How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Monomial Characters and M Groups - Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Brauer Induction and Elementary Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Characters and the Orthogonality Relations
- Clifford Theory over Normal Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Extraspecial p-Groups and Central Products
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Averaging and Character-Theory Prerequisites
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Induced Representations, Frobenius Reciprocity and Applications
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Maschke's Theorem, Complete Reducibility and the Structure of k[G]
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monomial Characters and M Groups
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Semidirect Products, Automorphism Groups and Split Extensions
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples exhibit the monomial inductions of the main page on explicit groups. For the dihedral group the dual of the cyclic subgroup splits into the characters fixed by inversion, which extend to the linear characters of the group, and the remaining two-element orbits, which give the irreducible characters of degree two, each induced from a linear character of the cyclic subgroup of index two. These inductions exhibit one choice of subgroup for each character; an irreducible may also be induced from a different subgroup. The unitriangular group is handled the same way over an abelian normal subgroup of index : its centre and commutator subgroup coincide, the quotient contributes linear characters, and the nontrivial orbits of the dual contribute irreducible characters of degree , so that the sum of squared degrees exhausts the group of order .
The counterexample is the binary tetrahedral group of order , constructed inside the quaternions: it is solvable, its left multiplication on the quaternions is a faithful irreducible complex representation of degree two, and its abelianization is cyclic of order three, so it has no subgroup of index two. A degree-two monomial character would have to be induced from such a subgroup, so is a solvable group that is not an -group. The last example records the degenerate ends of the theory: a one-dimensional character is induced from the group itself and is monomial, the trivial group is an -group, and every finite abelian group is an -group because all of its irreducible complex characters are linear.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
All finite dihedral groups are M-groups
Example
For let the dihedral group of order in the notation of with inversion action has order and the dihedral relations. Then every irreducible complex character of is monomial, so is an -group, and the monomial inductions can be written down. With :
- each irreducible character of either is a linear character of whose restriction to is an -fixed linear character of — these are exactly the linear characters, each of them an extension of its restriction — or is for a linear character of the cyclic subgroup that is not fixed by , and then it has degree ;
- the second kind are exactly the irreducible characters of degree , one for each two-element orbit ;
- the list gives an inducing subgroup for every irreducible character: itself for a linear character and for a degree-two character. Thus is an -group; the displayed inducing subgroups need not be unique. The group is also supersolvable: a prime-factor subgroup series of the cyclic group has every term normal in , and adjoining gives a final factor of order two. This makes the result a special case of Finite supersolvable groups are M-groups, while the computation exhibits the characters and inductions explicitly.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , the group with and inversion action , the number , and an irreducible complex character .
, , , for all , and every element of has a unique form with , ; at the degenerate values and are abelian. ( with inversion action has order and the dihedral relations).
Every irreducible complex representation of a finite abelian group has degree , and is a splitting field for every finite group: it has characteristic and contains all roots of unity. (Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field is one-dimensional, A cyclotomic field splits a finite group).
Conjugation of characters is ; for the inertia group satisfies , and for one sets occurs in . (Inertia group and characters lying above a normal type).
Clifford correspondence: for , and , induction is a bijection , and the sets indexed by distinct -orbits in partition . (Clifford correspondence).
Clifford restriction formula: for with there is a positive integer with . In particular forces . (Clifford restriction formula).
For with finite, . (For with finite, ).
For a finite-dimensional -representation one has (The dimension of an induced finite-dimensional representation is ), and for the covariance condition determines by , so that evaluation at is a -isomorphism , (The induced -linear -module as -covariant functions on ).
A character of is monomial if for some and linear character , and is an -group if every irreducible complex character of is monomial. (Monomial representations, monomial characters, and M-groups).
equals for every representation affording . (The kernel of a complex character agrees with the kernel of any representation affording it).
If and a representation of has , then factors through , and is irreducible over if and only if it is irreducible over . (A representation with kernel containing a normal subgroup factors through the quotient, and irreducibility is unchanged by inflation).
The -th roots of unity in are exactly for , and these are distinct numbers. (The -th roots of a complex number and the distinct roots of unity for every ).
For and integers the congruence is solvable exactly when , and then it has exactly solution classes modulo . (For , is solvable exactly when , and then has exactly solution classes modulo ).
Verification
By [F1] the group has order , the subgroup is cyclic of index and normal, , and for ; in particular has order modulo and .
is cyclic, hence abelian, so by [F2] every irreducible complex character of is one-dimensional, i.e. a group homomorphism ; moreover is a splitting field for every finite group.
By [F7] a linear character of is monomial: taking and the one-dimensional module affording it, evaluation at is an isomorphism , so has the monomial form of [F8]; conversely, if with linear then , so a monomial character of is linear exactly when it is induced from itself.
The homomorphisms , , defined by , are well defined because , and ; for they are pairwise distinct, since for by [F11]. Conversely, if is any homomorphism then , so by [F11] there is with , whence for all and . Hence consists of exactly distinct linear characters by step 1.2, and exactly when .
The claim that is supersolvable also uses a genuine normal series with prime-order factors. Write with primes repeated according to multiplicity and let be the unique subgroup of the cyclic group of order , with and . Each is characteristic in and therefore normal in because by step 1.1; each has prime order , and has order two. Hence is a normal prime-factor series, including when , as required by Finite supersolvable groups are M-groups.
For each the conjugate is : by [F3] and the inversion action of step 1.1, for all , so the two homomorphisms of agree on the generator of . By step 2.1 the orbit of under the action of on is therefore , of size exactly when .
The restriction of to the normal subgroup is a nonzero finite-dimensional -module, so it has an irreducible -submodule, whose character is some by step 2.1; this occurs in , that is, in the notation of [F3].
Fix . By [F3] the inertia group contains and is contained in ; by [F6] applied to one has , so and or . By steps 1.1 and 3.1 the equality holds exactly when , i.e. exactly when , which by step 2.1 is exactly the condition ; equivalently . Hence the number of -fixed characters of is the number of solutions of , which by [F12] (with , ) is
Case . By [F4] applied to and , the irreducible characters of lying over are exactly the with . Every is linear by step 1.2, so occurs in itself, and lies over exactly when , by the distinctness in step 2.1. Hence with linear: is monomial by [F8], and by [F7] and step 1.1.
Case : then is -fixed. By [F5] with , for the positive integer , that is, for all ; and by step 4.1 the -fixedness says , hence and for every .
Put . Then is normal in : for and one has , because fixes , so . Moreover : for the formula of step 5.2 gives , so by [F9].
For example, when the subgroup is normal of index two in and differs from . Define its linear character by and . Conjugation by sends to , so and . Since is abelian, its only irreducible character lying over is itself; [F4] therefore makes an irreducible character of degree by [F7]. Thus the degree-two character of has an inducing subgroup other than .
In the quotient the images generate (they are the images of the generators of ), and they commute: because by step 5.2, likewise , and , so . A group generated by two commuting elements is abelian, so is a finite abelian group.
Let be a representation affording , so by [F9] and by step 6.1. By [F10] the representation factors through and stays irreducible over ; so for some . Since is finite abelian by step 7.1 and is a splitting field, [F2] gives , hence : in this case is a linear character of . By step 1.3 is monomial, and since and with of degree , its restriction is (a degree- character occurring in a degree- character), so extends .
The linear characters of are exactly the extensions of the -fixed characters of found in step 4.1. Indeed, if is -fixed, i.e. by step 4.1, then for the formula is well defined by the uniqueness of the normal form [F1], and it is multiplicative: by [F1] the product of and is , and of that product is , which equals because and ; so is a linear character with and , and . Conversely a linear character of restricts to an -fixed by step 2.1, since , and is determined by together with (as ), hence equals for one ; by step 8.1 every linear character arises in this way from an -fixed . Distinct pairs give distinct characters, because their restrictions to differ or their values at differ, so there are exactly linear characters in total.
Every is monomial: if it is by step 5.1, and if it is linear by step 8.1, hence monomial by step 1.3. Therefore is an -group by [F8].
The degree- irreducible characters are exactly the characters of step 5.1, that is, the for that is not -fixed. Each such has orbit of size two by step 3.1, distinct orbits give disjoint sets by [F4], and by step 4.1 every orbit of size two arises from a character that is not -fixed. Since by step 4.1 exactly of the characters of are -fixed and the remaining split into two-element orbits, there are exactly irreducible characters of degree , each induced from the cyclic index-two subgroup ; the remaining irreducible characters are the linear ones of step 9.1. This constructs an inducing subgroup for every irreducible character without asserting that the subgroup is unique.
The degenerate cases are covered by the same statements. For the group is by [F1], and , and step 9.1 returns the two linear characters of and no character of degree ; for one has by [F1], and , and step 9.1 returns all four linear characters of , again with no character of degree . Both agree with steps 9.2 and 10.1, since in these cases every irreducible character is linear and hence monomial.
The example is verified: for every each irreducible complex character of is either a linear character extending an -fixed linear character of the cyclic subgroup (the characters of step 9.1) or the monomial character of a linear character of that is not -fixed, of degree (the characters of step 10.1); in either case it is monomial, so is an -group, with and including the degenerate cases .
The order- unitriangular group is an M-group
Example
Let be a prime and let be the Heisenberg group of order of The Heisenberg group of order over , with the multiplication of The Heisenberg multiplication is a group law, nonabelian, on a set of elements; these triples are the unipotent upper triangular matrices over . Then has exactly linear characters and exactly irreducible characters of degree , and every one of them is monomial:
- the linear characters are (), which are the characters of the abelian quotient for the central subgroup , and each is induced from itself;
- the characters of degree are for the abelian subgroup of index and the linear characters of with and , namely ; these are precisely the linear characters of that are nontrivial on the centre , and the inertia group of each of them is .
Consequently every irreducible character of is monomial, so is an -group; this holds for every prime , including .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A prime , the Heisenberg group with multiplication , the elements , , , the number , and the subsets and .
is a group of order with identity , inverse , and generate , each of order ; is nonabelian; the same group is the group of unipotent upper triangular matrices over . (The Heisenberg group of order over , The Heisenberg multiplication is a group law, nonabelian, on a set of elements).
Every irreducible complex representation of a finite abelian group has degree , and is a splitting field for every finite group. (Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field is one-dimensional, A cyclotomic field splits a finite group).
has order , and the -th roots of unity are for , pairwise distinct. (The -th roots of a complex number and the distinct roots of unity for every ).
Conjugation of characters is ; the inertia group is a subgroup, and denotes the irreducible characters of in which occurs. (Inertia group and characters lying above a normal type).
Clifford correspondence: for , and , induction is a bijection , and the sets over distinct -orbits in partition . (Clifford correspondence).
for every finite group . (The regular character gives a second proof of the sum-of-squares formula).
A character is monomial if it is induced from a linear character of a subgroup, and a finite group is a monomial group (-group) if all its irreducible complex characters are monomial. (Monomial representations, monomial characters, and M-groups).
is a field, so implies only for . (For every prime , the two operations on make it a field).
Verification
By [F1] the set with the displayed multiplication is a group of order , its identity is , its inverses are , and generate with .
is a subgroup: for the product is , and for the inverse computed from the formula of step 1.1 is (since ), which lies in ; so is closed under products and inverses, and because range over . The subset is contained in and has .
For define . This is well defined on the triple , and it is a homomorphism: by step 1.1 the first two coordinates of a product add, so . Different pairs give different characters, because and determine by the distinctness of the powers of in [F3]. Hence has at least characters of degree ; each of them is an irreducible character of and, being a linear character of the subgroup itself, is monomial in the sense of [F7]: in the covariant-function model, evaluation at identifies with its one-dimensional space, with inverse .
Characters of : for define . Each is a homomorphism, because the coordinates of multiply by adding by step 2.1: . The characters are pairwise distinct, since and are determined by by [F3]. Since the abelian group has only one-dimensional irreducible complex characters by [F2], and every such character is a homomorphism determined by its two values on and , each of which is a -th root of unity by [F3], there are exactly of them, so Moreover exactly when .
Conjugation formula: for and one has . Indeed by the multiplication law, and multiplying by the inverse from step 1.1 gives first coordinate , second coordinate , and third coordinate . This formula gives , so is normal. An element commuting with must have by this formula; comparison of its products with then forces . Conversely every commutes with all triples by the multiplication law. Thus is exactly the centre, and identifies with the additive group .
The action of on : by the definition [F4] and step 3.2, for every , where . Since characters are determined by their values,
Orbits and inertia groups. Fix and let run over , so that runs over while the remaining coordinates are arbitrary. If , then is injective by [F8] on the -element set , hence bijective, and the orbit of is , of size ; the stabilizer is by step 3.2, so . If , then for all by step 4.1, so . Hence the characters with split into orbits of size (the sets with a fixed ), and the characters with are fixed points.
Characters of degree . Let and let ; by step 5.1 its inertia group is . Since is abelian with irreducible characters exactly the by step 3.1, the only irreducible character of lying over is itself, so by the Clifford correspondence [F5] applied to and the set consists of the single character ; in particular is irreducible, of degree (a covariant function is specified by one scalar at each of the left-coset representatives), and it is monomial, being the induction of the linear character of the subgroup by [F7]. This construction is well defined on orbits: the two members of an orbit have the same inertia group and induce isomorphic characters, while distinct orbits have disjoint sets by [F5], so the orbits of step 5.1 produce pairwise distinct irreducible characters of , all of degree and all induced from the abelian subgroup of index .
Completeness. The linear characters of step 2.2 and the characters of degree of step 6.1 are pairwise distinct irreducible characters of , of degrees and . Since by [F6] and by step 1.1, and the sum of squares over the characters listed so far is the list already attains the total: there is no further irreducible character of , and the listed ones are exactly . In particular the linear and the degree- characters of steps 2.2 and 6.1 are precisely the irreducible characters of .
Therefore every irreducible complex character of is monomial: the linear characters are induced from itself by step 2.2, and the characters of degree are induced from the linear character of the abelian subgroup of index by step 6.1. By the definition [F7] the group of order is an -group, with exactly linear characters and exactly irreducibles of degree .
The example is verified: for every prime , including , the Heisenberg group has exactly linear characters, namely the , and exactly irreducible characters of degree , namely the with ; the linear characters are induced from itself, of index , and the degree- characters are induced from the abelian subgroup , of index , so is an -group.
A solvable group that is not an M-group
Statement refuted
"Every finite solvable group is an -group (Monomial representations, monomial characters, and M-groups)."
The binary tetrahedral group generated inside the nonzero quaternions by the quaternion group (The quaternion group inside the nonzero quaternions) and the element (The quaternions : real quadruples with componentwise addition and an explicit multiplication formula matching the table on ), is of order and is the internal semidirect product (An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup). The group is solvable, and left multiplication on , for the complex structure of step 1.3 below, is a faithful irreducible -dimensional complex representation of . Its character is an irreducible complex character, and is not monomial: has no subgroup of index two, whereas a monomial character of degree two is induced from a linear character of a subgroup of index two. Hence is a finite solvable group that is not an -group.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quaternions with basis and conjugate and norm (The quaternions : real quadruples with componentwise addition and an explicit multiplication formula matching the table on ), the quaternion group (The quaternion group inside the nonzero quaternions), the element , and the subgroup generated by and (The subgroup generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup , and cyclic groups).
In one has , , , , , , , the real multiples of are central, and is a ring in which ; if then and , so is a group. (The quaternions : real quadruples with componentwise addition and an explicit multiplication formula matching the table on , is a division ring that is not commutative, hence not a field: for , while and ).
is a subgroup of with whose elements are exactly , each written as a quadruple with coordinates in ; is its only element of order and each of has order . (The quaternion group inside the nonzero quaternions, is a subgroup of with eight elements, and is its only element of order ).
If , and for subgroups , then is the internal semidirect product of by . (An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup, Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation, Subgroup).
A nonempty subset of a group is a subgroup exactly when for all ; and is the smallest subgroup of containing , so for every subgroup with . (One-step subgroup test: a nonempty is a subgroup iff for all ; the identity and the inverses of are then those of , The subgroup generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup , and cyclic groups).
For the commutator is and is the subgroup generated by all commutators. (Commutators and the commutator subgroup ).
If then is abelian if and only if ; and is characteristic and normal, is abelian, and every homomorphism into an abelian group satisfies for a unique homomorphism , where is the quotient map. ( is abelian if and only if , The derived subgroup is characteristic and the abelianization is universal).
and , and is solvable when for some . (The derived series, solvable groups, and derived length).
If has index then ; a group of order for a prime is abelian; and for finite and one has . (Every subgroup of index two is normal, Every group of order , for prime , is abelian, Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
A complex representation of a group is a group homomorphism on a finite-dimensional -vector space ; its character is , its degree is , and a nonzero representation is irreducible exactly when and are its only invariant subspaces. (A finite-dimensional representation over a field, and its degree, The character of a finite-dimensional complex representation, Subrepresentations, direct sums of representations, and irreducibility).
A character of is monomial if for some and linear character ; is an -group if every irreducible complex character of is monomial; a nonzero representation is monomial exactly when its character is; the character of an irreducible representation is irreducible; and . (Monomial representations, monomial characters, and M-groups, An irreducible complex character, The induced -linear -module as -covariant functions on , The dimension of an induced finite-dimensional representation is ).
If have scalar parts and imaginary parts in the basis , then has scalar part and imaginary part , by the product formula of The quaternions : real quadruples with componentwise addition and an explicit multiplication formula matching the table on .
Counterexample
The element satisfies and . Indeed with by [F1], so ; by [A1] the product has scalar part and imaginary part , the cross product vanishing because the imaginary parts of and are antiparallel, so and by [F1], whence . Moreover and : the coordinates of and of are half-integers, whereas all coordinates of elements of lie in by [F2]. Hence are three distinct elements with and (exponent reduced modulo ), so is a subgroup of order and .
The derived subgroup of is . First , since by [F1] and [F5]. Second, has order by [F8] and is therefore abelian by [F8], so [F6] gives .
The subring of is a field isomorphic to via , and one obtains a complex structure on by for and . This is a -vector space structure: , , and , all by associativity and distributivity in the ring of [F1]. The elements form a -basis: for and one computes with coordinates by [F1], which vanishes only for ; and every with coordinates is , since . Hence with this structure is a -dimensional complex vector space.
Conjugation by permutes the generators of : one computes and , and expanding the four products , , , with the multiplication table of [F1] gives , so ; the same expansion with and gives and . Since is central by [F1] and every element of is by [F2], conjugation by maps the set bijectively onto itself; the same holds for , whose conjugation is the inverse permutation.
For the left multiplication is -linear, because by associativity [F1]; moreover and , so is a group homomorphism. Restricting to the subgroup gives a -dimensional complex representation of in the sense of [F9], since is a group and the restriction of a homomorphism is a homomorphism.
In the -basis the matrices are and : by step 1.3, and because by [F1], while and .
is normal in . Let ; conjugation by any is a bijection of , so if and only if , and if then , so . Thus is a subgroup of by [F4], and it contains (conjugation by an element of the subgroup preserves ) and by step 2.1. As is the smallest subgroup containing by [F4], one has , that is .
The representation is faithful: if for some , then .
The -module is irreducible. Let be a -invariant -subspace with . If then by step 1.3, so is a line, and is invariant under of step 2.3, hence equals one of the eigenspaces of the two distinct eigenvalues , namely or . But is also invariant under , whereas and , since and by steps 1.3 and 2.3. This contradiction shows , so has no nonzero proper -invariant subspace and is irreducible by [F9].
Every element of has the form with and . For one has with by step 3.1 (for , using ) and for the residue of modulo by step 1.1, so the product lies in ; and . Hence is a subgroup by [F4], and it contains and , so and therefore . The expression is unique: gives by step 1.1, hence and because are distinct. Consequently , the group is the internal semidirect product of by in the sense of [F3], and is an isomorphism , so is cyclic of order .
The derived subgroup of is contained in : by step 4.1 the quotient is isomorphic to the abelian group , so [F6] gives .
Conversely . By [F5] and step 2.1, , and all lie in , where , and by [F2]; as is a subgroup containing , , and , it contains all eight elements of . Together with step 5.1 this gives .
The derived series of terminates: by steps 6.1 and 1.2, , and because is abelian (its commutators are trivial by [F5]). Hence and is solvable by [F7].
The group has no subgroup of index . Suppose satisfies . Then and has order by [F8], so the quotient map is a homomorphism onto an abelian group; by [F6] it factors as with the quotient map and . By steps 6.1 and 4.1, ; writing for a generator of one has and because has order , so the order of divides both and by [F8] and is therefore ; hence is trivial and so is , contradicting that is surjective onto a group of order .
The character of the irreducible -dimensional -module is an irreducible complex character of by [F9] and [F10], and it is not monomial. Suppose for some and linear character ; by [F10] the underlying representation is then for the one-dimensional -module affording , so by [F10], that is , contradicting step 7.2. Hence is a solvable group, by step 7.1, with an irreducible complex character that is not monomial, so is not an -group by [F10]; the statement that every finite solvable group is an -group is therefore false.
Trivial and one-dimensional monomial cases
Example
Let be a finite group. Then:
- every one-dimensional complex character of is monomial (Monomial representations, monomial characters, and M-groups), namely , and in particular the trivial character of is monomial;
- the trivial group is an -group;
- every finite abelian group is an -group, because all of its irreducible complex characters are one-dimensional.
The three cases are the degenerate ends of the theory: subgroups of index one, the group of order one, and the abelian groups, whose irreducible characters cannot be induced from any proper subgroup.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group with identity element (Group and abelian group), a one-dimensional complex representation of with character (The character of a finite-dimensional complex representation), and the trivial representation of , on which every acts as the identity.
For a subgroup and a complex -module , the induced module is with and pointwise module operations. (The induced -linear -module as -covariant functions on ).
A linear character of is a homomorphism , equivalently the character of a one-dimensional complex representation of ; a character of is monomial if for some and linear character of ; is an -group if every irreducible complex character of is monomial; and a nonzero representation is monomial exactly when its character is. (Monomial representations, monomial characters, and M-groups).
A complex representation of is a group homomorphism on a finite-dimensional complex vector space , and it is irreducible exactly when and and are its only invariant subspaces. (A finite-dimensional representation over a field, and its degree, Subrepresentations, direct sums of representations, and irreducibility).
Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field has degree , and is a splitting field for every finite group. (Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field is one-dimensional, A cyclotomic field splits a finite group).
The irreducible complex characters of a finite group satisfy . (The regular character gives a second proof of the sum-of-squares formula).
For a finite-dimensional -representation one has , and the character of an irreducible representation is an irreducible character. (The dimension of an induced finite-dimensional representation is , An irreducible complex character).
Verification
Evaluation at the identity, , , is a -linear map of -modules. It is -linear because the module operations on are pointwise by [F1]; and for and one has , where the covariance law of [F1] with and gives .
The map is bijective. For define by ; then for all and , so by [F1], and is -linear and -equivariant because . Moreover , and for the same covariance law with , gives , that is . Hence and as -modules, so their characters agree: . The degrees match, since by [F6].
By step 2.1 every one-dimensional complex character of is monomial in the sense of [F2], with and . In particular the trivial character , the character of the trivial representation of , is one-dimensional and hence monomial; the trivial representation is irreducible because a one-dimensional space has no nonzero proper subspace, so and are its only invariant subspaces by [F3].
For the trivial group one has , so over the irreducible complex characters by [F5]; each term is a positive integer, so the sum has exactly one term and . Hence has exactly one irreducible complex character, of degree one, and it is monomial by step 3.1; by [F2] the trivial group is an -group.
For a finite abelian group , the field is a splitting field for by [F4], so every irreducible complex representation of has degree by [F4]; hence every irreducible complex character of is a one-dimensional character and is monomial by step 3.1, so is an -group by [F2]. Moreover [F5] now evaluates to , so a finite abelian group has exactly irreducible characters, all of them linear and monomial; the cases and are the extremes, the former being step 4.1.
All three assertions hold: every one-dimensional character of a finite group is induced from the group itself and is monomial, the trivial group is an -group, and every finite abelian group is an -group. The construction involves no proper subgroup and no choice: for the module is explicitly identified with by evaluation at , with inverse , and the only groups used have a specified single irreducible character or are handled by the degree count of [F5].
Sources
- Tammo tom Dieck, Representation Theory — (4.2.4)–(4.2.7), printed pp. 55–57; §4.3, printed pp. 57–59
- Wen-Wei Li, Yanqi Lake Lectures on Algebra I — §12.5, printed pp. 146–148
- Paul Garrett, Heisenberg groups over finite fields, §§1–2, PDF pp. 1–3
- Tammo tom Dieck, Representation Theory — §4.3, Problem 1 (the binary tetrahedral group), printed pp. 58–59
- Tammo tom Dieck, Representation Theory — §4.3, printed pp. 57–58, and §4.6, printed pp. 64–65