 1.1step 1.2algebra

On each shared reference edge, the two affine traces of Ih(x2/4) agree at its endpoints and therefore agree everywhere on that edge. Thus Φh has matching traces; the exact map is globally smooth and has matching traces as well. On each boundary edge, Φh is the straight segment joining the exact images of its vertices. The vertical boundary traces agree exactly with Φ; on each horizontal boundary segment, Φh(x,±1)=(x,±1+Ih(x2/4)), so the boundary discrepancy is bounded by Ch2 from step 1.2. Compatibility here does not assert equality of the exact parabolic arcs and their straight approximations. By [F2], Φh is continuous and injective on the compact square, hence by [F4] is a homeomorphism onto its image, as is Φ. Its cell restrictions are invertible affine maps extending to neighborhood diffeomorphisms; the exact restrictions extend by the global shear. These facts verify matching and boundary-trace compatibility and common image topology in [F1].

3.1F3A1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

Step 1.1 bounds DΦ uniformly, and step 1.2 gives ∥DΦh∥∞≤∥DΦ∥∞+Ch and determinant lower bounds J=1, Jh≥1/2. Apply [F3] cellwise, with the compatible maps from step 2.1, and substitute e1≤Ch from step 1.2. This yields ∥B−Bh∥∞≤Ch with constants uniform over the mesh family.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

An empty-sphere tetrahedron can be arbitrarily flat

Statement refuted

For each integer n≥1, set εn=2−n and take the four unweighted sites with distinct stable identifiers 1,2,3,4 at p1=(0,0,0), p2=(1,0,0), p3=(0,1,0), and p4=(1/4,1/4,εn). All coordinates are dyadic. They span one tetrahedron. Its circumsphere is empty of other sites because there are no other sites, so it is a Delaunay tetrahedron, while its inradius tends to zero and its diameter is at least 1 as n→∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: For each integer n≥1, the four unweighted sites with distinct stable identifiers 1,2,3,4 and coordinates p1,p2,p3,p4 as specified, with εn=2−n.

[F1]

Three-dimensional Delaunay and weighted regular triangulations by lifting: in the unweighted full-dimensional case the regular subdivision is ordinary Delaunay, and tetrahedra have empty circumspheres.

Counterexample

1.1F1givenalgebra

For every n≥1, εn∈D and the four sites therefore satisfy the dyadic-coordinate input condition of [F1]. The first three points are noncollinear in z=0 and p4 has positive height, so the four points are affinely independent and form a nondegenerate tetrahedron. Its volume is one third of base area 1/2 times height εn, namely Vn=εn/6. With only these four sites, its circumsphere contains no other site in its interior, so [F1] makes it an empty-sphere Delaunay tetrahedron.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

The total face area Sn is at least the base area 1/2 and is bounded above uniformly in n, since every edge length is at most 2 and each of the four face areas is at most half the product of two such edge lengths; in particular Sn≤8. The inradius is rn=3Vn/Sn=εn/(2Sn), so εn/16≤rn≤εn and rn→0. The diameter is at least ∣p1−p2∣=1. Thus empty-sphere Delaunay membership imposes no positive uniform inradius-to-diameter bound in three dimensions.

Sources