How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Asymptotic ends and ADM surface integrals
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Absolute Continuity and the Sharp Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Causal And Initial Value Boundaries
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Connections And Free Fall
- Connections Levi Civita and Parallel Transport
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Curvature And Tides
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Differentiation of Monotone Functions and the Vitali Covering Theorem
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Framework And Geometry
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Geodesics, the Exponential Map, Completeness, and Hopf–Rinow
- Gr14 Full High Regularity Symmetric Hyperbolic Proof
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemann Curvature and Riemannian Submanifolds
- Riemannian Metrics Length Distance and Volume
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Spacetime Primitives
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensors And Observers
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
A specified asymptotically Euclidean ADM end
A fixed-chart geometric definition of an asymptotic energy limit; no Einstein constraint, positivity, coordinate-invariance, or empirical claim is included.
Definition
For the geometric initial-data convention, let be a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold and let be a smooth embedded three-manifold whose induced metric is positive definite. Its future unit normal satisfies and for . The second fundamental form is , with the Levi-Civita connection of and the curvature sign convention stated in the Definition references section. The end data below are specified as a Riemannian metric and a symmetric tensor of these types; no embedding or Einstein constraint equation is required.
Let , where is a length, are Cartesian coordinates measured in metres, and . Write for the standard Euclidean metric, where if and otherwise; repeated spatial indices are summed over . A fixed-chart asymptotically Euclidean end consists of this exterior domain, a symmetric positive-definite covariant -tensor , and a symmetric covariant -tensor such that where is a constant real matrix, , and . For any tensor components , the notation means that for every multi-index with there are constants such that for , uniformly in angle. Thus the definition requires two Cartesian derivatives of the metric remainder and one of . The coordinates and have units of metres; and are dimensionless, has units of metres, and has inverse-length units in a spatial orthonormal frame.
For , the coordinate sphere is a smooth embedded surface in . Let be its inclusion and its induced Riemannian metric. The Euclidean area measure is the Riemannian area measure of : for any smooth rank-two local parametrization with coordinates , its coordinate density is
The change-of-variables formula makes this density independent of the chosen surface coordinates; since is measured in metres, has units of square metres. The sphere's outward Euclidean unit normal has components . If its limiting integral exists as —the spatial-infinity limit in this chosen chart—the fixed-chart ADM energy and its associated mass are Here is the SI speed-of-light conversion constant with units metres per second, and is the Newtonian gravitational conversion constant with units metres cubed per kilogram per second squared. The limit has units of metres, has units of joules, and has units of kilograms. The prefactor fixes the asymptotic time-translation normalization; in SI coordinates use . No rescaling of this convention is part of the definition.
Definition references
Conventions and scope
The formula depends only on , not on ; the stated decay of records the initial-data setting. This definition does not assert that satisfies the Einstein constraint equations, that the limit is invariant under changes of chart, or that the energy is positive. It is a limit at spatial infinity, not a finite-radius surface value or a local gravitational energy density. Angular momentum and center of mass require additional decay and parity hypotheses and are outside this definition.
The sketch is a two-dimensional section through the Cartesian end. The shaded disk is excluded from , its dashed boundary is , and the outer circle is a representative coordinate sphere with . The arrow at the outer circle points along the outward Euclidean unit normal . The sketch suppresses the other angular directions and plays no role in any proof; the definitions above specify the full three-dimensional objects.
Scalar curvature of a conformally Euclidean three-metric
A local differential-geometric identity for a Riemannian metric; it asserts no Einstein constraint or physical model.
Statement
Let be a nonempty open set with Cartesian coordinates , standard Euclidean metric with for and otherwise, inverse components , and Laplacian . Let and set . Form the product Lorentzian manifold with metric and future orientation ; its slice is a smooth spacelike hypersurface with induced metric . Use the induced connection and curvature convention supplied for this slice by the earlier normal-decomposition theorem. In Cartesian coordinates define by , , and . For , write . Then
This statement concerns a smooth positive conformal metric and its induced scalar curvature. The product construction only fixes the geometric convention; no Einstein equation, energy condition, or completeness hypothesis is imposed.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The open Euclidean coordinate domain , its metric , the positive smooth function , and the metric in the Statement.
For an induced Riemannian metric on a smooth spacelike hypersurface, is its Levi-Civita connection, has the ambient curvature operator convention, and is its scalar curvature (Gauss-Codazzi decomposition in Gaussian normal coordinates and the constraint equations in terms of the induced metric and second fundamental form, proof step 1.1 and Statement clause (c)).
is smooth and strictly positive, so is smooth and is a smooth Riemannian metric.
Proof
Given: [F1], [A1], and the Cartesian coordinates in the Statement.
Write for the Christoffel coefficients of in the coordinate frame. Torsion-freedom gives , and metric compatibility gives . Add this identity to the one with interchanged and subtract the one with interchanged; using symmetry of and yields . Multiplying by gives the coordinate Levi-Civita formula .
Since and , substitution into step 1.1 gives , where and .
In a coordinate frame the definition gives ; contraction in the first and third slots gives . Substituting step 2.1 and applying the product rule gives , , , and . Therefore .
Contract the Ricci tensor in step 3.1 with to obtain . For , the chain rule gives and . The two contributions cancel, and , so .
Remarks
The identity is proved here from the library's curvature sign convention. It is used only for explicit smooth conformal metrics; no scalar-curvature sign condition or completeness assertion is assumed.
ADM energy of a conformally flat end
A fixed-chart calculation for a conformally flat end; no constraint equation, positivity result, or empirical claim is inferred.
Statement
On a fixed-chart end with the ADM convention stated below, let satisfy , where has units of metres and . Set and choose any symmetric tensor . Then the ADM limit exists in the specified chart and
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The fixed Cartesian end and ADM convention of A specified asymptotically Euclidean ADM end, a smooth positive with , and .
On the fixed chart, is times the limit of , where is induced by and a local parametrization has density ; controls Cartesian derivatives of order by uniformly in angle; and have the SI units stated in the definition (A specified asymptotically Euclidean ADM end).
is a real length parameter, is strictly positive on , and the remainder bounds are uniform in angle, as required by the Statement.
Proof
Given: [F1], [A1], and the conformally flat metric in the Statement.
Set . Derivatives of satisfy for , since each derivative is homogeneous of degree and bounded on the unit sphere. Together with , this gives ; the product rule gives . Also , so the binomial expansion yields . Since , is positive definite and , and the supplied symmetric is with decay. Thus satisfies the definition of a fixed-chart end with and . Now gives and , hence . Contracting with on replaces by .
The radial derivative bounds in [F1] and give and , uniformly in angle. Thus , so step 1.1's contracted integrand is , uniformly on .
Parameterize the complement of the poles and one meridian in by , with coordinates and . Its coordinate tangent vectors are and , so the induced-metric Gram matrix is , with determinant . The area-measure definition in [F1] therefore gives . The omitted poles and meridian have area zero, so integrating the uniform expansion in step 2.1 over this chart yields , since . This proves the limit exists.
Multiplying the limit in step 3.1 by from [F1] gives . The dimensions are , as specified in [F1].
Remarks
The proof uses the fixed chart and the exact stated falloff. It proves neither coordinate invariance for broader asymptotic classes nor a positivity theorem.
Compact interior changes leave a fixed ADM integral unchanged
A fixed-chart equality of asymptotic limits under compactly supported metric changes; no field equation or positivity result is used.
Statement
Let and be two Riemannian metrics on the same end , with the same fixed Cartesian chart and asymptotic time normalization stated below. Suppose outside a compact set and both fixed-chart ADM limits exist. Then The symmetric tensors associated with the two data sets may differ; each need only satisfy the decay in the definition.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The same end chart and ADM formula for both metrics, a compact set , equality on , and existence of both limits.
The ADM integrand in the fixed chart is on , with the same constant prefactor for both metrics; does not enter that formula (A specified asymptotically Euclidean ADM end).
The two limits exist, and the metrics agree on the complement of the same compact set in the same chart, as stipulated.
Proof
Given: [F1], [A1], and the two metrics in the Statement.
If is nonempty, continuity of on compact gives a finite . If is empty, set . For every , the sphere is disjoint from and lies in the open set , on which . Since the metrics agree on this open set, their first Cartesian derivatives also agree at every point of .
By [F1] and step 1.1, the two integrands coincide pointwise on every with , so the two surface integrals are equal for all such . Taking the limits, which exist by [A1], gives equal limits. Multiplication by the common factor proves the equality of ADM energies.
Remarks
This is a fixed-chart statement. It makes no claim of diffeomorphism invariance, constraint preservation, completeness, or scalar-curvature equality.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
None yet.
Sources
- Eric Gourgoulhon, 3+1 Formalism and Bases of Numerical Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/0703035v1 (2007), §§7.2.1–7.2.2 and 7.3.1–7.3.2, PDF pp. 103–110; geometric units are used.
- Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Lecture Notes on 3+1 Numerical Relativity, v0.1 (2021), §§7.1–7.2 and §7.2.2, PDF pp. 32–35; geometric units are used.
- José Luis Jaramillo, Juan Antonio Valiente Kroon, and Eric Gourgoulhon, From Geometry to Numerics, arXiv:0712.2332v2 (2008), §2.1 and equation (2), PDF pp. 7–8.
- Eric Gourgoulhon, 3+1 Formalism and Bases of Numerical Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/0703035v1 (2007), §§6.3.1–6.3.2, equations (6.48)–(6.52), PDF pp. 89–91.
- Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Lecture Notes on 3+1 Numerical Relativity, v0.1 (2021), §6.3, equation (6.17), PDF pp. 26–27.
- Eric Gourgoulhon, 3+1 Formalism and Bases of Numerical Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/0703035v1 (2007), §§7.3.1–7.3.2, equations (7.14)–(7.15) and (7.45)–(7.48), PDF pp. 105–110.
- Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Lecture Notes on 3+1 Numerical Relativity, v0.1 (2021), §§7.2 and 7.2.2, equations (7.6b)–(7.6d) and (7.18)–(7.22), PDF pp. 33–35.
- José Luis Jaramillo, Juan Antonio Valiente Kroon, and Eric Gourgoulhon, From Geometry to Numerics, arXiv:0712.2332v2 (2008), §2.1, equation (2), PDF pp. 7–8.
- Eric Gourgoulhon, 3+1 Formalism and Bases of Numerical Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/0703035v1 (2007), §§7.2.1 and 7.3.1, equations (7.13)–(7.15), PDF pp. 103–106.
- Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Lecture Notes on 3+1 Numerical Relativity, v0.1 (2021), §§7.1–7.2, equations (7.1a)–(7.6c), PDF pp. 32–34.